Lorillard
Experimental Chemotherapy in Chemically Induced Mouse Tumors and Their Transplants
Fields
- Author
- Baker, J.R.
- Homburger, F.
- Russfield, A.B.
- Tregier, A.
- Homburger, F.
- Area
- SCHULTZ/BASEMENT GMP (VPRD)
- Type
- PSCI, SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION
- BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
- CHAR, CHART/GRAPH
- PHOT, PHOTOGRAPH
- BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Site
- G60
- Request
- R1-080
- Named Person
- Clarke
- Crooker, C.
- Friend
- Kenney, R.
- Moloney
- Ringer
- Rous
- Rys, H.
- Sugiura
- Warner, S.
- Weiant
- Crooker, C.
- Date Loaded
- 14 Sep 2001
- Document File
- 01197922/01198045/Bio Research 64 01-64 06
- Named Organization
- Bio, Bio Research Labs.,Bio Research Consultants
- Jackson Memorial Lab
- Purina
- Jackson Memorial Lab
- Litigation
- Feda/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Cancer Research
- Master ID
- 01197922/7958
Related Documents: - UCSF Legacy ID
- fvk58c00
Document Images
Experimental Chemotherapy in Chemically Induced
Mouse Tumors and Their Transplants
I
F. HOVIBURGER, , A. B. RUSSFIELDy J. R. BAKER,AND A. TREGIER
Reprinted for private circulation from
CANCER RESEARCH
Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 368-74, ApriP 1962
Copyxlght 1962 by Caum Rewrep, Ina
nmxa w va.a.

62
ng.
rer
in
rk:
in
a
,id;
n-
9:
ar,
in
0,
of
ry
't
~-
n
f.
1
I

90
f/OD r1 T£PA-J WfEXSAFTER D.P. 1NJECTION I' (/DO f7YEPA- 6 WEEKS AFTER D:P. /NJECT/ON 2'
-S(157) Af69) 18
«~
/
r 79 {
'
~ r
/
r f
! .
f r
I X
f
t 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 liI6 19 2021 22 -WEEKS 10+11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
I 22
(/00 j) TEPA- 7 WEEKSAFTER D.R, /NJEGT/ON 3' SUMMARY OF l. P, AND A
1213) 20 l~ 1
~ r
/ R
r r
f r
. ~
.
i
' J
.
r r
,r r
10 IIf.12 13 14 15 16 17 IB 19 20 21 22 -WEEK9- 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Cnanx L-The bar graphs show the weekly tumor inci- weeks (panel 4)', and 7 weeks (panel!S) after
carcinogen injee-
dence in untreated (black) and treated (open bars) mice. tiom. Pane14 summarizes these data: The
line graphs show the
Tteatment in these instances was thioTEPA injected intra- cumulative tumor incidence in treated
(solid lines) and un-
peritoneally on the dose schedule outlined in the text, begin- treated (broken lines) mice,
ning 5weeksafter carcinogen injection. (Panel'I of chart), 6
TABLE 1
EFFECTS'OF THfOTEPA PRF.TREATME\'T ON DIBENZPIRENE-IiNDDCED AND TBAN'9Pt.ANTED TRMOBB'
. AND THE@ SGD9EQHEL'T TItA.\SPIANTABD.ITY
Top part of tabk: Five animals bearing 5,4,9,10-dibemspyrene-induced tumors received £ mg/kg
thiofEPA in 0.1 ml. of Ringer e
solution intraperitoneally for 7 days,, and their tumors were transplanted into fifteen animals of
the same strain, allowed; to grow
for 8 weeks, and the animals then killed. Another fifteen animals were given transplan ts of
8,4,9,10dibenapyrene-iuducedtumors
treated with Ringer's solution. Notethe significant tumor inhibition when the original host received
thioTEPA.
Bodom: parB.of Wble: The experiment is the same as above, except that the tumor which was
transplanted'after chemotherapy
wasnot.the originally induced neoplasm, but instead a 54th-generation offspring of a
8,4,9,10-dibenzpyrene-iuduced tumor.
These transplants grew more rapidlly, bnt at'the end of 2 weeks the tumors originating from treated
animals had grown signifivaat-
ly moreslowly tban those emanating from controls.
Dbxntms Danos An '+'cnoa Smnnrraxca oe
o.
