FTC Joe Camel Documents
Strategic Overview
Fields
Document Images
STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
Market Dynamics
50755 6087
Stability in longer term performance of brands is due to the
mechanics of how shares change. Two market dynamics cause SOM
change:
Aging is the result of new 18 yearold smokers replacing
older smokers who quit.
Brand switching occurs as smokers change UB.
Xq

50755 6088
STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
Market Dynamics
YAS are the only source of replacement smokers.
government studies show that...
Repeated
Less than one-third of smokers (31%) start after age 18
Only 5% of smokers start after age 24
On an annual basis, about 800M (1.7%) adult smokers are new YAS.
Conversely, about 1,500M smokers quit each year.

p~. ~d.u.ced t)y
~ omap 5u.[sn pa~,e=t~sa
aq ueo ~oue= ie ~,eq~, aouanlju.[ aql
0£'I£~ 99"Z~
sJa~ou~ 686I
~L'9 ~
(suo.[ [ [ .[ B) ~;eO
• [o^ [enuuv /a:~e~l aaqmnN
"amntoA ~J~snpuI uo ~oedm~ ue aAeq sJa~tnO pue SVA MaN
M3IA~3AO 3ID31V~IS

STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
50755 6090
Market Dynamics
Marlboro's share among smokers 18-20 is 63% while their 50 plus
share is only 8%. As a result, Marlboro gains volume/share via
the aging dynamic.
New YAS provide 4.3 billionunits
Quitters cost them only 1.45 billion units
Aging benefit each year is...
- 2.82 billion units
- 1.02 share points
Ind. Marlboro
Volume I Volume
1988 Smokers 541.84 i--> 24.89 134.86 <--1
New YAS ~i~~-~ ...... ~.~-~83334.271.45
Older guitter .i.__>.=2_~.4
1989 Smokers . ~ 137.68 <

STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
Market Dynamics
50755 6091
Marlboro has owned the YAS market for many years and their share
is growing. This has provided a total aging gain of 7.64 share
points since 1981.
Marlboro Share
Group 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
Smokers 18-20 42.4 47.6 52.2 55.1 57.5 60.6 63.3
~okers 50+
5.6 6.3 6.9 7.2 7.3 7.8 8.4
Impact on SOM
.87 1.52 .82 .99 1.16 1.08 1.20

50755 6092:
STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
Market .Dynamics
Switching also has an impact on a Brand's performance, however,
it is more difficult to measure. The number of switchers
depends on the definition and time interval used.
Switching Definition
Purchase UB 90%+
Claimed UB
Time Interval
Month 1 vs. Month 6
Month I vs. Month 6
3..5~
7.8%
Claimed UB
Any Change
The tota] number of;~o~e~FW~ll~i~.__:~l~ss e i .... is probably
between 1.87MM (4~)

50755 6093
STRAT EG I C OVERVI EW
Market Dynamics
The impact of Switching on a particular Brand's performance
is usually small because its gains are nearly the same as its
losses. Key reasons are:
Switchers have different wants
More than 70 Brands compete
PERCENT OF SWITCHERS
WINSTON
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 Total
Gain 12.5~ 12.1~ 11.3% 10.6I 10.1g
Loss 9.3 11.2 12.2 11.6 12.6
Diff. +3.2 + .9 - .9 -1.0 -2.7
Switching
-.02
-.04

STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
Market Dynamics
The number of potential switchers is larger than the number of New
YAS. However...
YAS Switchers
Size 800M
1.87MM - 3.74HM
Wants Similar Dissimilar
Brands 2 70
Brands/Prospect
400H 27M - 53M
Since Switching is hard to define and generally has less impact on
performance than.Agi1., i --"-.. u..~ .....
Net Switchlng-~ To~aiIS~nge-~g~~ng

STRATEGIC OVERVIEW
Market Dynamics
50755 6095
All of MarIboro's growth in the 1980's was due to its ability to
attract new YAS.
| Marlboro lost business as a result of switching.
SOM Market Dynamic
1981 1988 Change Aging Switching
Marlboro 18.32 24.89 I+6..571 1+7.(;41

•
se~ued=o3
spueJ8 XaH
so~=eu~o ~eHJeN jo
9609 ~-~..0 g
