Guildford Misc
5-page document: 3.;,.T.. ~, & D, CQ:".~Z.RENCE - .~:;O.~:72_~,%~ October 24 :o 27 1967.
Fields
Document Images
3.;,.T.. ~, & D, CQ:".~Z.RENCE - .~:;O.~:72_~,%~
October 24 :o 27 1967.
Present:
Dr. S. I. Green
Sir Charles Ellis
Dr. D. G. Felton
Dr. R. B. Gtifflth
Mr. L. C. LaporCe
Dr. R. A. Sanford
Dr. F. Seehofer
Mr. H. E. So.off
Mr. R. S. Wade
Conclusion a.t3.d Recommend-3tlons
=
,
.
The maLn conclusions are as follows:
e
Company scientists should be fully involved in the
formulation of company policy in the field of smoking
and health.
.
6.
Smoking is now irreversibly associated with health.
More legislation and governmental control can be
expeczed.
Lessons can be learnt from the Strickman affair
applicable over a wide range of activity.
Some attempt Jhould be made to establish the optimal
levels of nicotine for smokers, to develop low T,P,M.
normal nicotine cigarettes, low T.P.M. low nicotine
cigarettes, predominantly health-orientated cigarettes
and to consider more radical approaches to smoking
devices and non-inhalable cigarettes.
Montreal and Hamburg will seek approval to develop
a cigarette made predominantly of locally produced
reconstituted tobacco.
Southampton will develop a cigarette incorporating
all factors considered of importance la blo-assay and
aim to have it tested biologically.
e
Biotes%ing of Company products should be liraited to
products believed to be completely developed to a
viable saleable proposition.
..=...a.
O

- 2 -
Q
.
I0.
II.
12.
13.
The Companies of the G~'oup ace generally weak
and ,n~lnerable in the development of conventional
ci~'~ret:es. We should examine the a.opltcatton of
scien:ific work to these problems. The closest
working rel.~tionshlps with those e.m, ployed in marketing
should be established.
Knowledge of the technical details of how people
smoke could be of great value.
The attention of microbiologists w~.thin the Group
should be drawn to the possibility of the necessity
for microbiological production control.
The I00 mm._cigarette is probably in entirely the
wrong direction. It could, however, provide an
opportunity to introduce extra long filters.
It was conctuded that members had found the conference
useful although the criticism was expressed that there
had been insufficient detailed co-ordination of work
progra mines.
There should be further conferences of this nature and
the majority present thought that the next meeting
should be within the next six or seven months.
CZD
CZ>

- 3 -
1. C, b Cec;ives of t~e.Cor~ere..nce
Dr. Green outlined the objectives of the conJerence
as follows:
a)
b)
To -. :~ine the research and development
ec'.tv[t7 relevanL to the Companies of the
Group.
To ',den~Jfy the main assumptions implicit
tn present actlvtties.
c)
To identify the maLn objectives of research
and development and to recom,'~, end any
desirabIe changes in objectives or procedure.
He pointed out that the objectives were yew broad
and should be construed to include other research cent.~es such
as Harrogate. Although add~.tlonal topics could arise ~rom t:me
to time, two major themes had been Isolated, namely smok'.ng
and health and product development.
2. The meeting approved the agenda structure, after a
"= short discussion.
3. Assumotlons
Constderable discussion took place on the assumptions
made by R, & D. scientists and these were listed without any
attempt to justify them or to agree on their covertness at this
time.
as:
Of the assumptions listed, the main ones were Identified
Research can be profitable.
b)
c)
There is a m~nimum necessacy Level of ulcotlne.
Smoking Is a hablt a~ributable to n~cottne,
The form o~ nicotine affects the race of absorptlon
by the smoker.
Smoking and health problems are susceptible
to a research solut¢on.
d)
e)
If there is no inhaling, there is no lung cancer
or respiratory disease.
Smoking has both physiological and psychological
effects.

- 4 -
O
--I
g)
h)
There will be more gove.,~.,..ent involvement in
:he tobacco :ndus:cy in the future.
,~omo-n,/ ncn--..edlcal scientists are capable
o£ making judgements on health matters.
Selective :iltrat!on of non-volatile =atertaIs
is possible (i.e., aerosol particles are chemically
inhomogeneous).
i)
Smoking and health matters cannot be entirely
handled by legal and politlcal moves.
4. The Presen'. En-:i.-onment
A nu.-.~er o: factors were listed as being "~hose affecting
R. & D. activity but over which we have little or no control.
The me,lot ones were as foll.~ws:
a}
Le.,'~_[ and oo!i'~:cal =re_~su:es
The meeting heard summaries of the American,
Canadian and German positions and %*late unanimous
in reaching =he conclusion that the technical
position on smoking and health is hecon~ng
increasingly complex and that the companies'
scientists should be fully involved in the formula-
tion of company policy in the --'ield of smoking and
health.
Sir Charles said that in his opinion, 1:he industry
should atter'.,pt to seize the initiative by some
positive action. A number of suggestions were
considered and it was felt generally that some
attempt should be made at the appropriate time
to bring together the £ndust.-y scientists in the
U.S. in order to explore possible action in this
field. Dr. Griffith cited examples of the U.K,
and especially Germany.
It was also agreed that company scientls:s can
provide a positive approach in contacts with
public authorities.
It was agreed that smoking is likely to be
associated with health continuously in the
future and that it was not a passing phase.
!t was likely, moreover, that tobacco would
be involved in legislaclon of a food and drug
administration nature in respect both of product
and of manufacture. The German situation
regarding pesticide on tobacco's indicative
CZD
<Zz)

- 5 -
"Ib
b)
c)
o.~ :~is trend a!though tobacco ~n Germany
a~re3dy comes under the .~ood Iaws.
The meeting d~cussed Amcel's smok%ng
mate.-'.al S.V. and I.-..petlai Developments.
The position may be reached within a Fear
o: sO where Celanese Corporation of America
may attemp: to exert, pressure through the
public authorities to get their pzoduc~
incorporated into cigarettes. In chis
connection, it was considered that the
presen¢ arrangements were satisfactoc7.
The present arrangement |s that B.A.T.
(A~illbank) ere in touch wlth Amce! and
have a rela~ionshlp which Is 'warm' but
llmlted to supplier and possible consumer.
R. & D.E. ate testing SIV~ materLals a~.d
Amcel undertake ~o keep us fully ~.nfon.,ed
and not to disclose publicly without prior
consultation. There were reports that Amcel
had recently made a "technologlcal break-
through", and if this were the case, both
Germany and Canada wlshed ¢o receive
samples through ~V.iilbank when these become
available. Germany would also l~ke a small
quantiW of the curren~ product.
In the case of Imperial Developments the
problems of communication were clarlfied.
Because of the A.M. & F. license to I.T.Co.
(G.B. & I.), Dr. Green undertook to get further
clarification with respect to the provision of
information to Br~.stol of new developments on
PCL in Canada and America.
External Research -m.,'osrammes
It was agreed that such programmes as ~hose
at the U.-.'~vers'.ty of ,~entuc~" and at the
Environmental Health Unl¢ a~ Research Triangle,
N.C. (.~o~In) will influence company research"
programmes and may also have other effects.
For example, the fact that they will of necessity,
publish their resul:s should le~d to a reconslderatlon
of our own policy on publlsh~ng arid it was agreed
that where results which we had obtained were
l~keI7 to be covered by such publications, we
ourselves sho-~d publish ~irst. ~t was also
agreed that we should co-operate in such programmes
CD
<ZD
