Council for Tobacco Research
the Smoking and Health Problem--A Critical and Objective Appraisal [Discusses the Cigarette Smoke-Health Problem and the Potential Involvement of the Company's Research Department]
Abstract
MIS;MAR
Fields
- Master ID
- Ctrmn00042811-3384
Related Documents:- CTRMN042811-3094 Deposition of James F. Glenn [Deposition of Glenn in the Matter of the State of Minnesota]
- CTRMN043095-3096 A Frank Statement to Cigarette Smokers [Response to Reports About Link Between Smoking and Lung Cancer]
- CTRMN043097-3103 Agenda Tobacco Industry Research Committee [Includes Information on Advertising and the Link Between Cancer and Smoking]
- CTRMN043104-3112 Forwarding Memorandum [Discusses Challenges Faced by the Tobacco Industry]
- CTRMN043113-3118 Background Material on the Cigarette Industry Client [St]
- CTRMN043119-3150 ""Best" Program for C.T.R." [Discusses How the Ctr Serves the Industry]
- CTRMN043151-3153 Statement by Timothy V. Hartrett, Chairman Tobacco Industry Research Committee [Information on Money Given by the Tobacco Industry Research Committee for Specific Scientific Research Projects Into Public Health Problems]
- CTRMN043154-3156 TIRC Program [Information on TIRC]
- CTRMN043157-3157 Hartrett Says Statistics Do Not Establish Causes [Discusses Cause-and-Effect Relationships]
- CTRMN043158-3167 Report on Visit to U.S.A. And Canada 17th April - 12th May 1958 ["Information About Lung Cancer and the Issue of "Causation""]
- CTRMN043168-3190 Survey of Cancer Research with Emphasis on Possible Carcinogens From Tobacco [Increased Incidence of Cancer of the Lung Is Due to Increased Contact with Carcinogenic Stimuli]
- CTRMN043191-3193 Scientist Comments on Benzpirene Report [Discounts the Role of Benzpyrene]
- CTRMN043194-3197 Cancer Scientist's Comments on Smoking-Lung Cancer Review [Discusses Evidence Which Conflicts with the Tobacco-Smoking Theories of Lung Cancer]
- CTRMN043198-3202 the Optimum Composition of Tobacco and Its Smoke [Discussion of Smoke Composition in Relation to Health and Smoking Enjoyment]
- CTRMN043203-3205 Gaps Still Exist in Knowledge of Lung Cancer and Heart Disease, Says Little [States That Many Clinical and Experimental Factors Still Need to Be Identified in Consideration of the Origin of Lung Cancer]
- CTRMN043213-3217 for Release at 6:30 P.M. Monday, February 3, 1969 [Discusses the Lack of A Demonstrated Causal Relationship Between Smoking and Disease]
- CTRMN043218-3223 Visit to Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington, July 3, 1974 [Discusses the Dog Inhalation Laboratory]
- CTRMN043224-3225 Council Manipulated Media on Smoking's Dangers [Discusses A Report Released by the House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee]
- CTRMN043226-3248 the Broadcast Reporting Service Tellex Report A Dying Industry [Discusses the Tobacco Industry As A Lobby]
- CTRMN043249-3258 State of Minnesota County of Ramsey District Court Second Judicial District Case Type: Other Civil Court File No. C1-94-8565 the State of Minnesota, by Humbert H. Humphrey, III, Its Attorney General, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Plaintiffs, Vs. Philip Morris Incorporated, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Corporation, B.A.T. Industries P.L.C., Lorillard Tobacco Company, the American Tobacco Company, Liggett Group, Inc., the Council for Tobacco Research -- U.S.A., Inc., and the Tobacco Institute, Inc., Defendants. Response of the Council for Tobacco Research -- U.S.A., Inc. To Plaintiffs' First Set for Requests for Admission [States Ctr's Position on A Number of Questions Regarding Cigarette Smoking As A Cause of Disease]
