Council for Tobacco Research
the Niles Cluster; Newsweek [at A Seminar in La Jolla Ca Some of the Nations Top Virologists Heard the Most Impressive Evidence So Far That Viruses May Be Responsible for Cancer]
Fields
- Type
- ARTICLE
- Depository Date
- 31 Jan 1996
- Named Person
- Usphs
- Heath, C.
- Cdc Epidemic Intelligence Service
- Cook Cnty Hospital
- Acs
- Schwartz, S.
- Farber, S.
- Children'S Cancer Research Foundation
- Nci
- Stanley, W.M.
- Trentin, J.J.
- Baylor Univ
- Salk, J.
- Rubin, H.
- Univ, C.A.
- St John Brebeuf
- Newsweek
- Heath, C.
- Request
- 132
- Author
- Newsweek
- Box
- 096
- Site
- Hoyt
- UCSF Legacy ID
- wei1aa00
Document Images
>aEWSREK
Apri1.22, 1963
'The Niles Cluster'
Smallpox, yellow fever, polio mumps,
fld, me~:!rs-one by one, a host of in-
fecrrous diseases have been proved to
be raused by vinrses. At a seminar in
Lu Joila, C:odif., last week, some of the
nateon's top virologists heard the most
imprrssive r~idenee so far that vinrses
may be responsible for the most feared
d:sense of all-cancer.
The evidence, which does not rule
out other possible causes of cancer such
as heradiq- or environmental factors,
was Freseutrd in the form of a report on
what h:s become knowrr among cancer
e.perts as "The Ndes Cluster."
The tosvu of Niles, llbnois, is an or-
dm;:n, middle-class suburb of Chicago
with a population of around 25,000. But
in March 1961, the U.S. Public Health
Sendce's Communicable Disease Center
in Atlanta, v!rlch routinely keeps track
of infectious disease outbreaks reported
throughout the country, received an ex
traordinary report. four Niles children
had died within the space of three
months of acute leukemia, an incurable
Lype af cancer that floods the blood-
st-aam with abnormal white cells. Aiore
over, nther voungsters had come down
witl: 3eukemia in recent years, all within
the same 2-squaremila neighborhood.
Dr. Clark Heath Jr. of the CDC's
Epidemic Intr lligence Service was
quicki% otderer; to Niles.
lnteniewinf, parents, family physi
cians, and lo,:al health officials, Heath
learned that eight Niles youngsters,
3 to 14 years old, had developed leu
kemia since 1957. These cases gave
NJe: an annual leukemia rate five times
higher than the national average.
Familiar Partprnr Heath also noted
"a concentration of cases among families
usinF a particular school, and a periodic
pattern of onset." Seven of the children
either were going to St. John Breberd,
a parochial school, or had older brothers
or sisters at the school. And the disease
cropped up in two distinct periods-
three cases between the fall of 1957
and spring of 195b, and five between
winter 1959 and summer 1900.
All this suggested to the CDC invesli-
gator (and to a team from Cook County
Hospital in Chicago) a familiar pattern;
the lerrkemur was acting like an infee
tioes disease. Niles seemed to be in
c:.ded by a °cancer virus "
E,:t on the cthrr hM.i HP,th found
that none of lhe stricken children came
trom the same famdc, nor, in foct, were
the youngsters or their families even
acquainted. As the summer wnre on,
hawevcr Heath came upon two more
flndrr.gs suggesting that the Niles leuke-
min cases were infectious in origin. First
he leamed thut the two leukemia emp-
tious rMCurred at about the same time as
MEDICINE
two outbreaks of rheumatic feverlike ill-
ness. Second, a survey of death certifi-
cates for the same period revealed an
abnormal number of Nile~ youngsters
had died with congenital heart defects.
What could be the connection be-
tween leukemia, the rlreumaticlike
illne5ses, and malformed hearts? Sum-
marizing his report on the case at the
American Cancer Society seminar in La
Jolla, He.rth pointed out that the paral
lel outbreak of rheumatic-like disease
suggests that both it and acute child
hood leukemia may be a sequel to a
milder infection going the rounds, just
as acute rheumatic fever itself may fol
low a strep throat. As for the heart de
fcrts, he added, the% "crommonly occur
in infants whose mothers n,tch Cermm
measles [rubella] in early pregnancy:"
Tying all this together, conceivably the
rubella virus might lie dormant in a
child infected before birth, only to
awaken years later to produce leukemia,
or to activate a leukemia virus.
Stealth,r Nolrr Nor does the ab-
sence of direct contact between the
Niles victims rule out the possibility that
viruses play a stealthy role in the dis
ease, Heath noted. The polio virus, for
example, infects many people, but rela-
tively few actually become sick or para
lyzed. Similarly, some scientists believe,
leukemia could be caused by a'tiveak"
virus, infecting many children, but trig
gering malignancy in only a few.
Further evidence that a virus may
have been at work in the Niles leukemia
cluster is offered by the Cook County
Hospital team of Dr. Steven Schwartt.
Several years ago, Schwartz reported
that volunteers inoculated with extracts
from the tissues of leukemia patients
produce antibodies as they would after
a polio shot, and he concluded that the
injected tissues contained viruses. Re-
cently, he tested blood samples taken
from relatives of the Niles leukemia vic
tims "A certain number of the somples"
Heath
The rirrimrlmd sornething in rommon
H TflJ034U11
Schwartz told NEwswr.etr, "rontaured
antibodies to leukemic extracts."
The interest of some cancer experts
who heard Heath's report was tempered
with caution. "Until more cluster out-
breaks are studied in detail," said Dr.
Sidney Farber, research director of Bos-
ton's Children's Cancer Research Foun-
dation, "I prefer to think of the Niles
case simply as an unusual occurrence
that deserves special note." And the
experts were careful to emphasize that.
the question of infection aside, there is
no concrete evidence that leukemia is
"catching," the way a cold Is. Already,
however, epidemiologists at the Com-
municable Disease Center and the Na-
tional Cancer institute are Investigating
other reported leukemia drrsters.
Had the Niles incident occurred a
Adrno.irus 12
A garden rvrrirh rarned ranter

decade ago, it might well have been
overlooked. Its significance today is
largely attributable to the surge of re-
search interest in viruses as a cause of
cancer, which started with Dr. Wendell
M. Stanley's pronouncement in 1956
that "the time has come when we should
assume that viruses are responsible for
most, if not all, kinds of cancer, includ-
ing cancer In man " The Nobel Piize
winner's assertion, of course, was
grounded on solid evidence of the role
viruses play in some animal cancers. At
least three kinds of leukemia in mice
can be vjrusinduced, as well as one
type of breast tumor. Working with hu-
man blood samples under an electron
microscope, investigators have found
particles in leukemic cells that are indis-
tinguishable from the mouse leukemia
vinrses. But no one has yet seen a
virus from a solid human cancer.
Neo- ApproaeHr Searching for the
viruses that may be at work in human
malignancy, Prof. John J. Trenttn of
Houston's Baylor University College of
Medicine is using a new approach. In-
stead of looking for airoses in human
caneer cells, he is looking for human
viruses that cause cancer. The Texas re-
searcher has taken various types of
adenovirus-many of which cause re-
ap vatory infections in man-and inlerted
them, one by one, into baby hamsters
and mice. Two types, adenoviruses 12
and 18, produced highly lethal tumors
in the test animals, he reported last
week. Both types, he noted, infect hu-
mans (nearly half of the persons tested
have antibodies to adenovirus 12), but
they do not actually produce ill-
ness. "No one knows whether they
cause human cancer;" Trentin added,
"but we should test all the garden-
varietv viruses we can."
When invesligating the role of vinrses
In cancer, scientists are constantly
amazed by ;he cunning and versatility of
their prey. Bacteria, which harm the
Hi®0034072
body by creating in9ammation or by
secreting poisons, are clumsy by coar-
parison to vinises. Because they per-
form their subtle mischief within the
cell, virus behavior is as complex-and
mysterious-as the process of life. In-
deed, a virus is only a submicroscopic
speck of nucleic acid-the same sub-
stance that makes up the eell's genetic
material, delertoines its characteristics,
and controls the production of enzymes,
hormones, and other essential proteins.
chemlcst Naehlnerva Once inside
the cell, the virus may take over its
host's chemical machinery in many ways.
It may destroy the cell outright, after
forcing it to produce more vinues, in-
stead nf normal proteins. Or it may, as
Dr. Jonas Salk, famous developer of the
killed-virus polio vaccine explained,
"cause malignant cell changes." We
should, Salk says, think of viruses a.'
"infectiors molecules," chemicals on
the threshold of Bfe.
External factors may also have an im-
portant bearing on the ability of cancer
viruses to spread infectimr. Dr. Harry
Rubin of the University of California
reported at the seminar the Rous sar-
coma virus, which infects chickens, can
cause the growth of malignant cells but
cannot fome the cells to produce other
Rous viruses without the help of another
viral agent. The "helper" virus, which
causes a form of leukemia in chicken
9ocks, helps the Rous virus acquire the
protein covering it needs to become a
complete infectious particle.
"It is no longer suf6cient to think of a
virus in terms of simple infection and
multipBcation," concluded Nobelist Stan-
ley. Thus, as the relationahip between
viruses and cancer becomes clearer, the
picture of viruses themselves grows
more complea.
Stanley
ARumP N+at rdrnu3 are reifronaible
