Anne Landman's Collection
THE Second Icosi Meeting Brillancourt, Lausanne 771111 - 771112
Abstract
In 1977, the major global tobacco companies came together and formed a group called the International Committee on Smoking Issues, or ICOSI, to address their common problems: declining social acceptability of smoking, allegations that secondhand smoke harmed non-smokers, medical research that pinpointed cigarettes as a cause of disease, etc.
The American tobacco companies were apparently a leader in
The position papers that emerged from ICOSI
Fields
- Notes
Document is marked "Strictly Confidential." http://www.pmdocs.com/getallimg.asp?if=avpidx&DOCID=1000208720/8741
- Quotes
POSITION PAPER
1. Medical Controversy
We acknolwedge that there is controversy over many aspects of the general problem of smoking and health. There is disagreement among medical experts as to whether the reported associations between smoking and various diseases are causal or not. Accordingly, there is a continuing need for further research into the causes of such diseases and it remains our policy to support such research. To be effective it is desireable that the tobacco industry as a whole is seen to be responsible and, within its area of competence, authoratative. Moreover, we believe it is better to speak as an industry with one voice on such matters and that this can often best be accomplished by national associations of manufacturers. In this connection we believe it important that the industry assure that all appropriate members are kept advised of pertinent scientific, political, social and other developments.
2. Social Awareness, Responsibility and the Social Acceptability of Smoking
Because there is a general sensitivity in respect of our products per se, we should at all times be particularly vigilant in ensuraing that we remain beyone reproach concerning the ordinary duties and obligations we owe both our consumers and our workers.
Whilst the opponents of smoking use emotional arguments rather than scientific facts in their attempts to make smoking socially unacceptable, we must ensure that we never knowingly mislead our consumers who muyst believe that as manufacturers at all times we are acting responsible and have concern for their interests. We should state quite properly and responsibly that in view of the smoking and health controversy that recongizes that the causation issue remains controversial and unresolved.
We take the view that to date there is no persuasive scientific evidence to support the contention that the non-smoker is harmed by the tobacco smoke of others. However, it is our position that both smokers and non-smokers should be considerate of each other.
3. Disclosure of Information
We should influence as far as proper medical an dofficial opinion againsgt incautious imposition of contstraints and any unnecessafy restrictions on smoking. To do this it may be necessary to talk to medical authorities and Government agencies.
Our legitimate objectives must include protection of the interests of our consumers....
4. The Role of Government in a Free Society
The Industry believes that smokers are well aware of the claimed health effects of smoking. Information is available to thepublic from a variety of sources. The traditional role of Government is a free society with reference to legal products is to inform people, to give them the facts or to see that they are given the facts, and to leave the exercise of free choice to the individual.
5. Warning Clauses
If Governments propose wording implying or stating smoking causes certain diseases, Companies must strenuously resist with all means at their disposal.
6. League Tables
So far there is no valid scientific basis for combining measurements of different chemical compounds in the smoke of an individual cigarette brand into a single index number as to represent a measure of implied hazard relative to other brands. Such agregation implies unjustifiable judgments of the strength of assoication between chemical compounds and diseases. Such arbirtrary indices of hazard and their introduction should be resisted wherever possible.
7. Maximum "Tar" and Nicotine Limits
The imposition of maximum "tar" and nicotine yields, as well as attempts by Governments to tax high "tar" products differentially to those with lower deliveries, should be resisted.
8. Advertising
It is the Industry view that there is no valid evidence to support the contention that advertising increases total consumption of cigarettes. Advertising may affect the sales and distribution among indivudual companies or specific brands. In attempting to obtain the best possible shares of the market cigarette manufacturers have used competetive advertising to inform the consumer of product availablility, modificat6ions and innovations.
In view of the existence of the medical controversy, in any advertising, claims, express or implied, that one cigarette is healthier or less harmful than another should be avoided. We should resist restrictions on media advertising; however, in the area of voluntary agreements with Governments we should recognize that there is a limit beyond which the Industry cannot make further concessions...
WORKING PARTY REPORTS AND ICOSI DECISIONS
...(5) Social Acceptability Working Party (SAP)...
1. Initial Concentration on Passive Smoking
The Working Party will concentrate on recommended countermeasures for the passive smoking area of social acceptability issues....
2. Summarize Scientific Data on Passive Smoking
The Working party proposes that ICOSI asks its research Working Party to prepare in international summary of scientific studies on passive smoking...This would provide an essential factual basis for all subsequent planning and recommending of countermeasures...
3. Anaylsis of New Opinion Survey Data
The Working Party proposes to carefully analyze the results of the extensive opinion research now being conducted in the U.S. The aim would be to determine which "themes" and communications techniques are most effective in communicating the facts about passive smoking to the general public and other critical audiences. This interest in shaping public opinion reflects the Working Party's desire to go beyond the industry's traidtional practice of limiting its countermeasures to governmental agencies and officials...
4. Study the Feasibility of an Internation Ad Campaign
The Working Party proposes to study the feasibility of retaining an agency to develop a countermeasure advertising campaign on passive smoking aimed at international opinion leaders. The campaign would be designed for international publications (e.g. the Economist and airline magazines).
In making this proposal the Working Party is fully aware of the practical and legal difficulties of designing and running such advertising. However, the need to tell the industry's story succinctly and to reach opinion leaders is great enough to justify at least exploring the proposal....
- Company
- Philip Morris Cos., Inc.
- Author
- N/A
- Recipient
- Stamped "Received" by H. Wakeham of Philip Morris
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Type
- Rept, Other Report
- Subject
- Social Acceptability (Social acceptability of smoking)The industry fought the decline in social acceptability of smoking through public relations campaigns, legislation, etc.
- social influence
Document Images









