Abstract
This 1981 Philip Morris (PM) marketing research report discusses the importance of teenage smokers as young as 12 to PM's financial future. It has been used as a trial exhibit in Florida, Missouri, Minnesota, and Texas. The document discusses smoking rates among children as young as 12. It was authored by Myron Johnston of PM's marketing research department, and was approved by Carolyn J. Levy, who in the mid-1990s was appointed to head PM's Youth Smoking Prevention Department.
Johnston states,
"For over fifteen years certain demographic and social trends have been moving in a direction favorable to industry growth. No, one by one, these powerful social and demographic factors are turning against us...
The trends are:
1. After increasing for over a decade, the prevalence of teenage smoking is now declining sharply.
2. After increasing for over a decade, the average daily consumption of teenage smokers is declining sharply....
...While this news is not good for the industry, I believe we can use these data and other data I plan to report on to good advantage in order to minimize the adverse effect on Philip Morris."
Johnston concludes that "the industry can no longer rely on an ever increasing pool of teenage smokers to replace adult smokers lost through natural attrition."
He says, "It is important to know as much as possible about teenage smoking patterns and attitudes. Today's teenager is tomorrow's potential regular customer, and the overwhelming majority of smokers first begin to smoke while still in their teens..." Johnston concludes that peer pressure among teens NOT to smoke is a major reason why so many teenagers were staying nonsmokers, and states that perceived peer disapproval of teenage smoking had increased sharply in 1980. He also attributes this public health success "in large part to the anti-smoking propaganda," which had apparently been successful in convincing teens that they incur great risk from smoking. The document clearly portrays the decline in teenage smokers as a threat to the industry, and discusses positioning Philip Morris to incur the least harm by gaining the most market share. This document may indicate reasons why PM became such an aggressive company at gaining market share worldwide.
The document shows the importance of young smokers to the industry and particularly to Philip Morris, who manufactures the leading starter brand among youth(Marlboro). It also shows how well public health efforts to cut smoking were working (particularly among youth) prior to the industry's becoming involved in youth smoking prevention issues (in the mid-1980s). It also shows the importance to the industry of continuing to collect data on trends, attitudes and preferences among youth, which the industry's current multitude of "youth smoking prevention" programs now allows them to do openly.
Fields
- Notes
This document was first posted to Doc-Alert in 1980. The links have been updated. Thanks to Kirsten Nielsen for suggesting a re-post.
- Quotes
For over fifteen years certain demographic and social trends have been moving in directions favorable to industry growth. Now, one by one, these powerful social and demographic factors are turning against us, and by 1985 all will be operating against us.
The trends are:
1. After increasing for over a decade, the prevalence of teenage smoking is now declining sharply.
2. After increasing for over a decade, the average daily consumption of teenage smokers is declining sharply.
3. After increasing 18 percent from 1967 to 1976, the absolute number of 15-19 year-olds will decline 19 percent during the 1980s, with the period of sharpest decline beginning in 1981.
4. Beginning in 1981 the absolute number of 20-24 year-olds (the ages during which average dai1y cigarette consumption increases most rapidly) will begin to decline, after increasing for the past 20 years.
5. For the first time in a decade of polling, average daily cigarette consumption as reported on the National Panel has declined.
6. In 1985, after declining for nearly a decade, the number of people in the age group most disposed to quit smoking (ages 45-54) will begin to increase dramatically.
It is inevitable therefore, that industry sales Will begin to decline within the next few years. Thus, Philip Morris USA can sustain its past rate of growth only by an acceleration of the rate of increase in market share. While this news is not good for the industry, I believe we can use these data and other data I plan to report on to good advantage in order to minimize the adverse effect on Philip Morris.
This report deals with only one of these trends--teenage smoking and attitudes toward smoking, together with related demographics. Subsequent reports will cover the social, economic and psychographic characteristics of teenage smokers and the demographics of other significant age groups. Because the major data sources have just become available, and because of the importance of these data to the company, I have elected to report the data in a series of memoranda rather than wait andi issue all of the material at once.
[From the Summary, on Page 1000390808]:
It is important to know as much as possible about teenage smoking patterns and attitudes. Today's teenager is tomorrow's potential regular cusomter, and the overwhelming majority of smokers first begin to smoke while still in their teens. In addition, the ten years following the teenage years is the period during which average daily consumption per smoker increases to the average adult level. The smoking patterns of teenagers are particularly important to Philip Morris...Furthermore, it is during the teenage years that the initial brand choice is made: At least part of the success of Marlboro Red during its most rapid growth period was because it became THE brand of choice among teenagers who then stuck with it as they grew older. Bewteen 1967 and 1976 thenumber of 15-19 year olds in the U.S. increased 18 percent, and there was also an increase during at least part of that period in the percent of teenagers who smoked cigarettes...Average daily consumption of these young smokers also increased, so that between 1968 and 1974 the number of 12-18 year olds who smoked ten or more cigarettes per day more than doubles. Industry sales were also aided by the fact that this period was one of rapid increase in the number of people aged 20-24 - ages during which average daily consumption increases...Beginning in 1985 there will be ain increase...in the number of people reaching ages at which people typically begin to quit smoking or cut down (ages 45-54). We will no longer be able to rely on a rapidly increasing pool of teenagers from which to replace smokers lost through normal attrition...
...Because of our high share of the market among the youngest smokers, Philip Morris will suffer more than the other companies from the decline in the number of teenage smokers...
[From Page 1000390827]:
Reasons for the Decline in Teenage Smoking
There is no question but that peer pressure is important in influencing the young not to begin smoking. A decade and more ago it was a major reason why teenagers began to smoke. Now it is a major reason for their not beginning to smoke. Perceived parental disapproval of teenage smoking has remained constant over the past five years, as has the level, of teenagers' own disapproval of adult smoking. Perceived peer disapproval of teenage smoking, however, has increased sharply in 1980 (Chart 16). This decline in teenage smoking is also attributable in large part to the anti-smoking propaganda: The high school seniors were asked "How much do you think people risk harming themselves (physically or in others ways), if they...Smoke one or more packs of cigarettes per day." The percent answering "great risk" increased from 51 percent in 1975 to 65 percent in 1980, with the sharpest increases in 1976 and 1979. The perceived risk of smoking one or more packs of cigarettes per day is now 20 percentage points higher than the perceived risk of smoking marihuana regularly, and is higher than the perceived risk of trying heroin once or twice (Chart 17).
- Company
- Philip Morris
- Author
- Daniel, Harry G. (PM R&D Planning Coordinator c. 1975-82)
Research Professional
- Johnston, Myron E., Jr. (PM Marketing researcher)
- Levy, Carolyn J., Ph.D. (PM Youth Smoking Prevention Sr.VP (1998-2002))
Carolyn Levy is a long time Philip Morris scientist who has intimate knowledge of smoker behavior, psychology and PM's addiction studies. Studied and reported at PM on smoker psychology, 1974-75. Studied the role of nicotine in reinforcing smoker behavior in 1976 (1003293201). Levy also has knowledge of the importance of the youth market to future cigarette sales. In a Mar. 31, 1981 PM report Levy wrote, "Today's teenager is tomorrow's potential regular customer...The smoking patterns of teenagers are particularly important to Philip Morris." (1003636640) Appointed Assistant Director of Consumer Research at PM in 1988; Sr. VP Marketing and Sales Information in 1995; Was Sr. VP of PM's Youth Smoking Prevention Programs 1998.
- Recipient
- Daniel, Harry G. (PM R&D Planning Coordinator c. 1975-82)
Research Professional
- Goodale, Thomas T. (PM Marketing Mgmt., Marketing Services 1977-93)
(PMI's Introduction to Privilege Log and Glossary of Names, Estate of Burl Butler v. PMI, et al, April 19, 1996)
- Levy, Carolyn J., Ph.D. (PM Youth Smoking Prevention Sr.VP (1998-2002))
Carolyn Levy is a long time Philip Morris scientist who has intimate knowledge of smoker behavior, psychology and PM's addiction studies. Studied and reported at PM on smoker psychology, 1974-75. Studied the role of nicotine in reinforcing smoker behavior in 1976 (1003293201). Levy also has knowledge of the importance of the youth market to future cigarette sales. In a Mar. 31, 1981 PM report Levy wrote, "Today's teenager is tomorrow's potential regular customer...The smoking patterns of teenagers are particularly important to Philip Morris." (1003636640) Appointed Assistant Director of Consumer Research at PM in 1988; Sr. VP Marketing and Sales Information in 1995; Was Sr. VP of PM's Youth Smoking Prevention Programs 1998.
- Meyer, L.
- Thomson, R.
- Zoler, Jon N. (PM Director of Marketing Research, c. 1982)
- Region
- United States
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Broi/Trial Exhibit
- Flag/Trial Exhibit P-2033
- Morm/Trial Exhibit
- Stmn/Trial Exhibit P-10339
- Txag/Trial Exhibit P-12354
- Txag/Trial Exhibit P-2033
- Stmn/Selected
- Named Organization
- Chilton Research Services
- Natl Clearing House on Smoking & He
- Natl Inst of Education
- SGC, Surgeon General's (Advisory) Comm
- Survey Research Center Univ of Mi
- Univ of Ca
- Univ of Richmond
- Type
- MRRT, MARKET RESEARCH REPORT
- CHAR, CHART/GRAPH
- Subject
- youth
- youth initiation
- target market
- Target/Youth (pre-18) (Target Groups)
- market forecast
- market segment
- market trend
- marketing research
- smoking initiation
- smoking prevalence
Document Images
Page 1: ftu74e00
Accession No. 81-081
Copy No.
Issue&To
. TYPE REPORT: OANNUAL OSEMIANNUAL O COMPLETION QSPECIAL
DATE: March 31, 1981 PERIOD COVERED:
,.f
C
I
I,
REPORT TITLE:
WRITTEN BY
Young Smokers
Prevalence, Trends, Implications,
and Related'Demographic Trends
~
My E. J on
APPROVED BY `ev
,
Harry G. Daniel Carolyn J. Levy
DISTRIBUTION:
Mr. R. Thomson Mr. J. Zoler (NYO)
Mr. H. Daniel Mr. T. Goodale (NYO)
Dr. C. Levy
Mr. L. Meyer
KEYWORDS:
Smoking Prevalence, Youth, Young Smokers
Demographic Trends
i
_4
;
v fi
a~
Page 2: ftu74e00
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
RICHMOND, VIRGINfA
r
F
F
F
F
I
I
I
L
L
i
L
To:
From:
Su b j'ect:
Dr. Robert B. Seligman
. Myron Johnston
Date: March 31, 1981
Young Smokers -- Prevalence, Trends, Implications,
andiReliated Demographic Trends
For over fifteen years certain demographic and social trends have been moving
in directions favorable to industry growth. Nbw, one by one, these powerful
social and demographic factors are turning against us, and by 1985 all will be
operating against us.
The trends are:
1. After increasing for over a decade, the prevalence of teenage smoking is now
declining sharply.
2. After increasing for over a decade, the average daily consumption of teenage
smokers is declining.
3. After increasing 18 percent from 1967 to
1976, the absolute number of 15-19
year-olds will decline 19 percent during the 1980"s, with the period of
sharpest decline beginning in 1981.
4. Beginning in 1981 the absolute number of 20-24 year-olds (the ages duringg
which average daily cigarette consumption increases most rapidly)
will begin to decline, after increasing for the past 20 years.
5. For the first time in a decade of polling, average daily cigarette
consumption as reported on the National Panel has declined.
6. In 1985, after declining for nearly a decade, the number of people in the
age group most disposed to quit smoking (ages 45-54) will begin to increase
dramatically.
-1-
1U"C+:s9OS05
I

Page 3: ftu74e00
F
F
F
IT
F
F
I
I
F
I-
L
I-
I.
