Jump to:

Industry-Provided Depositions

Search Terms
Document Code
Date
Items: Sort:
Listing
[1 - 25 of 2,303] » Next Page

Project 6900 Physiological Studies (Semi Annual)

09 May 1967
11 pp

Author:
Notes Original document code was 2958.
[ 1 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/HmPdPMI19670509.Rs ]

Project 6900, Physiological Studies. Reports results of several sets of animal studies, examining effect of smoke inhalation and of skin painting. Finds, in primate inhalation study, that only two of the smoking monkeys survived, and that the others are pressured to have died from carbon monoxide poisoning, which was found to be in high saturation in the surviving animals; notes monkeys smoked 35 cigarettes per day for nine months, the equivalent of 30 packs per day for a man.

[Re: Fax Cover Page]

23 Jun 1994
1 p

Author: Gullotta, F P; INBIFO
Recipient: Hayes, C S
Notes Original document code was 3154.
[ 2 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/ToPMI19940623.Fx ]

Fax cover sheet for document 3155, from INBIFO to Philip Morris.

In Re: Mike Moore, Attorney General Ex Rel, State of Mississippi Tobacco Litigation, Deposition of: David Iauco

14 Mar 1997
70 pp

Author: Iauco, David
Notes Original document code was 389.
[ 3 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/AmLgNON19970314.Ld ]

Deposition statement of David Iauco states details on his marketing work for R.J. Reynolds, management of brands targeting women and blacks. Argues that R.J. Reynolds did not violate any cigarette advertising or promotional code. States merchandising of cigarette products does not target youth. Admits that R.J. Reynolds has sponsored rock concerts and looked at whether children or adolescents attended. Contains summary of deposition. States that after Joe Camel campaign 1988, market share jumped from 8% - 13% .

In Re Mike Moore, Attorney General Ex Rel, State of Mississippi Tobacco Litigation, Plaintiff, vs. American Tobacco Company, et al., Defendants. Deposition of: Richard J. Semenik

18 Mar 1997
107 pp

Author: Semenik, Richard J
Notes Original document code was 378.
[ 4 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/AmToNON19970318.Ld ]

Deposition of Richard J. Semenik, concerning consumer decision-makers and behavior. Reviews his background and consulting experience, as well as his work on adolescents and marketing. States he feels many factors enter decisions regarding cigarettes and smoking, including peers, family, friends, school, religion, etc., but that advertising has no effect. States advertising exists to influence brand selection. Expresses view that cigarettes ads are not aimed at youth. Includes legal abstract of this deposition.

Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation vs. Philip Morris, Inc Volume III, Continued Deposition of Nancy G. Naughton

10 Sep 1992
216 pp

Author: Naughton, Nancy G.
Notes Original document code was 493.
[ 5 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/AmBrBWC19920910.Ld ]

Deposition statement of Nancy Naughton, Capri Brand Manager for Brown and Williamson. Questions at length the strategy of cutting advertising spending in Capri between 1989-1990. Produces textbook marketing principles stating that increased spending for marketing increases sales. Argues that Capri did not lose appreciable market share from vastly reduced spending. Identifies Virginia Slims Super Slims as primary competition for Capri.

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation vs Walter Jacobson and CBS, Inc., Deposition of Michael Radutzky

10 Jul 1984
220 pp

Author: Radutzky, Michael; Wolfe, Rosenberg and Associates Inc
Notes Original document code was 495.
[ 6 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/AmLgBWC19840710.Ld ]

Deposition of Michael Podutzsky. Discusses a news program called Cigarette Perspectives, which he researched, produced and aired. Contents of program were fires started by cigarettes, educating children and prevalence of cigarette advertising. Discusses advertising or product placement in movies such as Superman II and Body Heat. Brings up topics such as candy cigarettes, sampling to minors and moving promotions like the Merit wagon or Marlboro truck. Presents sections of confidential FTC report. Mentions the pot, wine, beer, sex strategy developed by Ted Bates for Viceroy cigarettes. States that this strategy is designed to attract starters by featuring young people demonstrating a free and easy hedonistic lifestyle. Claims Brown and Williamson never adopted the strategy.

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation vs. Walter Jacobson and CBS, Inc., Deposition of Walter Jacobson

12 Jul 1984
190 pp

Author: Jacobson, Walter; Wolfe, Rosenberg and Associates Inc
Notes Original document code was 496.
[ 7 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/AmLgBWC19840712.Ld ]

Deposition statement of Walter Johnson, reporter and commentator from WBBM, argues the philosophies and professional responsibilities for a reporter, includes providing fair and accurate information. Questions whether it is essential to give sense of time and place to the viewer.Presents CBS's standards for reporting, asks if Michael Podutzsky produced an article or script for his article perspective, mentions the confidential FTC report, the pot, wine, beer, sex marketing strategy.

