Jump to:

Anne Landman's Collection

Search Terms
Document Code
Date
Tcml Field Id
Resource Id
Items: Sort:
Listing
[1 - 6 of 6]

Kent's Health Protection

No date
1 p
[ 1 of 6 | landman/137813 ]
[ Index status: In Progress (anne@tobaccodocuments.org on 2005-04-19 17:55:35) ]

This is a Lorillard ad from 1952 for Kent cigarettes with 'the Exclusive Micronite Filter.' This filter was made of asbestos, which led to the recent sucessful lawsuit by a person who came down with mesothelioma, a unique form of cancer caused almost exclusively by exposure to asbestos: See the original document at: http://www.lorillarddocs.com/getimg.asp?pgno=0&start=0&bool=80687142&docid=80687142 Anne Landman, Regional Program Coordinator American Lung Association of Colorado, West Region Office Grand Junction

Something Wonderful Happens. Winston Tastes Good-Like A Cigarette Should! Ad Notebook.

Apr 1963
1 p

Author: R.J. Reynolds
Recipient: R.J. Reynolds
[ 2 of 6 | landman/503960911-0911 ]

This 1963 advertisement for Winston cigarettes targeted American Jews and ran in newspapers and Jewish magazines in 1963. The ad features a line of people dancing the hora (shot from above, looking down on the dancers). The text along side and below the photo links smoking with the joy of the Jewish holidays:

"Shevouth time is the season for many of the happiest celebrations in Jewish life. And at some point during the festivities...SOMETHING WONDERFUL HAPPENS. The music stops, then it starts again. The beat is faster, exciting. A circle forms and spirits soar into the joyous, lively world of the irresistible hora!

And certainly joy abounds in smoking when your cigarette is Winston, America's best-selling filter cigarette. The special pleasure begins up fron, ahead of the pure white, modern filter. That's where only winston puts filter blend tobaccos specially selected and specially processed for the best taste in filter smoking. Try Winston. Winston tastes good--like a cigarette should!"

A Frank Statement to the Public By the Makers of Cigarettes

26 Dec 1953
3 pp

Notes Comments: Replaced with authenticated copy on 7/9/97. Related Documents: 39832 Produced by: J. Hill Archives Issues: F-LIE, P-PRG Affected Defendants: H&K No Bates number is available for this document. Document contains a stamp of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin, Archives Division. A Doc-Alert posting about the original Frank Statement can be seen at http://www.tobacco.org/Documents/dd/ddfrankstatement.html
[ 3 of 6 | landman/4720 ]

A FRANK STATEMENT TO CIGARETTE SMOKERS was an infamous tobacco industry advertisement from 1954. The ad marked the turning point: the beginning of the tobacco industry's lengthy U.S. misinformation campaign about the health effects of tobacco. Coached by John Hill of the public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, the "Frank Statement" was published in over 400 major newspapers and magazines across the United States as a response to initial public scientific disclosures that cigarette smoking was linked with lung cancer.

Researcher Norbert Hirschhorn M.D. has found a fascinating original draft of The Frank Statement among the Ness-Motley collection of documents on Tobacco Documents Online. The draft contains handwritten marginalia and stricken portions of original text. One can see that the changes made in the original text of the Frank Statement were carefully designed to keep the truth further at bay. In today's posting I have showed the wording that was lined out by using strikeout text and the handwritten comments added in are indicated by italicized text. Following is an example of both the changes and how they are documented:

"We accept an interest in people's health as a basic responsibility paramount to every other consideration in our business.

We believe the products we make are not injurious to health. Science has no proof to the contrary.

We will never produce and market a product shown to be the cause of any serious human ailment.

We always have and always will cooperate closely with the Governmental authorities those whose task it is to safeguard the public health."

Happy New Year, You Greedy Killers.

1985
2 pp

Author: Meyers, B.L.
Recipient: Long, Gerald H.
Notes Today, through its web site, RJR still denies secondhand smoke can have any health effect on adult nonsmokers. Its website only suggests exposure to tobacco smoke should be minimized for infants and young children (http://www.rjrt.com/TI/TIsecondhand_smoke.asp)
[ 4 of 6 | landman/505560967-0968 ]

From 1984-86 the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company ran a widespread print advertisement campaign aimed at convincing the lay public that a controversy existed about whether secondhand tobacco smoke posed any harm to the non-smoker. RJR's ads ran in publications like Better Homes and Gardens, Family Circle, the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, Cleveland Plain Dealer and the Washington Post, to name a few. The ads themselves sparked significant controversy, drawing fire from individuals and health organizations, as well as praise from smokers. RJR's document database contains numerous letters from people angry about these ads, or from people who wrote to correct the company or describe situations where either they or their family members had been harmed by, or suffered from exposure to secondhand smoke. In today's document, someone who suffers adverse health effects from secondhand smoke exposure has scrawled an angry answer to RJR on a copy of the ad and mailed it back to the company. Following (in the "Quotes" section) are both the text of the ad and the writer's response.

