Jump to:

Anne Landman's Collection

Assorted Notes on Root Meeting - 3 3 93 - or a Counterblast to Ammonia

Date: 04 Mar 1993
Length: 4 pages
401850152-401850155
Jump To Images
bat_cdc 8912

Abstract

These notes from a British American Tobacco (BAT) company scientist (D. Irwin) discuss "ROOT Technology," a tobacco industry term for enhancing nicotine delivery to smokers by adding ammonia-based compounds to tobacco.

In 1994 in the United States, an ABC News Day One segment accused tobacco companies of "spiking" their cigarettes by adding nicotine. The accusation only slightly missed the mark. The tobacco companies' technology is aimed at putting more of the nicotine that already exists in a cigarette into vapor form (also called "free nicotine"), where it is more rapidly absorbed by the smoker. As D. Irwin put it in a different BAT memo (from 1994) ,

"I need hardly point out that adding substances to tobacco that lead to more of the tobacco nicotine ending up in smoke is very close to nicotine fortification." http://www.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/batco/html/400/482/

Today's document states, "Ammonia increases impact because it increases smoke pH which enhances impact."

Even more interesting, however, is the question Irwin poses in this memo about another cigarette additive: Urea.

"Would disclosure of urea as a tobacco additive have a negative effect on consumer perception given that it is a constituent of urine?"

Fields

Notes

Thank you to Kirsten Neilsen for passing on information about this document.

Quotes

[From Page 1]:

Would disclosure of urea as a tobacco additive have a negative effect on consumer perception given that it is a constituent of urine?

[From Page 4]:

We (or I) need to be clear on what ammonia addition offers. My understanding of what has been claimed at various times is as follows Ammonia increases impact because it increases smoke pH which increases the amount of "free" nicotine which enhances impact...

Ammonia depresses irritation through reaction in the smoke with substances (aldehydes)that are even more irritating...

Ammonia reacts with sugars to produce volatile flavours and involatile flavour precursors. These substances are not different to what tobacco contains naturally, through the same reactions, but levels are enhanced.

Company
British American Tobacco
Author
Irwin, W. D. E. "Derek" (Scientist with BATCO GR&DC)
1984 Worked on sidestream research for BAT
Recipient
Presumed corporate recipient, British American Tobacco
Region
United Kingdom
Type
Notes, report
Subject
additives
Ammonia (Additives)
Ammoniation (Technology)
free nicotine (nicotine without salt, in vapor form)
Free nicotine is more rapidly and easily absorbed into the bloodstream, gives the user more of a "kick" when smoked. (RJR 500917506)
nicotine
nicotine technology
nicotine manipulation
urea