No. Pca cvvr
rvxoa
ro.va Av,
ws~oar
raaoe cz,aex ceeaaas
Gaovr eice(..vmrar). I
e,.-ivn~e nc..res anowra mu
(a.J (~oa)
(wc.) (ua.)
I I (au.)
P
Treated (induced) 15 0: 14X17 4.SX 5.6 0.64
3 7.5 <0.01
Controls (induced). 15 0 1RXQ0 11.7X29.0 4.02
~ (1.7-7.7)
Treated (transplant) 15 0 ~
--
I 12XS2 I1.BXQ0.4 1.47
(0.6-4.0)
2 5.1 <0.01
Controls(transplant) 15 I 0 17XR8 14.OXQ4.4 ?..S
I r&. (1.4-5.8)
19XS1
01197

I-Io.rnrxGEltet ad.-CA,e.notherapy of Induced Jlouse TuSnors'
days. Tumor weights were then determined and
compared with vehicle-treated controls.
Tumor inhibitions of 50 per cent ormorer were
obtained in 3,4,9,10-dibenepyrene-induced tumors
of approximately 1 cm. in diameterby means of
Miracil-D, mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil (see
Table 5)'. As judged by tumorweight,r amethop-
terin yielded no significant effect; however, in
terms of tumor diameter, the reduction of tumor
size with amethopterin was less than 50 per cent,,
which is in accordance with Sugiura's report (16)
and with Clarke's' observations on Sarcoma 180.
The ineffectiveness of ameLhopterin in induced
tumors was also observed by Weiant (17) and by
Clarke.' With 5-Huorouracil, Sugiura observed
approximately 50 perr cent inhibition of Sarcoma
180:and even less with mitomycin C.
DISCIISSIO\
linder present conditions of cancer chemothera-
py screening, the extrapolotion of animal data to
humans is hazard'ous (5) and, according to some,
373
may be expected to improve only uponn discovery
of aclinically'effectiveagent (10). It is tempting:
to hypothesize that biologic models resembling,
more closely human cancer would, when used as
screening systems, yield predictivce results applie cable. to humann chemotherapy. Spontaneous
mouse mammary adenocarcinoma has indeed re-
sisted most potential chemotherapeutic agents.
(11, 12) as does human cancer, with the exception
of certain, plant auxins which inhibited mouse
breast cancer (1) but have as yet not been ade-
quately tested in liumans. Unfortunately, the use
of spontaneous.and methylcholanthrene-indhced
mammary mouse cancers for screening iss imprac-
tical (9, 10).
Autochthonous tumors are the logical tool for
chemothcrapy study (4), since its aim is the cure
of autochthonous human cancer. Subcutaneous
fitirosarcomas,, induced in mice by a single injec,
tion of 3,4,9,10-dibenzpyrene, grow with remark-
able uniformity.'1'his carcinogen is not excreted in
~ D.. Clarke, personal communication.
TABLE 5
EFFECTS OF CHERIOTHEHAPEUTIC AGENTS'OV DIBEr-ZPPRENE-IN'DUCED TUSfons'.
Groups of ten or twelve animals bearing$,4,9,10-dibenzpyrene-induced tumors of approximately 1 cm.
in diameter received
the chemotherapeutic agents.in the doses listed in Column lifor 7-8 days. Tumor weightB were
thenAetermined and'compared
with those ofvehicle-treated controls.
Av. mvoe e.xc Ar my E 9iunmewxce oe
GB9CP A\E l,fiqE \o. PeE ccxr Av..uam we,axa (m'c'1 wemex "e~on weecar cneucea
s.\O1aL9 DEEtE-0 O}Ca.lV4F.1 C4a~1 (al\-OE)
Start
Autapey IOY.J
S
P
f-~
!Ymethnpterin 12 8.3 -0..54(-4.0to}O~S) SX10. 6X9 '0~.64(0.1-1.3)
1.5 mg,'kg.
Not sig nificsnt
Controls ~ 1$ 0 }L1(O:.Oto-{-4.3). 8Xlu 14X12 1O19(0.4-1.9)
Niracil D r-
67.5mgjkg 18 8.3 -4.05(-3.4to-0.7) 9X9 10X10 -0lR7(0.1-016) .
