Health Canada
Document 10221043
Fields
- Notes
Selected on visit 1 (May 1999)
- Site
- Guildford
Document Images
I

I rJ =.~ |
DBM/91C
29th September 1986
Notes on Meeting to Discuss Proposed Portable Smoking
Monitoring System
Date: 24th September 1986
Present: J L Beven, D H Mullen, R P Ferris
-A. Introduction
The purpose of this meeting was to discuss a proposal for
producing a portable human smoking monitoring system which could
be used outside R&D either in the UK or overseas for consumer
testing.
A recommendation could then be made on how this project
should be progressed.
2. Existing Systems
At present the Human Smoking Behaviour section has several Apple
based systems used for monitoring the pressure and flow profiles of
smokers. They are not regarded as suitable for the new application
since:
* They are not particularly portable or rugged.
* Each system can only deal ~ith a single smoker.
* They require relatively highly trained staff to operate them.
3. Outline Requirements for System
After discussions the following were defined as the major requirements
for the proposed system:
* It should be capable of monitoring and recording the pressure/
flow profiles for up to 16 human smokers simultaneously. It
should mimic the current Apple software in the way that it
detects the start of smoking and should produce raw data files
in the same format as that produced by the Apples micros.
* The system should be easily portable. Preferably it should
weigh less than 40Kg and be be divided into two parts -
the micro-computer(keyboard~display etc) and the power
supplies/transducers etc. The system should be rugged enough
to be carried as airline cargo without additional protection.
* For reasons of compatibility the system should be based on
an IBM XT (or IBM emulation) micro-computer.
ClibPDF - www.fastio.com
L,,,I
"-4

* The software should be written in such a way that the operator
can easily run the system without extensive training. The PC
screen should display enough information for the operator to
determine that a recording run is progressing satisfactorily.
3. Implementation and Schedule
Because of other commitments DBM suggested that this project
would best be achieved by writing a detailed specification
document and then handing this over to an external company for
implementation and testing. JLB said that he was aware of at
least one company who would be capable of handling this work.
Scheduling of this work would therefore depend on when the
specification document was produced and when the company could
n
begin the work.
4. Estimated Costs
JLB gave the following estimate of costs based on his knowledge of
thŁs area:
IBM XT or compatible micro
Lab Tech system
Adalab Interface
16 transducers (for for 8 channels)
Hardware construction
Software
Total
2,500~
• 1,000 ~
2,000m
3,500 ~ ~1~
2,000
,4,000
15,000 pounds
5. Actions
_>
* RPF to get outline approval for expenditure on this projeet
based on the above estimates.
* JLB to begin drafting a system specification document
and to have initial discussions with companies who
could potentially implement the system.
cc: Those present R R Baker
T Hirji
ClibPDF - www.fastio.com
0
i",0
O0

ClibPDF - www.fastio.com
I"O
I",0

FOR LIMITED CIRCULATION ONLY
Gale I
Brief Report and Research Proposal (Sumuitted to Mz. R. Ferris)
Title of Project. The Role of Smoking in Behavioural Modulation
Introduction. This brief su~ission first reviews progress to date on
smoking research funded by BAT, Southampton, at the Department of
Psychology, University of Southampton (Phase I). We then outline studies
currently in progress and/or to be completed under Phase II. Finally, a
proposal is set out for work under Phase III. All these phases of the
project are inter-related. The report therefQre begins with a brief
background statement.
BackgrouncL The _ti'tle to _t~__project reveals the. emphasis of our ap,Rroac/L
Smoking is se-en-as-a-s~t-6f physiologicai[-behavio6r~-~iai ~a--~
~experiential events.I-These /re s~ctured by the indi~i~i-~6"&&~Ł in
tlY~_f o~~--o~life tasks. Smoking behaviour is therefore seen as
purposeful since it is used to modulate the individual's emoticmal state,
facilitate complex performance, and support social interaction. Within this
framework all the above components to smoking are considered important_ It
thus follows that a description of smoking must include the interplay of
these factors. This implies parallel simultaneous measurement of temporal
streams of data derived from objective indexes of smoking behaviour, within
various contexts, and under different task conditions.
Phase I: Literature reviews and the establishment of basic research
procedures. Three major literature reviews have been completed, covering
all published papers in three fields of smoking research: me m~_2__~_~
le~__~g, vigilance a.nd r_eaction time, and ele _cc~__~ical correl~es. All
reviews have confirmed our view thaŁ multiple measurement (physiology,
smoking behaviour, subjective experience, concurrent performance/social
behaviour/gestures) is essential for the description and explanation of
smoking behaviour. Each review includes full abstracts of each individual
study reviewed, within a formal critical framework, and ends with
reccss~ndations for future work. One further major review remains to be
carried out (see Phase III below).
Several empirical studies have also been completed and their results have
been presented in formal reports to BAT and at seminar presentations. The
initial two studies were designed to measure aspects of smoking during
cognitive performance. These demonstrated general physiological
consequences of smoking and physiological responses specific to smoking
acts (inhaling); they also demonstrated the modulation of smoking
behaviours under demanding task conditions. In order to account for our
findings, a model of smoking and physiology relationships was constructed
to explain the effects of smoking on attention. This model emphasized the
notion that some aspects of smoking may be beneficial to performance while
others might reduce performance. Thus performance optimisation can only
occur when such effects do not cancel each other out. We believe our model
to be unique; it could help to explain task conditions under which
increments in performance during smoking have not been demonstrated.
The next key s~udy took smoking behaviour into the social domairL Subjects
were monitored during a stressful interview and subsequently rated their
own videotapes (other measures included gross body movements, heart rate,
facial expression, psychometric measures of anxiety, paralinguistic
ClibPDF - www.fastio.com
P,O
r',o

FOR ~ CIRCULATION ONLY
Gale 2
measures of anxiety and relaxation). A relationship was shown between
facial expression and smoking behaviour. Several analyses demonstrated tb~
viability of multiple channel measurement; (we believe this pilot study
should now be extended, see Phase III).
Thus, in Phase I, three key advances were made: comprehensive literature
reviews (which are unique); development and testing of the monitoring of
physiology, performance, smoking acts, and sub~ctive report; deployment of
tb~ methods in two contexts (cognitive information processing and social
stress).
The key research worker throughout Phase I was Dr. Tara Ney, who has now
left the research group and is resident in Canada. Dr. Ney is editing a new
text on smoking behaviour.
Phase II. Smokinq, brain activity, and sustained attention. The work under
this phase is being carried out by Mr. Robert Church and Mr. Haydn Morris,
both of whom hold postgraduate research studentships funded by BAT. They
were responsible for the second and third reports mentioned abo%~.
Mr. Church is responsible for the development of electrccortical studies of
smoking. Two studies are currently underway. The first seeks to measure, in
a novel fashion, the microstructure of the effects of smoking on the brain;
essentially this involves measuring the electroencephalogram in relation to
individual inhalations and their immediate cortical consequences. To
achieve this, subjects first attend the laboratory on several occasions,
during which a smoking profile is derived. The profile is then used in
yoked-control mode as a means of instructing the subject when to inhale.
This technique breaks with earlier studies, none of which have examined the
consequences of smoking in such fine detail. A second study (in which
Messrs. Church and Morris are collaborating) involves measurement of
several physiological indices (heart rate, electrodermal activity,
electroencephalogram) together with continuous ratings of alertness, and
reaction time. The task is similar to that used by Warburton at Reading, in
which he has shown beneficial effects of smoking on sustained attention.
Our aim is to tie together: smoking acts, physiological changes, subjective
ratings of alertness, and shifts in performance. Again, the approach is
a complete break with earlier traditions in smoking/performance studies.
Mr. Church plans further experiments, one of which will involve
measurement of the P300 wave.
Mr. Morris has been responsible for reviewing work on sustained attention
and reaction time. He is devising a vigilance task which, unlike those used
by Warburton, will be difficult to perform and will yield adequate data for
a formal Signal Detection Analysis. This will enable us to partition the
effects of smoking between sensitivity and response bias, thus clarifying
more precisely the reason for the beneficial effects of smoking on
vigilance performance. He is also concerned with a detailed study of the
microstructure of smoking acts and changes in electrodermal activity. One
of his studies will involve replication of our cognitive processing task,
measuring also gestures used both when smoking and when deprived of
smoking.
Both Mr. Church and Mr. Morris have designed their studies so tb~t a
principal independent variable can be the use of cigarettes with varying
ClibPDF - www.fastio.com
0
i",J
P,O