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: 8912
4.3.93 Assorted Notes on BOOT Meeting - 3.3.93 (or a ¢ountm-blm~ to ramona?) Pasts ofthis note m wrlnen with the disadvantage ofsubetaatiai ignorance and I welcon~ coauctioe. I hope no-one bel~cd Erwln Kausch's piece about Consumer l)csmnd l~q~onslvcnz~ Would disclaeum of uscx -- • tobacco additive havc a ncsativc ctTcct on coasumcr pcrc~tlon fgivcn tint it is • constituent ot'u6~? I havc two rm~r cooccs~ about tbc bzponaacc ROOT Tcclmoiotw has usumcd in tbc dcvolopmzm otourUS myic bbnds to compme wlds ~ Tbc f'wst is dmt the coaV]e~!y of the cbamis~ and tt~ wu~W ofatwl~ ~ including nxxfsfmd ~ fmmdmkzL t-- pmvkk,d akstmZlal ~opc for ~'__.~_ ~~- m pracGr~ sb,~.trad~msd dmuomz~~ to dsc indus,. TI~ bm, c had km mcccss in emkia8 clb~ ~iom to ~ tobacco blending. This could mua that imptovlt~ tiw 705~ or m of rhc blcnd which stm ~pmds oa ~ cxpzt~ ~-- mt b.n Zivu sutr.:i~ w,~ ~rxtmsm~ mchm lq~| ~ lack of ~ or"nm ofthc crop" ccmjtmints could exaczsb~ this ettbcc ~ thg amount ofzffoct in R.OOT Technology with thc lack ofsctionia mqxmdi~ to the long knmm m~lu~ tl~ M.m'lbom contaim morn FC mscl icss Burlcy tima our blads. Only ia WWB hm a shit m mon~ PC occurred, from what I heard ymtcnbW. Is tbc technology util waglli~ tbg bkndinl dog? If PM am comtrzined by volume in tbz tobaccos they buy. caa thst be mined to o-_r ~lvuUtp if'we me n~so commubwd?. Peshqm oae ofPl~8 axtsaxim8 is ~ cu Ix~ mine oFtbz PC robin:co they wit md Imm oftbe Bu84~. Tbey then uE ROOT to offWt thiL Adq~811. we have hmrd th~ ROOT ehiftx tm~ tcn~m~ AC notes. It is sm0tb~ maazr ifone stress with • Burk~ tdanv, m we do, and then add ammoeda. Additivmshouidbe~totheblead. 'rh~ should not be a bsuc. ~ roUowiq v~ues for total blind ~ with nkm~ comributloa ~ wcm found fet" KS full flavour broads smnpled in early 1991. Mad~ U.S.A IV~lxysm Brazil Total k~ nicotine nltrogcn ' l~J~ Strike M_.m4bom Msrnx~o Brand (%) 2.69 2.39 2.5,8 2.$8 2.O9 2.24 tJ'l O t.r't r~ BAT Co LTD-- MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION
Page 2: 8912
• | -- ~ ~ Kbu~m~y ~ mm~d we m~ ~y not ~ i m~d ,,~L Tb~ is dm abody oPm~mw~bl ,n~d~ ll~ I~TC~. BlkW mcl o~Iva ~ I~ Ode~II ssd mm,e I~ In l, lsdl~ a~ o~ blwdm. Am~p tl~s is l,~.r ~ .,,~ ,.~. l,r ~ ~.qm~ ,o L, mlky Sml0. or ~m,lm ~ ,,mld~ wi, k,lm ~ oflksd (no ~ im ~i~r). 1~ mk.~bom bi, md ~, ,mS~ ~- ~. ~ b~ mt ~ by ~k,oiosi~ ~, ~mx,,/m ~ d= ml+sb~ ot tl~ I clma umm/¢o ~pport d~ impamm= odr ~X~ T~~. Tlds b mired to m~, From +mmm becmn: I lucu c+ kmow d,j d,s cka.,s ~ md ~ oI~ Smmm~l ~ ~ wko I~ a .al,. ~. d,.+ ~ ~ ammam ,ksm,llk ,b, wmrll.zim bolas o/" HB wm ~ douin dn klmmmry. Wl,o did dsc mmary maiall msd +.s Lt ( X nm bmvnd petal maial in Odb~. TIIw mmd, zd a mw flsvour tcclmolol~ ot a wsdm" k"mL l-rm talmmo tram pusc~ wm I~ not mmnon~ Thcpeacl knpt fladinlnodif3kn:necs. Hemuphisml~L Ne~Im?) u-tim foilowinl e~c of ~ cxJ..ss, z bsvc not men it, t~ qsin nmm~pdsc ti~ Iammlb: lkial~ ofdds t0pi¢ llmLacl~ Saila: bam+mdc~iskimqamam'bmd cast mzl lmper type slnzu with ud wiabou~ ROOT mmmnn~ e~ elu: h+Id coam~ If'so, has • ~ paul of'ncsml mq~c~ ~ mnoknd tiz: cipmttcs bFnnd Id with no mention oFwbal I!