- CTRMN043259-3260 [Discussion of An Inhalation Project]
- CTRMN043261-3262 Report on Visit to U.S.A. And Canada 17th April - 12th May 1958 Attitude of U.S. Industry to Biological Testing [States That Liggett&Myers Stayed Out of TIRC Because They Doubted the Sincerity of TIRC Motives]
- CTRMN043263-3264 Auerbach's Smoking Beagles [Discusses Response of A Dog to An Inhalation Experiment States That These Methods Produced A Carcinoma in the Animal]
- CTRMN043265-3267 Review of Ctr Abstracts Dated 11/1/70 [Raises Questions About the Relevance of Ctr Grants to the Problem of Smoking and Health]
- CTRMN043268-3270 Auerbach/Hammond Paper [Gives Information on Auerbach's Inhalation Experiments Author Accepts That Significant Tumorogenic Conditions Following Inhalation Have Been Demonstrated]
- CTRMN043271-3274 Supplementary Report on Discussion with Osdene (Philip Morris) [Discussion of Long-Term Mouse Skin Painting]
- CTRMN043275-3276 Statement of F.G. Book in Buffalo, N.Y. On October 12, 1956 [Discusses Laboratory Research on the Subject of Tobacco]
- CTRMN043277-3279 Minutes of Meeting to Discuss Results of Experiments with Smoking Digs Conducted by Dr. Oscar Auerbach - Office of the Council for Tobacco Research, November 3, 1970 [St]
- CTRMN043280-3282 [Accepts Manuscript on Inhalation Studies for Publication]
- CTRMN043283-3285 [Discusses Who Will Serve on the Committee to Study Research Programs Funded by the Tobacco Industry]
- CTRMN043286-3384 [Expresses Frustration with Ctr]
- Author
- Alan
- Depository Date
- 08 Sep 1997
- Box
- 267
- Type
- REPORT
- UCSF Legacy ID
- ipt30a00
Document Images
~
Autho-: Ala:: ...:ir=n
Di`is: .. Chc:ucal '.. scarc'~ ':ot ?::ges: ::ono
RD:f, 1402, l:o. °revious Rcports:
1954, tlo. 31
No. of p3ges: J:', 1955, :Io. 13
.'.L':, 1956, :'o. 10
.tD.t, 19--)9, :do 1
i?:..ial empt~ss'is is placed on the lung cancor probl,.a. nrgurnents by t:.ose
ri.
ihis
ca.;~ts
` ~,Z ' arg~
k
<
a>y,:
:..
a r.e.
.3,~a~t o .
.
awTC k
,
wILunw C. 1AAORec
RCOIaTLR[D Pwor:=RcPoRTCR
wrn
iao ci,~:,: ette smo:ce-hoalth probles is discussod, ar.d it is relato3 to-,
tac potential involvcnont of tho aea'ocrs of ;:ho Coapany's Rosoarch Departmor.t.
.,
F,. ..M
claiizing cieaTatte smoke as a health hazard are presente's, as wcll as tho-~R
counter-arguca~zaLs of those not in accord with such
viows. vsigat of tho; ar=waents
and countor=argurnents is discussed. :.n atte:.pt has boon made to pros.. :: t.'io
Tri a
~ .~.~.+-.~ ..~_.... . . .. w..... ~ ..
S':Ci:T-1G AND ":1LTa 'rZ05L~~f --
A CRITICAL A1TD 0BJ?.CiIV3 APP?AIaAL
.
;
ob~'aotively. tho arguments, several r eco:c%;.-:datic:.s
rig:~orandum presents
co:;oant.memorandum with jz;% identical
thoughts are presented
er.position
Altbough the
in more
my position as briefly and as concisely as p'ossible.
detail.
schematic organization, the seiie
If reo,uested, a t':orough, fully docu.aented
ideas will be prepIrcd.
major part of the sales of this Company consists of cigarc.t :s,
what the Company its
"~ should be
sc=aa*; sellij= is ciParette smoko. 7bis Company, ther~i'a.ro,
p=44y concerned with the physiological poperties and comp, siti.op of
cizorotte smato. Zhe benefits =''~ from such knowledge are obvious, paA3cu].arly
it anticip:tes possible future governmental regulation. Dwing 'the past.,,two decades,
cigarette smoko has been the t3rgot of a host of stutlies relating it to ill ::oslth N
o
and particularly to lung cancer. ~o naJority of those studies incari-..i-3te c_;arette ~
N
smoke from a health vievpoint.
