Jump to:

Anne Landman's Collection

International Committee on Smoking Issues Working Party on Social Acceptability of Smoking 770727 - 770729

Date: 19770727/D
Length: 69 pages
2025025021-2025025089
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 2025025021-2025025089

Abstract

This 69-page confidential Philip Morris (PM) document resulted from a meeting held by R.J. Reynolds, Imperial, British-American Tobacco, Gallaher and Philip Morris in 1977 to discuss how the global tobacco industry could reverse the declining social acceptability of smoking. Dennis Durden, Vice President of R.J. Reynolds Industries, Inc., in his introductory speech refers to the "health victory" public authorities had achieved in reducing smoking: "They [public health authorities] feel that their health victory is in hand...it is logical that the anti-smoking forces turn to social acceptability as a key issue. However, they could not make this turn if they did not feel that they had their "health victory." The "health victory" had to come first."

Durden alludes to the industry's efforts to reverse medical conclusions on the health effects of smoking, stating that "the health issue is closed, until there has been sufficient additional medical research to reopen the Surgeon General's report." He further acknowledges that opinion surveys show "more and more of the American public tends to agree with the anti-smoking forces."

Subsequent charts in the document show the effects that public health efforts have had on cigarette sales over the years: A chart shows the negative impact that "Anti-smoking Publicity by Doctors, Scientists and Reader's Digest" had on cigarette sales between 1952 and 1954 (page -5042). Another chart shows a decrease in cigarette sales after the 1964 Surgeon General's report was released. A chart entitled "Actual vs. Potential U.S. Cigarette Consumption" shows the amount of cigarette sales the industry believed it had lost as a result of effective public health efforts. (Page -5049-- a gap of 90 billion cigarettes is described for 1976).

A list of tobacco industry opponents identifies the U.S. Government's National Clearinghouse for Smoking and Health antagonistically as "Chief Anti-Smoking propaganda arm of Government."

The tobacco companies' objectives were to undermine this public health progress by "Develop[ing] strategies to retard or reverse the trend [of declining social acceptability] where feasible or desired" and to "recommend counter-measures."

Toward the end of the paper, Durden says that the industry's only hope is to "counterattack" public health efforts. In the absence of such an attack, he says, "there is virtually no real chance for increasing the social acceptability of smoking":

"More and more citizens and public leaders believe that smoking is a health hazard to non-smokers. As long as this belief grows without being subjected to effective challenge and counterattack, there is virtually no real chance for increasing the social acceptability of smoking." (Page -5086).

This document shows that cigarette makers from around the world conspired to undermine common knowledge that tobacco smoke is harmful to health, and that they actually worked to reverse the progress that public health authorities had made in convincing people not to smoke.

Fields

Quotes

[From the introductory statement by Dennis Durden, Vice President of R.J. Reynolds Industries, Inc., starting on Page 8, Bates No. 2025025028]:

Conventional wisdom in the U. S. tobacco community says that the "social acceptability" issue has arisen because other issues of anti-smoking forces have failed to curb cigarette consumption. More specifically, failings of the so-called "health" issues are cited as the reasons for a new and much stronger anti-smoking thrust based on social acceptability.

I disagree.

I don't believe that the social acceptabiliity issue is being forced as a replacement for the health issue... Quite the contrary. I think social acceptability is viewed as a logical followup to an assumed victory which is being claimed on the health issue. Anti-smoking forces feel they have achieved this victory and are now ready to make a followup effort.

As far as the tobacco community is concerned there has been no such "health victory." The industry believes that the health indictments of smoking are unproven. The industry feels that more research is needed before there will be enough facts to reach any verdict on the "health" issue.

To me, the anti-smoking forces are saying that more health research is not needed. Instead, what they want to see is more money being spent to spread the knowledge they have already established about the "health" hazards and dangers of smoking. They feel that they have their health victory in hand. They see everyone of our cigarette packages bearing the label "Warning, the Surgeon General has determined that cigarette smoking is dangerous to your health." I believe they now feel the time is right to seek a broader warning, which would ultimately include a phrase such as this: "The Surgeon General has determined that cigarette smoking is very dangerous to your health and to the health of non-smokers."

As I read the opinion surveys, I believe that more and more of the American public tends to agree with the anti-smoking forces. Finally, I think that the health issue is closed until there has been sufficient additional medical research to reopen the Surgeon General's report.

Thus, to me, it is logical that the anti-smoking forces turn to social acceptability as a key issue. However, they could not make this turn if they did not feel that they had their "health victory." The "health victory" had to come first. It is an initial step in isolating smokers and arousing their fears and anxieties.

The health issue and the social acceptability issue are closely intertwined. We treat them separately, but as my opening premise, I hold that no successes could have been achieved in the social acceptability issue if the foes of smoking hadn't been able to assume and, in fact, claim a "victory" on the "health" issue.

