Abstract
This 3-page "confidential" report discusses the filming of a 1971 big-screen movie called "Cold Turkey," a comedy that depicted the story of citizens of a small Midwestern American town who tried to quit smoking all at once on a dare from a tobacco company. In the movie, the company offers the town a $25 million prize if all its citizens can quit smoking for 30 days. The movie was set in the fictional town of "Eagle Rock" and was actually filmed in Greenfield, Iowa in 1969. Produced by Norman Lear, the movie featured a host of big actors like Dick Van Dyke, Bob Newhart, Edward Everett Horton, and Tom Poston among others. Interestingly, citizens of the town of Greenfield staged a mass quit-smoking campaign in conjunction with the movie. All of this greatly interested the real-life tobacco companies, who observed the whole situation closely.
According to this summary of the goings-on in Greenfield, Iowa the tobacco industry was interested in "(1) the effect the anti-smoking campaign had on the town's long run smoking behavior, (2) whether the smokers found substitutes for their abandoned cigarettes, (3) whether there were short range or long term problems associated with quitting, such as aggressiveness, overweight, alcoholism, etc."
This paper gives a brief tobacco-company's eye-view of the events surrounding the film and all it entailed. It contains colorful commentary like,
"Although the presentation [of the film] will be generally unfavorable towards the tobacco industry, there will be a few items of consolation: quitting cigarettes will be portrayed as (1) difficult and (2) followed by immediately unpleasant consequences, and (3) many of the anti-smoking kooks will be portrayed as kooks and carnival con-men."
As the tobacco industry kept watch on the town's efforts, it accumulated statistics about the quit smoking campaign. The writer of the paper boasts, "we are not in the favorable position of knowing more about a quit smoking campaign than the anti-smoking people." He or she also shows how the industry worked to obscure the results of the "experiment," saying, "Further, the town council, which is busy publicizing the community and its campaign, is now reliant on us for statistics. Needless to say, we intend to tell them almost nothing, and so far we've released only some figures which tend to belittle their success..."
Fields
- Notes
Prior posting on this topic:
http://tobaccodocuments.org/landman/140507.html?pattern=cold+turkey&
- Company
- Tobacco Institute
- Author
- Authorship not stated; found in the area of William Kloepfer, Senior Vice President of Public Affairs Relations for the Tobacco Institute
- Recipient
- Presumed recipient, the Tobacco Institute
RegionUnited States
Iowa
LitigationMinnesota AG
Named PersonAcs 1
Hew 2
Moss, F.E.
TypeREPORT
Subjectsmoking_cessation
smoking cessation programs
Annotations
- 1. Acs Named Person
- 2. Hew Named Person
Document Images
Page 1: TOB03607.05
CONFIDENTIAL: C 0 N F] D F N Y l/~ L
MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION
I want to tell you what happened in a community wide anti-smoking
campaign which took place in the town of Greenfield, lowa, in
August, 1969. The inhabitants attempted to go "cold turkey"
together, all smokers stopping at once. The idea stemmed from the
plot of the United Artists motion picture Cold Turkey_, in which
an lowa town attempts to give up smoking to win a prize offered by
a cigarette company.
It was more than sheer coincidence that the picture was being shot
on location in -- of all places -- Greenfield, lowa, at the time
the town quit s~oking. The studio's publicity department paid
them $6000 for the community effdrt.
The movie will have its world premiere in Des Moines o.n January 30,
and will be released nationally sometime thereafter. The release
will undoubtedly focus new attention on quitting cigarettes by
going cold turkey, and on community wide quit campaigns. The film
makers will be anxious to capitalize on their anti-smoking theme,
and the anti smoking people will probably be quick to capitalize
on the film's publ~icity
We haven't seen" the film, but we know a lot about it. Produced by
Norman Lear, it stars Dick van Dyke as an Iowa preacher who encourages
the washed-up run-down town of Eagle Rock to quit smoking..
• Bob Newhart, a Hollywood version of a Madison Avenue publicity man,
has persuaded Edward Everett" Horton, owner of the Valiant Tobacco
Company, to sponsor a contest giving $25 million to any town in
America which can talk all its citizens into giving up smoking for
30 days. Newhart is convinced that no town can do so, and that
Valiant will get much favorable, free publicity from the contest.
The late Mr. Horton's accomplished and wordless portrayal of the
company president will not be a very charitable one.
Back in Iowa, at least four types of pressure are brought to bear
on the popul.ace. Van Duke works on the religious and moral end,
th,e town ban~e~" threatens to call in some bank loans, the local..