The State of Florida, et. al., vs The American Tobacco Company, et al., Defendants, Deposition of Richard W. Mizerski, Ph.D (Vol I)

30 Apr 1997
47 pp

Author: Mizerski, Richard W., Ph.D
Notes Original document code was 388.
[ 8 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/AmLgNON19970430.Ld1 ]

Richard W. Mizerski's deposition on his work on advertising and marketing of cigarette companies. States opinions on cigarette labeling and whether it has changed his research on the Joe Camel campaign. States opinions that advertising does not influence smoking an that nicotine is not addictive. Questions where health information comes from in Florida. Asked about celebrity endorsements for cigarettes. States opinion that cigarette industry has not released untrue information. Describes cigarette smoking as a "spectacular activity" in the eyes of children.

In Re: Mike Moore, Attorney General, Ex Rel, State of Mississippi Tobacco Litigation, [Vol. II] Deposition of: Richard W. Mizerski, Ph.D.

30 Apr 1997
94 pp

Author: Mizerski, Richard W., Ph.D
Notes Original document code was 390.
[ 9 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/AmLgNON19970430.Ld2 ]

Deposition statement of Dr. Richard Mizerski in Mississippi tobacco litigation. States he worked as consultant for FTC for state of Florida and Mississippi. States he worked on reviewing advertising restrictions for state of Mississippi. Claims cigarette advertising does not influence loyalty or brand switching. Claims Mississippi has had more anti-smoking campaigns. Comments on restricting youth access. Feels price may not deter smoking. Claims restriction of advertising does not decrease smoking. Includes index.

State of Florida, et al., Plaintiffs, v American Tobacco Company, et al., Defendants, Video Deposition of: Richard J. Semenik

19 May 1997
202 pp

Author: Semenik, Richard J
Notes Original document code was 387.
[ 10 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/AmLgNON19970519.Ld ]

Deposition statement of Dr. Richard Semnik summarizes analysis of consumers of cigarettes. States his credentials and how he got into tobacco research. Recounts research on how many youth recognize Joe Camel. Discusses what constitutes advertising. Evaluates definition of peer pressure. Mentions opinions on why people smoke. Discusses consumer behavior and role in buying cigarettes and defines application.

Flora Mae Browner Vs Johns-Manville Corporation. Deposition of Max H. Crohn, Jr.

26 Jun 1979
25 pp

Author: Crohn, M.H. Jr
[ 11 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/500296707-6731 ]

Annual Report 1969 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company.

16 Feb 1970
39 pp

Author: Galloway, A.H.; Rjr
[ 12 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/500435078-5116 ]

Ira C. Lowe V.R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. Deposition of Witness.

01 Oct 1954
59 pp
[ 13 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/500502527-2585 ]

Pacific Tobacco Corp., Vs. The American Tobacco Company, Inc.. Deposition of: D. W. Grout

02 Feb 1971
47 pp

Author: Graham Erlacher & Assoc; Switzer, J.E. Jr; Grout, D.W.
[ 16 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/502048623-8669 ]

Pacific Tobacco Corp. Vs. The American Tobacco Company, Inc. Deposition of Stanley E. Hartman.

12 Aug 1970
99 pp

Author: American; Liggett; Philip Morris; Rjr; Hartman, S.E.
[ 17 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/502048893-8991 ]

Pacific Tobacco Corporation Vs the American Tobacco Company. Oral Deposition of Stuart E. Marion.

19 Mar 1971
105 pp

Author: Marion, S.E.; Morris, J.E.; Tilbury, R.; Tilbury & Kane; Hillard, W.; Mccolloch Dezendorf & Spears; Spaulding, B.; Souther Spaulding; Mcewen, D.W.; Cake Jaureguy Hardy Buttler Mcewen
[ 18 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/502049244-9348 ]

Philip Morris, Incorporated, -Vs- J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. The Deposition of John Howard Benson.

12 Nov 1974
48 pp

Author: Benson, J.H.; Unk
[ 20 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/502640304-0351 ]

Philip Morris, Incorporated, -Vs- R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. The Deposition of John Howard Benson.

12 Nov 1974
48 pp

Author: Benson, J.H.; Unk
[ 21 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/502640352-0399 ]

Philip Morris Incorporated V. Rj Reynolds Tobacco Company & William Esty Company, Inc. Deposition of Robert A. Fitzmaurice.

03 Feb 1975
36 pp

Author: Fitzmaurice, R.A.; Unk
[ 23 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/502640798-0833 ]

Philip Morris Incorporated V. Rj Reynolds Tobacco Company and William Esty Company, Inc. Deposition of H. Copeland Robinson, Jr.

16 Dec 1974
97 pp

Author: Robinson, C.H. Jr; Unk
[ 24 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/502640834-0930 ]

Tobacco Encyclopedia. Smoking and Health.

1983
2 pp

Author: Colby, F.G.
[ 25 of 2,303 | industry_depositions/502742934-2935 ]
Listing
[1 - 25 of 2,303] » Next Page