FTC Joe Camel Documents
RJR Strategy Programs: Ethnic
Fields
Document Images
P~R S~ATE~Y
r-~O710 16G8
~]~: TO AClIZEVE D01~NAItT PRESENCE FOR TARGETED BRAIE) VZA LOCAL
I:'ZELD ItARICETZI~ AJI) PROYZDE ]]MCd~RY 111AT Ai)IN~SSES UIGOUE INIIRI~T~.
CAMEL/SALEM ~xpecl~o TO AC~ZEVE 40t rm~L aY mo 1990's.
enmzc mmCeTS PROVZ~ES 11 POZm OF TOTAL YAS SHARE.
A 40% ~ ~N
IUR YAS Smu~
ETHHZC GRO@ S~RE ~
Hr:.XZCAnlCunmi
CAMEL 40t 5t
B~cx/P~ SALEM 40
TOTAL INIDNVI,~o,
HEI~0RT's ETHNZC PROGIM44 PRODUCED_8 POZNTS/YF.Xe AMONG BLAcK.YAS.
3 J~II DI. ~q paan po.~d
87M03834
|
CX 36-A

50718 IGS~
EXISTI]IG YJ~5 TARGETED PROGRAJ4S HAVE LtNI"TED ABZLI"TY TO CREATE A STRONG
ZJ~ACT~t. ~ m0US ,b0St.O YA,5.
Lo~ YAS En'zczn~cy ~ o~ VEHZCLF.S
INIDNVI
III
DZHf~I ~q pa3npoad
........... CX 36-B
87M03835

~R STP, ATEGY
TARGEITD YAS mmc[~m; pmuum zs NEEDED TO REAal ANGLO YAS z# AN
e
I
•
•
• PERSONAL ~SAGE
• EFFECT'ZVE REACH
~LqKL=T COVERAGE
•
•
DE)e6RA~ZC~ I SPECZAL
LrnlNI¢) DLrVELOPE~ ~I SPECZAL
0VERLAPPTNG GROUPS, TAK[N TOGETHER, COVER ALL YAS
EACH YAS ZN HULTIPLE GJ~I~
87M03836
3£HFH pa3np().ld
CX 36-C
5O718 1670

50710 1671
P.AMKETXNG PMOGI~J~ DESXGNED TO DEI-TVER D014XNANT PRESENCE AI~ A PERSONAL
MESSAGE.
IN[ "
~THNXC PI~IGRAMS
sp,~c~,, z,n~s [l i
DZHfH £q p~3npoad
CX 36-D
•
87M03837

5O718 ~672
1995 TAm~,eT~ 1995
CAI~L
SALJ31 15 ET~I.z¢ 11t
~GNA ~ A.~L~
TOTAL 40t TOTAL 20t
INII-DNVIA~
[II
3,L~lf~l £q p~3npoad
87M03838
CX 36-E

XV. ANALYTICAL SIJI~IARY
THE CONPOSZTZON OF THE 18. POPULATZON BEGAN TO CHANGE SZGNZFZCANTLY DURZNG THE
LATE 1970BS AND ZS EXPECTED TO CONTZNUE CNANGZNG FOR THE SE)UkZNDER OF THE
CENTURY.
OVERALL 18, POPULATXON HAS SEER GROWING AND VI:LL COIITTNUE TO IX)
SO DUR]:NG THE CONXNG YEARS (I:NCflEASXNG 7q; BY 1995). CONVERSELY,
THE ]8-24 POPULATXON PEAKED ZN 1980 AND HAS STEAD]ELY DECLXNED
EVER SYNCS. HOREOVER, THE 18-24 PQPULATZON |S EXPECTED TO
OECLZNE BY AN ADDZTXONAL 9~ BY ).995. THE PORTZON OF THE
POPULATZON A~[O ],8-24 ~ZLL DECLXHE TO ]2~ XN ]99S.
HZHORZTY XMPONTANCE TO THE 18-24 POPULATXON WZLL CONTZNUE TO
GROW. HOWEVER, .q~IGLO$ WXLL CONTXNUE TO BE THE DOMZNANT
DENOGRAPHZC FORCE ACCQUNTZNG FOR T'dQ-THZRDS OF ALL 18-24 YEAR
OL~S ZN 1995.
THESE DEHOGRAPHZ¢ SHZFTS HAVE ZNFLUENCED THE COHPOSZTZON OF THE ¢ZGARETTE
ZNDUSTRY. ALSO CONT~|BUT|HG TO THE AGZHG OF THE ¢|GARETTE MARKET. HOWEVER. ZS ~
- THERE ARE APPROX~I~/ELY 30% FEWER 18-24 SMOKERS z. 1988 COMPARED
TO 1980 (AN EST~T~ DECLINE OF OVER 3 HILL;ON S~KERS). ~T ~5
87M03839
CX 36-F

