Anne Landman's Collection
930000 - 970000 Philip Morris U.S.A. R&D Strategic Plan
Abstract
"Finally, we need to consider the long-term consequences for Philip Morris U.S.A. if even our best efforts to address the shrinking U.S. cigarette market fail. One approach is to try to replace domestic sales with export sales. Under that approach, we need to consider the social and political ramifications of exporting a product for which there is no domestic market." Page-3007
Fields
- Recipient
- Carchman, R.A.
- Named Organization
- Advantus Pharmaceuticals
- Alza
- Amed, American Medical Association
- Amer, American Tobacco
- American Cancer Society
- American Chemical Society
- American Cyanamid
- American Heart Assn
- American Lung Assn
- Archer
- Bandtabak Malchin
- Bat, British American Tobacco
- Block Drug
- Bristol Myers
- Budd Larner
- Bw, Brown & Williamson
- Cabarrus
- Center for Tobacco Products
- Ciba Geigy
- Congress
- Coresta, Coresta
- Courtaulds
- Cygnus Therapeutic
- Danchi IV Panel
- Demauduit
- Dexter
- Diet Safety Comm
- Duke Univ
- Dynagen
- Eastman Kodak
- Ecusta
- Eec
- Elan
- Epa, Environmental Protection Agency
- European Patent Office
- FDA, Food and Drug Administration
- Flavor Specifications Group
- Ftr, Fabriques De Tabac Reunies S.A.
- Gallaher
- Grey Advertising
- Hkcp Panel
- Hks
- Hoechst Celanese
- Hoffmann Laroche
- Imperial Tobacco
- Inbifo, Institut Fur Biologische Forschung
- Iso
- Jacobs Suchard
- Janssen
- Japan Tobacco
- Johnson Johnson
- Kabi Pharmacia
- Kimberly Clark
- Klemtner Advertising
- Lectec
- Lederle Lab
- Lewis Grace
- Lm, Liggett & Myers
- Lor, Lorillard
- Manchester Tobacco
- Marion Merrell Dow
- Ministry of Finance
- Mti
- Ncaa
- Nist, Natl Inst of Standards & Technology
- Operations Planning Environmental Strate
- Operations Task Force
- Operations Technology Assessment Comm
- OSHA, Occupational Safety & Health Administration
- Packaging Engineering Group
- Packaging Materials Evaluation Comm
- Ph Glatfelter
- Planning Comm
- Planning Strategy Task Force
- Pol, Product Opinion Lab
- Reemtsma
- RJR, R.J.Reynolds
- Roper, Roper Org
- Rothmans
- Salthouse Torre
- Schoeller Hoechst
- Schoeller Hoesch
- Shb, Shook,Hardy & Bacon
- Sudler Hennessey
- Sunshine Jr Stores
- Supply Chain Group
- Supreme Court
- Tabak As Kutna Hora Csfr
- Univ of Mn
- US Tobacco
- US Today
- Vezifa
- Viscofil Consolidated
- Wake Forest Univ
- Wall Street Journal
- Warner Lambert
- World Intellectual Property Org
- Advanced Tobacco Products
- Named Person
- Carchman, R.A.
- Anderson
- Apple, W.
- Applegate, D.
- Bacall, L.
- Banyasz, J.
- Cipollone
- Correa, E.
- Dimarco
- Edell, M.
- Ehmann, C.W.
- Epo
- Fitzmaurice, R.A.
- Gerstner
- Gruca, E.
- Halset
- Hardin, R.V.
- Hayes
- Higgins
- Hildebolt
- Hill, J.
- Ibister
- Irving, C.
- Johnson, D., J.R.
- Johnston
- Kao, J.
- Kellogg
- Kennedy
- Kilpatrick, M.
- Kornegay
- Laroy, B.
- Leyden, D.
- Lymbery
- Mccarty, W.
- Mccracken, J.
- Meade, T.
- Murray, T.
- Ockers
- Pritchard
- Reid, G.
- Roberts, S.
- Rose, J.E.
- Sanders, T.
- Schindler
- Scott, B.
- Shah, H.
- Sisel
- Spears
- Synar
- Thompson, D.
- Tindall, J.
- Ussery, B., J.R.
- Wasiuk, J.
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- BUDG, BUDGET, BUDGET REVIEW
- CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
Document Images





PLAN OUTLINEfCONTENT
P
age
VI. Resource Allocations and Implementation 75
A. Strategic Goal 1 75
B . Strategic Goa12 77
G. Strategic Goa13 79
D. Strategic Goa14 80
E. Strategic Goal 5 81
F. Resource Allocation Summary 83
VII. Implementation
Appendices
Appendix A Export Product Development Accomplishments
Appendix B Technology Review
Appendix C PME R&D Accomplishments
iv


2021522932

Executive Summary
The 1993-1997 PM U.S.A. R&D Strategic Plan contains seven major sections.
The first section is the PM U.S.A. Mission Statement and Goals. This is followed by an
Internal Analysis section. The 1993 R&D Major Programs are described and reasons for
changes between the 1992 and 1993 plans are presented. Resources allocated to the Major
Programs are shown. Major PM U.S.A. R&D accomplishments are summarized,
including an outline of patents and publications. The status of technology at PM U:S.A.
R&D is discussed. Next accomplishments and major objectives of PM Europe R&D are
described. This section closes with a summary of PM U.S.A. R&D strengths indicated by
the Internal Analysis.
Section Three is an External Analysis. A summary of the domestic market and a
detailed analysis of our four major competitors -- R.J. Reynolds, Brown &Williarnson
(and BAT), and Japan Tobacco - are discussed. Next, non-traditional competitors
(nicotine patches) are described. Competitive technology from a variety of sources is then
summarized. The status of suppliers of importance to R&D issues such as flavors, filter
tow, packaging materials, paper, and adhesives is discussed. A summary of relevant
political and social issues is followed by a discussion of the strategy of a number of anti-
smoking groups.
The next section is entitled R&D Issues and describes strategic issues arranged by
strategic goal. These issues raise many questions. The search for answers to these
questions is the basis for the PM U.S.A. R&D Programs, 1993 Commitments and 1993-
1997 Operational Plan.
A description of resource allocations in the next section and implementation in the
final section concludes the Plan. Resource allocations are presented for R&D Major
Programs. Resource allocations for all 1993 R&D activities by PM U.S.A. R&D cost
center are given in the appendix. To provide a concise plan, much of the supporting
documentation and information have not been included. This information is available for
review in the PM U.S.A. R&D Library.
Several changes were made to the PM U.S.A. R&D planning process during this
planning period. A decision was made to move the time line for developing the Strategic
Plan forward in the year to present the Plan in July. This goal was established to provide
planning information prior to, or at least simultaneously with, the budgeting process. In
general, the target dates were met. The new goal is to have R&D Strategic Planning
accomplished on a July to July calendar year, and R&D Operational Plans prepared by
September. In this way, Operational Plans may be reviewed prior to finalizing the budget.
Finally, as mentioned in the 1992-1996 R&D Strategic Plan, both the Strategic and
Operational plans for R&D should be living documents, not dust collectors. To this end, a
significant effort was made to provide tools to facilitate the modif cation of the R&D
Operational plan as needed, and to encourage a quarterly revision in conjunction with the
R&D Quarterly Progress Report and Quarterly Planning Meeting.