4.0 <0.01
Controls 12 0 }0.44(', 0./.to}1.4) 8X99 lOXll 0.85(O.Q-1.4)
AIiracil D
5-Fmg/kg 10 10.0. -8.9(-4.Rto-r.9) SX10 9X11 0.5(0.1-1.0) j
' 1.9 <0.05
Controls 10 0 +0.8(0.Oto}1.7). 9X10
- 10X1B 0.8(0.8-1_5)
Jlitomycin C. ~
4mg/kg 12 . 8.3 -$.46(:-5.Sto-0.9) ! 9X10 7X8 0.44(01-0.5)
4.7 <0.01
Controls 12 0 }L1(0.Otot4.3) 8X10 1YX12 0.9(0.4-1_9)
5-Fluoronracil
35 mg/kg 14 0 -8.34(: 7.4 to -4.8) 8X9 4X5 0.Y(0.1-0.5)
5A
Controls 19 0 }l.l(OLO[o}4.3): 8X10 14X'lE 0.0(0.4-1.9)
i-Fluorouracil
44mg/kg, 10' 0 -1.Si(-5.Sto-0.4) 9X1.0 9X12 0.44(0.1-1.3)
3.1 <0.01
Controls 10 0 }0.8(O.Oto}U.7)'. 9X10 1OX14 0.8(0.3-1.5)

J
HovisuxGEx et al.-Cheraotherapg of fnduced Jfou.4e Turrmors
from the Jackson Memorial Laboratory in Bar
Harbor, Maine. Unless stated otherwise, male.
mice were used. All animals were kept in the same
air-conditioned animal room in groups of ten per
cage and received Purina chow and water ad
libitum. San-I-CeI wass used as.bedding. 3,4'y9,10-
d'ibenzpyrene caused subcutaneous.fibrosarcomass in all injected animals, which grew at comparable.
rates. Serial histologic studies. beginning atthe
time of injection of the carcinogen had shown that
morphologically malignant cells were identifiable
at the injection sites 4-5 weeks after administra.
tion of the carcinogen (7) and that the tumors in-
duced were fibrosarcomas of consistent morpho-
logic and functional uniformity.
Although it is known that 20-methylcholan-
threne is rapidly excreted through the bile, no
8,4,9,10-dfbenzpyrenc was found in urine or feces
of mice for many weeks after its injection, and the
carcinogen~has been recovered by solvent extrac:
tion from large tumors.which it.had produced.
TRANSPr.ANTATION OF TUMORs'
Transplants were made into male C57BL/6'
mice from fibrosarcomas which had been induced
by 3,4;9,I0-dibenzpyrene. Tumor fragments 1-$2
mm. in diameter were used and transferred into
the recipients by the. usual trocar method. The
take rate was 100 per cent,. and the growth rate of
these. tumors was relatively uniform. There were
no regressions, and the tumors killed the hosts in
2-4 weeks. One line of these.transplanted offspring
of 3,4,9,10-dibenzpyrene-induced tumors was.kept
by weekly transplants for 54 generations. To ob-
tain slowly growing tumorss for more extended
chemotherapy studies,.cytosieve transplants were
used (14), with injection of 0.$ ml. of a 4 per cent
tumor cell suspension in Ringer's solution. This
method produced; tumors of 1-cm. diameter in R9
weeks and permitted sufficient survival time for
S- to 14-day courses of therapy after tumors had
reached as.much as 2 cm. im diameter.
CIIE:rIOTHERAPYCompounds. and doses.-N-N'-N"-triethylene
thiophosphoramide (thioTEPA) was used as the
standard chemotherapeutic agent, since its effec-
tiveness against transplantable mouse sarcomas
had been well established (1.5).. Doses of 2 and 4mg/kgin Ringer's solution, given intraperitoneal-
ly daily for 8-14 days, were used. Other chemo-
therapeutic agents studied were: ,
5-Fluorouracil 24 and 35 mg/kg
.. Amethopterin 1.5 mg/kg
Jlytomycin C 4 mg/kg
Miracil D 54 and 67.5 mg/kg
369
RESULTS
Effects of thioTEPA during tlre tumor induction
period.-Four mg/kg of thioTEPA was given in-
traperitoneally for 8 d'ays,, followed by a single
injection 7'days'.later and by three more, beginning
]I days later. Thisempiricali dosage schedule thus
stretched out over 47 days, beginning.5, 6, and 7
weeks after injection of the carcinogen. ThioTEPA
was thus given during the induction period, at a
time when previous histologic studies. had shown
the presence of morphologically malignant cells
(4r5 weeks after injection of carcinogen). This re-
suited in asignificantlp delayed appearance of the
tumors. These observations are illustrated in
Chart 1.
