Jump to:

Anne Landman's Collection

Subject: Product Information

Date: 30 Aug 1978
Length: 2 pages
03537131-03537132 Exhibit 101
Jump To Images
youth 98

Abstract

This memo dated August 1978 was sent to Curtis Judge, President of the Lorillard Tobacco Company, from Lorillard area sales manager Ted L. Achey. In it, Achey discusses the market success of Newports among African-American and "young adult" groups. Achey emphasizes that, "...the base of our business is the high school student."

Achey also says that Newport in the 1970s is "turning into the Marlboro of the 70's" [referring to the fact that Marlboro was (and still is, incidentally) the most popular brand among youth who are starting to smoke] and that Newport is "the 'IN' brand to smoke if you want to be one of the group." This passage indicates that tobacco companies value peer pressure among young smokers because it determine which brand many youth will smoke. Peer pressure of this type can greatly increase the sales of one brand of cigarettes over another. This memo appears to say that Lorillard valued this "in" status for NEWPORT since it would boost sales of their Newport brand.

Fields

Notes

This memo was used as a trial exhibit in the Broin case.

Quotes

TO: Mr. Curtis Judge FROM: T.L. Achey - Field 3 SUBJECT: Product Information

Mr. Judge, if you will look at my sales figures (attached), you will note that NEWPORT king size is the #1 selling Lorillard Brand, and NEWPORT box the #6 selling Lorillard brand in Field 3 for the year-to-date.

I know your immediate concern must be the "Lights" market; however, I also know the efforts placed into several "taste" brands over the past few years.

The success of NEWPORT has been fantastic during the past few years. Our profile taken locally shows this brand being purchased by black people (all ages), young adults (usually college age), but the base of our business is the high school student.

NEWPORT in the 1970's is turning into the Marlboro of the 60's and 70's. It is the "In" brand to smoke if you want to be one of the group.

Our problem is the younger consumer that does not desire a menthol cigarette. If that person desires a non-menthol, but wants to be part of the "In group", he goes to Marlboro.

Could we be furnishing a back-lash to Marlboro from our NEWPORT brands?

Is Marlboro as strong with the early beginning consumers as the NEWPORT brands?

Could we end the success story for Marlboro by furnishing the young adult consumers with a total category of "In" brands?

I think the time is right to develop and NEWPORT NATURAL (non-menthol) cigarette to attract the young adult consumer desiring a non-menthol product. We have a solid base with NEWPORT and I foresee much success with the name of Newport on new packaging.

We would need packaging in the Soft pack and Box.

A good test area might be the Camden, New Jersey Division. NEWPORT KING SIZE is the #6 brand (all companies) in this division.

T.L.A.

Company
Lorillard Inc.
Author
Achey, Ted L. (LOR, Area Sales Manager, circa 1979)
Director of Sales in the Midwest for the Lorillard Tobacco Company, worked with Vending and Military and was General Sales Manager in the North East and South East from 1958 to 1984.
Recipient
Judge, Curtis H. (RJR Bd of Direct. '67-69, VP Mrkting '68; CEO of Lorillard)
Curtis H. Judge served on the RJR Board of Directors from 1967-1969, Vice President of Marketing in 1968, and on the Advertising Committee. (Source: RJR Who's Who NMLRP)Also, CTR director, President of Lorrillard during 1970s-1980s.
Type
Memorandum

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: 98
I know your immediate concern must be the "Lights" market: however, I also ~now the efforts placed into several "taste" brands over the past few years. The success of ~k~WPORT has been fantastic during ~he past few years. C,/r profile taken locally shows ~hls brand being purchased by black people (all ages), younq adults (usually college age), but the base of our business is the high school s~udent. h"i~.~PORT in the 1970's is turning into ~he Marlboro of the 60's and 70's. It is the "~n" brand to smoke if you want be one of the group. Our problem is ~he younger consumer t.hat does not desire a menthol cigarette. If that person desires a non-menthol, but wants to be part of t_he "In group", he goes to Marlboro. Could we be furnishing a back-lash to .Marlboro from our ~PORT brands? Is Marlboro as strong with the early beginning consumers . as t-he NEWPORT brands? Could w~ end the success story for Marlboro by furnishing the young adult consumers with a total category of "In" brands? t I think the time is right to develop a N~WPORT NATURAL (non-menthol) cigarette to attract the young adult consumer desiring a non-menthol product. We have a solid base with .~EWPORT and I fcrsee much success with the name of hrEWPORT cn new packaging. > o
Page 2: 98
We would need packaging in ~he Soft pack and Box. & ~ood tes~ area m~ht be ~e Ca~en, ~ew ~erse~ Division. N~4PORT ~ING SZZE is the #6 brand (all companies) in this Division. C.

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: