Authorship not stated; found in the area of William Kloepfer, Senior Vice President of Public Affairs Relations for the Tobacco Institute
Prior posting on this topic:
http://tobaccodocuments.org/landman/140507.html?pattern=cold+turkey&
This 3-page "confidential" report discusses the filming of a 1971 big-screen movie called "Cold Turkey," a comedy that depicted the story of citizens of a small Midwestern American town who tried to quit smoking all at once on a dare from a tobacco company. In the movie, the company offers the town a $25 million prize if all its citizens can quit smoking for 30 days. The movie was set in the fictional town of "Eagle Rock" and was actually filmed in Greenfield, Iowa in 1969. Produced by Norman Lear, the movie featured a host of big actors like Dick Van Dyke, Bob Newhart, Edward Everett Horton, and Tom Poston among others. Interestingly, citizens of the town of Greenfield staged a mass quit-smoking campaign in conjunction with the movie. All of this greatly interested the real-life tobacco companies, who observed the whole situation closely.
According to this summary of the goings-on in Greenfield, Iowa the tobacco industry was interested in "(1) the effect the anti-smoking campaign had on the town's long run smoking behavior, (2) whether the smokers found substitutes for their abandoned cigarettes, (3) whether there were short range or long term problems associated with quitting, such as aggressiveness, overweight, alcoholism, etc."
This paper gives a brief tobacco-company's eye-view of the events surrounding the film and all it entailed. It contains colorful commentary like,
"Although the presentation [of the film] will be generally unfavorable towards the tobacco industry, there will be a few items of consolation: quitting cigarettes will be portrayed as (1) difficult and (2) followed by immediately unpleasant consequences, and (3) many of the anti-smoking kooks will be portrayed as kooks and carnival con-men."
As the tobacco industry kept watch on the town's efforts, it accumulated statistics about the quit smoking campaign. The writer of the paper boasts, "we are not in the favorable position of knowing more about a quit smoking campaign than the anti-smoking people." He or she also shows how the industry worked to obscure the results of the "experiment," saying, "Further, the town council, which is busy publicizing the community and its campaign, is now reliant on us for statistics. Needless to say, we intend to tell them almost nothing, and so far we've released only some figures which tend to belittle their success..."