~ trot wm about. Did tlb~ fred a smwmry difference? If so wha~ ~n~u Ih~ di~? We (or D aeed to be clear o~ wl~ ammonis addition offem. My uade~__.ndlalj of what his been ©lsbrml st ~s ~ is ms Follows. Ammomia Increases impact because It Imcrutet smoke pH which incrtua the amount of"fr~" nieot*me mn'ach mnbaneu Impact. I ~Dk mo~ ofus m~ fairly very Im~ in+~ pll D irri~ao~ mort= tlna iaV~ not. food Bc,idm, ~m iml~zt bs - full flm~msr cilm,~ is not na=,,m~l~ alood tldal, I scciall wink m,ll~b~ mazl~ ~m ,cuV~,bi'd~ and ~ in CI'T Howzves', I h~w~ oban'vcd that this chdm is rm~ly n~ now for RO~. It may l~vc barn amds in nd~ m ~ ~ ks ml~ Somc m~ms, s,~h ~s ,:Idoddm ckixcss smo~ smm~om. What is known shout pbomhs~ in this mmpuct? Ammonis depresses irritalJon tlu'oulh reaction in the smoke w/th substances (aldeh~ tbsl are evm more b~illltlall. I acccpt ~ mnmoa~ docs ~ m sired. ~ do ~ ,a~ coaUlm~ ~l'~.m,~y to iait,,~ioa? I think tlsc jury is still out oa this. FC tobecco d=lbe~ nmm ~d= msd mrolein thin uncascd amt~, Wmlmbl~ d.~ ~oa ~ ormlm'immmD~ in PCmml k~ Boi= mnmmda ~o m=et witk tltc 8kb4Wdas. Unamed Burlcy is dsfinitzly much morc ~ th0m PC, ao d~ duc to IdSh~ smo~ pl-I dzmn~ mmu ~ zimoZcu, [mclm~lll~ BllrJl~ylJlOblOlSlllrltoofflctthe+cFFect- Iluslx~t that ~ sltmlms ~ ~ is mo~ mmally a Cm=Z of kri"++on tl~ akfel~dm. At a ~iai level, the list Ihinl a USB needs is nitrolen Fortificat/m~. thoUlh oCeoume a USB does intnmluee mqlm'J to tim Budey por~a and final smoke pH is no/substNstially Ip~atmr than for PC smoke. Total nitrolen was ~ in o ......6 Q M U~ BAT Co LTD - MINNE..C~TA TOBACCO LITIGATION
Page 3: 8912
tlml"FMfmm 15 PCsad t0 kdey siaslesrade ciSmettu~ The ~wc~aot "=mdm" wi~6oftl= no~beism SemU.S.A. Ti=sndmwe~ ~wa from ]YS3-t~S6 ,mpL Msm total samsm~ sm is=lad~ ~ ~ w=~ 2£% k 1~ sad SJ'A ~ Irma, mlmmsd m • ~ of NF/~M. set TPt4. For tim mm~ mia ~ dziml~ ~ml~mm ~dm mb.~ ~ -* ........ l~Mmn nudcy Mma T~ m ~ ~ (%) i.~ ~in 1¢ (%) AII~ m~m 1¢ (%) Ammei~N Or) ~tmte N (%) 1.0 0.27 O.O2 ~,,0t 3.4 1.8 0.56 0.37 0.44 Total nitmsms in TPM is not a regular me.Jthod and I do not have data for blends. However, ms cam rarely mmme that sdtmgen coacentmtim in Iql~DPM imczuees with nitmgea coacentratioa in the tobacco. I am wondering irma ~il~z~i'~ ~.pluu~,m of~xluce~ ~ from DAP lies in ttnpbosphm, notttnmmsmim~ Sutbeesdi~cmnm~dmutthiL Oeedidc ~t~-rd~ mad ~.duced inV~ fR~ D~. mzibutinS thb m .k,,~ b~ ~ ~ thembretoleu~puffdelJvefiet "rlmmmnemi~amp~to~ A~fmm 1ow~ ~e]ivet~ per pu~ ~etd ptmptm mJuge hrlmtm tnueu~ mm drop in coadmafoa jiving 8 diffenmt bebmc~ ofsmokn comlmoenla u well as lower abeolute levtk? Ammonia rinds with sugars to produce volatile Ilmvom amd iavolattle flavour prmwtm's. Th~ mnbammom sre not dtffm-mt to whst tolma:o contains naturally, through the same ructlotu, lint ]ev~.d are mlumetd. Then: is no doubt ~ ~b~~ a~ fommt, but do ti~ matribute at a nmiecable k'vci, ps~kulsdy ia a USB wtm= trot, ¢im~ctsr owes amch to sdd~ tssiap a~! flavot~? Whst b the evidence, Igi~a that flevoar clammter difibmr.m m~ mually ku goeamnay dmribed by pm~ th~ J:e e~uain~ ty~ ~~. Pnummab[y these flavour peccursors arc formed natmully