FOR LIMITED CIRCULATION ONLY
Gale 3
nicotine-to-tar ratios.
Phase III: The patterning and deployment of smoking in social situations.
This is a proposal to extend the techniques we have established, to measure
smoking behaviour in social situations. The majority of previous WOLk has
focused on individuals, either sitting passively in the laboratory, or
performing special tasks in social isolatiorL Very little empirical work
exists on smoking behaviour in social contexts. We do not know, for
example, under what circumstances individuals light up at parties, in
restaurants or public houses, in working groups, or during office work.
we propose that a further postgraduate research studentship be established
over a period of three years with the following specific brief: (a) to
review all studies of smoking in social situations; (b) to review, and make
reccmmendations concerning, the measurement of individual and dyadic
behaviour in social situations; (c) to develop methods for monitoring
individuals in field situations, with a view to determining social
antecedents to smoking acts; (d) to study the relationships between
specific social events and smoking behaviours.
In parallel with the literature review the researcher appointed would begin
with the extension of the stress interview outlined above. This would
enable the individual ccncerned to acquire skills in physiological and
social psychological measurement, while at the same time allowing us to
realise the promise revealed by the pilot study. Specifically, we s~_k to
demonstrate that smoking acts occur following particular expressions of
emotional experience and/or that emotion expressed on the face alters
following smoking acts.
The next stage in Phase III will be to study the patterning of smoking acts
while smokers are in social dyads, to explore the relationship between the
smoking behaviour of subjects. It is our view that there are phase
relationships in the smoking acts of interacting dyads. It is hoped that,
once we have demonstrated patterning in the phasing of smoking acts, we
shall be able to demonstrate shifts induced by different nicotine/tar ratio
cigarettes.
An important issue here is whether smokers have stable smoking profiles and
whether such profiles are influenced by social context, the nicotine/tar
ratio of the cigarette, or indeed, by other product-based variables. As in
all our studies, the monitoring of smoking behaviour will be a central
ccmponent of the approach. One aim is to determine whether particular
sources of influence on the individual's smoking behaviour have
differential effects on particular aspects of the smoking profile.
Finally, we wish to develop field study methods for monitoring smoking in
working contexts where there is social interaction (ie between immediate
workers, on the telephone, between individual workers and others within the
organisation). It is proposed that ambulatory monitoring equipment already
available at BAT be used for this purpose, to enable storage of
physiological responses and smoking acts.
Statistical support. Much of our research involves a break with standard
statistical approaches (for example, analysis of variance). With the
support of colleagues in the Department of Social Statistics we are using
ClibPDF - www.fastio.com
P',D
mO
P,O

POR L~ CIRCULATION ONLY
Gale 4
specially-developed time-series models for studying smoking behaviour and
its relationship with other variables over t/me. Most previous studies have
collapsed data across a testing sessicru Inl~ with our interest in the
patterning of smoking acts and the modulation of behaviour, temporal
analysis is crucial. Otherwise, it will not be possible to demonstrate
dependencies of smoking acts upon antecedent events within the flux of
internal and external processes.
The future. Funding for Mr. Church ends in October 1987 and for Mr. Morris
in December 1987. It is proposed that if Phase III is to be funded, a new
postgraduate researcher be appointed with effect" from January 1987. This
will allow for skill transfer and training for the new recruit, enabling the
individual concerned to move as quickly as possible into an active research
role.
Anthony Gale BA PhD FBPsS
Director of Smoking Research Project
Department of Psychology
University of Southampton
ist September, 1.986
ClibPDF - www.fastio.com
i',O
P,O

/
Report to Mr. R. Ferris i
THE ROLE OF SMOKING IN BEHAVIOURAL MODULATION
Introduction
This Draft Report has been prepared for Mr. R. Ferris as p~ of
the documentation for his coming trip to Hamburg. It is,
therefore, a brief document (a) identifying progress made so ~--r
and (b) setting out our intentions for future work under
existing BAT funding. The current manpower supported by the ~_ds
provided consists of two post-graduate research students (Mr. R.
Church and Mr. H. Morris) who will complete their PhD theses hy
September 1987. Ms. T. Ney, formerly supported as a research
assistant, has now left the research group, having been award~J_
her PhD. Ms. Ney completed a number of experimental studies w-_cse
findings are set out below. Mr. Church was appointed with a
specific brief, to study electrocortical correlates of smokir-__-.
Mr. Morris was appointed to develop work on smoking and
vigilance, one area of performance in which strong claims ha':e
been made for the beneficial effects of nicotine. Mr. Morris is
also following up some of the more interesting findings revel--led
by Ms. Ney's work.
Reports Now Available
One of the main purposes of the research has been to conduct
major literature reviews on substantive areas relating to the
psychological and psychophysiological effects of smoking. Three
key reports are now available: (1)"Studies of Learning and
Memory" (T. Ney and A. Gale); (2)"Electrocortical Correlates ~f
Smoking" (R. Church and A. Gale); and (3) "Studies of Reacti~
Time and Sustained Attention" (H. Morris and A. Gale). We ~ "
a aCZ~
also two bibliographies: (i) "Electrocortical Correlates of
Smoking: A Reading List" and (ii) "Smoking, Vigilance and
t~. Reaction Time: A Reading List". In addition, a copy of Ms. Ney's
'.~ doctoral thesis "T_he Role of Smoking in the Modulation of Em~icn
": ~˘; and Behaviour" has been made available. This thesis
includes=
-.-..,,-. -~c "~_..~.:: -. major literature reviews of: theories of smoking, effects o~. ~
:--~ ce : smoking on cognitive performance, and current theories an~% ~,
.' ,~%~ research in the field of emotion. ~?I ~;%
"~ Further Reports and Books in Preparation ~~
~% Ms. Ney and A. Gale have secured a contract from Messrs. Joh~
~-~ ,,-
~-,~,,~,,~ Wiley and Son, to edit a volume entitled '~ng and Human
, ~
:. ~d.) Behaviour". A number of leading world authoritles on sm~i~ ~_ud
its-t~'~e~'Have agreed to contribute. It is expected that this
chapters are being prepared for publication. It is intended ~hat
'~7~ 2~~ ~he literature reviews prepared by R. Church and H. Morris w~_!! ---
-~% be submitted for publication by the end of September 1988. O
mO
ClibPDF - www.fastio.com

Report to Mr. R. Ferris 2
Complementary Aotivities
The Committee of Advanced Studies of the University of
Southampton has awarded a Linked Postgraduate Studentship to A.
Gale, with effect from September 1966. The studentsbip is
associated with A. Gale's work on electrocortical studies of
working memory. The intention is that the new student should work
closely with R. Church and H. Morris and that she/he will conduct
collaborative studies which will be of benefit to the research
igroup as a whole. One of the experiments planned in the series
will involve studying the effects of smoking on short term
memory. The Economic and S~ial Rese&rch-Councilhas awaz~ed a
~o[n~ research grant to Dr. Chris Skinner of the Department of
Social Statistics and A. Gale, to develop time series models for
the analysis of psychological experiments. It is intended that
Dr. Skinner and his Research Fellow, Ms. T. Brunsdon, will assist
in the analysis of data emerging from experiments conducted by
the group. The special problems associated with time series
analysis of smoking and other behaviours are discussed below.
Research Studies Conducted by Ms. Ney
Ms. Ney conducted a series of five experiments and these are
reported in great detail in her PhD thesis (referred to above).
.Smokin~ and Information Processing. In two major studies, she
ex~lored the effects of ~_Q~ng_uponhigh level cognitive
.processing (the solution of intelligenoe~esŁ~Łems). Smoking had
no effects on-be~{orm~c&-'in-either an indepenaent groups or
~pea~ed-m%as~ge~"~i~ One effect (not replicated) was to show
that smokers were, if anything, more risky in identifying
incorrect solutions, in that such responses were sig6~ficantly
{asŁer--th~ th6s~ for non-smokers. However, the task had powerful
effects on the pattern of dragging on and tapping the cigarette.
IAt times of most intense concentration on the task, subjects
opped virtually all smoking acts. This effect was replicated
d is reliable.~ It was also shown that smoking acts increased
just before an item was presented and foiiowibg-iŁ&m"5omPl~tion
Reduotlons In smoklng aotlvlty were assoclated w~th body
stilling, lowered heart rate, and lowered skin conductance
responses. We concluded that when under states of intense
selective attention and active mental processing, all actions,
including smoking, are given a lower priority of importance. We
believe these findings to be the most significant, from a
theoretical point of view. However, a further replicated finding
is also of interest. Each dragging act on the cigarette was
analysed in terms of antecedent and consequent physiological
activity. Major increases in skin_oonductance responses occurred
prior to dragging (in a variety of analyses). We believe we m~v
have discovered some aspect of the motivational causes of
smoking. These changes appear to have been initiated in the
ClibPDF - www.fastio.com
r,,o
