Industry-Provided Depositions
Pacific Tobacco Corp., Vs. The American Tobacco Company, Inc.. Deposition of: Charles B. Wade, Jr..
Fields
- Type
- DEPOSITION
- Characteristic
- Marginalia
- Date Loaded
- 27 Feb 1998
- Request
- 19970311
- Letter
- Minnesota
- Request
- Letter
- Box
- Rjr4136
- Site
- Rjri
- Law
Document Images
0
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
it
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
I
M. 0' NEILL, Object to the form of the question.
tii'ITiFESS: There is none.
Q (By rr. Tilbury) Does the Tobacco Institute
distribute or assist in any way with regard to the
cigarette advertising code?
A i1To.
k4 1ias your Company subscribed to the cigarette
advertising, code?
A At one time - did at one time.
Q I take it that it's not at the present time?
A 240.
Q Z:hy is it no longer?
A Well, the og,,aru-ation wasn't viable when it
dwindied dokn to two or three members.
Q When did that occur, was that last year?
A I think last year.
Q Now as far as the operations of the cigarette
advertisir..g code, how did your company participate in
it, what did you do?
A I'd have to go back and add something to the'
other question too.
Q Please do.
A The advertising code undertook advice on the ~
. ~
question of television and radio advertising,AmaJor portio
ti: c S tLaS
of thc coripsny's budget wer,z in this field with that~pre-
GRAHAM ERLACHER d ASSOCIATES
OfFIC1AL COURT RlPORT[RS
ASHE DRIVE
W/NSTON-SALEM-N.C.
PHOkE:765-0636

0
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
an?, ft"w4 InJn fY'lFd
empted " by law in April, 3~:vii~ =8ffn~t January the 2nd.
Q 1971?
A 1971. There was no point in continuing the code
unless the whole industry was participating.
Q All right. During what period of time did your
compo.ny subscribe to the code?
A From 1962 or '64, whenever it was established.
Q tisas all of your advertising submitted to the
code during that period of time?
A Yes , sir.
Q t.as any of your advertising re3ected by the code
A I understood that it was.
Q On what grounds, sir?
A On the grounds that it violated; , in the opinion
of the code it violated the provisions of the.code.
G In what respect?
A This could be the-using iaodels for example
that were twenty-five and seemed to be--and girls look
yo=,rcr all the time to me; and I presumed they did to
ti1c- yn e ~-
I
.Mr. r in3r, that's the type of thing, sensuousness, and
these are very arbitrary areas of opinion.
Ib:EylJc'r'S
Q 'I~otit was Governor 'r;i-nors s decision binding in
all cases?
A So far as I know, only,clour company; only,, our
coMpeny his decisions were binding. We would attempt to
GRAHAM ERLACHER & ASSOCIATES
OFFICIAL COURT REPORTEkS
ASHE DRIVE
WINSTONSALEM, N. C.
PHONE: 765-0636

0
x
3
6
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
comply with the wishes of the administrator.
Q As I recb.ll, there was provision in the code
providing for penalties of up to a Hundred Thousand Dollar
for violation of the code?
A Yes, sir.
0 Do you Icnow if any companies that were required
to pay such pcnaltics?
A I do not.
Q hll right.
You meant no, not just the hundred thousand?
A I don't.
Q. Did Mr. Thomas Austern, an attorney I believe in
Wasriin~;ton, do some work for the Tobacco Institute?
A . Yey.
Q Af ter t::e tcrainGtion of the cigarette advertis-
ing code as you have described it, did your company then
cooperate with the National Association of Eroadcasters in
some kind of code or formal or in-Lormal code that they
utilized?
A I do not know, I would presume that it did.
Q Did your co:_pany reqTaest' inlormation of the
Tobacco ar.sta.tute with rcspect to the plaintiff here, the
Pacific TobGcco Company?
A t~o .
G r.ould they uz:dErtake or did they undertake the
GRAHAM ERLACHER a ASSOCIATES
OffIClAL COUNT REPORT[RS
ASHE DRIVE
WINSTON-SALEM. N. C.
PNOkE:76S-O636

0
3
6
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
investiDation from time to time-of specific request from
Tobacco Companies liko that of any other particular companyi,
for exaraple? ~
A I have no knowledge.
0 Now wh.ich of your officers besides yourself--
i1r. Wa~.e participated in 'any way in the Tobacco Institute?
A The President of our company has always been a
member of the Board of Directors and a member of the Exe-
cutive Comnittee of the Tobacco Institute; our General
Counsel has always participated in what is called the Legal
Committee of the Institute, and I have always participated
in the Comm. unications Com.^;ittee.
0 There are some records that appears to have been
identified as publication has been marked as ExTiibit ?-lo.
Cne, vould apply to the ci£arette advertising code, is
there only one code that you are familiar with?
A . That' s -al l .
(The docuwnEnt above-referred-to
was rGrked ---:c.hibit I.o. 1 for
identification.)
Q This particular document which has been marked
as P14 intiff's E-x.hibit No.One , has some material w-ritten
on the side of it by someone--I'm not sure who did it
rcally--showinG a notation of a few provisions were aus-
pended in Dece;ii'oer of 1967?
A Yes.
GRAHAM ERLACHER & ASSOCIATES
Ofi.C1AL COVRT REpORTERS
ASHE DRIVE
WINSTON-SALEM. N. C.
P~4or:E. 765OG36

3
6
a Could you tell me please if those provisions
w ere suspcnded about that time?
A I do not know.
Q Do you know of any provisions that were sus-
p-Unded any ti:.,e?
A I beard th3t there were provisions that were
suspended, but I have no knowledl;e of t':era.
Q Do you know why they were suspended?
A I do not.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1s
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
G Are you
~: Yes.
KICE'~'~~'r
acquainted with a 2f:r. +:itliam -~.:-loeper-?
Kleep~ef
0 Did :-Ir, r,i-o~r work
with you?
A Yes.
U In wht:t capacity was
I.15tiytt }e
for the '.t,obacco Csmpany
rie employed?
A Iae was employed as Vice President for Public
Relations.
C< I:ave 'you in connection with your work for the
~ecvrcy^pu Ic
^eyr.o2cis t;o:.: ;any e7couzitcrtd the t:=Lor Fj-.:*% Corapany
at ~ ., .:
~. . G"!S
~ ~
_f
A I'o .
C~. Are you pcrsonally a member of any other Associa-I
tions other than those you h: ve identified?
Q Do you attcnd conventions of one kind or another?
GRAHAM ERLACHER 8 ASSOCIATES
OFf'ILI.L COURT REPORTERS
ASHE DRIVE
WINSTON-SALEM. N. C.
PNO..E: 7650686

.
A Very seldom.
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q ti'hat sort of conventions would you attend if
you--when you have the opportunity to do so?
A N;ore meetings than conventions I attend; the
raeetin; of the Tobacco Growers Information Committee, I
believe that's the only industry connected--tt:e neeting
that I attend.
0 Who does that consist of, the Tobacco Growers
InforLZatio~j Committee, who are members of that?
1 r i lit(+r. ~ ~
A Prd-mar-j-the agricultural people, warehousemen,
-
farmers.
Q Are there major tobacco companies members?
A No.
Q V'hat are the associations or trade groups with
the Reynolds Conp4ny be a member of insofar as they relate
to the Tobacco Industry?
A I know of no;ze.
Q Did you in connection with your work have any
contact in anyway with the subject of cancer cigarettes
with Pacific Tobacco Company?
A I did not.
C Did any ~.~emorandas that were written by any of
trie R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company come to your attention
on the subject?
A I have seen no mcmorandums written about it.
GRAHAM ERLACHER & ASSOCIATES
OFf1C1Al COURT REPORTERS
ASHE DRIVE
. WINSTONSALEM,N.C.
P..Or+E: 7f,5 0636
(n
O
~
~
do

