Industry-Provided Depositions
Philip Morris, Incorporated, -Vs- R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. The Deposition of John Howard Benson.
Fields
- Alias
- CN 74CIV2395
- Box
- Rjr4108
- Characteristic
- Marginalia
- Site
- Rjri
- Law
- Date Loaded
- 27 Feb 1998
- Author
- Benson, J.H.
- Unk
- Request
- 19970311
- Letter
- Minnesota
- Request
- Letter
- Type
- DEPOSITION
Document Images
e)
1
.,
5
G
APPF;ARAI!CES :
Mr, Ar.ti:c::y L. Fletcher, and
A!r, -T?;:othy C. Quinn, Jr.
(Conbcy,.I-:eilitt, O'Brien
& Boardman )
20 Exchar,ge Plaza
New York, New York 10005
appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff;
Mr. R. Bradlee Boal
(Cooper, Dunham, Clark,
Griffin & Moran)
8 30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, New York 10020
c°~ --
~ and
v 10 - Mr. L. Alfred Willson
d (8.7**J. Reynolds Industries, Inc.)
11 Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27102
~ appeared on behalf of the Defendants.
~ 12
4
z
a
~
13
s
0
~ 14
~
15
16
17
18
19
.1
O
w
~
w

t
.
,
MR. BOAL: Would you swear the witness", plea-c: ;,
(Witness duly sworn. )
JOHN HO:dI!RD B:,-:i3S0I1,
-called as a ttitness herein, having been first duly
sworn, was examined and testified as follows:
Q
A John Benson.
@
Q
Howard.
.Q Okay. What is your home address,
Mr. Benson?
A 774 Pleasant Avenue, Highland Park,
Illinois.
Q How long have you been workin g for Leo
-Burnett? :
Q
EXAMINATION
By_ Mr. Boal :
What is your name?
- Is that your full name?
Correct.
No middle name?
Twenty-one years.
Were you working for Leo Burnett before
Philip.Morris became a client?
Correct",'-
Do you work on Philip Morris advertising
w

.
8
~..._........,...._, - ,.......~. _~. . _._..__._ . , _.. _~... ...~.... _..~._
_._..._..__.._..... _ ........
. .
A That would have been in 1955.
And -tirhat was the nature of that ad?
3
A As I re;:all; it was . a man in a tuxedo.
And how long was the man in
5
an insertion.
7
,
Q
the tuxedo ucc--a?
There were several different types of-ads
used to broaden the appeal of Marlboro, is that
correct?
Q
Correct.
Could you name a few of the others?
Amateur radio operator; a sports announcer
are two that come to mind.
Q Did there come a time when these other
vehicles -- if I can use that term -- were dropped?
A. Yes, in 1963.
Q What happened in 1963?
The advertising was changed.
And_,what was it changed.to?.
Changed to the exclusive use of cowboys,
And-has that been true from that date to
today?.
23 1 - A Correct:..
D.oes any other cigarette manufacturer, use :

1
0
8
0
3
5
i
8
9
v 10
I N D E X
WITNESS
JOHN HOWARD BENSON
Examination - By Mr. Boal
PAGE

!}
now ?
-° ! A Yes.
Q
5
7
s
Q
Q Has all.of this advertising been prepared. ~
by Leo Burnett for Philip Morris Company? ~
advertising from the inception of the relationship
betweeri Philip Morris and Leo Burnett?
A Correct,.
Q We have here a group of advertisements
that have been copied from an exhibit .in an other
litigation matter which has been prepared by
Mr. Fletcher, and it was previously.identif ied in
the deposition of Mr. James Morgan as Defendants'
Morgan Exhibit Number 2, and I would ask you to look
at this collection of advertising, Can you.identify
.that advertising?
(Witness examining document,)
THE WITNESS: Yes, I could identify that.
By .Mr, Boal:-
°1
And for-now long~ have you worked on it?
Twenty years,
Okay, Have you worked on Philip Morris
Correct.
Q And it was
w
v+
of various kinds
~
0
N
O%
F
all placed in print advertising o