I
I
-2-
It is inevitable therefore, that industry sales will begin to decline within the
next few years. Thus, Philip Morris USA can sustain its past rate of growth
only by an acceleration of the rate of increase in market share. While this
news is not good for the industry, I believe we can use these data and other
data I plan to report on to good advantage in order to minimize the adverse
.eff ect on Philip Morris.
This report deals with only one of these trends-teenage smoking and
attitudes toward smoking, together with related demographics. Subsequent
reports will cover the social, economic and psychographic characteristics of
teenage smokers and the demographics of other significant age groups.
Because the major data: sources have just become available, and because of the
importance of these data to the company, I have elected to report the data in a
series of memoranda rather than wait and issue all of the material at once.
MEJ:yl
Attachments
CC: Mr. R. Thomson Mr. J. Zoler (NYO)
Mr.
Dr.
Mr. H.
C.
L. Daniel
Levy
Meyer Mr. T. Goodale (NYO)
C
I
I
I
.. w.>~.:
.~.,.,_ .,_ ... _ .... . .. _,..w::.~..t;::~......

Page 4: ftu74e00
Page
1
Teenage Smoking Prevalence 1968 -1974 3
I
I
I
I
I
~
L
Teenage Smoking Prevalence 1975 -1980
Smoking Prevalance and Educational Aspirations 8
Race Differences in Smoking Prevalence 12
Regional Differences in Smoking Prevalence 16
Future Smoking Expectations 18
Reasons for the Decline in Teenage Smoking 20
Conclusions and Implications 21
Plans 22
Attachment A
Description of Data Sources
Attachment B
Charts
k
.
Page 5: ftu74e00
Summary
It is important to know as much as possible about teenage smoking patterns and
attitudes. 'Poday's teenager is tomorrow's potential regular customer, and
overwhelming,majority of smokers first begin to smoke while still in their ;:
during which average daily consumption per smoker increases to the average adult
teens. In addition, the ten years following the teenage years is the period
level. The smoking natterns of teenagers are particularly important to PhiLip a~
~~
X~ ~a3 ~
.. :~ t r,~
Morris: Of the eleven packings of which the median age of smokers is under age ',,I
30, seven are Philip Morris packings, and the share index is highest in the
youngest age group for all Marlboro and Virginia Slims packings an& for B&H
Lights and Menthol.
Furthermore, it is during the teenage years that the initial brand choice is
I
I
~
I-
~
1:
t
made: At least a Dart of the success of' Marlboro Red durinQ its most rapid
growth period was because it became the brand of choice among teenagers who then
stuck with it as they grew older - this combined with the rapid growth in the
absolute number of teenagers. Between 1967 and 1976 the number of 15-19
year-olds in the U.S. increased 18 percent, and there was also an increase
during at least part of that period in the percent of teenagers who smoked
cigarettes.
Average daily consumption of these young,smokers also increased, so that between~
1968 and 1974 the number of 12-18 year-olds who smoked ten or more cigarettes
per day more than doubled. Industry sales were also aided by the fact that this
periodwas one of rapid increase in the number of people aged 20 to 24 - ages
during which average daily consumptionlincreases.
The prevalence of teenage smoking peaked in 1976-77 and is now declining.
Furthermore, the number of 15-19 year-oldis also peaked in 1976 and will decline
19 percent during the next decade.
.
The effect of this decline in the prevalence of teenage smoking will not become
apparent for a few years. It will continue to be masked by the fact that there
will be a continued increase in the number of smokers in their 20's who have
high prevalence rates and are reaching ages at which the average daily
consumption per smoker is near its maximum. In addition, the number of people
reaching the prime quitting ages (ages 45-54) will continue to be low as a
result of the small number of births during the Depression.

Page 6: ftu74e00
El
Chart 1). There will be a decline in the number of people, and an even greater
In a very few years, however, there will be a reversal of these trends (see
consumotion normally increases - the number of 20-24 year-olds will peak in
decline in~ the number of smokers, in the age group in which average daily
increase (which too will accelerate) in the number of people reaching the ages ;
1981, and then begin an accelerating decline. Beginning in 1985 there will be an
at which people typically begin, to quit smoking or cut down (ages 45-54). We
I
I
I
F
L
[
I
I
L
will no longer be able to rely on a rapidly increasing pooL of teenagers from
which to replace smokers lost through normal attrition.
The decline in the prevalence of teenage smoking has been sharper among boys
than among girls, and now more girls than boys smoke cigarettes. The decline in
teenage smoking has been particularly pronounced among blacks, which may account
for the decline in Kool's market share. The Northeast has the highest
prevalence of teenage smoking and the West has the lowest. Between 1975 and
1979 the proportion of teenagers who say they "definitely will not" be smoking
five years hence has increased dramatically. The major reasons for the decline
are the perceived health~hazards of smoking and peer pressure not to smoke.
appear to be the least vulnerable of all the companies, as will be discussed
later in this report.
Because of our high share of the market among the youngest smokers, Philip
Morris will suffer more than the other companies from the decline in the number
of teenage smokers. For at least the next decade, however, the populatiom
trends will have a much more powerful influence, and in this regard we would
.

Page 7: ftu74e00
F
F
U
I
[
I
I
L
L
I
l
L
I
L
The best data.I have on the overall prevalence of teenage smoking for the
.. ..,. ., .. . ,. . ,
1968-74 period comes from studies conducted by Chilton Research Services
Teenage Smoking Prevalence 1968-1974
f or the National Clearinghouse on Smoking and Health:
M1 TABLE 1
Percent who are "Current Regular Smokers"* by age, 1968-1974
1968 1.8 13.3 24.4
1970 4.4 17.0 30.0
1972 3.7 17.0 27.8
1974 4.6 19.2 28.4
*A current regular smoker was defined as someone who smoked' one or
more cigarettes per week.
Among boys, smoking prevalence increased from 1968 to 1970, declined from 1970
to 1972, and then remained essentially constant through 1974. There was a
steady and dramatic increase in the number of girls who started smoking, as
shown in Table 2.
TABLE' 2~
Percent of 15-18 year-olds
who were "Current Regular Smokers"
1968 - 1974 !
Boys Girls Total N
~
1968 23.6 14.1 18.8
~
1970 28'.4 18.6 23.5 C.!
~
1972' 24.0 20.8 22.4
~
1974 24.6 23.0 23'.8 N
0
Page 8: ftu74e00
4
Because the absolute number of 15-19'year-olds increased 14 percent from 1968 to:
1974, the number of teenage smokers increased~ 44 percent during this period'.
There was also an increase in the number of cigarettes these young
smokers smoked, and between 1968 and 1974 the percent of young smokers
who smoked 10 or more cigarettes per day nearly doublied, as shown in Table 3
bel'ow. Here too, the increase among gi'rls was much greater thanithat amongg
boys.
TABLE 3
Percent of All 12-18 year-olds
Who Smoked 10 or More Cigarettes per Day
Boys - Girls Total
1968 6.7 3.3 5.0
1970 8.0: 5.2 6.6
1972 8.5 6.3 7.4
1974 10.6 8.6 9.6
Again, because of the increase in the absolute number of teenagers, the number
who smoked a halif-pack or more per day increased 120 percent.
Teenage Smoking Prevalence 1975-1980
Until;very recently there have been no good data on teenage cigarette smoking
for the years after 1974. I have recentlry come upon two excellent sources of
data on cigarette smoking. The most useful data are from the Survey Research
Center at the University of Michigan. Each spring since 1975 questionnaires
have been administered to~hi'lgh school seniors in selected schools throughout the
country. The response rate has ranged from 77 to~85 percent and the total
sample size from 15,0001to 19',000 (:A complete description is contained'lin~
Attachment A). The major shortcoming of the data is that they do not include
the approximately 15-20 percent of American youth who drop out of school', beflore
the spring of their senior year in highischool. More informatibn will be givem
later about this group.
