Lorillard
Fields
- Author
- Marmor, R.S.
- Area
- MINNEMEYER/OFFICE
- Type
- MEMO, MEMORANDUM
- Alias
- 00044643
- Site
- G46
- Recipient
- Spears, A.W.
- Date Loaded
- 27 Feb 1998
- Document File
- 00044412/00044785/Nap2.
- Copied
- Minnemeyer, H.J.
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Stmn/Selected
- Named Person
- Reid
- Request
- R1-004
- R1-081
- R1-132
- R1-081
- UCSF Legacy ID
- lsl88d00
Document Images
C
C
: ~ , N titr.
R. 'S. Marmor
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dr. A. W. Spears
FROM: R. S. Marmor
March 3, 1977
The extraction of ammoniated tobacco with freon
was performed as requested. After removing the freon
from the tobacco, the freon was extracted with aqueous
acid to remove nicotine, then used again to extract
a fresh batch of ammoniated tobacco. This process
was repeated six times.
The following conclusions can be drawn from Dr.
Reid's experimental data:
1) The amount of nicotine removed on extraction with
freon was the same regardless of whether fresh freon
or recycled freon containing tobacco solubles was used.
2) The amount of tobacco solubles retained by the
freon reached an equilibrium concentration level after
only two extraction cycles.
This is of course a good sign for a large scale freon
process, but the major problem as I see it now is the
fact that the ammonia pretreatment introduces off-taste
in the recovered tobacco. While this won't be a problem
if we are going to throw away the extracted tobacco, the
aqueous extraction procedure we are presently investi-
gating may be more reasonable.
RSM/1mh
Xc: Dr. H. J. Minnemeyer
L4
