Council for Tobacco Research
Report of the Scientific Director [St]
Fields
- Depository Date
- 25 Sep 1995
- Master ID
- Ctrmn00010849-2859
Related Documents:- CTRMN010849-0887 Deposition of Lorraine Pollice [Deposition of Pollice in the Matter of Allgood]
- CTRMN010888-0889 Scientific Advisory Board Members 1954- [Record of Names of Members]
- CTRMN010890-0892 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN010893-0919 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN010920-0926 [St]
- CTRMN010927-0938 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN010939-0956 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN010957-0958 Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Mckeen Cattell [St]
- CTRMN010959-0960 Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Julius E. Comroe Jr. [St]
- CTRMN010961-0974 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN010975-0990 Abstracts [St]
- CTRMN010991-1010 [St]
- CTRMN011011-1020 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN011021-1056 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN011057-1082 Jeffrey Robert Idle Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN011083-1092 Leon Orris Jacobson, M.D. [St]
- CTRMN011093-1116 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN011117-1123 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN011124-1126 Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Paul Kotin [St]
- CTRMN011127-1128 Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Clarence Cook Little [St]
- CTRMN011129-1132 Biographical Sketch [St]
- CTRMN011133-1160 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN011161-1161 Ctr Mn 011161 Is Unused [Record of Bates Number]
- CTRMN011162-1163 Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Kenneth Merrill Lynch [St]
- CTRMN011164-1166 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN011167-1176 Curriculum Vitae Gordon Barry Pierce, Jr., M.D. [St]
- CTRMN011177-1178 Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Stanely Philip Reimann [St]
- CTRMN011179-1180 Curriculum Vitae of Dr. William Francis Rienhoff Jr. [St]
- CTRMN011181-1190 Curriculum Vitae of Gordon Sato [St]
- CTRMN011191-1219 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN011220-1239 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN011240-1241 Biographical Sketch [St]
- CTRMN011242-1243 Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Edwin Bidwell Wilson [St]
- CTRMN011244-1245 Curriculum Vitae [St]
- CTRMN011246-1274 1956 Report of the Scientific Director [St]
- CTRMN011275-1325 Report of the Scientific Director [St]
- CTRMN011326-1359 1958 Report of the Scientific Director [St]
- CTRMN011360-1396 1959 Report of the Scientific Director [St]
- CTRMN011397-1430 1960 Report of the Scientific Director [St]
- CTRMN011431-1467 1961 Report of the Scientific Director [St]
- CTRMN011468-1499 1962 Report of the Scientific Director [St]
- CTRMN011500-1500 Ctr Mn 011500 Is Unused [Record of Bates Number]
- CTRMN011501-1535 Annual Report of the Scientific Director [St]
- CTRMN011577-1619 Report of the Scientific Director [St]
- CTRMN011620-1662 Annual Report of the Scientific Director [St]
- CTRMN011663-1720 Annual Report of the Scientific Director [St]
- CTRMN011721-1765 Report of the Scientific Director [St]
- CTRMN011766-1815 Annual Report of the Council for Tobacco Research U.S.A, Inc. [St]
- CTRMN011816-1870 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A., Inc. 1972 [St]
- CTRMN011871-1871 Ctr Mn 011871 Is Unused [Record of Bates Number]
- CTRMN011872-1921 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A., Inc. [St]
- CTRMN011922-1968 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research, U.S.A., Inc. [St]
- CTRMN011969-2011 1975 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A., Inc. [St]
- CTRMN012012-2057 1976 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A., Inc. [St]
- CTRMN012058-2101 1977 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A., Inc. [St]
- CTRMN012102-2156 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research, U.S.A., Inc. [St]
- CTRMN012157-2210 1979 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A, Inc. [St]
- CTRMN012211-2211 Ctr Mn 012211 Is Unused [Record of Bates Number]
- CTRMN012212-2268 1980 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A, Inc. [St]
- CTRMN012269-2329 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A., Inc. [St]
- CTRMN012330-2386 1982 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A., Inc. [St]
- CTRMN012387-2458 1983 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A., Inc. [St]
- CTRMN012459-2533 1984 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A., Inc. [St]
- CTRMN012534-2534 Ctr Mn 012534 Is Unused [Record of Bates Number]
- CTRMN012535-2647 1985 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A., Inc. [St]
- CTRMN012648-2744 1986 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A., Inc. [St]
- CTRMN012745-2844 1987 Report of the Council for Tobacco Research - U.S.A., Inc. [St]
- CTRMN012845-2859 Partial Listing of Research Institutions, Ctr Grantees at Those Institutions, and Dates the Grantee Received Ctr Funding at That Institution [St]
- Author
- Hartnett, T.V., Ctr
- Hoyt, W.T., Ctr
- Little, C.C., Ctr
- Hoyt, W.T., Ctr
- Request
- 118
- Type
- ANNUAL REPORT
- Box
- 005
- UCSF Legacy ID
- bvr30a00
Document Images
CTR HN 011536

i.
!
('ORICItJAI, WO NOT I2EMOVE UNLESS Tp~;
rAKE A PlIOTOCOP
y
.~
~
. : ~.
_
SCIENTIF.IC DIRECTOR.<
aaRovcE ooor ,,rrnt, ac.n.
-4
m TIIE (:OIINCII. FOR T()OACCO RE_SEAR(:11-lI.S.A. ~.
m
~
:
m
am
0
m ~

4
t
f
.
`.P
~. ~,
lZatiO[1
'` . , ~'olicY~
-
'
r. , ~. - .. _ ~.
.
.
