Guildford Misc
4-page document: • .XT ! 2oJUNI98| BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY] iL!. MITED .......
Fields
Document Images
• .XT ! 2oJUNI98|
BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY] iL!. MITED .......
I
,~ • -
•
Regd. Omee: PO Box 4~ Westminster House 7 Millbank London-.~'~ 1P 3,.11~.~}
Incorporated :n Londoa-No.7t971
i
Te.." ex ~384.5
RESTRICTED
Circular No 65
RLOEIGCM ~,
TO ALL NO Is AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGERS OF OPERATING COMPANIES
"ADVERTISING DOCUMENTATION": UPDATED VERSION
You may already have seen a copy of a paper produced by INFOTAB in
1979 entitled, "Advertising Argumentation". This was the document
referred to in the BATCo lg81 Board Strategies on Smoking Issues as
fol l ows:
"Although it must be assumed that evidence that advertising does
not affect total consumption will not dissuade authorities from
restricting or banning cigarette advertising, companies should
nevertheless quote all available evidence of this kind in
negotiations with the authori ties particularly INFOTAB' s paper
enti tl ed "Adverti sing Argumentati on"."
(Strategies P.7, 6.Z)
INFOTAB have now up-dated this material and retitled it, "Advertising
Oocumentation". A copy is enclosed. Parts of the text have been
amended and the "Argumentation" section now contains more recent
supporting quotations. If you have a copy of the 1979 document in
your possession, you may wish to destroy it to avoid possible con-
fusion in future.
I do hope this paper will be of value to you in your work, and would
just like to point out that when using its contents, you should
please ensure that no mention is made of its source. Also, where
practicable, your own paraphrase may be preferable to a direct
quote.
With kind regards
RLO ELY /
0
0
""~0
(_,,q

ADVERTISING DOCUMENTATION BOOK - ERRATA
FROM I~IFOTAB
One of our readers has kindly advised us of a mistake
which he noticed on two different pages in the above
Advertising Doc~T.en~ation Book.
The word "sociophysiological" should read
"SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL"
in the fol!owinq two instances:
- lhtroducto~z page entitled "Advertising Argument-
ation", paracraph 3, 5th line.
- Section "Argumentation", page 3/1, first para-
graph, 5th line.
Would you be kind enough to change these two words in
your copy of the Advertising Documentation Book.
Thanking you in advance for your attention to this
matter, we remain,
With kind regards,
Yours sincerely,
Antonietta Corzl
Director of Information Services
!S/AC/LG
Encl.
O
(ZD
--o
L~4

A2VERTISING ARGUMENTATION
.
,
.
.
S.
.
.
8.
o
I0.
ii.
CIGARETTE ADVERTISING HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO INCREASE THE
TOTAL TOBACCO M~R?LET BUT ONLY TO DIVIDE AN ALREADY EXISTING
MARKET.
CIGARETTE ADVERTISING PROMOTES BRAND SWITCHING, NOT OVERALL
SALES. THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY CONDUCTS NO GENERIC ADVERTISING
IN CONTRAST TO SOME INDUSTRIES WHICH PRODUCE OTHER CONTRO-
VERSIAL PRODUCTS, E.G. EGGS, MILK, MEAT, ETC.
CIGARETTE ADVERTISING REPORTEDLY HAS LITTLE OR NO
INFLUENCE
ON THE DECISION OF YOUNG PEOPLE TO BEGIN SMOKING.
INVESTI-
GATORS IN THIS ARE~, F~NY OF WHOM ARE INVOLVED IN THE
DEVELOP-
MENT OF ANTI-SMOKING CAMPAIGNS, HAVE DETERMINED THAT YOUNG
PEOPLE BEGIN SMOKING FOR A VARIETY OF SOCIOPHYSIOLOGICAL,
SOCIOCULTURAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS. HOWEVER, IT IS
GENERALLY AGREE2 THAT THE INFLUENCE OF PARENTS AND OTHER
YOUNG PEOPLE A~PLAR TO BE ,MAJOR FACTORS.
CIGARETTE ADVERTISING HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO CAUSE ADULTS TO
BEGIN SMOKING CR TO CONTINUE SMOKING.
THE WORLDWIDE USE OF TOBACCO PRECEDED THE EMERGENCE OF
ADVERTISING.
TOBACCO IS A~'E';~.~ PRODUCT; CONSEQUENTLY, ADVERTISING OF
TOBACCO PRODUCTS IS A COMMERCIAL RIGHT.
CIGARETTE ADVERTISING IS ALREADY REGULATED.
ADVERTISING BANS OR RESTRICTIONS APPEAR TO HAVE LITTLE OR NO
EFFECT ON OVEraLL CIGARETTE SALES.
ELECTRONIC MEDZA IS GENERALLY CONSIDERED TO BE ONE OF THE
MOST EFFECTIVE_ M~NS OF ADVERTISING; YET, BANS ON BROADCAST
CIGARETTE ADVERTZSING HAVE REPORTEDLY HAD LITTLE OR NO
EFFECT ON OVERALL SALES. THEREFORE, IT SEEMS THAT EXTENDING
SUCH BANS TO ALL OTHER MEDIA WOULD HAVE NO GREATER EFFECT.
SOME GOVERNMENTS, GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, AND ~NTI-SMOKING
SPOKESMEN HAVE REJECTED THE IDEA OF BANNING CIGARETTE
AD%~RTISING.
ADVERTISING RESTR=CTIONS OR BANS CURB PRODUCT INNOVATION .AND
DEVELOPMENT.
CD
O
kO
ok.)
c.r]

12. ADVERTISING BANS DEPRIVE CONSUMERS OF IMPORTANT
PRODUCT
INFORMATION.
13. ADVERTISING BANS ARE ECONOMICALLY DETRIMENTAL.
14. ADVERTISING BANS THREATEN FREE ENTERPRISE.
15. ADVERTISING BANS THREATEN THE CONCEPT OF FREE SPEECH IN
ADVERTISING AND THE PERSONAL LIBERTIES OF EACH INDIVIDUAL.
16. ADVERTISING BANS ARE AN INSULT TO THE INTELLIGENCE OF THE
CONSUMER.
ORGANIZATIONAL NOTES
(!) The quotations within each of the numbered sections are
arranged chronologically, beginning with the most recent. The
only exception to this rule is Section 3: "Cigarette smoking
reportedly has little or no influence on the decision of young
people to begin smoking." That section is divided into two
subsections based on content. This organization is explained in
more detail on the firsu page of that section.
(2) It should be noted that there may be more than one set of
Quotation marks within one quotation. This is intended to
indicate that although the entire quotation appears within the
cited article or book, it may not necessarily appear in the same
paragraph or on the same page of that article or book. In that
case, all the pages are listed in the citation.
O
O
~o
O~