Effects of thioTEPA administered to animals
bearing 3,4;9,10-dibenzpyrene-indueed tumors and
F-54 transplantss of induced tumors upon their aub-
sequent transpdantabitity.-Five donor mice bear-
ing 3,4;9,10-dibenzpyrene-induced tumors were
given 2 mg/kg of thioTEPA in 0.1 ml.ofRinger's
solution intraperitoneally for 7 days, and their
tumors were transplanted by trocar into fifteen
animalsof the same strain. Another fifteen animals
received transplants of 3,4,9,10-dibenzpyrene-in-
duced tumors of comparable size, the hosts. of
which had received a similar injection schedule of
Ringer's solution only. After 3 weeks;e the animals
were killed and the. tumors weighed. The growth
rate of these transplants was' significantly re-
duced,, and the average final Lumor weight was
0.6 gm., as eompared'with 4.0 gm.. in the controls,
with a t value of 7.5 (P < 0.01). Anotherexperi-
ment was done treating,, in similar fashion, mice
bearing 54th-generation transplants derived from
3,4,9,10-dibenzpyrene-iuduced tumors after they
had grown for 1 week. These tumors also showed a
reduced transplantability, but to a lesser degree
(Table 1).
E,f'ecta of a single dose of thioTEPA ' onthe
growth rate of induced tumors when measuring 1-1.5
cm. in diameter -A single dose of 4 mg/kg of thio-
TEPA was given intraperitoneally to sixteen male
and fifteen female mice with 3,4~,9,10-dibenzpy-
rene-induced tumors measuring 1-1.5 em, in di-
ameter. A similar group of animals received only
Ringer's solution as a control. Weekly plas6o-
grams (1) were made to obtain growth curves on
treated and untreated tumors. Na effect was ob-served on either tumor growth rate or survival
time.
Effect of multiple doses of thioTEPA on.3,4,9,10-
dibenzpyrene-induced tumorsmeasuring 1-1.5 cm.
in diaraeter.-Forty seven animals with induced
tumors measuring 1-1.5 em. in diameter were
matched with 47 controls of similar tumor size and

Experimental Chemotherapy in Chemically Induced
Mouse Tumors and Their Transplants*
F. HOMBUAGER, A. B. RU55FIELD, J. R. BAKER,AND A. TREGIER
wrrHTHE TECRNICALABBr9TANCE OY R, KENNEY. C. CEVULHiy H: RY9, AND S`VARNEH'
(Bin-Rtsearcfi InstiEUk, Cambridge, SlaseacLveetta)
SU41Af ARYUniform subcutaneous fibrosarcanas can be.induced by singlee injectionsof 3,4,9,10-
dibenzpyrene into C57BL/6 mice at the rate of 400-300 tumors per week from a colony
of approximately 3,000 animals (8) and are practical for chemotherapy screening, as
shown by their response.to five different chemotherapeutic agents' previously tested in
transplanted tumors..The animals are safe, since no carcinogen is exereted. Histology
showed more marked responses (reduced: mitoses, fibrosis)) in induced than in trans-
planted, tumors. Chemotherapy with thioTEPA administered during the induction
period or latent phase.caused significant'.delays in the appearance of tumors, which
isanalogous.to the tumor-inhibiting effect.claimed clinically forthioTEP_it when ad-
ministered after radical surgeryf'or breast cancer.
Transplanted mouse tumors, widelyused for
experimental screeningof' potential chemothera-
penticc agent.s,, represent a biologic model ofthef tumor-host system which is different in many re-
spects from cancer in patients.`Ghereas human,
cancers and spontaneouss animal tumors are
autologous, transplanted tumors, especially during
continuous transplantation, may losc their initial
genetic and immunologic compatibility (10): Thee
response of transplanted tumors to ehemothera-
peutic agents represents the end-result of numer,
ous interactions of host and tumor, complicated
by estraneous.factors such as infection and chemi-
cal and physical' effects on cell viability,, which
enter into play at the time of tumor tYansplanta-
tion. The results,of such experiments must there-
fore be.interpreted with caution.