ia BorJcy bcforc sugsr is lint in cudng. Tbcy arc, I ~ fresher enlmaced after mgar casing at the condi~.om ofpmcmi~ C~r,cr~t~. X tnd tmnaed ent ehey would be pramt naturally in PC tetmu:o, deq~te th~ vmy low ammmm levels after flue gugiag, me the tim tabik above, la tim table the diffmu~ betwwn 1~ am:t Barley zmdc mummim is mucl~ pua:r, m a pmpoaim trois, than ttn oa other niuopma apwt fl~m nimte. I lind umded to mmm~ a,~ the msmmais ftot umed up im the Immmmee ofe~mm q0m~ I bare since been told that a more liknly explaution ofiow mummmia inVC isdm to Idler mei~ tmapmmmm ~ it of~ Aaotl~ umU-my m,d pmb~ly tinter ~ wm tl~ mymie bnmkdowa of amilm aeidsete, is ~apped by fltm-etwia|but coatianea fe~ mmz time ia Budey. Yet a Fur.her maumy point was that mflm~-mmmoaia nmctimm would not occur st the low pH of PC ~. The f'umt two points do not ps~lnde mg~-l~o scid maefioa products, but the pH point probably docs. This could be aaswcr~ by amalytical O mm~ t.T1 mmiJ BAT Co LTD - MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION
Page 4: 8912
Bsults on tbc tyi~ amd icvci of ~ Izoducts in PC mid Buricy Ipa~ks. Ibaw~ bwa totd that k~ls me km~ in i~ bat ifmsyo~ bm sin/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ If m~ me Immm i~ PC wkuzo md do mmik~ to I ti~'n tbmm mum be ms ~ for ~ din duoml~ ~ ~'pomlb~ jwt u for usk ~t ~ my ~ .mm.z~-mpr mt~a,'-- mmmit-mtm m.etim~ tmnmm t~ liar troy zi~ AC mmL ~ ~billmd ~ mw m ~ lhst [ doubt tli dlatb~km emJid be minis. If~s get AC aotm from botk typm oF ~tiam tim ~ ~ ~ ~ VA td.ad.) would .z~ tim .m~ titus m,mmny, p.oo.r ~ ~ ,,o, dd b,, nm Wi~L]~C bmmm ~t dora ~oe Im~c flw tomb ~ to soak up w,~r ~ Hows~r, mcom/imtod op6om ,cassia. Pluc-cm.cd a~cm is low m IXOtcia coapaccd to PC Imsdm,. Product Tcclmolozy does ~vc a prc~ to ~ slr~m knpmvancas m~d one mmsd ot'k ¢oaccms "adjmmmat" ofamlNmmt iavels to flmm oflmnlnL I do not know ~ sums but that ni~ fac~ftuzioa wm oa the apndL Om can ma rmimmk for ~'I~RGE and AI.STP~ mpplicn~a to utah bmcd oa ~ Imn noc soi~ to mare pos~i~ sulapuda~ t, ccs,z~ ldo no¢ Imow what to bcficvc. Wc could set up a ltoyad Comaduioa wkh tim pow~ w obuu cviclcncc and cram mwimcw:s. Itkink~twouldnotbcim0cluctivc. Tim~mustbc somc scuory eft'cot bared on the amoult of noa tobecco nmtcxinis ~ It nn~" cyst bc s potJtiv~ oflbct in qmtific biznd comp~ble mm~ioM bucd ms PM's usz of tiN: mdai¢ '1"~ m ~ f~r MTCo m~ I~ im millay in ~ ~ eitl~r to euhmscc aiai~; c~ or immdua: modifl~ ~. MIDA~ h~ o~ Idmd option wkb 10% CPCL9 it • mad. VA blcad. This rcplsccs 10% stem in mmdmr option. My uade~l k ~ thaw ~ will bz ~ ptodmt tinted in m~ Ausmm~ Ommm~ md ~ ,~ ~ blmb ~lm bei~ evdu,~nd t,/ expem? Ou ma~ of~mmnt~s m~tm~ PM mi~ be pmptmd to k~ tmte if ~ir e~s tb0ul~ a new ,m~ ~yI~ wm wa~ pumdq. Onc tmmio would bc zapm~ pmfmm~ m~l oomumm, pm~ Imdi~ to uu i~ dm amrk~ But I hm, e s fc~lin~ tbe MIDAS CPT ~t~m stmsdlm~ is mperlority. ~r tbe n~sult, MIDAS is ,to sub~im~ for a prosrmmnc to c-valu.~z tbc b~mfits of ROOT in Vir~inis products, if such is mClU~rcd. D. Irwin C~ G. Rr~ A. S~cnson R. C~cIlin G. Brooks A. Bmncs C~ Go mmm~ BAT Co LTD - MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: