Lorillard
Air Dilution Cigarette with Puffed Tobacco Blend
Fields
- Author
- Skladanowski, M.A.
- Area
- MINNEMEYER/OFFICE
- Type
- MEMO, MEMORANDUM
- BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
- CHAR, CHART/GRAPH
- Alias
- 00044971/00044974
- Recipient
- Ireland, M.S.
Document Images
.
MEMORANDUM
December 15, 1976
TO: Ms..M. S. Ireland
FROM: M. A. Skladanowski
SUBJECT: Air Dilution Cigarette with Puffed Tobacco Blend~
Tom Larson and Jim Morgan have made cigarettes similar
to the True 85 (5mg) using a blend containing all puffed
tobacco. The all puffed blend, 40% puffed flue cured
tobacco and 60% puffed burley tobacco, was treated with
2.0 to 2.5 percent (NH 4)2 HPO to decrease the burn time.
An "all air dilution" cigarette (1,2) was made from these
puffed tobacco cigarettes following the same procedures
given for sample #5,in a previous report (1).
Cigarettes were selected by weight after the plastiN,
mouthpieces, cellulose acetate plugs and p]:ug wraps had
been removed. Then a 20mm section of True plastic rod,
which had three 0.4cmX 1.0cm slots in the sides,.and a
gas chromagraphy column cap (6.25cm) with 8 holes in the
bottom (0.4mm drill bit) were inserted into tl~:e filter
end of the sample cigarettes as shown in Figure 1. Four
additional air vents (0.6mm diameter) were add'ed to the
True 85 air vents before the sample cigarettes were smoked.
The control cigarettes, which contained no filter plugs
or mouthpieces,were taped and then smoked.
The sample and control cigarettes were smoked by
the Lorillard smoking laboratory and the results are
shown in Table 1. The smoke data for the same cigarette
design made with True 85 (5mg) tobacco blend is also
shown in Table l(1). The unfiltered and filtered smoke
from the all puffed blend has a larger nicotine to tar
ratio than the True 85 blend. The nicotine to tar ratio
multiplied by 100 was 11.9 for the filtered unpuffed
blend and was 10.0 for the filtered True 85 blend.
Dean Sidbury, in the Lorillard Engineering Department,
was contacted with regard to the design of a'cigarette
utilizing only air dilution to filter the smoke. He

.
b,
Ms. M. S. Ireland - 2 - Dec. 15, 1976
felt that the models which have been put together in the
laboratory would be difficult to manufacture and the model
proposed in the previous report using a solid plastic piece
would not work. Presently, the new designs for all air
dilution cigarettes are being investigated.
~ .r,..
t
G
M. . ladanowski
MAS/lmh
Xc: Dr. F. J. Schultz
Dr. H. J. Minnemeyer
'll~
4
%/

Table 1. Smoke data for "all air dilution"cigarettes
without cellulose acetate plugs
All Puffeda All Puffed True 85b True 85
Blend Control Blend(l) Control(
Weight mg/cig .662 .462 .877 .680
Pressure drop mm/cig 112. 68 108 63
Dry Part Mat mg/cig 7.5 19.8 7.0 19.4
Nicotine mg/cig 0.80 1.33 0.63 1.11
Corrected Part Mat mg/cig 6.7' 18.4 6.3 18.3
Puff Count 4.7 3.8 6.2 5.1
(Nicotine/CPM) 100 11.9 7.2 10.0 6.1
$ CPM Removal 64 66
$ Nicotine Removal 40 43
a. Cigarette design like sample #5(1)
b. Sample #5 (1) ..
1. M. A. Skladanowski, "Air Dilution Filtration of Cigarette
Smoke Without a Cellulose Acetate Plug", Lorillard Research
Report, Accession Number 908, Nov. 4, 1976.
2. M. A. Skladanowski, "Air Dilution As A Filtration Technique
to Increase Nicotine to Tar Ratios in the Mainstream,Smoke
of Cigarettes", Lorillard Memorandum, July 27, 1976.
C

j: ,
Figure l., Design for an
air dilution G
filter which
offers'low tar,
high nicotine
and low carbon
monoxide without
using a cellulose
acetate filter
Plug F
`
