Jump to:

Anne Landman's Collection

Translation

Date: 12 Oct 1979
Length: 3 pages
2016000963-2016000964A
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 2016000963-2016000964A

Abstract

This is a translation of a letter written by a German scientist named Dietrich Schmaehl, who was performing biological research for Philip Morris in 1979 in a quest to find a "safer cigarette." Schmaehl was doing experiments to determine the carcinogenic effect of the smoke condensates from specific brands of cigarettes.

Philip Morris threatened to cut off Schmaehl's funding. After finding this out, Schmael wrote to Dr. Franz Adlkofer (presumably his boss), "In our conversation it was argued that the Industry could not support such experiments since this might prove that the previously manufactured products have a carcinogenic effect and that such experiments could especially not be supported because they would be financed with Industry funds. I am totally unable to follow these arguments."

Schmaehl in no uncertain terms threatened that if his funding was cut off, he would continue performing the investigations on his own and publish the results, naming the brands (currently on the market) that he used in the experiments:

"I want to tell you again that in case this project...is refused support by the Industry, I will carry out such investigations in my Institute on my own account; in that case I will, in my publication of this work, call a 'spade a spade'; this means I will name the brands currently on the market which were used to prepare the smoke condensates."

According to another internal memo from Alex Holtzman (PM Assistant General Counsel) to Thomas Osdene (Director of Research) about Schmael's letter, PM clearly considered Schmaehl's threats blackmail, but decided to fund his work anyway to keep him quiet. Holtzman says, "I do feel that this letter is tantamount to blackmail by Schmaehl . I am very much afraid that unless financial support be provided to Schmaehl he will chastise the industry." That memo can be seen at http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp'if=avpidx&DOCID=1000774066

Fields

Quotes

TO: A Holztman From: Donald H. Hoel

October 12, 1979

TRANSLATION

Dear Dr. Adlkofer:

This letter refers to the conversation that you and I had on September 27th, 19779, with Dr.s Koenig and Brueckner and in which we discussed the for me essential experiments on dose effect relationships of high tar cigarettes compared to low tar cigarettes. Such experiments are completely indispensable in the arguments on a safer cigarette, especially if one supports such efforts publicly.

In our conversation it was argued that the Industry could not support such experiments since this might prove that the previously manufactured products have a carcinogenic effect and that such experiments could especially not be supported because they would be financed with Industry funds. I am totally unable to follow these arguments. Especially since, for example, in the former Dontenwill Institute such dose effect relationships were already investigated and were financed by the Industry. The same applies to the detailed investigations by Mr. Lee at the BAT Research Institute in England, which were likewise financed by the Industry. Therefore the arguments made by Drs. Koenig and Brueckner do not hold.

I want to tell you again thatin case this project, which is essential from my point as well as for other members of the Research Advisory Board, is refused support by the Industry, I will carry out such investigations in my Institute on my own account; in that case I will, in my publication of this work, call a "spade a spade"; this means I will name the brands currently on the market which were used to prepare the smoke condensates. --------------- Dr. Schmaehl uses a German colloquialism which literally translates "I shall clearly identify horse and rider," which in German is --at least implicitly--a bit more threatening that just naming brand names. -----------------------

It is self evident that if such experiments are carried outin Heidelberg, they will be done without being influenced by the Scientific Advisory Board or by your industry, and that I will only test what interests me, i.e., the dose-response relationships of the different amounts of condensates, without testing questions you are interested in, i.e., the effect of nicotine.

These experiments which I want to carry out and which I have requested you to approve for me to do for about one and a half years, will help to prove the correctness of the approach taken by the Scientific Advisory Board with reference to the promotion of low tar cigarettes. I am totally at a loss to understand that these arguments are not accepted by the Industry, because they are designed to show that we are on the way to produce something better. Your attitude would indicate a willingness on the part of the Industry to no longer follow this approach which the Industry itself had participated in initiating and had promoted and supported...

Company
Philip Morris (Altria Group)
Author
Schmaehl, Dietrich (Researcher for Philip Morris biological labs in Europe, c. 1)
Recipient
Adlkofer, Franz (VDC Research Director)
Argued in a 1988 joint meeting of the worldwide tobacco companies that the industry should stop developing "marketable science" for use in public relations to fight the secondhand smoke issue and instead should establish a safe threshold for exposure to secondhand smoke. (Bates No. 2021548222/8235)
Region
Europe
Named Organization
BAT Research Inst
Dontenwill Inst
Research Advisory Board
Scientific Advisory Board
PM, Philip Morris
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Named Person
Holtzman, Alexander (PM Asst General Counsel. 1975-85.)
*Brueckner, Ernst (use Bruckner, Ernst, Dr.) (Deputy Secretary General)
1989 West Germany
Koenig
Lee
Schmaehl, Dietrich (Researcher for Philip Morris biological labs in Europe, c. 1)
Hoel, Donald K. (CTR Industry Research Committee & PM Attorney, Shook Hardy)
Donald Hoel was an attorney with Philip Morris' law firm Shook Hardy and Bacon (SHB). He served as a member of the CTR Industry Research Committee in 1978?. Hoel assisted in screening "apppropriate" projects to received CTR funding.
Type
LETT, LETTER
Subject
research activity
safer cigarette
carcinogen