V p1 R !-I! y! 4rt' I' ,3.uF .I' +ISY
S

-2-
.. -;xx:
I. Tne Zvidence - Pro a^d Con
:ae cigarette smoke-luno caneor problen has been invostiviated
epideziologlcally, p3thologically, biologically, and chemically.
Each discipline has yiolded pertinent infornation.
IL. Dide_tai_ol_oL:ical I?ata_
-,'~ The results of 34 different
statistical studies show
that cigarette-~
W,.1%
sro:iing increases the risk of devoloping lung cancer. 1eny authorit1es
. Sa..J
_believe the relationship to be one of csuse-an6-effect.
.0&'-;^dictory data hsve been provided by limited statistical stiidies
uhich est that cigarette smdsing is linkod to a constitution3l iactor.
h<s`
Tne r:8s~ttlts of these studies can, however, account for only a s.-asll_,<...<
frac~~on Df the difference in lung cancer incidence observed botuoeti"i
... ...,w:Ni}'<. ..
(
f
nd nonsno~cers
a
S~uo:ce
.
;a
r
Yr
4.
' i ',
' -
~
os
di r a
f th n
s
c
-
s a
lth
ti ti 1 d t
e _-.
. o~
*~g
a
. oa s u o
:. ta s ca a rom e
:,,,,,~s,.
11y acceoted. After more than ten yoars, criticisas of tho st:udies
univex~
have fbsban: reduced to the dicttua A statistical studv csnnot nrove a'ttuse-
;~. ......
an~-effect reletionship betueen two factors.
:2a>H:c>:::i`
b. Yathd-ggkba_1 D$,ta,
It ha`s""bebn observed that cigarette sraokers' lungs show profound cellular
changes uhich are proportional to cigarette consumption, that fluoruscent
constituents of cigarette sno:ce are absorbed into respiratory tract;cells
(although fluorescence and. carci.nogenicity are not synonymous), that;~cigarette
...,~.
s:noke and some of its constituents cause ciliary pare7,ysis, and that;.
cigarette smoke collects in the lungs at cilia-free areas and st are.$s
~
with paralyzed cilia. °
CD
N
I
Y
t
C` T R N N 0 43 2 0 7"

-3-
Contradictory evidence irdicates th:t the abovo-doscribod collulcr
changos can be caused by respiratory disoases and other illnesses, th3t
,,.
r..
those changes occur to a deeroe in infants, in nonsmokors, in the wiridpipos
T`NC~
of smo'.cers (although cancer of the trindpi,no is rare), and in residents of
aroas of extremo air pollution, and that ciliary paralysis can be caiisod by
air pollutants like industrial and automobilo o:fisust gases. Also it'"is
:;,.:
not known uhethor such changed colls over becoao canoerous.
x-.
Those finlings may be sumoa:ized as follous3 Since celluler chs~aes in
tho Iu~,as>? and ciliery psralvsis can be c?used bLfactors other t*nn )cif7arotto
~~ ...:
s'..loi!@Lsirce these chenn.es occur in nonsaokors' lunQs and in the'cancer-fres
3 woa"
'
: ~cpW
"rindoiti'~5" of snokers
;~ y.S
'JV ~waw
becocerous, ciF:arette srloke, therefore. is not the only fsctor to be
bla:ed"`ir` lunr
cancer
M ;; ~;.
and sincc it is not kn_o:rn _ifzether these chi"-6e`_cals
s
causation.
Ci,;aj'ette smoke condensate is
carcinogenic to nouse
the fa...c`th3t the dosage level used exceeds
levels,
skin.
:2?~...
that of the human exposure.
aade of
Other
did not obtain positiva'vresults.
Some'inC_erpret this an an indication that cioarette smoke is not carcino~onic.
(..;..a.h,... K V . .1
invest'igators, using norainal dos3ge
.M.~T:.:
saxv.
R-
pcxat
It shouft be noted,- however, that many atter^pts were made to induce-cancer i-i
ar . 11
aniz~ls with coal tar prior to the first success with u.~raalistic do-sages.
Inhalation studios with cigaretto s=dse have yielded an increaW incidenca
of adenomas in adenoma-susceptiblo mouso strains. No ha^an-typo carC~,::no.:,ss have
been produced although the previously mentioned collular changes and~bro7chitic
conditions have.