YOUNGER ~..LT SM01CERS
50718 1739
I'V. ANALYTZCAL SIN4ARY
0ECLTNXNG SOCXALACCEPTAEXLXTYOF SOIOI~NG AND XNCREASZNG PRZCES
ARE RESPONSZlL[ FOR TN[ OXSPROPORT~ONAll RATE OF |NCIOENCE
DECLZNE ANONG YAS. XNCREASXNG CXGARETTE PRZCES. HOHEVER. ZS
|ELXLrVED TO BE THE SZNGLE HOST XNFLUENTZAL FACTOR.
O
O
~OTH THE S~L_I~_ AND C~Q~EL BRANDS ARE BEG|NNXNG TO HAKE PROGRESS ZN POSZTXVELY
ALTERZNG YOUNGER ADULT SMOKER ATTZTUDES AND PERCEPTXONS. [EY TO BOTH CAHPAXGNS
ARE THEXR ABZLZTY TO ATrRACT ATTENTZON ZN A UNXGUE AND EXCZTXNG 14ANNER.
THE YOUNGER ADULT SmKER NARKET XS XNCREASZNGLY |ECONXNG A 1140 BRAND HARKET AS
~IANLUORO AND Nk'~m)ORT NOV CAPTURE TWO-THZRDS" OF ALL YAS (uP F;UX4 44% ZH 1982).
R3R HAS EXPERXENCED LOSSES AMONG 18-24 YeAR OLD S;40~[RS ON eACH
OF THE CORE BRANDS. THESE LOSSES HAVE ACCELERATED SZNCE 2982.
THE =GAP" BETWEEN R3R's A~O PH'S SHARE OF YAS ¢ONTXNUES TO
ZNCREASE (OVER S0 SHARE POXNTS ZN 1987 versus 24 SHARE ~OZnTS ZN
1980~.. THX~. Z~PAILItTX~qI~P~.A.L~RIIzlIG AS XT CAN me ¢OIISX|[I[I) AN
Hi
•
~ J~H fH ~q P a ~ n p o.~ cl
87M03840
CX 36-G

50718 1740
11/. ANALYTICAL SUIglARY
RESOUIK:ES ALLOCATED T~ |llOIrlllG THE IUSlHESS AIIIONG YOUNGER ADULT SMOKERS IdEl~
flEOLICED SIGHIIrICANTLY Ill THE IqlO-]980'S. THIS REFLECTED & PRONOUNCED SHIFT
TOMARD VOLU~ GEIIERAVING PROGIUIJ4S IrOLLI)qdXNG THE FET 1rNCREASE AND ACCOMPANIED BY
TOTAL YAS SUPPOBT OH CORE Bmmns HAS DECLINED iy44~ SINCE 2982.
|k)REOVER, THE SHARE OF TOTAL HESOURCES THAT HAVE REACHED YOUNGER
ADULT S/4OKERS NA$ DECLINED TO 11% IX 1987, DOV~ FROM OVER 18% IN
THE tArtLY 1980'S.
THIS DECLINE IN SPENDING HAS OCCURRED ON EACH OF THE CORE
BRANDS |UT HAS BEEN PARTICULARLY SHARP ON CAMEL ANo SALE]4
(EFFECTIVE SPENDING DOWN OVER 50% SINCE 1982).
J~Ji BEGAN TO SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE BUSINESS 8UlLDiHt SUPPORT IN
1987. THIS ~ENL~,~D EFrORT COWrZHUED INTO 1988.
3 LI IfH pa,3npoad
87M03841
CX 36-H

YOUNGER ~I.T SI40i(ERS
S0718 174t
V. XI4PACT OF_ YAS PERFOIOMI~ TREHI) -- "THE BOTTOH LIllE"
THE ANALYSIS TO THIS POINT NAS FOCUSED ON SLII~iARIZIIIGKEY CNANGES OCCURRING t/XTHIN
THE CIGAIIETTE NARKLrT. SPECXIrZCALLY...
OE~OGRAPNIC TRENDS INOXCAT~TNATTHE YOUNGER ADULT POPULATION NAS
ANOWZLL CONTINUE TO OECLINE. ~k)R[OVERe SNOI(ING INCXOENCE ANONG YAS
ZS OECLINXNG AT AN ORE RAPID HATE THAN THE NARKET IN GENERAL.
P.JR's PERFORIqANCE RNONG YA5 HAS DETERIORATED CONSIDERABLY SINCE 1982.
FACT, LOSSES ANOffG THZS GROUP HAVE ACCELERAT~p.
DESPITE RJR's DECLX.NXNG YAS PERFORI4ANCE. RESOURCES DEVOTED TO
REVERSING THIS TREHD HAVE BEEN REDUCED SIGNIFICANTLY.
FOLLOHZNG QUANTIFIES THE ~ THAT THESE OYNANXCS HAVE ON R3R's ABILITY TO NEET
SHARE AND VOLUNE OBJECTIVES.
INI.DNVI/
Ill
87M03842
CX 36-I

YOUHGER ~,.,iLT SI40KEY.S
507~0 1742
Vo
114PACT OF YA$ PERFOMIANCE TREND -- "111E BOTTOH LINE"
T~o FACTORS ALONEACCOUNT FOR A 8RANO*$ OR~:MPANY*S OV£RALLPERIrORILANCE: AGZNGAND
SblXTCHXNG. XT ZS APPARENT, NOkIEVER, TNAT AGXNG ZS THE PRZNARY XNFLUENCE ZN THE
CXGARETTE NARKET DUE TO HZGH DEGREE OF BRAND LOYALTY.
APPROXXHATELY 7S% OF ALL SHARE OF SHOK[N CHANGE XS DUE TO NEW
SI4QICERS REPLACXNG ONES WHO QUZT.
GROklTH gRANDS HAVE HXGHER SHANEANONG nNLCbfSn
DECLXNZNG BRAHOS HAVE HXGHER SHARE OF nOUZTS~
THE OTHER 2S% OF XNDUSTRY SHARE CHANGE XS DUE TO SHXTCHXNGB
NOSTLY RELATED TO EXTERNAL EVENTS |X.E., PRXCE gRANDS, LQ~/ERED
TAR, ETC.).
3J HF},I fiq pa npoad
CX 36-J
87M03843