Spontaneous mouse tumors such as breast
adenocareinomas, which probably would constitute
the most vigorous animal screening, test for a
chemotlicrapcrd!ic agent (4, 10)4 present numerous
.difficulties.. It is impractical too obtain at any one
time sufficient numbers of such tumors of com-
parable size for screening purposes (10, 11).
Sufficient knowledge is now available on the
virus-induced Rouschicken sarcoma. and Friend
and Moloney mmtseleukemia (2, 3) to permit their
use in experimental chemotherapy (Q), but this
necessitat'es the introduction of tumor viruses into
animal colonies.
Tumors.induced by means of chemical carcino-
gens arise from thee host's own cells and therefore
resemble human clinical cancer much more closely
than do transplanted ncoplasms. Complicating
factors with chemically induced tumors are the
possible effects of carcinogen upon the behavior of
the tumor and thc hazards to other animals and
to personnel which may arise from the excreted
carcinogen or its metabolites in urine and feces.
The carcinogens 3,4,9,10'-dibenzpyrene, when
injected subcutaneously, induces uniform fibro-
sarcomas and: is not excreted in urine or feces (8).
Since these induced mouse.tumors are transplant-
able, an opportunity exists to compare the re-
sponse i.o chenmt'herapy of the originally induced
tumor with the response of transplants derived,
from the original' tttmor;, as well as with other
transplantable tumor systcrns.
MATERIALS AND ASETHODS
IRDUCTIOY OF TUMURS
The carcinogens used were 3,4,9,10-dibenzpy-
reue and ?0-methylcholanthrene,.given subcuta-
Supportcd in part byUSPHS Grant CY-4B66. . neously in singlee doses of 500. µg. in peanut oil.
Received fon publication October 90, 1961. The animals used were C57BL/6mice obtained
368
01197951

374 Cancer Research
feces or urine and remains in t'he.induced tumors2
without apparently interfering with their response
to chemotherapeutic agents. Whereas such tumors
induced in a different strain were shown by others
(17) to be susceptible to. caloric restriction, weight
losses per se do not explain the tumor responses
observed in this study.
Judged by histologic study, induced neoplasms
aremore responsive to thioTEPA than their trans-
planted offspring, and the induced tumors grow
more slowly; as do spontaneous mammary tumors,
when compared with their transplants (13). Al-
though the response of the fully developed
8,4y9,10-dibenzpyrene-induced tumors was analo-
gous to responses observed with commonly used
transplanted tumors, the inhibiting effects on tu-
mor appearance rate obtained with thioTEPA
given during the induction period suggest that this
biologic system of chemotherapy during early
cancerization behaves much as do patients given
thioTEPA for cancer cells remaining after opera-
tion (6).
REFERENCES
1. ArFFEI, C. A.;.TREGren,.A.; and HomaURCER, F. Syn-
thetic Auxins in the Chemotherapy of Tmnsplwried and
Spontaneous Mouse Adenocarcinoma. J.. Nat'1. Cancer
In.st., 26:1111-8o, 1960.
2. BarwN, W. R Problems in Viml Tumor Therapy. Nat'l.
Cancer Inst. Monograph, 4:363-76, 1960.
3. Cmmcos;. M. A.; MOLONEY, J. B.;. HUUrImIES, S. R.;
tiLAxrEE, N.; and Gol.DSN, A. Response ofVirus-indnced
Murine Lymphoid Leukemia to Drug Therapy. Cancer
Rese arc h,. 21: B03 -11,.1961. .
4. DAY,.E. D. Animal Cancer, the Primary Tool (Gue.u Edi-
torial). CancerResearch, 2L58L-fii, 1961..
5: GEm.aoax;,A., and: HmsctmEaG, E: (ed.). Investigations
' Author a unpublished dataa and' personall communication
from E. L'nseren and L. F. Fieser.
Frc:.1.-Photomicmgraphof tmnsplanted (FI) tumor de-
rived from 3,i,9,l0dibenspyrene-induced parent tumor (H. &
E., X 1600) from control animal treated with Ringer's solution
for 1@ d6,vs. Note numerous mitotic figures andlarge, vesicular
nuclei.
FIG. R.-Photomicrogmph of'. 3,4,9,10-dibenzpyrene-in-
duavl tumor from mouse treated with tbioTEPA for 8 days
Vol. 42, April 1964
of Diverse Systems for Cancer Chemotherapy Screening.
Cancer Research Supplement No. 3, 1955.
6. Hor.L.xn,. J, F. Chemotherapy and Chemapmxis. Cancer
Research, 31:1f188-99; 196L..
7.. HoxEVneEn; F:, and TueolEa,A. Modifying Factors in
Carcinogenesis. In: F', HoesaIIAGEa (ad.), Progress in Es-
perimental Tumor Research,1:311-Z8. Base]/New York:
S. Karger AG, 1960.
8.. Hoslavnoen; F., and TaeGIEn, A. Modifying Factons in
3.4,9,10-Dibenzpyrene Carcinogenicity. Proe Am, Assoc.
Cancer Research, 3:140, 1960.
9.HvGGlus, C.; BmauREl.m, G.; and SornoN,. H., Jn-Rapid
Induction of MammaryCarcinoma in the Rat and the In-
fluence of Hormones.on the Tumom. J. Exp,.Jled., 109:
44-45, 1959.
10. Knacsossar, D. A. Experimental Cancer Chemotherapy.
In: F.,Homsuacen (ed.), The PhysiopatYolbgy of Cancer.
4d ed.,, pp. 788-8,0. New York: Paul B.. Hoeber, Inc.,
1953.
11.. SenoI.I.Ea,.J. Practical and Theoretical Considemtions in
the Use of Induced and Spontaneous Mammaty Tumors in
Cancer Chemotherapy. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci:, 76:855-00,
1958.
14.. Scnouwa, J., and BerruEn, J. J. Further Studies of
Chemotherapeutic Agents in Spontaneous Mammary
Adenocurcinomxs of Micc and imthe Transplants of Recent
Origim Cancer Research, 18:464-69, 1956.
13. SclrolaEa, J.; Brrrvea, J. J.; and Pnrmra, F. S.. Chemo-
therapeutic Studies with Transplants af'~ Spontaneous
Mammary Tumors of Mice Grorving.ih Various Hosts.
Cancer Research, 17:GOb-8..19n7:
14. SxEEU, C. D. A Cytosieve Permittfing$terile Preparation
of Suspcnsions of Tumor Cells for Tmnsplantation. J.
Nat'l. Cancer Inst., 13:1511-15; 19.i3.
15. SrocK, C. C.; CLenKa,.D. A.; PulErra, F. S.;andBaacner,
R. K. Sarcoma ISO Screening Data.. Cancer Research,
20(8);.8-4, 1960.
16. Suomne, K. EAperimental Chemotherapy of Cancer-A
Report of Progress. In: F...HWIBURGER (ed.)i Plogress in
Experimental Tumor Research, 2:334-76. Basel/Nbw
York: A. Kargcr AG, 1061.
17. WEIANT, E. A.; R'OUNaKV, IL;. E.EnsLEt; C. J.; and
LElren, J. Studies on the Chemotherapy of Chemically
Induced Tumors. Proc. Am.,.lssoc. Cancer Research, 3:
476, 1961.
(total dose, 0.8.mg.)i (H. & E:,. X1600). Note dark spindle
shaped nuclei and absence of mitotic figures:
FIG. d.-Photomicrograph of 3,4,9,10-dibenapyrene-in-
duaedlumor from a mouse treated %.ith thioTEPA (0.1 mg/
day for B days). Note numerous giant cells (H.. & E;, X800).
FIG. 4:-Details of Fig. 3 at 160U.magnificatfon. Note ab-
normal mitotic figure in giant cell.
0119'795r7

TABLE 3
EFFECIS OF TRIOTEFA ON DIBENZPYRENE-INDUCED TOMORS AND F-86 TBANSPLA!V18
MEASURING 1 Caf. AND 2 CM. INDiAMETER
Eleven 3;4.9,10-dibenzpyrene-indOced tumors were selected when they measured 1 cm. in diameter.and
were matched with
fifteen transplanted tumors (36th transplant generation of.S,4,0,10iiibenspyrene-induced tumors) of
comparable size. Both groups
received 4 mg/kg tkdoTEFA intraperttoneally for 8 days. Tumor weights were determined at the end of
treatment. Fifteen
induced tumors were selected when they measured appruximately E cm. in diametcr and were matched
with ten transplanted
tttmors.(S6thgeneration of 3,4,9,10-dibenapyrene-induced tumors) of similar siee: These animals
received the same treatment as
the 1-cm. tumor group. Controls with comparable tumors were given Ringer's solution. (See text for
interpretatfon of results.)