Those findings are interproted by so_ze as an indication that cigarette
v~
smoke is not carcinogenic to human lung tissue. ~o facts offsot such thinking.
0
r
First, mice are not men, hence carcinomas should not be eapectad in a host °
t
C* TR t 1 N 0 43"22 0 8

-4-
»!pYF(.v
i3...
~.
~" ~..
~
.
.
..,.»,:.S.;,F
,.....,,r.:.x~<
.. .......:::C
rosistant to tho induction of carcino= of tho lunC and Air.ose usual lunS
cancar is the adeno^la. Secondly, tho r::tio, lun" cancor deathsstot_l- cigarotto
r....
s7o-:ers in tho United Ststes, is aoproxiratoly 1:1780, honco on irholation
k+rA«
carcinoaa,
assi::ainC tho response of mousd and hu^.an lun1r., tissue uas the sene. iiiq
:biological
o:marirr.ent would reouiro about 1700 nice for the production of one- ltsi;
' ..y
~
Pitx;inga are oft3n diamissod with tho statoments 1!ice are not nen and-k'ouse
r':i+~~i~,not hu-iQn luno tissug.
~ft. Che_-ic31 H3t2.
Ci~4"tte smoke
Cigarett.A.sooke also
»w:x
w~ocs:
~~oso findings,
««..
disoissed as unimpo3tant baca'it?e none of
be
Y_
ever be `.ca.rriod out.
~ Y
carcinogenic or coc~,arcinogenic to
< hucaan luna :tissuo. It is unlikel
v that such experisionts will
contains at least 17 compounds carcinooonic to
contains pro:aotins (or cocarcinogenio)*agents.
at firs.t i;apugnod, are now accepted but
the co"""~mpo~ds has been shown in vivo to
>;;>
,
.~:.:
~#i~gnce to Date_
. :.x:.
, a <
Obzri,otisly, the amount of evidenco
accursulr+ted to indict cigarett;e":sraol:e as
a healt}i',hi':zard
is overwhelrsin~. Tho evidence
dttenpts toi shift the
blame to 6ther factors,
challenging this indict9ent is scant.
e.g., air pollutants, n`e ossitates
... !.~
:
.
. r.v.JiY'.JN~
in the cigarette smose ca
accoptanco:;flf data similar to those denied
w,< O Y
a,<
.~>.
:.
~
.~+ ence '
Inters orets,~aiis ~f th- Evice
~xH<
After reviewing this evidonce, goveriaaental health agencies and
1--.t j
societies throug
i -~k
ned ioe 1
s~ .
e world have concluded that a cause-and-effect relat,10nship
ea3sts between ciearette smoke and ltutg cancer. It is predicted that ths"`'recently
appointed blwgeon General's Advisory Coaroittee on 3aoking and Health uill~reech the
same conclusion.
0
a
CD
N
..:
~
v
~
It has been repoatedly stated that soae sciontists discount the cigarette smoke-
luno cancer theory. This is true. But it should be noted that rrany of those quoted in
this reEard are on record with contra~inE views, e.g., Berkson,the stctistician, has s
stated "...tho definitive important finding of those statistical studios is not that
there is an association between smoking end laao cancer; but that there is an
G .
C" T R I I N 0 4 3` ~220 ~'

( 1
~,,...<w.,
:,;~~~::.:
...
associ3tion betwoon :-oking and coat*ns SYom all csuses gc:u`rally..... ", and Yotin,
.^..Anbcr of thc Scicntific Advisory 3oard, TIRC, stated "Tho statc:rmt....to the effect
a,~ty
that 'Tao sum total of sciontific evidence establishes boyond recsonabZ9"`:doubt that
.~.~.d
_r<,:
ciCcrotte smo:co is a causal factor in tho rapidly increasing incidenco:.of hunsn
epidormoid ccncor of the lung' ropresents a view with uhich we concur.-...
'i'ne Tobacco Lncustry's Contribution
47 on
To inv(-stigate the tobacco s.+aoSto-hoalth situation the Tobscco Indu,~stry has given
.~.
about five million dollars to TIRC since 1954 for rosearch. According t<y*Llttlo, its
Scie~tLid;~lrector, th9 puppose of TIRC is "...to encourage and sugport;c,ualified
~~
rossarctr*iontists in their efforts to learn nore about these complex: ~oblesis Ccancc
;.~~
."
and heart. diseese')
Ox: _4r ^
on the W6isii%try of tobacco andits smoko,
studiesW 7$ on heart and circulation studies, 4
psyahp-physiologi3cl
tob3cco-aaa.lth textbook).
,xantee^, Tublishcsi 19~/, pspors; 36
sp'aGR
cancer research, 13 on* hu^an lung
on Sastrointestinsl trect studies,
studies, and 14 miscellaneous studies (lu_no
` I baliove that much ofzthis rescarch,
carrie
out in th`~-research departments of the tobacco companies. The necibers crf, this Coapar~y
Researcli~:~p.ertment are as qualified, as objoctive, and as interested #ri° learning "..
: ~X .
more about these complex problems.....',6's scientists not employed by a!°~tobacco manuSE
O:JNi
r:.x.
.~y;.
c.8ncor rovieus,,
W.ec..
«.
<':..
p3rticularly that on the chemic:?, biochem
v'4Mri
o:om<
and bio2og fb-~1 study of tobacco and its sraoke, could have and should heve been
not
turer. Any findings made byt us could ave any more adverse effect on the Tob3cco Yndi
than those reported by TRC grantees.
Tois Company is studying in detail the composition of cigarette scao:{o, but :auch
P':...
data re:aain unp'ublished because they are concerned with carcinogenic orv'cocarcinogen'
` YW
compounds or with patentable m3terial. Tnis raises an
~
0
c
CD
N
N
w
W,
~
r
Through Docenber 1961, TIRC
C T R H N 0 43e.? 10

i-:'^restinr- ouastion about thr, f; rr~r -f con?oun^s: If a 1rc ~. co_?any
;)1rod or ;Tot ?r oven" to thp ch.ir;e th~t cir r.:?;,:e s-o:;e (or ono of
its constituents) is an-T-==factor in the' c=usqtion of lun-"ca.iscrnr cr
. .;>
coac othr:: disnz5o, can thn con?,:ny justifiably take the ;-.osition tha.::fcublication
of ci:ta acr tain'_ng to cir.; rcttrs s:iolle co*3 aosition or nroonr;.ie:s s1ouZ~,'bo
...,:.}:
tiri+"-cld because such data ;.iight affect adversely the conpany's economic status
w5cn the company has already inp , in its plea that no such otiolo"Ic effect
exists?
<::
not my intent to surqest that this Company accept the c~~a
arette sro:o-
rette-_
at face value, but I do suz-;ost that
in cigaxette s.*aoke-health stu6ies.
B.
;:<. .
A£a,a=consideration of the evidence available
'J~xobloai`}anc the ConPanY's
"4° 1tiS ddt~ t
aa~
:
n
na
r
(wiiere necessary) be acouired:"`.'ts
soon as
possi,ble to study biologically ciazarette smoke, tobacco, and tobacco accitivo
~ \c"
ectivo2v.;porticinato
on the cigaretto s a;e-:ealth
obli;ntion to its custoners,
:.
1. :F lities, animals, and personnel
I~s,t,~;;~rora such st~idies a~y be invalu3ble if gover n:~'cal rostrictions 2: s
C
imP'osed as a result of the conclusions of the Sur Ceon Gsnorel's: }Adviscry
e
e
e
.
Co.nnittee on Smoking and Health.
~ ~ata available on cigarette smoke constituents with edversc
physiological effocts be published.
._`
l.r
3. Tkata on anelytic,3l pnoceduos concerning such constituents be publishod.
4. The Coapc,nv's supervisory pr,rsonnel be provided with reports li3ce: the
Royal College of' Physiciens' :-~ Smoking and Kc-i1tn and the An':u,_ :.ccort
of the Scientific Director (ii3C) just as they wore providod vith Science
Looks at "nokino (P?orthrup), Tob3cco and Health pamphlets, end .'
:
stoc:choluers, a id e~?_oyees,
.
C I R l 1 l 47 0 1 1sN t+s.c 11

CTR MN 043212