.
ir~~~,T1~ Caa;acr7 bor lbbipo~ l.p.rclhllt.A L
T ~ 4
^o+ e pr'oitr.. °S t+e..att! 1NO !pa'ti°om artobaco w0 a.d be.fti. It Me.
-~i~I i~. r.{~~d V Mfl~ 1YS4.y Ir~.~tlM f!< IObaCOO erae4tKlY[tlt. : ,;'
~~- ; ~po+ior~ !sd w~r.~r.qo,
prb .rc~ r..eudt tbrpr~b . proa.m d
;,
1t t?t/p
,
,
r
~
~A
4 Zide.tl6S /1QTboR Do.rd /b Tb Carocil .d®ieisten tbis pIffints- :'
b+W prope,. Tb Boerd wrready oo..iMs d w. .cieeelsL ..d eo«ton
.bo .+abe.L tbdr rapec!}ve L.titvtiaisel dlW.timr. A Wt of the Board
oe.nber..pqcars an par
~.
i TU Scie.tiAc AAri.or7 So.r'Q bas fw0 tc.pos.3bWty for reaeercb potky
.ad prop.a+mkc Ai . Board II doea .ot directl2 e.tage le reseerch tor
': 7U0 Oo.uail. .oM dau T1e C',oeMr kacu opa.t4 .ar r"altlch facility.
Unotsi.-aJd for re.ep.rcb are made by the Board to lodcpeadcot aci-
~'. ,_' , s~lael pbo ue raursd coeflpkte aicnri6c trttdom In conducting tlxir
t~~ti rM..fcb. T1ey.ipee.re re.poeribk for rrportin4 or publithing their findings
til/ woepted ltieatJlt e+aeeet-tMough medical and acientific Journalt '
f7,727,000. ' -
,, .
t ~ .r
~ ti,~. A Wt, pf rY.e.r~ prvjocU wpQoreoe !2 itre Council 4 included In
Rspoet ALo iocluWed .re abstr.cta o( 62 re.earch paper., .cknowrkdg-
~' C,oteed ivpport, th.t have .ppe.red in .cieaWlc Foueaala since the
~ 1p63-" Rcporl Md tlrorgh December 1964. A totel d 401 lvch papers
!!SA S' ~. ,yry beew ribil#od bt Vrsat rccipienis.
TMOT.T V. BafTMRT W. T. IIOiT
((Jl 1..: :.
. (]..Ir~..n '~ !aeeMli..INr.e~er
T11C (:()(RV(]L POR T)dA(:(:() REaF:AR(lt-I1.9.A.
633 T1IrJ A.e..., New Yerk, N. Y. 10017
~pt}K !00 borQitab, aal.ettklatM yd fc.carcb in.titullon.. These Irant award.
~~(hesta by Ibs WKd t5rourb 1964 ha.e been made to 212 Kicotiat. In
,
a=
`
ANN(IA1. HEI'ORT
uJ the
ti(;1!':N'1'1!''1(:. 1)ilt!:(:7'()It
(7.ARF,N(:B (aN1K 1.1f'TLF:, S4:.1).
I I

SCIF:NTIF'1(: A1)Vlti/)RY 1){/Alt[)
to 'lhe ('ouncrl l(or I uhacco Rescarch -U S A.
KI NNF1II MI RRII I. 1 YN('lI, M I), St 1), l.l. h, ('hnrrnrun
('honrrllrn and l'rtr/rstnr o/ I'arhofogy
Medical ('(rllesc of South ('arohna, Charleston, South Carolina
IIUWARI) H ANI)IiRVONT, Sc D.
Scirnnhc f-Jrarr, The Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Bethesda, Maryland
RI('l1ARD 1. HINO, M D.
1'ru/rrsor anJ Chairman, Department of Medicine
Wayne State lJniversily ('ulkge of Medicinc, [ktroit, Michigan
Mt K FI:.N ('A7'1Pit 1) , M 1)
1'rofrrtrw I ntrrNUt tn/ 1'l+urmat nLrfy
('runcll trnrvcrsity McdKal ( o11cRe, New York, N. Y.
I EiON 0 lA('OHS)N, M 1)
1'rnfrttur and ('hunrnun. Ihpartmenl of Medicine
llniversity of ( h+cagts
llnrctrw. ArR(mnc ('anccr Research Ilospital, ('hica6t+, Illinnis
PA111. KO11N, M 1)
A nrrI rnrr 1)rrrr ror lrn f rrJd SruJrrt
National ('nucr InslUtutc, Itcthc.d.r, Maryland
('I ARFN( ri ('(1OK 1 I111 F, S( 1), I 1 1), I ttt I).
.Sr irmr6r 11rrr+ nrr, Ihe Cr+unul (ra I tthacco Rcscarch - l I S A.
4 F llrrrr rnr F rnrrtrut, Ruscoc 11 )rikson Mcnwrial I ahuratrny
Hat llartKjr, Maine
STANI NY P RI IMANN, M I), St n
~ (hrrfrrN Ernrrirur, The Insutulc for Canccr Research
Philadclphia, Pennsylvania
.w7. WIt L1AM F RII:N11OI-F, 1ot , M 1)
.~:~.. !'rn/rjtnr I-.mr.irur rr/ .Surxrry
~ lohns Ilupkins llnivcnity Srhomd of Mcdiirnc. Italtimurc, Maryland
m Ptt 1) 1 MtsRRICON f11tAt1Y, M 1) ~.
R 1(' II(x'KI?1-1'
RO1t1:
tn ,
.