SlanrCrCA.YCE Ur
Gvoor No..
*pnyre Pv eWr
x AvA aooT Wsraer
A}f
)~
(
) Islrus ~em`ce
ouYSTa6(Cn.) Av. ToYOe
WalOnx(OY.). mr.oa Ws.cux csnaaee
aas
ee aLwx
.
aY. Ar. (aesos) (asnoe)
I P
Tteated(induced) 11 0'. -Q,77(-4.6to-1-S) 1 (0.8-1.R) 0.4(0.04-0.4)
t-5.RT
Controls(induced) 15 0 -0.27(:-4.8to+1.$) 1 (0.8-1.R) 8.5 <0.01
Treated(4ndumd)'. , 15 0 -4.44(:-5.8to-0.4) 4
l-1.0'
Controls(iuduced) 15 0 to}1.R) 2 (1.9-9.4) 1_6(1.
0-2.5) 8.5 <0.01
Treated (transplant) 15 6.7 +0.49(-1.1 to }g,4) 1 (0.8-1.2) 0.7(0.4-1.1))
t-4.0*
Controls(tmnsplant) 15 0 -1.3(-4.5to}0.8) 1 (0.8-1.2) 1.8(0.7-3.1)
. '
7.3 <0.01
Treated (transplant) 10 10.0 }0.59(-L.5 to }8.6) 2 (1.4-4.8) 1.4(0.6-R.1).
f-0.9*
Control'.(transplant): 10 0 }0A5(-eto}R.Y). 2 E.7(fl.4-3.4) 7.6 <0.01
Transplant/Induced (Treated). 1 0'..7/0.S 6.3 <0.01
Transplant/Induced(Treated) 2 (1.4~.5) 1.4/0.5 5.4 <0.01
Transplant/Indneed (Controls) 1 (0.8-1.2). 1,8/0.5 7.2 . <0.01
Transplant/Induoad(Controls) Y (1.4-4.5) 9.7/L6 8.1 <0.01
* These dvalues.are for the significance of diffcremeof body weight changes in controls versus
treated,.animals-
TABLE 4
EFFECTSOF THIOTEPA ON40.METHYLCHOLANTHRENE7NDUCED TOMORSINC57BL/6a'D'
Fourteen animals with methylchoianthrene-induced tumors measuring approximately 1 cm. in diameter
were given 4 mg/kg
of thio'FEPA in Ringer's solution intraperitoneally daily for 9 days and matched with fourteen
controls bearing comparable
tumors.and receiving only Ringer's solution.
GAOLr
No.
Pa. CENT
AY. YOni wEI®X Av, rovax ema
(YY) Av. roaos
We1WT Slmarsrc.uascs or
TeY08 ALIOar CaLMGm
*p1Y*Ly aedfae C}(BANOC) tOY.)
Start
Autopsy (ayNpa)
(oY')
S
I P
Tieated' 14 35.7 -1.6(-10.Oto}5.8) 10XIY IIX1fl 0.9 ~
(0.4-&.5)
1-1.2' 4.6 <0.01
Controls. 14 21.4 }0.1(-5.0to}Q-8) 9X14 18X15 5./.
(0.8-4.4)
* t is for the significance of bod¢ weight (change).difference between treated and untreated
animals (not significant)'.
01197955

I-LoalBUROE,x el al. Clzemotlierapy of Induced Mouse Tumors.
were given 4 mg/kg of thioTEPA intraperitoneal-
ly, daily,, for 14 days. Significant inhibition of these
induced tumors wasobserved (Tablc £).
Effeets of multiple doses of tJaioTEPA on 9,.f,9,10-
dibenzpyrene-induced tumors and F-.46 transplants
measuring 1 cm. andt' cm. in diameter.-Eleven in-
duced tumors (3,4;9,10-dlbenzpyrene) were select-
ed when thev measured 1 cm. in diameter and were
matched with fifteen transplanted tumors (36th
transplant generation of 3,4,9,10-dibenzpyrene-
induced tumors) of comparable size. Both groups
received 40 mg/kg thioTEPA in Ringer's solution
intraperitoneally for 8days.. Tumor weights' were
determined at the end of treatment. All tumors
weree sectioned, and their histology wass studied.
Similar numbers of controls with tumors of similar
size received only Ringer's solution. Untreated
transplanted tumonsgrew more rapidly than un-
371
Fifteemindueed tumors were selected when they
measured approximately Scm. in diameter and
were matched with ten transplanted tumors (36th
generation of 3,4,9,10tlibenzpyrene-induced tu-
mors) of similar size. These animals received the
same treatment as the1-em, tumor group. Con-
trols with comparable tumors were given Ringer's
solution.
Induced, as well as transplanted, tumors meas-
uring 2 cm. in diameter were affected by thio-
TEPA (Table 3), but in this case, even judging by
tumor weight,, the induced neoplasm wass some-
what more inhibited than the transplanted tumor
(Figs..1-4)~.
In this experiment, differences of body weight
changes in treated,, as compared with untreated,
animals were not statistically significant in the
case of animals bearing tumors measuring approxi-
TABLE 2
EFFECIS ON THIOTEPA ON 3:4,9,10-DIBEYEPYRENH-I6DUCED TUMOBs IFC57BL/6dl cj'
The3,4,9,10-dibenzpyrene-induced tumors in,a9 04 animals were of comparable size (1-1.5 cm~ in
rGameter) when half of the
mice received 4 mg/kg ofdhioTEPa daityin Ringer's solution intraperitoneallyfur 14 days. The
controls received only Atinger s
solution. The resulting.tumor inhibition m the treated animals wassignificant.
Gsore
N0,
.
r8N
Ar. EOUi 4GION2
' Av: muos nunsrna
~~') A...roaos
w T S~om..c"cs or
'CCNOa
W3IOFIT~ rnAnOflB
y
~u nsersa A}(.ez) (cu.)
.
Start
Autopey (a. oe)
(ax)
t
P
Treated 47 33. -3.66(-9.4to-0,S) 1.0-1.5 1.0-L5 0.7
I 3.8 <0.01
Controls 47 ?8' +0.81('-3.4to-F4.3) 1.0-1.5 1.5~.0 1.9
I (0.1-7.3)
treated induced tumors (beginning, of measure-
ments in both eases with tumors of 1 cm. in di-
ameter)L However, the degree of inhibition result-
ing from thioTEPA was the same in both cases as
measured by tumor weight.. Histolbgical study
showed that, in the induced tumors, thioTEPA
appeared to decrease thenumberof mitotic.figures
present as compared with those in the controls.
Treatment also appeared toincrcase the number
of'bizarre gjantcells present which are interpreted
as being the result of incomplete cell division.
(Occasional giant cells were a1so.folmd in the un-
treated induced'tumors and might represent a re-
action to the carcinogenpresent.).Individltal cells
in t'hetYeated tumors were smaller and more uni-
form than in the controls and: tended to resemble
fibroblasts. In no case did the decrease in tumor
size produced by thioTEPA appear to be caused
by actual necrosis. In the.transplanted tumors, the
histologic differences between the treated and un-
treatedd tumors werc.less noticeable, and no giant
cells were seen.
mately 2 em. at.the.beginning of the experiment.
The tumor reductions in thee instances with insig-
nificant body weight change were highly signifi-
cant.
Effects of thioTEPA on methylcholanthrene-in-
duced tumors.-Fourteen animals with methylcho-
lanthrene-induced tumors measuring; approxi-
mately I cm.. in diameter were given 4 mg/kgpf
thioTEPA intraperitoneally daily for 9 days and
matched' with fourteen controls bearing com-
parablee tumors and receivingg only Ringer's solu-
tion. TbioTEPA caused approximately 50 per cent
tumor inhibition in 20-methylcholanthrene-in«
dueed tumors, which is comparable to the depres-
sion observed in3,4',9,10-dibenepyrenc-induced
tumors (1'able 4).
E,Yjects of other eTiemotherapeuticagents on in-
duced tumors.-Groups of twelve animals bearing
3,4,9,10-dibenzpyrene-induced tumors of approxi-
mately 1 em',, in diameter received the chemothera-
pcut'ic agents in the doses listed above for 7-8