Dave's

16 Jan 1994
32 pp

Author: Young & Rubicam
Recipient: Philip Morris
[ 5 of 6 | landman/2044826305-6336 ]

This Philip Morris document provides insight into the creation of "Dave's" cigarettes, a discount brand targeted at "YAMS" (Young Adult Male Smokers). The idea was to create a discount brand that would make broke YAMS feel as though they were buying by choice, not because they were broke. This presentation, by the advertising firm Young and Rubicam, describes the plight of YAMS and the gap "Dave's" would strive to fill: "Economic reality forces a trade down...Nothing comes close to cigarettes in terms of a degrading trade-down...In a category that is supposed to be a reward and indulgence, a discount cigarette stands for the antithesis of what smoking is all about. Therefore YAMS can't feel good about purchasing discount cigarettes when they have to. In their heart of hearts, they would like to feel that when they buy a discount brand, it's because they choose to -- not because they happen to be cheap, broke or desperate."

Dave's was designed to be that magical brand that would make it okay for YAMS to buy discount cigarettes.

To sell "Dave's," Philip Morris created a fictional cigarette company run by a fictional, independent, honest, hard-working guy named "Dave" who got around in a down-to-earth 1957 yellow pickup truck. Ads for "Dave's" cigarettes touted "Dave" as a youthful renegade who got fed up with the establishment and struck out on his own. There was no hint in the ads that the product was made by Philip Morris.

(One ad read:

"Dave was fed up with cheap, fast burning smokes. Instead of just getting mad, he did something about it. He read some books, cleared twenty acres and got to work. He put a down payment on a tractor and traded his lawn mower for a weather radio. And then it was just a matter of waiting for the final frost of the season and a new moon. In early April, Dave sowed his first seeds. A few sunny days later, Dave's Tobacco Company was born. Word spread about Dave's "different smokes." His tobacco leaves were hand picked, then barn cured and barrel aged for rich taste. And to make sure they burned perfectly, each smoke was packed tight. People started buying these new smokes that didn't burn fast and tasted great. They told their friends..who told their friends. Now Dave works for nobody but himself. And it all started with a few tobacco seeds..and a dream." [See the ad, The tale of Dave's Original Blend Link: http://tobaccodocuments.org/pollay_ads/Dave01.06.html]

Focus group testing showed, though, that if and when YAMS did find out that "Dave's" cigarettes were really made by the Philip Morris Tobacco Company, the felt disappointed and betrayed. PM minimized the importance of this finding, however, and pressed ahead with the marketing brand [see the PM document Dave's Seattle Research (1994) http://tobaccodocuments.org/pm/2045165728.html]

Shortly after "Dave's" hit the market, humor columnist Dave Barry wrote a scathing column ripping "Dave's" cigarettes:

I want to stress that I'm not bitter about what the Philip Morris Corp. is trying to do with the name "Dave." In case you didn't know, Philip Morris is test-marketing a new brand of cigarettes called "Dave's." Over the past year I've seen big billboard advertisements for "Dave's" cigarettes in Seattle and Denver. These are folksy ads; one of them features a tractor. The message is that "Dave's" is a folksy brand of cigarette, produced by a down-to-earth, tractor-driving guy named "Dave" for ordinary people who work hard and make an honest living, at least until they start coughing up big folksy chunks of trachea. .." http://www.s-t.com/daily/07-96/07-28-96/e02li154.htm:

A 1995 Wall Street Journal article also ripped PM's effort to deceive smokers with "Dave":

"Dave's Cigarettes" has become a trend setter in anti-establishment marketing. The promotional literature describes Dave as "an entrepreneur who believes in the value of home made products and the concept of offering folks quality cigarettes at the right price." Dave is such a populist he tells store owners he doesn't even want his folksy cigs to "mix with the 'corporate' cigarettes." Now take a guess as to which $60 billion tobacco giant owns Dave's? If you said Phillip Morris you win a half case of Red Dog beer (also owned by PM). Nowhere does Phillip Morris, in it's self-described effort to "convey cutting edge hipness," acknowledge it's relation to "Dave." Just being "plain folks" I guess. (WSJ 3/2/95)

Today "Dave's" appears to be a failed brand, along with another brand PM proposed to be targeted at young men (but that never made it off the drawing board), "Barking Fish" cigarettes http://tobaccodocuments.org/landman/2041490669-0681.html )

Oops, Wrong Number.

Oct 1985 (est.)
1 p

Author: Philip Morris
[ 6 of 6 | landman/2040597173 ]

Philip Morris ran this advertisement in the Richmond News Leader on March 7, 1986. The ad attacks the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company over its workplace smoking restrictions. The ad gives an idea of the intimidation tactics employers could expect from tobacco companies in retaliation for enacting smoking policies to protect the health of their workers. The ad says, "Never mind that world-class scientific minds have found no conclusive health risk to others from ambient smoke, information available to C&P for the asking." The tag line says the ad was "presented in the public interest" by Philip Morris USA.

Today Philip Morris' web site displays different point of view, saying:

"Public health officials have concluded that secondhand smoke from cigarettes causes disease, including lung cancer and heart disease, in non-smoking adults...We also believe that the conclusions of public health officials concerning environmental tobacco smoke are sufficient to warrant measures that regulate smoking in public places..." http://www.philipmorrisusa.com/en/health_issues/secondhand_smoke.asp

It remains unknown whether PM ever apologized to the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone company for running this ad. The entire text of PM's ad is below. A clipping of the ad from the News Leader (showing it actually ran publicly) can be seen at http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/cgi/getdoc?tid=etk46e00&fmt=pdf&ref=results