0 s-;., ..~
~-~k Nj AL
DEN:jb .
~
.
.,
I
16
17
18
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR TiiE' SOU*1: ~RN DISTRICT OF NEW 'YORK
PHILIP MOT'.RIS, INCORPORAT:rD, )
-vs-.
)
Plaintiff; )
~
)
)
R. J; REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY)
and WM. ESTY, INC,, )
~
Defendants. )
No. 74.C Iv. 2395
The deposition of JOHN HOWARD BENSON,
called by the defendants for examination, pursuant to
notice and pursuant to the Rules of Civil Procedure
for the United States District Courts pertaining to
the taking of depositions for the purpose of dis-
covery, taken before Diane E. Norris, a notary public
within and for the County of Cook and State of
Illinois, at Prudential_Plaza, Suite 1500, Chicago,
Illinois, on the 12th day of November, A,D,, 19?4,
commencing at the.hour of 1:30 o'clock p.m:

b
.,
5
6
.._.~ ..w~_.. ...-.......r...~.._...___...._ ,..._...-. w...__ ..,....... _ _._ , ._.~._.........__
.r. ..........
C,orrect,
-- for Prilip Morris?
Leo *Buraett d id not promote the sale of
any. other Philip Morris brands at that time, did
they?
A Correct.
Q Was there an eff ort to create a new image
for Marlboro at that time -- which appears to be
1955?
There was an effort to broaden the appeal
of the brand.
z
~ 15
..,
.
Q
Could.you elaborate on that?
The Marlboro brand on sale prior to our
was a very limited specialty
16
17'
1s
19
20
21
0,
23
24
getting the assignment
brand being sold, as I understood it, primarily
only in the East,
Q Higher priced luxury cigarette?
Correct.
More app-eal to females than males?.
A Correct, This advertising was designed --
to broaden'the appeal to more smokers was the reason
f or t,his advertisin;,-
And more male: smokers? ~ v+
0
N
~
Not necessarily, but ,to appeal just to morel =
0
v~ .

12
@.
pro j ect?
Were you in favor of the pro ject?
vlas there w reason why you favored the
A To expand the Marlboro f ranchise,
Q Who did you expect to expand it to?
A -To non-smokers of Marlboro Red,
Q Any non-smoker of Marlboro Red?
A Hopefully, yes.
Q - Were there any discussions at that time as S
to the target group to whom Philip Morris or Leo f!
"Burnett wanted to appeal with this new cigarette?
A Well, basically, as I said earlier, we
~
)
wanted to expand the franchise of the Marlboro brand
~
name,' and there were people who did not smoke Marlboro
Red, and we, hopefully, were going to attract those
non-smokers of Marlboro Red with another brand of
Marlboro,
Q Was one of the aims to protect the Marlboro
franchise from erosion to high filtratiori or low tar.
and nicotine cigarettes?
A If-I understand your question correctly,
protect the eros'ion; the answer is no,
Ln
Q Was there at that time any erosion f rom.the
. ~

r
5
Correct, I think you have a thirty-seconci
stcry board*in there.
Q
Thirty-second story board?
Yes, wasnIt there?;
All right,
.:I have here another group of ads which has
been`identif ied in Mr. Morgan's deposition as.
,
This one (indicating), .
That's 1C; Is that the advertising which.
was used to promote Marlboro about the time that they
changed agencies?. -
THE WITNESS: I'm only familiar with one of the
By Mr. Boal:
Q Which one is that?.
A That I don't know.
But you do remember that a
E

i
3
5
smokers,
Q
Q
7
Was it successful?
Yes,
Do you recall any change in share of market
in Marlboro during that time, 1955?
7
But it was an increase?
Q
~ A Yes,
Q And what was the concept used to make the
broader appeal.-- was there a concept used to make
V
a broader appeal?
No, I don't specifically..
Well, there wasn't a concept used. The
idea was to present* the brand in such a manner as to
be more appealing to more people.
.Q
And how was that done?
Well, one of the devices was the use of a
cowboy in the initial ad,
. Q Has the use of a cowboy been continuous.
ever since 1955?
Did there come a time that`Philip Morris
stopped usingo a cowboy-to promote Marlboro?
The second ad -was not a cowboy.
The second ad? When was that?'.
- L"
%0
