Anne Landman's Collection
Alpine Project: Landor Brief (Draft)
Abstract
Shows that Philip Morris intended to get around a total ban on advertising in Singapore by introducing a wine cooler (made by its winery in Australia) with the same brand name as the cigarette they wanted to introduce in that country.
Fields
- Author
- Schmidt, P.
- Named Person
- Feenie, J.
- Named Organization
- Eac
- Leo, Leo Burnett Agency
- Lindemans
- Pmi, Philip Morris International
- RJR, R.J.Reynolds
- Rothmans
- Stc
- Bat, British American Tobacco
- Type
- MEMO, MEMORANDUM
- BRPL, BRAND PLAN
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Subject
- advertising
- advertising activity
- advertising campaign
- advertising restriction
- promotional campaign
- promotions
Document Images
PHILIP MORRIS ASIA INCORPORATED
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
2 2. APR 87 ~ 25/F, UNITED CENTRE, HONG KONG
To: Distribution Date:
From: Peter Schmidt cc: T. Keim
J. Feen
Subject: Alpine Project: Landor Brief (DRAFT)
We are currently planning/developing a new product
introduction for the Alpine brand in Singapore. Thus, the
purposes of this meeting is to review the Singapore market
and provide a brief for the Alpine packaging development.
Overview of the Alpine Proiect
As you are aware, we cannot advertise cigarettes via
traditional media vehicles in Singapore. Due to this
government restriction, we will be using a brand
diversification strategy to create awareness and visibility
for the Alpine brand name. We plan to accomplish this
objective by introducing a wine cooler called Alpine. Our
target date for the wine cooler is July 1, 1987.
With aide of Lindeman's, our winery in Australia, the EAC,
our distributor in Singapore, and Leo Burnett will be
introducing the Alpine Wine Cooler using a strong,
innovative advertising/promotional campaign targeted to
reach our potential Alpine smokers. The wine cooler
campaign will run approximately four to six weeks prior to
our cigarette introduction which is planned for September 1,
1987.
~ According to the Richmond manufacturing people we will need
to make a packaging commitment by mid-riay, thereby providing
nearly three weeks to finalize Alpine packaging which needs
only minor revisions.
Singapore Market Overview
0 Most Recent Develo ment
During early March the tobacco industry was hit with a
30 cents ($ Singapore) per pack tax increase which
Philip Morris decided to absorb. Our competitors, on
the other hand, raised their prices to cover the tax
increase. As a result of our newly established price
advantage, PM brands have had a major surge in sales
while eating into competitive volume. Regardless of
whether or not we raise our prices in the future.
Alpine will be introduced at a price advantage of $2.50
to $2.60 S or $0.20 to $0.30 less than Salem our target
consumer. Salem is currently selling at $2.80.
ie

- 2 -
o Advertising Environment
tiedia: Total ban on print/electronic media.
Promotion: Total ban.
Sponsorship: Total ban.
P.O.S.M.: Restricted - no messages/pictorial to
induce smoking.
- not more than 3 sq. ft.
- one sign per brand per
cigarette outlet.
Give-aways/Incentives: Some "souvenirs" allowed.
o Current Parallel Advertisin
Dunhill Shops
Cartier Accessories
Peter Stuyvesant Travel
Kent Leisure
Camel Adventure Gear
Salem High Country
rfarlboro Country
o Industry Volume
Since 1983 the total industry has been declining due to
poor overall economic conditions -- price increases far
above the inflation rate -- and the deportation of
thousands of alien workers who were young smokers.
1983 - 4.3 billion units
1984 - 4.2
1985 - 4.0
1986 - 3.8
o 1286 S.O.M. By Companv
Companv
am Trend
'83 - '86
Rothmans 38% '---~
S.T.C. (BAT) 22
~
RJR 22
PM 17
Others 1 '----~

3
0 1986 S.O.M. For Tolp- Ten Brands (87% Total Market)
Trend
Bratls~ am !83-'$~ Brand Profile
Dunhill 23% ~- Premium/Virginia/Old
Marlboro 16 -~, Premium/Young & Old
Salem 14 ~ T,ienthol/Young/Male-Female
Consolate
Camel 7
7
-~ Menthol/Female/Old
Non-filter/Old
P. Stuyvesant 5 ~ Low Price
555 4 ~ Low Price/Virginia/Old
L. Strike 4 /7 Low Price/Younger/Filters
B & H 4 ~ High Price/Old/Upper Class
Kent 3 ~ Premium/Middle Age/Upper
Class
0 iIi Prod
Trend
~ Sty1e am
Filter 66%
Plenthol 25
Non-filter 9 183 - 186
0 1986 S.O.M._By Price Categorv
Trend
Pric ~ * am, '84 - '86
Premium $2.80+ 44%
High $2.49-2.30 28 -~ N
Medium $2.29-2.10
10 LM
a
Low below $2.10 18 ~ -~
~
~
* Before 30 cent tax increase w

- 4 -
0 1986 S.O.M. By Pack Size
Trend
Pack Size a.QD '83 - '86
10's 14%
12's 8
14's
20's 60
Others 3 --~
0 1986 S.O.M. By Blend Segments
~
Trend
Blend zo, 183 - '86
Virginia 50%
Blended 50
~
o Smoker Profile & Total Industrv
a= iu '83 Lu
Male 94% -9.0% 91%
Female 7 10 9
A,ag
16-25 24 24 30
26-35 26 24 26
36-45 21 21 18
~ 46+ 30 31 26
Household Income
$1,000 & below (low)
35
26 18
$1,001 - $2,000 (med) 50 45 52
$2,001+ (high) 15 29 30
o 1986 S.O.M. Menthol Category By Brand
Brand am Current Trend
Salem 14.2%
Consolate 7.4
Newport 2.3
Virginia Slims 0.8

5
o Menthol Smoker Profile
Total
Industrv
Consolate
Salem
I3ewport
LU ' $2 $5
' $2 _'$5
' 'U '
$5 _' U '
$ z
_
_ _ _
. _
Male 94% 91% 71% 65~ 94% 84% NA
Female 7 9 29 35 6 16 NA 26
8~U
16-25 24 30 12 18 55 58 NA 67
26-35 26 26 20 21 30 27 NA 26
36-45 21 18 27 24 12 9 NA 4
46+ 30 26 41 38 3 5 NA 4
o Marlboro Versus Salem: Share of Age Segment
Mariboro Salem
~ '83 _'U '83 '$5
-
16-25 45% 23% 14%
26-35 22 22 9
36-45 13 14 1
Summary Of Current Industry Trends
It is clear after
franchise gaining
franchise. Young looking
moment
smokers at the
at the
(16-25 facts that the Salem
expense of our tIarlboro
years), smoking for the
~ first time or switching to a new brand, choosing Salem for a
number of reasons:
Peer pressure.
RJR's targeted promotion strategy via disco/clubs.
Ability to sr:loke more menthol cigarettes during an
extended period of time. (Smokers complain about the
harshness of smoking many non-menthol cigarettes in
social settings.)
Price (before tax increase).

6
Introducing Alpine with a price advantage, targeted at the
Salem smoker, in conjunction with a strong promotional
program will motivate young menthol smokers to at least try
and eventually switch to our new entry.
Packaging Assignment
Overall, the current USA Alpine package looks good, however,
the following changes/options need to be considered:
o Color - shift from aqua blue to slightly more green
to produce a more green menthol cue.
o Script "i4enthol" - below the word Alpine should be
changed to Menthol Fresh using different type faces
sides of pack as well. Another option is to look at
"Menthol Fresh" above the mountain within the green
chevron. Colors for the words Menthol Fresh should
either be green or gold.
o Gold Boarder - around green chevron separated with
white area between gold boarder and green color for a
classier/upscale look.
o Closure Sticker - explore green color with white
lettering.
o Pt-1 Crest - let's look'at a raised embossed PM crest for
this soft pack.
o gacha_ainc,~ Foil/Tear Tape Color - should either be gold
or silver. Lettering on pack will obviously affect
this choice.
o Pack Size Oj~tions - let's look at the
10's/14's/20's/sample 6's/7's sizes and explore the
possibility to increase the facing size of l0's/14's
packs to the size of a 20's pack. (Richmond can do it,
however, timing and retooling packers (costs) may be
inhibiting factors.)
o Cicrarette - 85 mm length circumference, white tipped
with a single gold band around filter (Salem has a
green band) and the name Alpine in green on the
cigarette paper for bolder look and Lights extension
option.
Let's discuss on any questions, concerns, or comments you
may have.
