Industry-Provided Depositions
Louise Sahli V. Manville Corporation. Deposition of Richard Bordow, M.D.
Fields
- Site
- Jones Day
- Author
- Bordow, R.
- Date Loaded
- 27 Feb 1998
- Box
- Rjr4115
- Request
- Minnesota
- Letter
- Request
- 19970311
- Type
- DEPOSITION
Document Images
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2 4
.,..+- e..nn*1t, rI A rAf haar }1AVP it in
w
25 1 front of me before I quote it.
BORDOW 378
has not been, to your knowledge, furnished copies
of those additional slides?
A. I don't think that pathologist has. I
think another pathologist in the laboratory was
provided with the slides. I don't know if there
were additional slides cut by her.
Q. Who was that, please?
A. Dr. Woodruff.
Q. And Dr. Woodruf f' s f irst name?
A. Kay.
Q. Dr. Kay Woodruff?
A. Yes.
Q. Have you discussed those slides with
Dr. Woodruff?
A. No, not in detail. I think she just
sent me a note on her findings.
Q. Do you have the note with you?
A. No, I don't.
Q. Do you have them available?
A. I could probably get them.
Q. Perhaps at a break. Have you a
recollection of what the note said?
(n
0
4
~
~
(_D
0)
0
0
ABA REPORTERS, INC.
(415) 974-5994

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
PRICE 376
EDWARD C. McLEAN, JR., Attorney at Law, appeared
as counsel on behalf of the def endant, American
Tobacco Company.
HYDE & FORSBLAD, 185
0 Mount Diablo
Boulevard, Suite 310, Walnut Cr eek, California
94596, represented by PATRICK M . HYDE, Attorney at
Law, appeared as counsel on beh alf of the
defendant, American Brands.
McCUTCHEN, DOYLE, BR
OWN & ENERSEN,
Three Embarcadero Center, San F rancisco,
California 94111, represented b y DOROTHY A.
STREUTKER, Attorney at Law, app eared as counsel on
behalf of the defendant, GAF.
0
0
v
r
.AtD
~
tn
00
4% '
ABA REPORTERS, INC.
(415 ) 974-5994

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
PRICE 375
A P P E A R A N C E S
LAW OFFICES OF GEORG E KILBOURNE, 3755
Alhambra Avenue, Martinez, Cali fornia 94553,
represented by GEORGE KILBOURNE , Attorney at Law,
appeared as counsel on behalf o f the plaintiff.
WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SAN DRIDGE & RICE, 2400
Wachovia Building, Drawer 84, W inston-Salem, North
Carolina 27102, represented by DANIEL W. DONAHUE,
Attorney at Law, appeared as co unsel on behalf of
the defendant, R. J. Reynolds T obacco Company.
HOWARD, RICE, NEMERO VSKI, CANADY,
ROBERTSON & FALK, Three Embarca dero Center, Suite
700, San Francisco, California 94111, represented
by MARTIN R. GLICK, Attorney at Law, appeared as
counsel on behalf of the defend ant, R. J. Reynolds
Tobacco Company.
PILLSBURY, MADISON &
SUTRO, 225 Bush
Street, San Francisco, Californ ia 94120,
represented by WILLIAM ROBERT B UXTON and JOHN
NYHAN, Attorneys at Law, appear ed as counsel on
behalf of the defendant, Am eric an Tobacco Company. N
0
~
~
CHADBOURNE & PARKE, 30 Rockefeller ~
tD
Plaza, New York, New York 10112 UI
, represented by
J
I
ABA REPORTERS, INC.
(415) 974-5994

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BORDOW 377
RICHARD BORDOW, M. D., called as a witness, having
been previously sworn by the Notary Public, was
examined and testified further as follows:
EXAMINATION BY MR. DONAHUE
MR. DONAHUE: Q. Doctor, you are aware
that you remain under oath from the previous
deposition session?
A. I guess.
Q. Are you aware that since the previous
deposition session additional tissue slides have
been made of lung tissue taken from Mr. Sahli?
A. No, I'm not aware of that.
Q.
You, then, have not, obviously, seen
the additional slides?
A. No.
Q. You recall the testimony during the
course of the last deposition relative to the
conversation that took place between yourself and
your pathologist here, during which your
pathologist advised that, before he could give a
definitive opinion on the slides he was examining,
he would like to do more work; do you recall that?
A. That's correct.
Q. I take it then that that pathologist
ABA REPORTERS, INC.
1
(415) 974-5994

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BORDOW 379
Q. And it wou ld take you a half an hour to
locate it?
A. I have to send up to the laboratory. I
could just tell my se cretary. if you want to hold
up, I could get thing s rolling. Actually, I did
have it in the pile, but my pile has been
destroyed.
Q. Distorted?
A. Destroyed by your copier, and•I can't
find anything anymore .
(Break tak en)
MR. DONAHU E: Q. Doctor, realizing
that you don't yet ha ve that you don't have the
pathology report from Dr. Woodruff?
A. I've got i t now.
MR. DONAHU E: May we identify that as
Deposition Exhibit No . 4, please.
(Whereupon , document above referred to
was marked as De fendants' Exhibit 4 for
identification, as of this date.)
MR. DONAHU E: Q. Doctor, while we wait o
for copies of the pat v
hology report of Dr. Kay ~
c0
Woodruff to be made, let me ask you, neve you read p
that report? r
ABA REPORTERS, INC.
(415) 974-5994