Right Wing Society is policing the local citizens to make sure no
one smokes, and an ever increasingly worried Newhart starts trying
to tempt the populace with free cigarettes. A blockade on all
main highways helps enforce an embargo on tobacco, so Newhart is
forced to such ruses as shooting cartons across the lines by mortars
or by dropping them from helicopters. ,
TIMN 0083099

Page 2: TOB03607.06
" CONFIDENTIAL:
MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION
The process of the cold turkey campaign turns Eagle Rock into an
ugly community, and the Right Wing Society becomes more. and more
Gestapo-like. In one sense the story is less about smoking than
it is about the transformation of character brought about by
greed. We haven't read the script, but we understand that there
is gunfire in some of the final scenes. In one of Van Dyke's
restless dreams he imagines himself as a Marlboro Man.
Those involved in the film feel it is a very good one, and United
Artists even considered releasing it in 1970 in order to qualify
for the coming academy awards. The cast is strong -- comic Tom
Poston, act-tess Pipper Scot and the comedy team of Bob and Ray
(Bob Elliot and Ray Goulding) play supporting roles -- the topic
is relevant, and the treatment sounds humorous.
Although the pr~sentation will b~ generally unfavorable towards
the tobacco industry, there will be a few items of .consolation:
quitting cigarettes will be portrayed as (I) diff.tcu]r.~ and (2)
followed by immediately unpleasant consequences, ~ (3) many
of the anti-smoking kooks will be portrayed as kooks and carnival
con -men.
When the real-life town of Greenfield tried to go Cold Turkey, it
did so in a truly carnival atmosphere. The merchants have always
sponsored a mid summer Crazy Day in Greenfield, with sidewalk sales,
baby carriage #arades, prizes for the best pet, free ballons, and
so on. In 1969 the Crazy'Day was named Cold Turkey D:ay, (CTD)
and to the normal hustle and bustle was added a frog.jum~-ing con-
test, a rock music exhibition, a fire hose fight between the Jaycees
and the volunteer fire department, the presence of the film crew,
appearances by Senator Frank Moss, Miss American Teen-ager, and
other celebraties, not to mention the American Cancer Society, the
American Heart Association, the Seventh Day adventists, Smoke Stoppers,
etc, including the Department of Health Education and Welfare. All
smokers were asked to sign a pledge to~ quit smoking, all non smokers
were asked to sign a pledge not to start. At the end of the day .
there was a bonfire into which smokers were encouraged to throw
their cigarettes, cigars and pipes, and 30 days of abstinence began.
Smoking was~discouraged, and even those who didn't try to quit
refrained from smoking in public. Cigarette sales dropped 30%.o
despite the influx of tourists and movie makers, and most merchants
either removed them from their shelves or a.t least removed them from
view. A large sign was erected in a cornfield at the edge of town
saying "Welcome to Greenfield, the town that went Cold Turkey. No
smoking, please.' (On Halloween a year later some high school
students repainted it to read "Welcome to Marlbor~ Country", which
everyone agreed was a fine prank.)
TIMN 0083100

Page 3: TOB03607.07
CONFIDENTIAL: ....
MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION
When th~ 30 days were up, IQ buttons were awa.rded the successful
abstainers at a public ceremony and Un. ited Artists presented the
$6000 to the mayor, who didn't know what to do with it. (After
considerable debate about erecting a monument to the Cold Turkey
campaign, the money was spent to buy a set of chimes whicl~ ring
out hourly in the town square. Amon~I the other .monuments con-
sidered, but rejected,was a combination bird bath - wading pool-
and fountain built in the shape of a huge ash tray 20 feet in
diameter, with an e~ght-foot cigarette butt in its center.)
It should be evident that the people of Greenfield have a delicious
sense of proportion and are in little danger of taking themselves
too seri.ously.
Inciden~lly, the evidence suggests that going co~d turkey is not a
very effective way to stop Smoking. Although we have never re-
searched the procedures to find out which is best, we have noted
the admitted failure of psychologists seeking an easy way to
quit cold and the relative success of the Smoke-Watchers Society
which stresses a. gradual tapering off.
Greenfield looked as if it would become important, so at Easter
time, 1970, we sent some questionnaires to Greenfield to find out
what had happed there. .
We wanted to know (1) the effect of the anti-smoking campaign had
on the town's long run smoking behavior, (2) whether th6 smokers
found substitutes for their abandonned cigarettes, (3) whether
there were short range or long term probl,ems associated with quitting,
such as aggressiveness, overweight, alcoholism, etc, and (4) whether
we could discriminate between nonsmokers, nonquitters, would-be
quitters, and quitters on the basis of other variables related to
smoking hisi:ory, demography, or personality.
Because our Product Opinion Lab was the only organization to make
an .in-depth study of what happened in Greenfield we are now in the
favorable position of knowing more about a quit-smoking campaign
than the anti smoking people. Further, the town council, which.. ~s
busy publicizing the community and its campaign, is now reliant on
us for its s'tatistics. Needless to say we intend to tell them
almost nothing, and so far we've released only some figures which
tend to belittle their success) figures much lower than some tallies
made locally just after the campaign. .
.
ooz, O:o
TIMN 0083101