A r na urrr .1r irnrr/Sr I Lrrr hw A t r,H rarr 1, rrnlrn~ l rnrr r,rr 0
7
Lv'S
CJ
G u
r
(7, P
~
(<1 N
n
I
t
Edwin B. Wilson. Ph.D.. LLD.
1879-1964
Ur. Edwin Bidwell Wilson, whose career
spanned the fiekls of authematics, physics,
aeronaulics, sulitlics, epidemiology and
sociology died on Decearbcr 28. 1964. hr.
Wilson had servcd as a member of the
Scientific Advisory Buard to The ('ouncil
lor I tobacco Research-U.S.A. since 1954.
lie was a professor enserilus of vital statis-
tics of the Ilarvard University Schad o!
Public ttcalth. Dr. Wilson had been a vice
president of the National Academy of Sci-
ersccs and edited its Proctedints from 1915
until his death. lie taught mathematics at
lwth Yale and llarvard and was chairman
of the Department of Physics at the Massa-
chusctts Institute of Technology. Dr. Wilson
served as a consultant lo the O/6ce of Naval
Research for many years and was a recipient
of the Navy's Distinguished Civilian Service
Award. Ile was a past president ol the
Amcrican Statistical Associaticsn, the Sucial
Science Rcsearch Council and the American
Academy of Arts and Sciences.

TA/t1.F: OF (:()N"TF:N'Tti
lhe PrrIrcss of Research 5
Abstracts rrr Rcrmxts . . 26
Psychn PhysH'hr8ical Studies . 26
I
( arJNrvax'ul.r Ihscasr 1(/
('arcinoRcncsis 9tudies 41
()thcr (-anccr Studies 47
Pulnu.nsry Physirrlrrgy Studies
('hcmwry & llitthcmittry Studies 48
SI
f'harmsc(Ji>Ry & PsyiMr Pharrnai"d"Ky Studies 55
Other Studies 56
R ccipicnts ul Grants 58
i
1'he Progress of Research
The Council for Tobacco Research is committed to a oontinuing and
etpaodin` progrsm of experimental and clinical studies of human diuases.
The Council's pro6ram, therefore, is primarily one of medical research,
which spreads over into the various related branches of science that can be
brought to bear upon problems of disease. Withid the broad field of tnedi-
cine, emphasis is placed upon etiology, that is, upon the facton, influences
and agenls, both internal and esternal, thal may have something to do with
the causation of disesse, rather than upon methods of treatment or cure.
7 his emphasis upon disesse genesis is due to conviction that prcvenrlvc mes-
wres will probably do most eventually to reduce the toll of those diseases
that are now our greatest kiUen.
The selection of diseases for study is based on the relative present inci-
dence of the disease as well as its importalsce as a cause of mortalily, and
the degree to which it has been reputed to be auoeiated ststislically with
lobacco use.
The various diseases which have been selected for study ats belong to
the broad category of constitutional diseases. These include, amons others.
the cardiovascular diseases, lung cancer, ukers and the various chronic
respiratory ailments.
In such diseases external agents are difficult to identify, often compks
or multipk and of minor importance or even impMent unkss and until lis-
sues of the host organism respond by reactions characteristic of their basic
and predetermined biological and biochemical makeup.
llris situation is in marked contrast with that found in the infectious
diseases where one or more specific external agents are involved Thcse in-
fcctiuus disease agents invade the cells and tissues as enemy aliens snJ they
rrmain su, mrpauinR, killint, destroying the cells and tissues wluch they
inv.rk "I hc invrsnRator can devckhs techniques to isrrlrle thrm and tn
rnutivate ur rkstruy thcnr In turn without harm lu the hv.ty cells
In the trwrstituuunal discaus. Ihe situaurrn is ddlrrenl ('rnrcr crlls arc
a part of the NKty nJ arc naf slicn to it 'lhry rc mrKhlicd hut arc very
much st hrnne
Sinularly, the aging cclls of the circulatory system are still hjK1y cclls,
impaired and wcakrncJ in function Irul still not strangers
P
5
s
v
r
9
m

4 3
~
70
...~.
.i:..
0 1
~
In cooslitulional diseases the prncess is inrrRrarrd with the rflccted
cells In infcctious disease it is a competitive and dual process and the agent
is nor inrrtrartd with the cell, but is an antagonist
The research program of Thc Council received impetus from the pub-
lication of several epidcmioloRical studies that reported morulity from a
score of diverse diseases to be hither among cigarette smokera than among
rson-srrxrken; repcsrls which havt been and still re the subject of much
debate among statisticians on tcchnical grounds.
Ifowever, such epidemiok>(ic studies are helpful since they contribute
hints and kads for clinical and esperimental investiRators. The Council
seeks to utilitt such hints and kads to a masimum degree in ordcr to pursue
the shortcat and most realistic roules toward the "l of practical preventicsn
or control This coursc, howcver, requires some cautkxs.
The mathematical association of one variable with anothcr typically
raius a numbcr of alternative esplanatnrr hypcsthcscs T1sis is particularly
truc when the clala used have been Rathcrcd from nature by observation,
without the intcrvcnlitm of esperirrsenlal planning nd controls to minimite
the cRects of disturbing variabks The cstablishmcnt of any one prnsibie
csplanatcxy hyf,tsrhrsu requires e.clusic,n of all other reasonable altcrna-
tivcs This is c>ftcn a difficult task
When an auc><-iatKxs bttwccn the incidence of some discase and cita-
rrtte smokina is rcpttrttd, thrrc qucsttnns ursc
1. Is ciRarcttc srntAtnR a c au%c 4,( the tIIKa%c, / t J.rs it omtnhutc in some
way tn rts cuwIt,Ry, whcthcr wc.ktV, trr~~nKly, lrrct tly ter indtrcctly7
2 Is cr6arcttc smwkcnR an tnth.attrr m twn.ntmr.nt trf c,rngcrutal char-
actcristics that prcdrsf.Crse It, rhr tlncast crr rhat cnRcnJcr a pattern of
living habrts, mnc or more of whMh may cause, ur prcdrtlxxe to the
disease?
3 Is the asscxiation fortuitous of an artifact due to technical operations?
We wJl kave Ihis third question tu Ihe statisticians.
If either of the first two questions could be answered definitely, the
answer would probably su"est measures for prevention or control of the
disease A positive answer to the first might lead us eventually to some
change in tobacco or tobacco ameke that would have protective value On
the othcr hand, a positive answer to the second question wuuld suggtsl
atscntitrn to the smoker rathcr Ihan to the smoke
f?ach qucstrttn suKgests certain lines uf rrsearch, quitc drllcrtrN ttncs
rn each case 1/ we knew (ur certain whtch hy{MoIhcsts wa srnrctt, we cuuld
pl.rs antl guuk rruarth mucli mtuc cRrurnlly antl ctttnnmrcally Sutcr we
do nut kntrw, rrs ncc catc t,f ny tlr+casc, we havc little chuic'e buI to putsue
studtcs 1uyFc.trJ by each possibility 'this has been lhe (-nuncil's fNtlicy.
P
u
P
I
I
I
In annual reports over the past I I ycan, 71se Council has provided es-
tensive reviews of its work in the fiefds of lung cancer and cardiovascular
disease. New developments regarding these topics will also be discusscd bat.
Tl+o ('ouncil's ulcer studies are of special interest because they i0us-
trate the natural history of a research effort in the field of coautitutional
disease etiolM. Beginning with repoAs of an ssocialion bttweto smoking
and uker, The Council over a period of yeart has suppostcd reseiuch de-
si6rsed to esplore and evaluate various esplanatory hypotheses.
These Council-supported ulcer studies illustrate both the difT'iculties of
research into constitutional disease and the many by-products of such rc-
search which often have an independent scientific value of their own.
I'eplic Ulcer and Smokirg
Tlsc term pcptic ulcer really includes two diseases: ulcer of the stomach
and ulcer of the duodenum. These are generally believed by physicians to
dif(cr in their etiokw<y, but they do have some common features.
No one seems to have studied the relative iruidence of these diseases
in ci6aretle smokers and non-smokcn, either separately or lumped together
simply as "uker." One survey rtported, however, that dearhr from uker.
though not very numerous, were about four tirsxa as frequent among
cigarette smokers as amona non-,mokers. Another similar study found a
ratio of 2.e). Mortalily figures are really not very satisfactory in this case
because scores of people who get ukers are able to keep these under control
or have them cured so that eventually they die from something else allo-
sethcr. We need to know what proportions of people contract ukers among
the groups with different smoking behavior.
Neverthekss, these studies were interpreted as showing a strong asusci-
lion between ciEarette smoking and uker mortality.
As mentioned before, we can ask three basic questions about this
association:
I. fkses cigarette smoking cause uker, or contribute somchow to its causa-
licsn, whether dircclly, indirectly, strongly or weakly?
2 f).rcs heavy cigarette smoking show the eaistcnce uf conslilutitrnal quali-
Iica that ntake a person susceptibk tn uker n. that make hirn adrspt a
palltns of life /sabits that tend ta hriut on the disease?
3 Is Ilse asstK'iation accidental ur dtte to a technical artifact (etua ins
prupcr sarrsphnR ur s.rect other cause?
It can hardly he said that when lhe ('ouncil's ulcer studies were begun,
7

hyptithcsis hat receivcd no support from this work anJ these investigations
have not yrclded any practical suRgestiuns lur ulcer prevention Ilurrugh
mrxfificalions ol lobacco use tx alteratUrm tit tobacco products
Whrk, from the stantlpcYinl of pure logic, the first working hyfwithesis
has not been disproved, it has been weakened by lack of suplxxt from ex-
temive perlinent atudy.
llence, it hecanx reasonable to consider the second hyprNhesis~ 1hKr
heavy cigarrttr tmrrkint show tht atistrrxt o/ cunrtuurinnul quolrnrr that
maAr a prrrrrn tuttrptyMr to ukrr trr that ma4e him udupt a pattern nf h/r
haf+us that trnd to bring un the dirrasr?
It is widely bclicvcd that peplic ulcer is to some cnnsitkrabk degree a
"psychostrmalic" disease in which a genetically dctermincd predisprnitirrn
makes certain kinds t>( pcrstsns respond to certain degrees or kinds of stresses
by rkvek,pinR ultcr r'r Presumably slrtss would nM induce ulrer withrut
snnre degree rr/ prtdisfwisilwxt and 1ht pctdlsposllNrn al,rne would not pro
duce the disease w,tMrul some degree of stresa ahovc the threshold of the
indrviAual's tultrarsce Onc would espcct a reciprocal rtlatiunship: the higher
the prcdispcailkrn, the less the atrtts reyuircd for precipitation or ovcrt
discasc
T?icse mnccpls, which have been drvclry.cd to yuile a snphivicated
Itvclr'r atc in harmony with the «trrnJ wrnkmR hylwrlhcsis and pruviJ; a
ptnsihk hasis lur it
It has alsn hren suggcsled many timts Ihr1 sonrc cll;arcltc snurkcrs may
pursue this practice as a resf+rontc Irr strrss nIJ fru.ttatnrn, tit in the scarch
hor relief from such In this cvtnt, their genetic tit crrnurlulinn:rl ahilhlics to
handle stress tsr frvsuawm might hc cspccted to dctcrmine ur inllucncc their
need or desire to sm(Ae
Combining these two conccpts, it appears entirely reasonable to porttu-
late that pcrst)on who are so constituted as to he likely candidates ftx ulcer
mi6?II also be of a type especially inclined to seek stress-relkf through ciR-
arellc smr.kinR Such a silualiun would be cspcclcd to prcxluce a statistical
association between smoking and ulcer murtality. Yet, in Ihis case an asso-
clall(M would MN imply that smoking nude any conlrihutirm to causation of
the discasc On the crrnlrary, it would suggetl that if smoking is truly elfrctivc
in reducing slress, it might tn that rrtrnr ai lually hrlp thrne predisrWascd tn
ulcer to defend thrmulves against slrctt influcrscct nd r)wt tscrcitr srnnrr
prcvtnlivc rllrclt Ilrit it a crwnllary uf Ihe tetrrnd hylwrthrs/t hu1 n nra
nrcctsary Ir, tit vcrilrcaurwl 'thc stcond hyl+4rthesn Jryrnds only ulw.n tlrr
Irr^Irr.nJt., !/1.a,.n, l nd ttrtY. 11 /1 IAr /n/1nrn.r .l I'n.A..l.rrr. lu.r.rrr
(Ip.n l.u .nrrrrrn,J Ihrrr.bemrr A Strnt..rru.n tht P.Ychrrin.lY/ra 1)u.rirrlY,
r ~ul, ,01~
potlulale that ulcer susceplihks sa,A slress relief IhrouRh smokin6, whether
tx not they achieve if If they achieved complete relkf, presumably the asso-
ciation between ulccr and smoking would disappear altogether. The yuestiun
whether smoking affords some degree of relief may be susceptible to investi-
Ralion through a suilably designed study of uker-prone persons divided a1
random into smoking nd non-smoking groups for comparison. Several
Council studies hcar upon the question of perstxulily in relation to smok-
ing, and uprm its possible "Iranyuilizin6' efletas, at the kvel of psycho-
pharmacolo6y.
Test of the second hypMhcsis. that ulcer susceptibles as a group may
restxl to relatively heavy cigarette smoking as an escape from slress, has
hc6un, but presents some difficullks. Stress is not easy to define or measure
and, msloritwsly, "one man's stress may be another's pleasure." It appears
necessary lo arrive at a method of describing or identifying the ulcer prone
person in tcrms of some group of physiukstkal, hitKhenlical and/M psycho-
logical characteristics that can be measured. An idcal profile should make
possible Ihe reliable itknlihcatitm of the individual who is ralher highly
susceplibk to uker under rclatively "normal" environmental condiliuns.
1 Presumahly any person, evch a highly resistant one, could develop ulcer
under eslremc conditions l
Short of the idcal, which may not be attained for a long time, is the
development of a profile capable at least of separating a Rrrtup of the rela-
lively susceptible from agrrwp of the relatively unsusceptibk with a mini-
mum degree of overlap If the susceptible Srtwp then contained more or
heavier cigarette smokcrs, whether or not they had ever had uker, the
hypt>thcsis would receive support (though hardly proof). [kvelopment of
this type of profile appears to lie within the realm of attainability in a not-
Icxt-dislanl future.
There are many other diseases, notably cardiovascular conditions, for
which similar crileria ftx idenlifscalicxs of the highly susceptible would be
very tksirable, and many efforts to establish such profiles are underway under
various auspices Studies of this kind are slill in their infancy. None has yet
been highly successful hut slow, steady progress is being made. Tlris type of
research nlust certainly become a major efltsrl in the fulure since it appcars
to offer the best hrq.c rd reducing Ihe loll of Ihose slowly-developinR cunJi-
Iirrns that are preunlly Ihe IeadinR causes ol sickness antl tkalh
A vast utd al,nnst uneapbhed nplrnlunily Iks here within Ifsc realrn
u/ hluthemlttry 1 he rtlatrvc levels and actrvrlks tsf the varirws cuzymrs and
enryme systcros as revealed fry eaaminatirrn of urine, hlt>,rd, saliva and
freshly csci.cd tissues secm likely to bccomc the basis for descrifYlivc profilcs
that will revcal Icndi ncics and prcdisprnilirms to imhat.nce even hrng hefurc
I

rn
~
9
actual disease tkvch+ps Such birrchcmic3l prnfilcs prr,mise to become an
eventual vrong diagnostic resource anrl a rnajrrr guide to cnnslitulional
disease prevention
In the case of ukcr, one new arluoach toward the tkvclapmcnt of
means for identifying the prcdrspined has been x+ught Ihrnugh studies of
the taste sense
It has been shown that genetic factors predominale in determining taste
sensitivity to 6 n prr.pylthrtwracil (PROP) and evidence adduced that this
measurabk characteristic sorsxhow refkcts the basic hiochemical makeup
of the human hrrdy It had been postulated also that these differences in
sensilivity to bittcr taste might conelatc with the incidence of certain gc-
nctic diseses, nd some confirmatory evicknce had been collected
A('ouncil study investigated 1ste sensitivity to PROP in duodenal and
gastric uker patient in comparison with naxm1s Significant drfferences
were fuund hctwccn the ducxfenI uker and the gastric ulcer subjects ??se
former were more sensitive tsters Subjects having htah ulcers rescmbkd
the duodenal grrwp (iastric ulcer patients tended to Ise significanlty less
sensitive to PROP whik duwKlenal uker patients and thrne with Iwrlh ulcers
showed a greater tste unsruvny Ira I'R( )P than normal suhjccb 1 he data
therchac supfwnt thc concept that durr.knal and gastric uker arc drftcrcnt
diseses, nd suggest crtnsutuurrnal haus at least fnr the lat)cr 1 hr y also
tuggest that mrsurcments nf taste scnsnrvily to I'ROP might con.rihule
to a prurik for scgrrgatnrn nl thrrsc prrdr+ptned tu gastric ulcer (rrrm the
"normal" prrpulatiun hut Ihal thrs rs prrrh.hly nrH the case for dwKlcnal
ulcer candidates
Subjccts without ulcer bul who smrrke at least nnc pack of crRrrNtes
per day were alut tested for PROP scnsithvity, lhrse relatively heavy
smokers showed a significantly higher prrtpr+rtirm ul insensrtive tasvers in
comparyson 1u non smokers. 1hus, this Iimilcd approach to a complcx
probkm does pruvitk snntc eviikncc of one cunstrlulirmal Jdfcrcncr cunt-
mcm to gastric ulcer patients and lo relatively hcavy cigarcttc smrdus to
that cslcnt, it tends to supporl the hyl.rrlhcsis under considcration
An obvious question is whelher Irrng term smrrking ilaclf mrtihfics taste
scnsitivity A study rif yrnrng pcrstrns, snntc n1 whrtrn are jusl IxRinninK to
smrtke, has been unrkrrskcn in sn eHorl to dcterurrnc whethcr Rrnctically
hased taste acuity rhxs indced att as a dclermur.urt rrf Acvcl,yrrnr, snurkmg
practices 11 has f.rrn shown alrrarly 111,01 « nvlivny Irr I'R/11' is stnul:rr in
hrHh sescs up tn Ihe age ro( (h 1t/ yrrs, hut rhrr-rlhr t/rtrrssrs m mnlrs
at the ratr rd III1t1 Ihtcshuld (Kr yrar anJ to Irnrrlrs it Ihr rar u/ Illllh
lhresh4rld prr year
In sumrnary, it r an iv %Inlcd that /ac~rnt cvirlcnt c frrun Crrunr rl sludics
12
r
fails to suppnt the Iryp,slhc.is that cigarette snu+king cuntrihutes to the
genesis of pcptic ulcer, and is better in accord wilh Ihe concept that genetic
characteristres which predispuse to uker also tend to encourage smoking It
cannot be said that Ihe matter is finally or conclusively seltlcd Many gaps in
knowledge have been indicated in the discussion above. Among the needed
additional studies are the following:
I. lipidcrniolagical studies to esplore any possible statistical correla-
lion between cigarette smoking and incidcnce of peptic ulcer, with
separate consideration of duodenal ulcer and gastric ulcer s sep-
arale clinical and etiological entities.
2. Carefully controlled clinical studies of uker healing under defined
regimens, with random division into smoking and non-smoking
suhgrrrups for crtmparisoo.
3 Ilcuer utethtrls of defininR and classifying stresses and of ineasur-
ing the reactions of suAjects to them.
4. f=.aploration of other psychological, bic.chemical or physiological
characlcrislics of Juudcnal and gastric ulcer patients with a view to
irnpruving the reliability of differentiation between high-suscepti-
hks and low-susceplibks.
5. Within a group of highly susceplibk persons, preferably without
overt uker, observaticsn of the relative incidence of overt disease
anrnng randomly selected subgroups who smuke or refrain from
smoking.
6. Psychnlrrgical and psycho-pharmacok+sical studies to assess nico-
tirx or smoking as a"Irnyuiliter' or reducer of stress effects.
7 he study of peptic ulcer deserves considerahk attention in its own
right, nut so much as a majtx cause of mtxlalily but as the source of much
disctrnrlurt and sullering in our modern stressful society.
Ifuwevcr, ulcer has been discussed at snme kngth in the present in-
stance more particularly tn illustrate the nature ol Ihe problems that are
faccd in the study of cnnstilutitmal diseases and Ilse kinds rd rpproaches that
'Ihe Council is makmg to their invesligalion, In fact, these same prtrhlctns
and apprusches have duminaled 'Tlx Council's more eatensive invcstiga-
tiuns o/ twth lung canter and Ihe cardiovascular diseases
llefutc Ihe sulblrcl is IcII, it rhoulJ Ire Iwtmlcd rwl also that lung canccr
patbcnts shuw a mut hgrrater hislnry rrr Isrptrc ulcer than the gcnrral fwqrula
lurn Iltis facl suy,grsts thr thought tha whatever faclun preJnlrusc to ulccr
may prove to ht releterl lu thusr rhat also predislwse to carcinurru of
this site.
13

..v~
~
~
S~~.'~$
~4"a (t
~
Uri ~
Q.
( irrrsIi/rilioifvl I,vcfors ift ( urrliorascular l)iscnse
1 he general ccxrsitkrations that h.vc hccn applied in approaching The
study nf pcptic ukcr re equally valyd in rclatitm lu scveral of thc leading
cardiovascular discases such as atherosckrosis, hypertcnsion and stroke.
Numcnws studks have been carried out rcgarding the effects of nico-
tine or of snrnking upon the physiological or buncemical factors that are
considercd to h.ve some possibte relation to the etirtlugy of the cardiovas-
cular discases Many of these were enumerated in the Council's 1963-64
Annual Report So far no ckar picture has emerged of their etiulogy, and
the fxnsible relations of tobacco use to the suspected factors in etiology are
still kss ckar A vast body of informaticsn on the acute pharmacobgy of
nicotine has been built up, both by Council sludies and othcrs, but concepts
as to how such effects could contribute chronically to genesis of cardiovas-
cular discascs remain highly conjectural A number of working hyputhcses
have, rd cnursc, been set up and are under test.
f erhaps thc studies most relevant to The question are those in which
human or aninul subjects have been c.posed chronically to nicotine or
smoking for kin6 pcricxls Rabbits or hens kept on rather rtificial types of
athcrugcnic drers dtd nrH ahtrw any convrnctng differences in Ihc condition
of their arteries if given nrculmc rrgul.rrly with the dict. A human autopsy
study, nnl sprrnst+rcd by lhe ( oumd, %huwcd Ih:rt any association csisting
hclwccn smoking Pracuccs and the devrlt.rmcnt of arlcriosclcrosis or Icsions
resulting thcrcfr,nn is tcnuous anJ mctmtlumvc A sinnlar autopsy study has
b<ch sMmstucd uvcr a Ittng f.crurJ by "1 he Cuuncil but results are nul yet
available
l hc well known prospective stuJy of the )'ublic Flealth Service in
Franringham. Massachusctts rcp+rlcd, arnong numcruus other findrngs, that
cigarette smttkcrs have no greater incidence of angina pecloris than non-
smokers Sincr this syndrome is regarded as most often being a chronic mani-
fcstation of coronary artery sclcrusis. this finding suggests that smuling drres
not cause or accelerate such sclcrosis
Still furthrr, as evidence of The non-involvement of smoling in the
chronic development of sckrutic cliseaus crf thc vascular system are thc
statistical indications that cigar and pipe anwkcrs have very nearly the same
incidence rrf thrse diuascs as non smttlers. cven thuugh they prtthahly
absnrb as much nicntirx as cigarrltc srnnlcn
At thc prrscnt linrr rhrrclorr, tlic wcrRhr rit rvulrntr is aKa-t thr
cnnccpt that ctthrr rnctNtnr ra smtrlmg in/lurntrs thc rthrrm. krtrut prtKrss
1 hc prrsvhtlity rrmains, howcvcr, thal smoking may ctrnlrthutc in s-trnc
way lu prrcipit.tuwm t,f an acute cflistKlc in pcrsons whtr have r prctli.lutsing
14
P
t
basic sclerotic condition. Since the factors bringing al>,rut acule cardiac
ischemia or 1hn+htbosis are sbll quite obscure, several Crruncil-sponxxed
studies have been inaugurated with emphasis upon clotting mcchanisms and
the possible acute influences of smoking or nicotine upon Ihcse.
On the whotc, therefore, it may be said that whik there is little evi-
dence at present to support the first hypdhesis, which attempts to rclate
cigarette smoking to causation of major cardiovascular diseascs, yet this
hypothesis cannot yet be considerLd as finally rukd out.
Mcanwhik investigations wggested by the second hypothesis have
been underway. The Council has contributed for many years to a study of
the precursors of hypertension and coronary disease, which aims t identi-
lying characteristics that may form the basis for profiks capable of scparat-
ing highly susceplibk persons from those of telalively low susceptibility.
Such factors may include 6enetic; physiologiul, metabolic, psychoksgical
and environmental ones. When human subjects are classifsed by a single
taclrx, the overlap between groups is so large that relative risks of dcvehK+-
ing disease cannot be estimated with any cerlainty for the individual. When,
however, the differcnliation is based upon the presence or absence rr/ several
faclots. the degree of differentiation is improved and overlap diminished.
71se people presently under study do rstA as yet shuw any evidence of
cardiovascular disease themselves but have been divided into groups of
presumably high, medium or tow susceptibility on the basis of a nuntber of
factors with special emphasis on family history, since these diseases have
been found to show familial trends which are considered 1u have a genetic
basis.
f)iscriminant function analysis has been useful in the investigation since
it masinsirts differences between populations. In one such study, nine vari-
ables were used. The somatic variables used were heiRht, weight, systolic
pressure, diastolic pressure, pulse rate and serum cholesterol level. I sycho
logical variabks were scores for dcpression, anaiety and arsgcr.
Subjecls grouped according to the history of hypertension among their
parenls (ho/h, father, nsnther, ncilhcr) showed significant nsean ddfcrcnccs
in syslulic presurc, diastulic pressure and serum chulestcrol, but no signifi
cant ditlcrcnccs in psychukssic:al factors.
A similarly condtKlcd study of pcrsons in relation to parental coronary
Ji.case (fancer, rntNher, neither) shuwcd mcan significanl chtlrrcnccs in
ansrrty and tkprrwrns, hul nrwsc (r-r any 44 the tiR sumatir varirblcs
WfKn Itrur gnrups of wh)ccls were crrnstruclyd ras Ihe hasis rrf prr+cncr
in their parrnn (nruhrr, father, mulhrr. Iwr1h) u/ either hyltcrtrnutrn ur
coronary di.case or Mrth, aignificanl mcan dilltrcnccs hclwecn thc.c grtHrps
were luund wirh rcclxct lu an ttrty, systtrlic pressure and dia.tulrc prcuurc
.
15

Mean diflcrcnccs in serum chtdcstcrul and pul%c rate only aflprnachcd
signific ance.
('umulativc frequency distrihutittm nf the lunctit+n scores of the four
grnups rcvcal in detail the clcar separation nf three uf the four groups 1?u
wldcst scparation Iies between (iroup 1, with Iwn negative parents and
(:roup 1 V, with two positive parenls, with no crossing over; (irrlulr 11, the
father yx,sitrve, mother negative group, takes an intermediate Mlstlirln while
Group I11, Ihc father ncgalive, mcs(hcr positive grnup shuwcd little dillcr-
cnce frrlm Gr<lup I The subjectf were all males and this finding suggests a
scx dtllcrence in the ,nnsmissksn of characterislics
A relalinn between smoking practices of subjecls and the cardiovascular
disease historics uf their parents was shown previously by the same irivcsti-
gators 1 his suggesled not only that constitutional characteristics play a role
in determining smoking behavior but that these charactcristics may also be
linked lo those that predispose to discases of this kind
'I hc invcstrgat us have now analyred the smt+king practices rlf the same
people in rclaUnn Itl the same nine snrnalic and psychological variables lhe
men wcrc first dtvukd inlrl three groups ftlr comparisrrn: ( 1) non stnokcrs
and (tccas/11naI smwkers, (1 ) heavy ctRuettc smokers and ( J l intermediate
smtlkcrs (Itght and mrakratc ctR.rctlc smttkcrs plus combined snurkers of
cigarctres anti n,hcr furms of Inhatcnl A highly signdicant dd/crence was
found hclwcrn Rr luln ( I 1 and ( 71, a.iu.rllcr vlnilir.int mne bt'Iween ( I 1
and ( 1 ), hut ntr vRntht an1 tliflcrt n, t h, t..t rrl (? 1mnil f 1) I.ilrrI a divivtto
was nlJde Illlll rlrfll g/oall, 1 I 1 li/t h m/, 1/11 n.i. t~ r% . (i 1 thn%t' whtr
smtlked less than oncc a dry, ( I ) .-4, r. ~I I r.- I11 trl.trtttct de11V, (<1
smukcrs of I I Itt 1V cigarcttcs ds Iy. 1% /"I ~mt I+et k mr mwc drdy,
(6) pqsc snulkcrs- (7) smttkcrs trt aIl ,hrcc /t~trus n1 t.-hacco, and /M) cr
snrokers 7hcre were loo few snlnkers ttl ugars unly tu of pqses plus cigars
to form a group Analysts of these eight gnlups shtrwcd significanl di/fcrcnces
It appeued that n<ln smokers, occasional smokers and pipe smokers formed
a conslcllaticxt of similar perscros, whilc former smokers and nrixcd smokers
appeared lo be quite a bit alike, falling about half-way Ixtwcen non smukers
and heavy smokers.
In both Ihree-group and eiRhl-grnup ennlparistms, the rnean discrim-
inant function score of ntln-smokcrs was al one ewlreme and that of heavy
cigarette snurkrrs a the other In the Ihree Errnrp crml/larisnn, pulsr rate
and an>ttely ctNruthuted mint Its the dtllerentulu.n In Ihr rtyhl gtr.rtl+
anolysis. Lulsc tatr tuntrtl+ulyd the nlusl, wrth t h,d.llctul, drJlrt0it Iltrsvurr
anti anRrr tttntrlt.utulg trs a/essrr rrlenl
Whtk it mirhl Ilc argued Ihal suth stnnatic (:uttrrs as pulse ratc, diastolic
pressure, w th.dc,trrol level nnght Ihcm.elves tre allcrcd hy recent trr ctm
I
i
tinued smtrking, it seems ralher unlikely that anxicty or anger scores would
be altected by smokrng, and such psychological characlcristics sccm more
likely to he a part t>< the congcnilal makeup which may influence the kinds
crf smoking behavior adapled.
On the whole, it appears that rather substantial support has been
atkiuced for the hypothesis that common or related constitutional factors
may influence both susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases and also smok-
ing behavior.
Despite these sludies, there is still no assurance that the best somatic
or psychological factors for differentiation have as yet been found. Thuse
employed were selected somewhat arbitrarily on the basis of suggestive
studies by others, ease and reproducibility of ineasurcments, etc. There is
every reason to suppose that other illuminating ones can Ix fuund by con-
tinuing investigations of this type, and the relative success heretofore at-
lained should encourage inlensificaticxs of the search. Reference has already
been made lo the opptxlunilies that may fit in the use rd biochemical
measuremcnls
Glydiocxlscular Disease arrJ Stress
One Council-sponsored investigator has looked into rclations between
stressful occupation and incicknce of cardiovascular diseases Since stress
cannot easily be measured by objeclive rrxlhods, an indirect melhcKl has been
used. Among lawycrs, physicians, and other professional groups. there are
specialties that by common agreement are particularly stressful while others
are relativcly low in stress Assuming that a large group within a high-sUess
specially must contain more persons subjecled to stress than a corresponding
group in a low slress specialty within the sadse professicsn, comparisons were
ntade of the iclative incidence of heart and arsery diseases. A significant
difference was found. There was also a correlation with the amount of cit-
arelte smoking Ilowever, persons who slopped smoking showed signifi-
camly lesr cardiovascular disease incidence than Ihrtse who had never
snwkcd at all This finding is not in accord with Ihe conception that ahcre
could be a cumulalive chronic effect of smoking or of nicotine upon the
cardiovascular system II has been interpreted s indicating that voluntary
'shtphers' are selected group containing an eacess of persrrns whu can
handle and resrdve stress relatively easily Such sludies are continuing
(It/rrr ( ardi0fYluulur .S'Irulrrs
A long series of ('uuncil assistcd studies has culminated in dcvelup-
nlenl of an trnl)ruved rnclhrxl using rubidium a14 clearance for measuring
Ih : I7
0
