Jump to:

Anne Landman's Collection

Ets Media Strategy

Date: Feb 1993 (est.)
Length: 12 pages
2023920090-2023920101
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 2023920090-2023920101

Abstract

This report, found in the files of Victor Han (Director of Communications for Philip Morris Worldwide Regulatory Affairs) describes the threat that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 1993 rating of secondhand or environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) as a Group A Human Carcinogen posed to the cigarette industry.

"Indirectly, ETS will have considerable influence on all other tobacco-related legislation, including taxation, marketing freedoms, etc. Of critical importance will be the effect on consumers, practically deprived of more and more locations in which they can smoke, and psychologically given more incentive to quit."

The Philip Morris (PM) report characterizes the EPA as "at worst corrupt and controlled by environmental terrorists" and states that "...without an effort to build considerable reasonable doubt about [EPA's case against secondhand smoke]--particularly among consumers--then virutally all other efforts [to fight the ETS issue] will be diminished in effectiveness."

PM's strategy is laid out: not to fight the ETS issue on its merits, but instead to destroy the credibility of the government agency that declared it dangerous:

"The credibility of the EPA is defeatable, but not on the basis of ETS alone. It must be part of a larger mosaic that concentrates all of the EPA's enemies against it at one time."

The paper describes how the media's focus would be taken off of ETS by the generation of non-ETS stories, stories that focus on "general EPA bashing by credible, authoritative sources." and "EPA ineptitude and, when possible, corruption."

The 13-page report reveals Philip Morris' strategies for a full-bore attack on the U.S. EPA over its efforts to better inform American citizens about the health dangers posed by the company's ubiquitous and largely unregulated products.

Fields

Quotes

Regardless, for the media and the public, assualted for 30 years with an ever-growing litany of the dangers of smoking, EPA's findings--buttressed by HHS as well as scientific authorities and aggressively advanced by the antis--are inherently believable.

The short term direct results will be:

--...to escalate employer-initiated and legislated smoking bans, --to stimulate an increase in litigation on ETS-related fronts.

Indirectly, ETS will have considerable influence on all other tobacco-related legislation, including taxation, marketing freedoms, etc. Of critical importance will be the effect on consumers, practically deprived of more and more locations in which they can smoke, and psychologicall given more incentive to quit.

The tobacco industry has several large obstacles working against it in its efforts to bring EPA's flawed action to light:

--Little credibility with the public --Less with the media which, in addition, acord the industry limited standing and access, --the tobacco industry is more isolated than most from teh networks of national allies from which other industries, in controversial situations, can draw support.

Philip Morris stands alone in the industry in its understanding, sophistication, resources, commitment to proactive public affairs and credibility, but direct company exposure on negative issues is an internal concern that has merit.

The growing perceptions about and animosity to EPA as an agency that is at least misguided and aggressive, at worst corrupt and controlled by environmental terrorists, offer one of the few avenues for inroads...

...However, without a major, concentrated effort to expose the scientific weaknesses of the EPA case, without an effort to build considerable reasonable doubt about that case--particularly among consumers--the virtually all other efforts...will be significantly diminished in effectiveness. This is the toughest challenge of all, the one against which the clock is ticking the fastest and the one that should be treated with the greatest urgency.

The credibility of EPA is defeatable, but not on the basis of ETS alone. It must be part of a larger mosiac that concentrates all of the EPA's enemies against it at one time.

Company
Philip Morris
Author
No author stated. Found in the area of Victor Han, Director of Communications for Philip Morris Worldwide Regulatory Affairs.
Region
United States
Named Organization
1st Amendment Center
ABA
ABA Journal
AFL-CIO News
American Automatic Merchandiser
Burson Marsteller (Tobacco industry PR firm)
Tobacco Industry public relations firm.
Business Law Today
Business Week
Chicago Tribune
Congress
Convenience Store Decisions
Convenience Store News
Environmental Forum
Environmental Law Inst
EPA Watch
*EPA ( use United States Environmental Protection Agency)
Financial World
Flue Cured Tobacco Farmer
Fortune (Magaine)
General Finance
Harpers (Magazine)
HHS, Dept of Health and Human Services (U.S.)
Independent Business
Inside EPA
Law Practice Management
Legal Times
Nations Business
Nations Restaurant News
Natl Law Journal
New York Times
OSHA, Occupational Safety & Health Administration
Progressive Grocer
Restaurant Hospitality
Retail Tobacconist
Science
Tobacco Reporter
US Chamber of Commerce
US Distribution Journal
Vending Times
Wall Street Journal
Named Person
Borelli, Thomas J. (PM Corporate Scientific Affairs Mgr., 1990)
Manager of Corporate Scientific Affairs for Philip Morris in 1990. Also worked for PM Corporate Services in Brussels.
Cohen, B.
Ohara, J.
Parrish, Steven C. (PM, Sr. VP, General Counsel)
Partner of industry law firm Shook Hardy and Bacon before going to work for PM. Was VP of PM Corporate Scientific Affairs in 1990. Defends PM on television.
Siegenthaler, J.
Type
REPT, REPORT, OTHER
CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Subject
secondhand smoke
Corporate strategy
media campaign
media coverage

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 11: sav88e00 Log in for more options!
Radio/TV Scientists Bad Science Consumers PM EPA-bashing Genll public Advocacy groups IAQ/Accommodation Growers HVAC experts Conservatives Employers 8
Page 12: sav88e00 Log in for more options!
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS There are also a number of other avenues that do not fall within the parameters of the medi~a strategy discussed above that we believe are worth serious exploration and consideration as part of the overall media effort. EPA Watch This publication is both media and messenger. We believe that there is tremendous currency :n establishing Bonner Cohen as a principal source for other journalists and as a direct voice on EPA matters. This effort has already begun but needs to be pushed forward. We believe that a regular series of radio actualities as well as any expanded effort to market EPA Watch to journalists will produce significant results. With the radio actualities, we believe that within six months we should be able to create the virtual sense of an EPA Watch commentary that woul'd achieve recognition and can be geographically tailored ta meet urgent needs. The First Amendment Center John Siegenthaler now heads this journalistic foundation, headquartered at Vanderbilt. We propose a meeting with him to explore the possibilities of reviewing coverage of ETS, EPA, risk assessments, etc. Steve Parrish should accompany me and Jim O'Hara, media director of B-M Washington, to the meeting. Jim worked with Siegenthaler for many years. This is only one example of potentilal efforts to influence the media through the indirect means of peer groups which have respect and they can, if we are successful, soften and change attitudes on a wholesale basis.

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: