Jump to:

Anne Landman's Collection

PR-PROJECT: CONFERENCE ON BENEFICIAL EFFECTS OF SMOKING

Date: Sep 1976
Length: 2 pages
2024273528-2024273529
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 2024273528-2024273529

Abstract

This document reveals the tobacco industry's efforts to generate favorable public relations for itself in the "tobacco and health controversy" by organizing a conference in which participants would expound on the beneficial effects of nicotine. The aim was to hide the industry's involvement in putting on such a conference. The author's intent is painstakingly clear, and belies the method of operation the industry chose to employ for years to come:

"...The industries concerned must by all means assure that no connection between them and this conference will be known publicly. Otherwise, the scientific and the PR value would be reduced to a minimum."

The writer further suggests the industry obscure its involvement:

"[The]organizer could be either a medical society, a medical journal or a government agency...",

and,

"...Participants should be medical doctors, who are known to be opinion leaders, and selected medical and scientific journalists of each sponsoring country."

Speakers were to be "top scientists who have got international reputations" and who "are not suspect of being protagonists of the interests of the tobacco industry."

Fields

Notes

Confidential. Translation. Poor copy; requires magnification.

Quotes

Short analysis of situation on smoking-health controversy:

Until today scientific research on tobacco and smoking is strongly biased towards concentrating on supposed health risks of smoking. Smokers feel increasingly unsecure about their habit inasmuch as the results of such research become part of the widespread popular controversy on smoking and health. Yet, amount 2 billion people all over the world do smoke. Therefore, smoking must have some beneficial effects for them.

According to various research work smoking furhers concentration and the ability of learning and of decision-making, on one hand; on the other hand it lowers the level of emotional arousa, of fear, and of aggressiveness.

Industry's aim:

These beneficial effects should be elucidated and evaluated by leading scientists and at the same time made understandable to the interested public, smokers and non-smokers. Such a rationalization of [a] primarily irrational habint should aim at furnishing smokers with a sound argumentation to justify their smoking before themselves and others, thus building up a counter-position against a growing anti-smokign surrounding.

Proposed PR Measure:

To deal with these beneficial effects in all their various aspects a scientific conference is proposed of about 3 days' length. The set up should be an international one because the PR problem is an international one, too. Therefore, such countries in which the smoking and health controversy is most likely to produce damaging effects on the image of smoking and which have already demonstrated their concern should be the sponsors of this conference, e.g. USA, Austria, and the Federal Republic of German. The industries concerned must by all means assure that no connection between them and this conference will be known publicly. Otherwise, the scientific and the PR value would be reduced to a minimum.

Organizer could be either a medical society, a medical journal or a government agency of a country which is not yet deeply committed in the smoking-health controversy but has leaf tobacco interests. The latter is necessary to make its role as organizer understandable to the public.

As a newcomer to the EEC and an important tobacco growing country we can imagine Greece to be such an ideal organizer.

Participants should be medical doctors, who are known to be opinion leaders, and selected medical and scientific journalists of each sponsoring country.

For speakers only top scientists should be invited who have got international reputation and are not suspect of being protagonists of the interests of the tobacco industry.

This conference should not only have an immediate echo in the press but should also produce a documentation serving as a valuable source of reference.

Company
Philip Morris
Author
N/A
Recipient
N/A
Region
Europe
Litigation
Texas Trial Exhibit P-15687
Type
Presentation
Speech

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: irx74e00
t ~......- __._...TT A:L i PI-11-Pro ject Con_.'ere^ce on 3"ene _? o_ei -_: fects of Smokin; t Cr ` ~S~'C on sL~pJEed~'~ health -J. _ I.-. ~ _ ._...r . . ... _ risks o_ smok=::1Z.. Smoker5 _er- _a~ rzes~r.~iy unsecure about t!?C" :" r£:'L i` as ~: _"A sr._-s of s'~'_c_'1 re sea':"c}1 .^.Zcoi2le i;= `, .C::';: o:r2='3J on sR-ioirincr 3n.1- healtlz. Yet, about 2 b'ill'_on nec-)--. e ali over the world do srno.,:e. Therefore, ___._ls t some ber.ef icial effects _or them. ~: t =^: •r s- . , situat;on o_~ s::~~_-.~n7- ; -;:.l':h Until to-.^-cy scientific rese3:"..^.^ on tobacco 7riCd smoking '._ccor~ in- to var; ous =-o=::r.Cr , fur ztic'_° ; cor.cen- trztio.~ and the ac;li-y er ...-_:._'r.J and " of decisicn-naking, or cne hand; on the ___ :~,_ `he level of emotio- nal nal arousal, of fear, afi~ Gf uo;roSS:'leY:eSS. ~- i.='V t'_i These beneficial effects be el:uci3ated and evaluated --;,. ,,e3d_ng sclant{ st_ ^n- ~: .=i .,a::e ti:: emade understandable ;.o the interestea public, sxo:.r;-.rs and non-smokers. Such a ra`tonalization, of nr;:r.:~ril;: :-or.al : a_bit should aim at i~~u_ lishin.r., sraoizers Witii a sou:.e trWt.:r.:entc,tion to justify their smoking before themselves and otl:z^s, thus building up a cn-nto^-pos.•i*ioii a~air_ct a'.~? a:^.t::-snoKing surrounding. Fronc sed I'P.-,:ne2:su^^e To deal with these beneficial ei'fec--s `_n all their various aspects' n scientific cc:^fe'ra:ice is proposed of about 3 days' length. The set up s:,osldl be an international one
Page 2: irx74e00
I bec.luse 'the PR-problem is an international one, too. Therefore, such countries in which the smo:ci:.g and health controversy is most likely to p_ oduce damaging effects on the image of sraokino and 4:hich have already demonstrated their concern should be the sponsors of t%,.is conference, e. g. USA, Austria,, and the Federal Republic of Germany. The industries concerned must b;i all means assure that no connection between them ancd t:^is conferer.ce will be known publicly. Otherwise, the scientific and the PR value would be reducedito a minimuW. Organlyze^ could be either a medicai society, a: medical . journal or a government agency of a country which is not y.et deeply committed in the s~ ..ing-: ealth :ontroversy but has le3T tobacco interests. The latter is necessary to make its role as organizer ur.derst-andable to the public. As al newcomer to the EEC and arn important tobacco growing ceuntr ywe can imagine Greece to be such an ideal organizer. P_~rticipants should be rc:1'i'cal coctors, -who are kno,,,rn to be c; _nion leaders, and selected medical and scientific jour- nalists of each sponsoring country. For speakers only top-Bcie :tists should be invited who have got international rep uts, tion and are not suspect of being protagonists of the interests of the tobacco industry. ''hi.'s cer_ference shouldinet on Ly have an immediate 'echo in the press but should dso produce a documentation serving as a valuable source of reference. N 0 ~ N ~ W UI N ~

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: