Industry-Provided Depositions
Louise Sahli V. Manville Corporation. Deposition of Richard Bordow, M.D.
Fields
- Site
- Jones Day
- Author
- Bordow, R.
- Date Loaded
- 27 Feb 1998
- Box
- Rjr4115
- Request
- Minnesota
- Letter
- Request
- 19970311
- Type
- DEPOSITION
Document Images
1 BORDOW 1
2 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
4 ---------------------------------------- x
5
OUISE
AHLI, ,C!7!'1S" n zfi,r~~
~ ~
~]:pj +U_u u L.
01 1 "1 s~~
6 Plaintiffs, :
7 -against- : Case No.
8 MANVILLE CORPORATION, et al., : 230512
9 Defendants. .
10 ----------------------------------------x
11
12 Deposition of RICHARD BORDOW, M.D.,
13 held at the Brookside Hospital, 2000 Vale
14 Road, San Pablo , California, on the 6 th of
15 October, 1986 a t 11:35 a.m., pursuant t
16 Notice, before Harry Schloff, C.S.R. 3563.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
~
0
25 v
.~
~
SQUIRE REPORTING COMPANY
NC. ca
N
N
(n

1 BORDOW 2
2 APPEARANCES:
3
4 LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE KILBOURNE
5 Attorney for Plaintiff:
6 3755 Alhambra
7 Martinez, California 94553
8 BY: GEORGE KILBOURNE, ESQ.,
9 Of Counsel
10
11 PILLSBURY, MADISON & SUTRO
12 Attorneys for Defendant The American
13 Tobacco Company:
14 225 Bush Street
15 San Francisco, California 94104
16 BY: WILLIAM ROBERT BUXTON, ES Q.,
17 Of Counsel
18
19 LAWLER, FELIX & HALL
20 Attorneys for Defendant R.J. Reynolds
21 Tobacco Company:
22 700 South Flower Street
23 Los Angeles, California 90017
24 BY: JOHN NYHAN, ESQ.,
25 Of Counsel
ESQUIRE REPORTING COMPANY INC.

1 BORDOW 3
2 APPEARANCES
3 (Continued):
4 WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE
5 Attorneys for R.J. Reynolds:
6 2400 Wachovia Building
7 Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27102
8 BY: DANIEL W. DONAHUE, ESQ. and
9 KEITH
10 CLINARD , ESQ.
Of Counsel
11
12 CHADBOURNE & PARKE
13 Attorneys for Defendant American Tobacco:
14 30 Rockfeller Plaza
15 New York, New York 10112
16 BY: EDWARD G. McLEAN, JR., ESQ .
17 Of Counsel
18
19 HYDE & FORSBLAD
20 Attorneys for Defendant American Brands:
21 1850 Mt. Diablo Boulevard, Suite 310
22 Walnut Creek, California 94596
23 BY: PATRICK M. HYDE, ESQ.
24 Of Counsel
0
0
~
25 ~
~
ta
N
N
v
ESQUIRE REPORTING COMPANY INC.

1 BORDOW 4
2 R I C H A R D B O R D 0 W, called as a
3 witness, having been first duly sworn by the
4 Notary Public , was examined and testified as
5 follows:
6 EXAMINATION BY
7 MR. DONAHUE:
8 Q. State your name for the record, please.
9 A. Richard Bordow.
10 Q. Your address?
11 A. 2 Dewey Road, Kensington, California.
12 Q. Were you served with a subpoena in this
13 case?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. In response to that subpoena have you
16 brought with you certain materials?
17 A. Yes, I hav e.
18 Q. Could you identify those for the record?
19 A. I brought three stacks over here but I
20 have many more in my office which I -- I can
21 transfer my office files to here.
22 Q. Do any of those materials deal with
23 Richard Sahli specifically?
24 A. Yes. tn
0
25
Q.
Could you
identify for us,
please, v
~
cn
N
N
co
ESQUIRE REPORTING COMPANY INC.

1 BORDOW 5
2 which materials you have with you that deal with
3 Mr. Sahli's case?
4 A. This is a copy of a chart that wa s
5 given to me.
6 Q. Refer to this please as Depositio n
hibit 1
7 .
Ex
8 (Whereupon, document above referr ed to
9 was marked as Exhibit 1 for
10 identification, as of this date.)
11 BY MR. DONAHUE:
12 Q. Who furnished this chart to you?
13 A. Mr. Kilbourne.
14 Q. It's entitled "Workers' Compensat ion
15 Appeals Board"; is that correct?
16 A. That's correct.
17 Q. Have you reviewed the material in this
18 chart?
19 A. Yes, I have.
i
f
i
20 Q. on
ormat
n
Have you any other
21 specifically relating to Mr. Sahli?
22 A. None.
23 Q. Is the material in this Exhibit 1
24 contained in chronological order beginning with
25 the most remote on the top and going to the most
ESQUIRE REPORTING COMPANY INC.

1 BORDOW 6
2 recent at the bottom, if you reca ll?
3 A. I believe it is. The most recent is in
4 the front . D id you say the most recent in the
5 fron t?
6 Q. Actually I said it the other way around.
7 A. I think the top is his final hospital
8 stay in w hich he expired.
9 Q. Upon completion of your review of this
10 material, have you furnished to Mr. Kilbourn e any
11 sort of a written report?
12 A. No, I haven't.
13 Q. Have you furnished to Mr. Kilbourne any
14 sort of a n oral report?
15 A. No, I have not.
16 Q. Have you discussed Mr. Sahli's
17 materials with Mr. Kilbourne?
18 A. Briefly, but not with the advantage of
19 having looked through the chart.
20 Q. When did that brief conversation take
21 place, please?
22 A. Last Wednesday. p
v
~
23 Q. This of course is Monday, the 6th of 4
to
24
O
b
t
o
t? N
c
o
er; c
rrec o
25 A. Yes. So it would be October 1st or so.
ESQUIRE REPORTING COMPANY INC.

1 BORDOW 7
2 Q. When did you recei ve the medical
3 records from Mr. Kilbourne?
4 A. That same day.
5 Q. On Wednesday, the 1st?
6 A. Wednesday, the 1st.
7 Q. Obviously you reviewed them at some
8 point between then and today?
9 A. Yes, I have.
10 Q. Have you reviewed any other materials
11 concerning Mr. Sahli other than these medical
12 records?
13 A. No, I haven' t.
14 Q. You have not reviewed any depositions
15 or any pleadings?
16 A. No.
17 Q. Have you had any discussions with Mr.
18 Kil bour ne conce rning the contents of any
19 dep osit ions or any pleadings?
20 A. Perhaps on a global scale, that there
21 were people that were deposed, but I really
22 haven't any information regarding the contents of
23 d
ositio
ep
ns.
24 Q. Did you make any notations of any
25 conversations that you had with Mr. Kilbourne
ESQUIRE REPORTING COMPANY INC.

1 BORDOW 8
2 concerning people who may have been deposed?
3 A. No, I haven't.
4 Q. As you sit here today, have you any
5 recollection of the names of any of the people who
6 were deposed in this case?
7 A. No, I don't.
8 Q. Have you any recollection of the
9 subject matter of any of those depositions?
10 A. Just that there were family members
11 deposed. One of them was more belligerent than
12 others. That wa s the only recollection that I
13 h
ave.
14 Q. Docto r, do you recall having testified,
15 do you not, approximately a year ago by a
16 deposition in a case called Galbraith versus R.J.
?
ld
17 s
Reyno
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. Did that deposition take place here in
20 this room?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. And since that time, have you published
23 any articles in any periodicals?
24 A. No, I haven't.
25 Q. Have you a current curriculum vitae?
ESQUIRE REPORTING COMPANY INC.

1 BORDOW 9
2 A. Yes. I'll get that for you at a break.
3 Q. Since October of 1985, would you
4 summarize for us, please, your professional
i
5 ence.
exper
6 Have you been consistently a practicing
7 physician, or have you engaged in any research
8 k?
wor
9 A. I have engaged in research work. I am
10 a practicing critical care and pulmonary doctor in
11 the East Bay.
12 Q. Would you describe for us the resear ch
13 work you engaged in in the past year?
14 A. The research work was done for a
15 pharmaceutical company determining the activity
16 and safety of a third-generation syphilis born in --
17 patients with chronic lung disease.
18 Q. I believe you testified you have not
19 published since --
20 A. I have not published. I'm not sure
21 when this will come out for publication.
22 Q. Since October of last year, have you
23 participated in any epidemiological study?
24 A. No, I haven't.
25 Q. Since October of last year, have you
ESQUIRE REPORTING COMPANY INC.

1 BORDOW 10
2 participated in any toxicology or animal studies?
3 A. No, I haven't.
4 Q. Since October of last year, have you
5 participated in the drafting of any Surge on
6 General's reports?
7 A. No, I haven't.
8 Q. Did you participate in any fashion in
9 the drafting or preparation of the 1985 Surgeon
10 General's report?
11 A. No, I didn't.
12 Q. And I take it you are not now
13 participating nor have you been in the drafting of
14 the 1986 Surg eon General's report; is that correct?
15 A. Th at's correct.
16 Q. Wi th reference, doctor, to your prior
17 participation in drafting Surgeon General's
18 reports, you were asked a number of questions by
19 Mr. Weber in that area.
20 Do
ou recall those?
y
21 A. No.
22 Q. My understanding is that incident to
23 the preparation or your involve ment in the
24 preparation of those reports, you would have
25 reviewed and compiled existing literature; correct?
ESQUIRE REPORTING COMPANY INC.