Company
Philip Morris
Author
International Committee on Smoking Issues (ICOSI)
Working Party on Social Acceptatbility of Smoking (SAWP)
Recipient
Presumed recipient, Philip Morris and members of ICOSI
Region
Global
Type
REPT, REPORT, OTHER
CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
LIST, LIST
MINU, MINUTES
OUTL, OUTLINE
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Named Person
Banzhaf, John F., III (Exec. Dir. Action of Smoking & Health (ASH))
Executive Director of Action on Smoking and Health (ASH).Professor of Law at Georgetown. Banzhaf succeeded in using the Fairness Doctrine to get cigarette commercials off television in 1968. See Banzhaf FCC, 405 F, 2d 1082 (D.C. Cir. 1968) (affirming FCC ruling that radio and television stations must devote a significant amount of broadcast time to case against smoking). His telephone number is (202) 659-4310. The big focus in past years has been to force OSHA to enforce smoking bans, per Matt Bars. ASH publishes Smoking and Health Review bulletins. "A leading anti-smoking activist" (Chic. Sun-Times 6/23/93). Action on Smoking and Health is located at 2013 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006. (Castano Expert List) See Action on Smoking a Health, TTLA Almanac - Names.
Durden, C. Dennis (VP of RJR Industries, 1984, TI Communications)
Director of RJR Corporate Public Affairs, 1975, Dir. of Public Affairs Council, 1977, VP of R.J. Reynolds Industries, 1984. Served on the Communications Committee for the Tobacco Institute, 1977 (while an RJR employee).TI Communications
Haddon, Richard (BAT Public Relations Manager, Tobacco Division)
London
Herter, Ulrich Georg Volker (BAT Tobacco Managing Director & Board of Directors Member)
New Business Development
Hind, James F. (RJR Director 1979-80, VP of Planning, RJR c.1978)
Landry, John T. (VP of PM 1970-76. Sr. VP '77-83, Dir. of Marketing '84)
Vice President for Philip Morris, Inc. from 1970-76. Became a Senior Vice President in 1977 and held that position until 1983. Was named Senior Vice President and Director of Marketing in 1984 and served on PM's Board of Directors from 1973-84. Served as memer of the Social Acceptability Working Party of ICOSI, c. 1978
Nader, Ralph (Consumer Activist)
Consumer activist long renowned for a career of exposing corporate deception and wrongdoing that result in human harm.
Reid, Andrew (ITC Ass't Managing Director (late 1970s))
Commercial Director, Imperial Tobacco, Bristol, England, c 1978
Stern, E.
Surgeon General
Vogel, C.
Murray
Whist, Andrew (PM External Affairs Sr. VP)
Served as Senior Vice President of External Affairs for Philip Morris, Inc. in 1986 and again from 1992 to 1993.
Witt, S.
Operation/Project
Undermining Common Knowledge (Efforts by the global tobacco companies to undermine common)
The global tobacco industry carried out multi-faceted plans and programs aimed at reversing declining smoking trends, keeping the smoking and health issue "an open question" and restoring and maintaining smoking as a socially acceptable behavior
Named Organization
Alliance of Nonsmokers
AMA, American Medical Association
American Cancer Society
American Heart Assn
American Lung Assn
American Public Health Association (Public health organization)
Professional organization for people working in public health
Action on Smoking and Health, US
Plaintiff
Assn for Nonsmokers Rights
BAT, British American Tobacco
Bureau of Consumer Protection
Citizens Against Public Smoking
Civil Aeronautics Board
Clean Air Now
Congress
*EPA ( use United States Environmental Protection Agency)
Federal Aviation Administration (Ruled on smoking on U.S. flights)
Federal Communications Commission
Federal Drug Administration
Federal Employees for Non Smokers Rights
Fresh Air for Non Smokers
Federal Trade Commission (Enforcement agency for laws against deceptive advertising)
Enforces laws against false and deceptive advertising, including ads for tobacco products. Ensures proper display of health warnings in ads and on tobacco products;collects and reports to Congress information concerning cigarette and smokeless tobacco advertising, sales expenditures, and the tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide content of cigarettes.
Gallaher
Group Against Smokers Pollution
Health Research Group
United States Department of Health, Education & Welfare (Branch of U.S. Government concerned with public health)
International Committee on Smoking Issues (ICOSI)
Was formed to address and reverse the global decline in social acceptability of smoking occurring in the 1970s Consisted of the major tobacco manufacturers worldwide, was created to deal with the global decline in social acceptability of smoking. ICOSI was created
Imperial Tobacco
Interstate Commerce Commission
Martin Brinkmann AG (in Germany)
Maxwell Report
Natl Clearinghouse for Smoking + Health
Natl Interagency Council on Smoking + He
NCI, Natl Cancer Inst
Nonsmoking Miami Single Campers
Readers Digest
Reemtsma
RJR, R.J.Reynolds
Royal College of Physicians (Monitors the quality of Canadian/U.K. medical education)
Society to Humiliate Aggravate Mortify +
State Dept
TTC, Tobacco Tax Council
United Nations
Usda, U.S. Dept of Agriculture
World Health Organization (Concerned with global public health)
International organization concered with public health worldwide
Womens Christian Temperance Union
Working Party on Social Acceptability of Smoking
7th Day Adventists
*American Health Foundation (Use American Health Foundation (IFCP)) (Health Research)
1993 American Health Foundation - Directed by the late Dr. Ernst Wynder. Took funds from PM and Kraft for research relating to dietary and lifestyle causes of lung cancer.
Subject
industry activity
industry influence
industry response
industry strategy
industry surveillance (Intelligence-gathering on public health forces)
Countermeasures
Strategies & tactics the industry used to counter public health efforts to control tobacco
Social Acceptability (Social acceptability of smoking)
The industry fought the decline in social acceptability of smoking through public relations campaigns, legislation, etc.
social influence
Passive Smoking
Health warnings
Undermining common knowledge
Increasing smoking rates

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: tla81f00
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE ON SMOKING ISSUES WORKING PARTY ON SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY UF' SMOKING Jv1y 27-29, 1977 UNITED NATIONS PLAZA HOTEL :~, NEW YtaRK CITY
Page 2: tla81f00
CONTENTS Page(s) I. MEETING AGENDA 1-2 II. BACKGROUND, OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES 3-9 III. DEFINITION OF TERMS 10 IV. SMOKING AND HEALTH CONTROVERSY IN U.S.A. AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE 11-22 V. BASIC WORKING MODEL 23-24 VI. WORKING MODEL APPLIED TO U.S.A. 25-49 A. Influencing Factors 50-52 B. Counter Measures 53-56 VII. APPENDIX
Page 3: tla81f00
MEMBERS OF WORKING PARTY ON!SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY ISSUE Telex No. (Chairman) Mr. Dennis Durden Vice President R. J. Reynolds Industries, Inc. Winston-Salem, NC 27102 (Associate Mr. James F. Hind Chairman) Vice President, Planning R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company 806446 06446 Winston-Salem, NC 27102 Mr. Andrew M. Reid Commercial Director Imperial Tobacco Limited Lombard Street Bristol BS99 7JR England Mr. Richard Haddon (Yl"vC~D`rre-ctnf of Public Relations British-American Tobacco Co., Ltd. P.'O. Box 482 Westminster House 7 Millbank London SW1P 3JE England Mr. Ulrich Herter Industry Policy & Pub1iC Relations Manager Martin Brinkmann A.G. 851 51 1 44791 7384 3261 .Neuer Jungfernstieg 18 P. 0. Box 30 05 50 2000 Hamburg 36 West Germany Mr. Christian Vogel 841 0212333 Chief of Public Relations Division Reemtsma Parkstrasse 51 2000 Hamburg 51 West Germany Dr. Edward Stern 51 5505 Gallaher, Ltd. 65 Kingsway London WC2B 6TG England Mr. John T. Landry TWX) 710 81 2237 Executive Vice President Philip Morris U.S.A. 100 Park Avenue New York, NY 10017 .. ~ 7
Page 4: tla81f00
+ ..i:l ~-t, t- L:..+Gl\U<i
Page 5: tla81f00
Page 1 of 2 AGENDA July 27-29 meeting of the ICSI Working Party on Social Acceptability of Smoking (All working sessions will be held at the United Nations Plaza Hotel in New York City) Wednesday, July 27 Reception, dinner and short meeting. 7:00 p.m. Cocktail Hour - Suite #2814 U. N. Plaza Hotel 8•00 p.m. Dinner - Hotel Dining Room, 9:30 p.m. Short working discussion - Suite #2814 Gathering together to get acquainted Working out daily schedule Pass out working notebooks Thursday, July 28 Workroom is registered in Dennis Durden's name at U. N. Plaza 9:00 a.m. (Session I) Discussion of each participant's overview and background perspectives on Social Acceptability Issue 10:30 a.m. Break 11'•00 a.m. (Session II), Review, amplify and settle on exact marching ~ orders for the working party (source document is "Terms of Reference" sheet from first ICSI meeting). Agree on working definitions of key terms. 12:30 p.m. Lunch in workroom 2:00 p.m. (Session III) Settle on scope of work and exact contents to be included;in the working party's September 17 report N Q 3:30 p.m. Break ~ 4:00 p.m. (Session IV) Discussion of basic working model for '~ organizing data that portrays the level of Social Acceptability of Smoking,, country by country 8:30 p.m. Dinner - Windows on The World ?A -1-
Page 6: tla81f00
Page 2 of 2 P") Friday, July 29 9:00 a.m. (Session V) Discussion of methods and formats for presenting data on "'underlying factors" 10:30 a.m. Break 11:00 a.m. (Session VI) Discussion of methods and formats for presenting data on "counter measures" 12:30 p.m. Lunch in workroom 2:00 p.m. (Session VII) Decide on country by country reporting assignments for each participant 3:30 p.m. Break 4:00 p.m. (Session VIII) Recap decisions and assignments Set place of next meeting Wrap-up comments by each participant 6:00 p.m. Adjourn working session until! August 30 7:00 p.m. Dinner Dennis Durden R. J. Reynolds Industries, Inc. Winston-Salem, NC 27102 July 26, 1977
Page 7: tla81f00
Dennis Durden AN INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT Page ] of 2 ON THE July 26, 1977 HEALTH ISSUE AS RELATED TO THE SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY ISSUE IN SMOKING 10%, • Conventional wisdom in the U. S. tobacco community says that the "social acceptability" issue has arisen because other issues of anti-smoking forces have failed to curb cigarette consumption. More specifically, failiings of the so- called "health"issues are cited as the reasons for a new and much stronger anti- smoking thrust based on social acceptability. I disagree. I don't believe that the social acceptability issue is being forced'as a "replacement for the health issue. Quite the contrary. I think social accepta- bility is viewed as a logicalfollowup to an assumed victory which i,s being claimed on the health issue, 4nti-smoking forces feel they have achieved this victory and are now ready to make a followup effort. As far as the tobacco community is concerned there has been no such "'health victory° The industry believes that the health indictments of smoking are unproven. The industry feels that more research is needed before there will be enough facts to reach any verdict on the "health" issue. To me, the anti-smoking forces are saying that more health research is not needed'.. Instead, what they want to see is more money being spent to spread the knowledge they have already established about the"health"hazards and dangers of smoking. They feel that they have their health victory in hand. They see everyone of our cigarette packages bearing the label"Warning, the Surgeon General has determined that cigarette smoking is dangerous to your health." I believe they now feel the time is right to seek a broader warning, which would ultimately include N a phrase such as this: "The Surgeon Generali has determined that cigarette smoking Q ~ is very dangerous to your health and to the health of non-smokers." As I read the opinion surveys, I bel~ieve that more ar.:; of the American public tends to agree with the anti-smokiing forces• Fi.`-1-!iy,I think that the „ health issue iis closed_until there has been sufficient additional medical research ~ -3-
Page 8: tla81f00
to teopen the Surgeon General's.report. Thus, to me, it iis logical that the anti-smoking forces turn to social acceptability as a key i~s we. However, they could not make this turn if they did not feel that they had their "health: victory." The "health victory" had to come first. It is an initial step in isolating smokers and arousing their fears and anxieties. The health issue and the soci,al acceptability issue are closely intertwined. We treat them separately, but as my opening premilse, I hold that no successes could have been achieved in the social acceptability issue if the foes of smoking hadn't been able to assume and, in fact, claim a "victory" on the "health" issue.
Page 9: tla81f00
WORKING PARTY ON THE SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY OF SMOKING ISSUE BACKGROUND, OBJECTIVES, AND PROCEDURES Background From the inaugural meeting of the International Committee on Smoking Issue, Shockerwick House, June 1977, the following was accomplished: (1) A charter (position paper) was approved. (2) An "outside contact" and press release policy was established regarding ICSI. (3) Three working parties were formed to examine the current state of each of three areas of interest, and to develop strategies. Suggested terms of reference to guide each working party were developed. A single company was chosen to be the "lead company" on each working party - charged to produce a report acceptable to the full ICSI - as noted below: Social Acceptability of Smoking R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Smoking Behavior British American Tobacco Medical Research Imperial Tobacco Limited
Page 10: tla81f00
Working Definition on Social Acceptability of Smoking Refers to the described level of acceptance of cigarette i,,aap 5mt~ti,~=5 smoking nby a country's society - including non-smokers as well as smokers. It can be measured by the attitude toward smoking, the nature and extent of people's smoking behavior, types of organiied activity for and against smoking, and governmental policy and/or types of government legislation on smoking. C2 .\~TT ..co TJL Terms of Reference for Working Party on Social Acceptability of Smoking 1'. To assess the current level of the social acceptability . of smoking; country by country, where relevant. 2. To identify the factors which have affected this. .: To examine such counter-measures as have been used. . To recommend the counter-measures to be used. 5. To recommend a:mechanism for monitoring and measuring future changes. The objectives and procedural steps that follow flow from these terms of reference.

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: