Jump to:

Anne Landman's Collection

Search Terms
Document Code
Date
Tcml Field Id
Field Value
Items: Sort:
Listing
[1 - 2 of 2]

930000 Action Points - Italy

15 Mar 1993
3 pp

Author: N/A (Corporate author, Philip Morris inferred)
Recipient: N/A (found in file called "Executive HQ/EU Archive" at PM)
[ 1 of 2 | landman/2501029464-9466 ]
[ Index status: Complete (anne@tobaccodocuments.org on 2001-11-13 12:37:38) ]

This outline from Philip Morris documents the company's corporate goals and "action points" for Italy in 1993. PM's goals include things like changing laws to benefit it, achieving restructuing of tax laws, promoting legislation of benefit to the company, recruiting third parties to hep the company "prevent further restrictions on public smoking," and developing smokers rights groups to oppose smoking restrictions.

Draft Project Plan for Ets Public Smoking and Credibility

28 Jul 1993
6 pp

Author: No author stated; found in the area of STAUNTON,DONNA/ACTIVE FILES
Recipient: No recipient specified
[ 2 of 2 | landman/2504079120-9125 ]
[ Index status: Queued (anne@tobaccodocuments.org on 2001-10-29 17:16:54) ]

This document describes a tobacco industry plan to bolster the industry's credibility and fight public smoking bans in Australia.

One of the "overriding objectives" for the "ETS/Public smoking and credibility projects" were "to influence politiciants, legislators and regulators to take a more balanced view on smoking and the tobacco industry."

The phrase "a more balanced view" refers to the view that smoking isn't harmful and that smoking behavior shouldn't be regulated. A poltician or legislator who believes that smoking is harmful and that others shouldn't have to breathe tobacco smoke against their will maintains a viewpoint that the tobacco industry considers an "unbalanced view" on smoking and the tobacco industry.

The program lists the intended target audiences for its credibility campaign, and then states that the industry will "focus on the particular concerns and hot buttons for each individuals' group."

Perhaps most telling, however, is the section at the end of the paper that recommends budgeting in enough money to put on a "Juvenile Smoking" campaign.

Tobacco control advocates have long stated that the objective of industry "kids shouldn't smoke" campaigns is not to reduce youth smoking, but to bolster industry credibility, and give politicians continued cover to support an unpopular industry. This document clearly mentions a "juvenile smoking campaign" not in the context of concern for the health of Australian youth, but in the context of its ability "to influence politicians, legislators and regulators to take a more balanced view on tobacco smoking" and bolster the industry's credibility.