i

Page 9: ftu74e00
I
U
I
IT
I
t
I
I
L
t
~
t
l
The striking thing is that, by whatever measure is used to describe smoking
status, the percent of high school seniors who smoke is declining. While the
percentage of seniors who have ever smoked declined significantly only in the
1978-1979 and 1979-1980 time periods, there have been substantial declines
since 1977 in all of the other measures of smoking status. Table 4 shows the
various measures of cigarette smoking prevalence. Chart 2 shows the
percent who smoke& at all in the 30 days prior to the survey, and the percent
who smoked one or more; ten or more, and 20 or more cigarettes during that
30-day perio& Chart 3 shows the percent of high school seniors who reported
that they were current regular smokers and the total percentage of those
reporting that they were current regular and current occasional smokers.
Clearly, by whatever measure is used to assess smoking prevalence, it peaked
in 1976 and' 1977 and then began an acceLerating decline.
TABLE 4
Percent of Seniors who Ever Smoked, Ever Smoked Daily, and'
Quantity Smoked in Past 30 Days
Class Class Class Class Class Class
of 1975 of 1976 of 1977 of 1978 of 1979 of 1980
Ever Smoked 73.7 75.4b 75.8 75.3 74.0b 71.0a
Smoked in last 30 days 36.8 38.8b 38.5 36.7a 34.4a' 30.5a
One or more per day 27.0 28.7b 29.0 27.5b 25.3a' 21.3a
Ten or more per day 18.0 19.1c 19.3 18'.5 16.4a 14.3a
20 or more per day 9.7 9.9 10.4 9.7c 8.4a 7.4a
Self-definition:
Current Regular Smoker 22.0 23.5b' 23.9 22.8c 20.3a 17.4a
Current Regular or
Occasional Smoker 38.4 40,.4b 40.2 39.Oc 36.8a 32.9a
N 10,100 14,600 . 15,500 18,450 16,200 16,500
aSignificantly different from preceding year p<.00'1
bSigni~ficantly diff erent from preceding year p<.01
cSignificantly different from preceding year p<.05
The decLilne in the percent of high schooll seniors who smoke has been most
pronounced among males, and began a year earlier among males than females, as
shown in Table 5 and Chart 4. In addition, the females now report that they
smoke more cigarettes per day than do the males.
_f i_?9.a
2

Page 10: ftu74e00
F
F
IT
IT
IT
I
(
I
L
i
t
[
I
~
I
L
L
TABLE 5
Percent of Seniors by Smoking Status, by Sex 1975-1980
6
Class Class Class Class Class Class
of 1975 of 1976 of 1977 of 1978 of 1979 of 1980
Have Smoked
in Last 30 Days
Male 37.4 37.7 36.7 34.5 31.2 26.8
Female 35.9 39.1 39.7 38.1 37.1 33.4
Smoked One or More
Cigarettes/day
in:Last 30 Days
Male 27.1 27.9 27.3 26.0 22.3
Female 26.3 28.8 30.1 28.2 27.8
18.6
23.4
Smoked 10 or More
Cigarettes/day
in Last 30'Days
Male 19.8 19.8 19.9 19.0 15.4 13.5
Female 16.1 18.0 19.0 18.0 17.1 14.7
Self-definition ,
Ctirrent Regular Smoker
Male 22.5 22.5 22.1 21.1 17.4 15.0
Female 21.5 24.1 25.2 24.0 22.5 19.2
Self-def inition
Current Regular or
Occasional Smoker
Male 38.8 38.9 38.4 36.3 33.2 29.3
Female 37.6 41.4 41.6 41.2 39.6 35.7
1000390813
Changes have also occurred in the
ages at which these high school seniors begin,
to smoke on a:daily basis. In 1976 more boys than girls smoked'n in all grades
to grade 12, when the percent of girls who smoked.daily exceeded that of the
boys. In 1979, by contrast, smoking by girls exceeded that of boys
beginning in the 9th grade. For both sexes the modal grades of initiationlof
smoking has remaine&grade 9, but between 1976 and 1979 there has been an
increase in the smoking incidence of seventh and eighth graders--dramatically
in the case of the girls. Data are shown in Table 6 andChart 5.
up
so
I