.
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
iR. TILBURY: Off the record.
(Discussion off the record.)
Q (By iTr. Tilbury) Mr. k'ade, could you identify
for us please, the subsidiaries of the R. J. Reynolds -
Co:::pany?
A Yes. Archer Products, Inc., R. J. R. Foods, Inc,
Sea Land, Inc. of r.cLean Industries.
No. GRIgSw:" You mean Sea Land is a subsidiary
of McLean which is in turn a subsidiary of Reynolds?
Wlli~~iSS: Right. R. J. Reynolds Lurope, ;. A.
There are some subsidiaries in Archer that are parts
of their business--Filaco, Inc., that's the only one
I recall.
Q (By Xr. Tilbury) Has your company recently
acquired--I believe- a"hundred pereent d'"the stock in the
American Independent Oil Company?
A Vot a hundred percent of the stock.
Q What percenta~e of stock do you own?
A I think we own more than fifty percent, but I
ara not positive.
Q Are you in the process of acquiring the remaininf
fifty percent?
A Not that I know of.
Q Is it fifty percent or is it more than fifty?
A I think it's more than fifty percent.
GRAHAM ERLACHER 6 ASSOCIATES
Off,c1A: COUNT REPORTERS
ASHE DRIVE
WINSTON-SALEM. N C.
PHONE 765-0636
f

4
0
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
li
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19'
20
21.
22
23
24
25
Q Is Penick and Ford another subsidiary?
A Yes, it is, and you'll have to forgive me for
forgetting to mention it to you, but we are having to
divest of that and I am apt to keep it out of my mind.
Q Docs your co::ipeny license other companies to
manufacture ciEarettes?
A Ye:~, we do.
G And which companies do you license?
A In the Philippines. The Philippines is the only
liccnsee
that comes to my mind right at the moment.
Q Do you have some in Holland and Peru, for
exa, ple? _
.A I don't think we do in Hollan'd~ because we make
ilQUs 11nu£rUurr
cigarettes for those countries at i?ou3e= ~tiu~ nb under
R. J. Reynolds P. Q Does your company maintain research laboratories
for testing tobacco products?
A Ye s, we do.'~~.c=-~ontra~t- #s~~nf~=out
-z =o1-land~si ~ h~
~;.~ire==-Com?any -nake s =the:n - for - o s .
G I see. Do you maintain a research laboratory--
A In 1/.inston-"alen.
C In any place?
A Yes.
Q And are they equipped and do they analyze
cigarette products?
GRAHAM ERLACHER & ASSOCIATES
O-F/CIAL COURT REf`ORTERS
ASHE DRIVE
WINSTONSALEM.N.C.
Pr4OnE765-0636
.

A Yes, 3ir.
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q Does your company do business to any extent with
A. ri. F. , American Machinery and Foundary?
A Not to my knowledge.
Q From which source do vou acquire your machinery?
A Hoeniy, Molins, primarily.
Q 1That do you do with your used machinery, how
do you dispose of it?
A I haven't known us to dispose of any machinery-
of consequence in twenty-five years, and I don't know
how we disvosed of it and when we do.
Q Have you had any dealinGs of your own with any
of the distributors or retail accounts in tl:e state of
.Oreson within t;ie last ten years?
A ivo, sir.
.Q Have you made trips in that-area for any rEason.
at all? '
A No, sir.
a Does your company do business with any other -
r:ajor tobacco companies in any respect?
A ~:e s---ll--you're talking about doing business
with--we supply them with some foil which ve ma.he in the
Archer Company.
:~ To whicYh other tobacco companies is it sold?
A Ve sell some to Lorillard, some to American,
GRAHAM ERLACHER & ASSOCIATES
OPsIciAL COURT REPOQ7ENt
ASHE ORIVE
WtNSTONSALEM. N. C.
PMONE: 765-0636
0
0
~
OD
61

0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
some to Liggett and rjyers, I believe we sell some to
Philip r:orris, and that's all that I recall.
Q Do you buy products from any of those.companies?
A Not that I know of.
0 Lo you exchange products with any of them?
~*
,o.
0 Do you utilize Turkish tobacco in connection
with any of the products that you make?
A Yes.
Q Do you buy any of these products from the
`?`urtsish State Monopoly?
A We have a subsidiary in the near k:ast -P,nd we
buy from that company; where they acquire tobaccos, I
don 't 1mow.
0 Approximately how long does it take to train
your employees to be able to operate the cigarette
nar.ufn cturin;; m4chines?
A As a cigarette machine operator?
Q Yes.
A I would think that it could be done in these
days in three or four months.
Q t:ow about a mechanic to service such a machine?
A A year.
Q Does your companj mAnufacture any private brand
ci.-arettes at any tine?
GRAHAM ERLACHER 6 ASSOCIATES
O«/.1AL COURT RCPORTERS ASHE DRIVE
WINSTON.SALEM. N.C.
PMOH[:765-0636
v
QD