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BORDOW 380
A. Yes.
Q. You have n
ot reviewe
d the tissue slides
yourself; is that cor rect?
A. Not with D r. Woodruf f, but I have
previously, as I m ent ioned to y ou.
Q. I'm talkin g about th e new tissue slides.
A. No, I wasn 't aware t hat she had recut
i
t.
Q. Doctor, it
appears f
rom reviewing
Exhibit No. 4, Dr. Wo odruff rep orts that she
prepared two slides f rom a tiss ue block which she
labeled 80-L-875 A an d B; is th at correct?
A. Well, she doesn't sa y that she cut two
slides. She says she cut slide s from two blocks.
Q. And prepar ed tissue sides?
A. I don' t kn ow how man y sl ides she
prepared. She could have prepa red 10 slides, as
far as I know, or no slides.
Q. She indica tes in the next page that two
slides for H & E stai ning were obtained for each
block
correct? M
, 0
v
~
A. That's cor rect. A
(0
0)
Q. In additio n, special stains for mucin 0
N
were obtained on the B block as well as a control;
ABA REPORTERS, INC.
(415) 974-5994

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BORDOW 388
Q. Have you an opinion, Doctor, as to
whether or not Mr. Sahli's rela tive risk of
developing pulmonary carcinoma was increased as a
result of his being exposed to asbestos fibers?
' A. I believe that if hi s level of exposure
was as intense as it was relate d to me, that it
probably did play a role in his carcinoma of the
1
ung .
Q. That's a little bit
different than the
question I asked, Doctor. The question I asked
was: Do you have an opinion as to whether Mr.
Sahli's relative risk of develo ping pulmonary
carcinoma was increased as a re sult of his
asbestos exposure, and your ans wer may have been
to that question.
A. Yes.
Q. You have an opinion?
A. I have an opinion.
Q. And that opinion is?
A. That, given his expo
sure was an intense
exposure, that it did play a ro le in his lung
cancer. N
0
v
~
Q. Now, you described'h is exposure as ~
to
1 intense. Is that based upon th m
e representations r
0
ABA REPORTERS, INC.
(415) 974-5994

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
correct?
A.
I'm unaware BO
of RDOW 387
any.
Q. Dr. Bordow, du ring the course of the
last deposition, I asked you a series of questions
relative to the extent of your knowledge of Mr.
Sahl i' s asbestos exposure . Do you recall,
generally, those question s?
A. It's been a wh ile. I'm not sure.
Q. The transcript will speak for itself,
obviously, but my recollection of those answers
was that you had h ad a conversation with Mr.
Kilbourne, during the course of which conversation
Mr. Kilbourne gave to you some of Mr. Sahli's
occupational history as it related to occupation
exposure to asbestos; is that correct?
A. That' s correct.
Q. Further, you had rev iewed cer ta in of
Mr. Sahli's medical records, correct?
A. That' s correct.
Q. Since that last deposition, Doctor,
have you obtained any further information
concerning the nature and extent of Mr.
Sahli's tn
0
4
exposure to asbestos fibers? I.
~
ca
A. No. m
0
ta
ABA REPORTERS, INC.
(415) 974-5994

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BORDOW 389
made to you by Mr. Kilbourne, which we discussed
during the course of the last d e position?
A
Yes
.
.
Q. You have
not had any
conversations with
Mr. Sahli's co-workers, nor hav e you read any
other depositions; is that corr ec t?
A. The only thing I hav e read is the chart
and that also was r eturned to m e without any of my
notes .
Q. By
"note
s," are you
ta
lking about
the
yellow stickers?
A. Yes.
Q. That was
identified
du
ring the course
of your first deposition?
A. That's correct.
Q. You are aware of studies, sometimes
referred to as synergy studies, epidemiologic in
nature, that have been conducted on the issue of
whether joint exposure to asbes to s fibe rs and
cigarette smoking can lea d to i nc reased risk of
cell lung cancer , correct ?
0
That is correc
A t. o
. v
r
Q. For example
there was a stu dy put out 4
, cn
by the Annals of the New
York A
ca
demy of Science, rn
~
ABA REPORTERS, INC.
(415) 974-5994

1
.2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
BORDOW 390
Doctor, by Hammond and Selikoff et al., correct?
A. Yes.
Q. That study concluded
, based upon a
review of the cohort of workers occupationally
exposed to asbestos fibers but who were not
smokers, that their relative ri sk of developing
lung cancer as a result of that occupational
exposure was 5.17, correct?
A. That sounds correct.
Q. When the cohort of p
eople who were
neither exposed to asbestos fib ers, nor were
smokers, was assigned a relativ e risk of 1; is
that correct?
A. That's correct.
Q. And I believe you ar e generally aware,
are you not, of the quantity of asbestos exposure
of that cohort of asbestos-expo sed workers,
correct?
A. That' s correct.
Q. If I recall correctl y -- and again, the
deposition will speak for itsel f -- you
characterized that as heavy or very heavy exposure UI
0
V
~
on the part of those insulator workers, correct? aa
t0
A. That's correct. ~
r
N
ABA REPORTERS, INC.
(415) 974-5994