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: big68e00 Log in for more options!
T0: r1. HOLTZ;i~'J QO~+t1.L~? . EL OCTOBER 12, 1979 M4.'~UTTCYd Dear i7r. Adlkofer. This letter refers to the oamvis`aticm that yut: and I h2d oa Septa:ber 27th, 1979, with Drs. Zaenig and ftuedaier and in 1hiC!] it'Q diShcssed the for me essential expeTimeJlts oU dos~.' effect re2atic:nshipps of hi& tar c.igarettes coVared to Im tar cig.u,ettes. Sh~ aacperfin*ats are oaVIetely 3ndispen=ble in the argurmnta on a s4fer cigarette, especii2ly ff oee sWports svrb efftrts publicly. In our coa%vrsaticn it xas s,rgued that the Industry oQuld mt strpport such enwiments sinoe this odgbt prove that tde previously nranufactured products have a carcfnogeaic effect and- that such "aertrnents could egecially mt be supported because they wcwld be finar%ced vrith Ir4A-try fimds. I uo totaliy uaLble to iclZox tbese argsmmta. Eslrecially, since, for exaVle, in tbs- toimer Doaten~~il1 Institute atcb dose effect relationshxps ~re Already investigated and wire finanaed by the Industry. The awe app]ies to tlxt detafled fnYestigatians by 1dr. Lee st the BAT Research Institute in Eng2and, wbich ~dre likewise i1rausoatl by the Irniustrry. 7herefore the argrments made by Drs. Koenig aaad 8rueckner do not bo2d. I aa.nt to tell pau again that In case this project, wbicb is essential frana asy point as sial as for the other manbers of the Rosmrcb Adti'i.%ry BvaA, ts irefused sWpoart by the Industry, I will carry cut SUcb iMs#isations in my Institntie tn my avn-aammt; in that c,aso I will, In or publication of this wx*, ca2l a"spade a qxuW*; this r~eaaa I will rnma the bearWW currently an the mLTket-- wchich sere wsed to prepm the amoke candematea. +ftM uses a Gmman oa Ivquia A. .;hich liteyaIly traasLtes "I IY-idMtlf;-k=v andr rider'", .hich In CGen=n is - at lemst Wicitly - a DIt moye .threntenirg tlAD just miV brand nemes.
Page 2: big68e00 Log in for more options!
Page twD of twa It is self evidaat that if such experiments are carried out in , Heidelberg, they will be aone witlaut beir.g inf luenced by the Sci eat if ic Ad'visDry Hoard or by paw Industry, and that I+ril Z caly test vibat 3nterests me,- i.e., the dose reWonse relaticr- sh.ips of the differ"t amarn10of aon&nsates, .vithaut testing cuestions pvu aane interested in, i.e., the effect of nieotine. 7bese experimhpts whic5 I.eant to carry out arod AAch I have requested yui.to approre for we to do for about vne and a n:a f years, will help to grme the c,arrectne^,s of the aWrmch taken by the Scientific advi.saary Boa.rd with rele:rence to the pramtioA of loar tar cigar+ettes. IM taftlly at x loss to undeistaud tiAt these aMunents are uot aaoept.ed by the Industiy, becmuse V-ey are designed to da• tbat we axe on the aay to prc7ftce som~tAW better. Your attitude wwld iaditzte a.rillingness on the part of the Industry to no lcrge+r follow this approxch wbich the Industry Itse2.f had partiaipatted In initiating auad tad prc7oted ancd sWported. - I arn asMmg you mast aWbatisallyr that you support i n the omirg meeting of Octcber 1ft. a very early start of the orperimmts outlined. I wonZd be grateful to yvu if you cx5uld advise me after the weeting tn the •ay the disou,ssioas weaat. (sdaaefi.1) P.S.: With referm" to dates for organizing the mar Scientific . Advisos7 Board, I rrould avggest January 22. or Jarma.ry 25,1980. N - - O - F-~ . ~ O O GD 0? ~
Page 3: big68e00 Log in for more options!
---

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: