Jump to:

Anne Landman's Collection

8102 Young Smokers Prevalence, Trends, Implications, and Related Demographics

Date: 31 Mar 1981
Length: 53 pages
1000390803-1000390855
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 1000390803-1000390855

Abstract

This 1981 Philip Morris (PM) marketing research report discusses the importance of teenage smokers as young as 12 to PM's financial future. It has been used as a trial exhibit in Florida, Missouri, Minnesota, and Texas. The document discusses smoking rates among children as young as 12. It was authored by Myron Johnston of PM's marketing research department, and was approved by Carolyn J. Levy, who in the mid-1990s was appointed to head PM's Youth Smoking Prevention Department. Johnston states,

"For over fifteen years certain demographic and social trends have been moving in a direction favorable to industry growth. No, one by one, these powerful social and demographic factors are turning against us...

The trends are:

1. After increasing for over a decade, the prevalence of teenage smoking is now declining sharply.

2. After increasing for over a decade, the average daily consumption of teenage smokers is declining sharply....

...While this news is not good for the industry, I believe we can use these data and other data I plan to report on to good advantage in order to minimize the adverse effect on Philip Morris."

Johnston concludes that "the industry can no longer rely on an ever increasing pool of teenage smokers to replace adult smokers lost through natural attrition."

He says, "It is important to know as much as possible about teenage smoking patterns and attitudes. Today's teenager is tomorrow's potential regular customer, and the overwhelming majority of smokers first begin to smoke while still in their teens..." Johnston concludes that peer pressure among teens NOT to smoke is a major reason why so many teenagers were staying nonsmokers, and states that perceived peer disapproval of teenage smoking had increased sharply in 1980. He also attributes this public health success "in large part to the anti-smoking propaganda," which had apparently been successful in convincing teens that they incur great risk from smoking. The document clearly portrays the decline in teenage smokers as a threat to the industry, and discusses positioning Philip Morris to incur the least harm by gaining the most market share. This document may indicate reasons why PM became such an aggressive company at gaining market share worldwide.

The document shows the importance of young smokers to the industry and particularly to Philip Morris, who manufactures the leading starter brand among youth(Marlboro). It also shows how well public health efforts to cut smoking were working (particularly among youth) prior to the industry's becoming involved in youth smoking prevention issues (in the mid-1980s). It also shows the importance to the industry of continuing to collect data on trends, attitudes and preferences among youth, which the industry's current multitude of "youth smoking prevention" programs now allows them to do openly.

Fields

Notes

This document was first posted to Doc-Alert in 1980. The links have been updated. Thanks to Kirsten Nielsen for suggesting a re-post.

Quotes

For over fifteen years certain demographic and social trends have been moving in directions favorable to industry growth. Now, one by one, these powerful social and demographic factors are turning against us, and by 1985 all will be operating against us.

The trends are:

1. After increasing for over a decade, the prevalence of teenage smoking is now declining sharply.

2. After increasing for over a decade, the average daily consumption of teenage smokers is declining sharply.

3. After increasing 18 percent from 1967 to 1976, the absolute number of 15-19 year-olds will decline 19 percent during the 1980s, with the period of sharpest decline beginning in 1981.

4. Beginning in 1981 the absolute number of 20-24 year-olds (the ages during which average dai1y cigarette consumption increases most rapidly) will begin to decline, after increasing for the past 20 years.

5. For the first time in a decade of polling, average daily cigarette consumption as reported on the National Panel has declined.

6. In 1985, after declining for nearly a decade, the number of people in the age group most disposed to quit smoking (ages 45-54) will begin to increase dramatically.

It is inevitable therefore, that industry sales Will begin to decline within the next few years. Thus, Philip Morris USA can sustain its past rate of growth only by an acceleration of the rate of increase in market share. While this news is not good for the industry, I believe we can use these data and other data I plan to report on to good advantage in order to minimize the adverse effect on Philip Morris.

This report deals with only one of these trends--teenage smoking and attitudes toward smoking, together with related demographics. Subsequent reports will cover the social, economic and psychographic characteristics of teenage smokers and the demographics of other significant age groups. Because the major data sources have just become available, and because of the importance of these data to the company, I have elected to report the data in a series of memoranda rather than wait andi issue all of the material at once.

[From the Summary, on Page 1000390808]:

It is important to know as much as possible about teenage smoking patterns and attitudes. Today's teenager is tomorrow's potential regular cusomter, and the overwhelming majority of smokers first begin to smoke while still in their teens. In addition, the ten years following the teenage years is the period during which average daily consumption per smoker increases to the average adult level. The smoking patterns of teenagers are particularly important to Philip Morris...Furthermore, it is during the teenage years that the initial brand choice is made: At least part of the success of Marlboro Red during its most rapid growth period was because it became THE brand of choice among teenagers who then stuck with it as they grew older. Bewteen 1967 and 1976 thenumber of 15-19 year olds in the U.S. increased 18 percent, and there was also an increase during at least part of that period in the percent of teenagers who smoked cigarettes...Average daily consumption of these young smokers also increased, so that between 1968 and 1974 the number of 12-18 year olds who smoked ten or more cigarettes per day more than doubles. Industry sales were also aided by the fact that this period was one of rapid increase in the number of people aged 20-24 - ages during which average daily consumption increases...Beginning in 1985 there will be ain increase...in the number of people reaching ages at which people typically begin to quit smoking or cut down (ages 45-54). We will no longer be able to rely on a rapidly increasing pool of teenagers from which to replace smokers lost through normal attrition...

...Because of our high share of the market among the youngest smokers, Philip Morris will suffer more than the other companies from the decline in the number of teenage smokers...

[From Page 1000390827]:

Reasons for the Decline in Teenage Smoking

There is no question but that peer pressure is important in influencing the young not to begin smoking. A decade and more ago it was a major reason why teenagers began to smoke. Now it is a major reason for their not beginning to smoke. Perceived parental disapproval of teenage smoking has remained constant over the past five years, as has the level, of teenagers' own disapproval of adult smoking. Perceived peer disapproval of teenage smoking, however, has increased sharply in 1980 (Chart 16). This decline in teenage smoking is also attributable in large part to the anti-smoking propaganda: The high school seniors were asked "How much do you think people risk harming themselves (physically or in others ways), if they...Smoke one or more packs of cigarettes per day." The percent answering "great risk" increased from 51 percent in 1975 to 65 percent in 1980, with the sharpest increases in 1976 and 1979. The perceived risk of smoking one or more packs of cigarettes per day is now 20 percentage points higher than the perceived risk of smoking marihuana regularly, and is higher than the perceived risk of trying heroin once or twice (Chart 17).

Company
Philip Morris
Author
Daniel, Harry G. (PM R&D Planning Coordinator c. 1975-82)
Research Professional
Johnston, Myron E., Jr. (PM Marketing researcher)
Levy, Carolyn J., Ph.D. (PM Youth Smoking Prevention Sr.VP (1998-2002))
Carolyn Levy is a long time Philip Morris scientist who has intimate knowledge of smoker behavior, psychology and PM's addiction studies. Studied and reported at PM on smoker psychology, 1974-75. Studied the role of nicotine in reinforcing smoker behavior in 1976 (1003293201). Levy also has knowledge of the importance of the youth market to future cigarette sales. In a Mar. 31, 1981 PM report Levy wrote, "Today's teenager is tomorrow's potential regular customer...The smoking patterns of teenagers are particularly important to Philip Morris." (1003636640) Appointed Assistant Director of Consumer Research at PM in 1988; Sr. VP Marketing and Sales Information in 1995; Was Sr. VP of PM's Youth Smoking Prevention Programs 1998.
Recipient
Daniel, Harry G. (PM R&D Planning Coordinator c. 1975-82)
Research Professional
Goodale, Thomas T. (PM Marketing Mgmt., Marketing Services 1977-93)
(PMI's Introduction to Privilege Log and Glossary of Names, Estate of Burl Butler v. PMI, et al, April 19, 1996)
Levy, Carolyn J., Ph.D. (PM Youth Smoking Prevention Sr.VP (1998-2002))
Carolyn Levy is a long time Philip Morris scientist who has intimate knowledge of smoker behavior, psychology and PM's addiction studies. Studied and reported at PM on smoker psychology, 1974-75. Studied the role of nicotine in reinforcing smoker behavior in 1976 (1003293201). Levy also has knowledge of the importance of the youth market to future cigarette sales. In a Mar. 31, 1981 PM report Levy wrote, "Today's teenager is tomorrow's potential regular customer...The smoking patterns of teenagers are particularly important to Philip Morris." (1003636640) Appointed Assistant Director of Consumer Research at PM in 1988; Sr. VP Marketing and Sales Information in 1995; Was Sr. VP of PM's Youth Smoking Prevention Programs 1998.
Meyer, L.
Thomson, R.
Zoler, Jon N. (PM Director of Marketing Research, c. 1982)
Region
United States
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Broi/Trial Exhibit
Flag/Trial Exhibit P-2033
Morm/Trial Exhibit
Stmn/Trial Exhibit P-10339
Txag/Trial Exhibit P-12354
Txag/Trial Exhibit P-2033
Stmn/Selected
Named Organization
Chilton Research Services
Natl Clearing House on Smoking & He
Natl Inst of Education
SGC, Surgeon General's (Advisory) Comm
Survey Research Center Univ of Mi
Univ of Ca
Univ of Richmond
Type
MRRT, MARKET RESEARCH REPORT
CHAR, CHART/GRAPH
Subject
youth
youth initiation
target market
Target/Youth (pre-18) (Target Groups)
market forecast
market segment
market trend
marketing research
smoking initiation
smoking prevalence

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: ftu74e00
Accession No. 81-081 Copy No. Issue&To . TYPE REPORT: OANNUAL OSEMIANNUAL O COMPLETION QSPECIAL DATE: March 31, 1981 PERIOD COVERED: ,.f C I I, REPORT TITLE: WRITTEN BY Young Smokers Prevalence, Trends, Implications, and Related'Demographic Trends ~ My E. J on APPROVED BY `ev , Harry G. Daniel Carolyn J. Levy DISTRIBUTION: Mr. R. Thomson Mr. J. Zoler (NYO) Mr. H. Daniel Mr. T. Goodale (NYO) Dr. C. Levy Mr. L. Meyer KEYWORDS: Smoking Prevalence, Youth, Young Smokers Demographic Trends i _4 ; v fi a~
Page 2: ftu74e00
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A. INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE RICHMOND, VIRGINfA r F F F F I I I L L i L To: From: Su b j'ect: Dr. Robert B. Seligman . Myron Johnston Date: March 31, 1981 Young Smokers -- Prevalence, Trends, Implications, andiReliated Demographic Trends For over fifteen years certain demographic and social trends have been moving in directions favorable to industry growth. Nbw, one by one, these powerful social and demographic factors are turning against us, and by 1985 all will be operating against us. The trends are: 1. After increasing for over a decade, the prevalence of teenage smoking is now declining sharply. 2. After increasing for over a decade, the average daily consumption of teenage smokers is declining. 3. After increasing 18 percent from 1967 to 1976, the absolute number of 15-19 year-olds will decline 19 percent during the 1980"s, with the period of sharpest decline beginning in 1981. 4. Beginning in 1981 the absolute number of 20-24 year-olds (the ages duringg which average daily cigarette consumption increases most rapidly) will begin to decline, after increasing for the past 20 years. 5. For the first time in a decade of polling, average daily cigarette consumption as reported on the National Panel has declined. 6. In 1985, after declining for nearly a decade, the number of people in the age group most disposed to quit smoking (ages 45-54) will begin to increase dramatically. -1- 1U"C+:s9OS05 I
Page 3: ftu74e00
F F F IT F F I I F I- L I- I. I I -2- It is inevitable therefore, that industry sales will begin to decline within the next few years. Thus, Philip Morris USA can sustain its past rate of growth only by an acceleration of the rate of increase in market share. While this news is not good for the industry, I believe we can use these data and other data I plan to report on to good advantage in order to minimize the adverse .eff ect on Philip Morris. This report deals with only one of these trends-teenage smoking and attitudes toward smoking, together with related demographics. Subsequent reports will cover the social, economic and psychographic characteristics of teenage smokers and the demographics of other significant age groups. Because the major data: sources have just become available, and because of the importance of these data to the company, I have elected to report the data in a series of memoranda rather than wait and issue all of the material at once. MEJ:yl Attachments CC: Mr. R. Thomson Mr. J. Zoler (NYO) Mr. Dr. Mr. H. C. L. Daniel Levy Meyer Mr. T. Goodale (NYO) C I I I .. w.>~.: .~.,.,_ .,_ ... _ .... . .. _,..w::.~..t;::~......
Page 4: ftu74e00
Page 1 Teenage Smoking Prevalence 1968 -1974 3 I I I I I ~ L Teenage Smoking Prevalence 1975 -1980 Smoking Prevalance and Educational Aspirations 8 Race Differences in Smoking Prevalence 12 Regional Differences in Smoking Prevalence 16 Future Smoking Expectations 18 Reasons for the Decline in Teenage Smoking 20 Conclusions and Implications 21 Plans 22 Attachment A Description of Data Sources Attachment B Charts k .
Page 5: ftu74e00
Summary It is important to know as much as possible about teenage smoking patterns and attitudes. 'Poday's teenager is tomorrow's potential regular customer, and overwhelming,majority of smokers first begin to smoke while still in their ;: during which average daily consumption per smoker increases to the average adult teens. In addition, the ten years following the teenage years is the period level. The smoking natterns of teenagers are particularly important to PhiLip a~ ~~ X~ ~a3 ~ .. :~ t r,~ Morris: Of the eleven packings of which the median age of smokers is under age ',,I 30, seven are Philip Morris packings, and the share index is highest in the youngest age group for all Marlboro and Virginia Slims packings an& for B&H Lights and Menthol. Furthermore, it is during the teenage years that the initial brand choice is I I ~ I- ~ 1: t made: At least a Dart of the success of' Marlboro Red durinQ its most rapid growth period was because it became the brand of choice among teenagers who then stuck with it as they grew older - this combined with the rapid growth in the absolute number of teenagers. Between 1967 and 1976 the number of 15-19 year-olds in the U.S. increased 18 percent, and there was also an increase during at least part of that period in the percent of teenagers who smoked cigarettes. Average daily consumption of these young,smokers also increased, so that between~ 1968 and 1974 the number of 12-18 year-olds who smoked ten or more cigarettes per day more than doubled. Industry sales were also aided by the fact that this periodwas one of rapid increase in the number of people aged 20 to 24 - ages during which average daily consumptionlincreases. The prevalence of teenage smoking peaked in 1976-77 and is now declining. Furthermore, the number of 15-19 year-oldis also peaked in 1976 and will decline 19 percent during the next decade. . The effect of this decline in the prevalence of teenage smoking will not become apparent for a few years. It will continue to be masked by the fact that there will be a continued increase in the number of smokers in their 20's who have high prevalence rates and are reaching ages at which the average daily consumption per smoker is near its maximum. In addition, the number of people reaching the prime quitting ages (ages 45-54) will continue to be low as a result of the small number of births during the Depression.
Page 6: ftu74e00
El Chart 1). There will be a decline in the number of people, and an even greater In a very few years, however, there will be a reversal of these trends (see consumotion normally increases - the number of 20-24 year-olds will peak in decline in~ the number of smokers, in the age group in which average daily increase (which too will accelerate) in the number of people reaching the ages ; 1981, and then begin an accelerating decline. Beginning in 1985 there will be an at which people typically begin, to quit smoking or cut down (ages 45-54). We I I I F L [ I I L will no longer be able to rely on a rapidly increasing pooL of teenagers from which to replace smokers lost through normal attrition. The decline in the prevalence of teenage smoking has been sharper among boys than among girls, and now more girls than boys smoke cigarettes. The decline in teenage smoking has been particularly pronounced among blacks, which may account for the decline in Kool's market share. The Northeast has the highest prevalence of teenage smoking and the West has the lowest. Between 1975 and 1979 the proportion of teenagers who say they "definitely will not" be smoking five years hence has increased dramatically. The major reasons for the decline are the perceived health~hazards of smoking and peer pressure not to smoke. appear to be the least vulnerable of all the companies, as will be discussed later in this report. Because of our high share of the market among the youngest smokers, Philip Morris will suffer more than the other companies from the decline in the number of teenage smokers. For at least the next decade, however, the populatiom trends will have a much more powerful influence, and in this regard we would .
Page 7: ftu74e00
F F U I [ I I L L I l L I L The best data.I have on the overall prevalence of teenage smoking for the .. ..,. ., .. . „ ,. . , 1968-74 period comes from studies conducted by Chilton Research Services Teenage Smoking Prevalence 1968-1974 f or the National Clearinghouse on Smoking and Health: M1 TABLE 1 Percent who are "Current Regular Smokers"* by age, 1968-1974 1968 1.8 13.3 24.4 1970 4.4 17.0 30.0 1972 3.7 17.0 27.8 1974 4.6 19.2 28.4 *A current regular smoker was defined as someone who smoked' one or more cigarettes per week. Among boys, smoking prevalence increased from 1968 to 1970, declined from 1970 to 1972, and then remained essentially constant through 1974. There was a steady and dramatic increase in the number of girls who started smoking, as shown in Table 2. TABLE' 2~ Percent of 15-18 year-olds who were "Current Regular Smokers" 1968 - 1974 ! Boys Girls Total N ~ 1968 23.6 14.1 18.8 ~ 1970 28'.4 18.6 23.5 C.! ~ 1972' 24.0 20.8 22.4 ~ 1974 24.6 23.0 23'.8 N 0
Page 8: ftu74e00
4 Because the absolute number of 15-19'year-olds increased 14 percent from 1968 to: 1974, the number of teenage smokers increased~ 44 percent during this period'. There was also an increase in the number of cigarettes these young smokers smoked, and between 1968 and 1974 the percent of young smokers who smoked 10 or more cigarettes per day nearly doublied, as shown in Table 3 bel'ow. Here too, the increase among gi'rls was much greater thanithat amongg boys. TABLE 3 Percent of All 12-18 year-olds Who Smoked 10 or More Cigarettes per Day Boys - Girls Total 1968 6.7 3.3 5.0 1970 8.0: 5.2 6.6 1972 8.5 6.3 7.4 1974 10.6 8.6 9.6 Again, because of the increase in the absolute number of teenagers, the number who smoked a halif-pack or more per day increased 120 percent. Teenage Smoking Prevalence 1975-1980 Until;very recently there have been no good data on teenage cigarette smoking for the years after 1974. I have recentlry come upon two excellent sources of data on cigarette smoking. The most useful data are from the Survey Research Center at the University of Michigan. Each spring since 1975 questionnaires have been administered to~hi'lgh school seniors in selected schools throughout the country. The response rate has ranged from 77 to~85 percent and the total sample size from 15,0001to 19',000 (:A complete description is contained'lin~ Attachment A). The major shortcoming of the data is that they do not include the approximately 15-20 percent of American youth who drop out of school', beflore the spring of their senior year in highischool. More informatibn will be givem later about this group. i
Page 9: ftu74e00
I U I IT I t I I L t ~ t l The striking thing is that, by whatever measure is used to describe smoking status, the percent of high school seniors who smoke is declining. While the percentage of seniors who have ever smoked declined significantly only in the 1978-1979 and 1979-1980 time periods, there have been substantial declines since 1977 in all of the other measures of smoking status. Table 4 shows the various measures of cigarette smoking prevalence. Chart 2 shows the percent who smoke& at all in the 30 days prior to the survey, and the percent who smoked one or more; ten or more, and 20 or more cigarettes during that 30-day perio& Chart 3 shows the percent of high school seniors who reported that they were current regular smokers and the total percentage of those reporting that they were current regular and current occasional smokers. Clearly, by whatever measure is used to assess smoking prevalence, it peaked in 1976 and' 1977 and then began an acceLerating decline. TABLE 4 Percent of Seniors who Ever Smoked, Ever Smoked Daily, and' Quantity Smoked in Past 30 Days Class Class Class Class Class Class of 1975 of 1976 of 1977 of 1978 of 1979 of 1980 Ever Smoked 73.7 75.4b 75.8 75.3 74.0b 71.0a Smoked in last 30 days 36.8 38.8b 38.5 36.7a 34.4a' 30.5a One or more per day 27.0 28.7b 29.0 27.5b 25.3a' 21.3a Ten or more per day 18.0 19.1c 19.3 18'.5 16.4a 14.3a 20 or more per day 9.7 9.9 10.4 9.7c 8.4a 7.4a Self-definition: Current Regular Smoker 22.0 23.5b' 23.9 22.8c 20.3a 17.4a Current Regular or Occasional Smoker 38.4 40,.4b 40.2 39.Oc 36.8a 32.9a N 10,100 14,600 . 15,500 18,450 16,200 16,500 aSignificantly different from preceding year p<.00'1 bSigni~ficantly diff erent from preceding year p<.01 cSignificantly different from preceding year p<.05 The decLilne in the percent of high schooll seniors who smoke has been most pronounced among males, and began a year earlier among males than females, as shown in Table 5 and Chart 4. In addition, the females now report that they smoke more cigarettes per day than do the males. _f i_?9.a 2
Page 10: ftu74e00
F F IT IT IT I ( I L i t [ I ~ I L L TABLE 5 Percent of Seniors by Smoking Status, by Sex 1975-1980 6 Class Class Class Class Class Class of 1975 of 1976 of 1977 of 1978 of 1979 of 1980 Have Smoked in Last 30 Days Male 37.4 37.7 36.7 34.5 31.2 26.8 Female 35.9 39.1 39.7 38.1 37.1 33.4 Smoked One or More Cigarettes/day in:Last 30 Days Male 27.1 27.9 27.3 26.0 22.3 Female 26.3 28.8 30.1 28.2 27.8 18.6 23.4 Smoked 10 or More Cigarettes/day in Last 30'Days Male 19.8 19.8 19.9 19.0 15.4 13.5 Female 16.1 18.0 19.0 18.0 17.1 14.7 Self-definition , Ctirrent Regular Smoker Male 22.5 22.5 22.1 21.1 17.4 15.0 Female 21.5 24.1 25.2 24.0 22.5 19.2 Self-def inition Current Regular or Occasional Smoker Male 38.8 38.9 38.4 36.3 33.2 29.3 Female 37.6 41.4 41.6 41.2 39.6 35.7 1000390813 Changes have also occurred in the ages at which these high school seniors begin, to smoke on a:daily basis. In 1976 more boys than girls smoked'n in all grades to grade 12, when the percent of girls who smoked.daily exceeded that of the boys. In 1979, by contrast, smoking by girls exceeded that of boys beginning in the 9th grade. For both sexes the modal grades of initiationlof smoking has remaine&grade 9, but between 1976 and 1979 there has been an increase in the smoking incidence of seventh and eighth graders--dramatically in the case of the girls. Data are shown in Table 6 andChart 5. up so I

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: