Brown & Williamson
840000 Kool Operational Plan
Fields
- Type
- MRPT, MARKETING REPORT
- BUDG, BUDGET
- CHAR, CHART
- COMP, COMPUTER PRINTOUT
- DRAW, DRAWING
- FILE, FILE FOLDER/BINDER COVERS/BLANK PAGES
- GRAP, GRAPH
- COMPUTER PRINTOUT
- FILE
- FINANCIAL
- GRAPHIC
- REPORT
- Characteristic
- DRFT, DRAFT
- ILLE, ILLEGIBLE
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- SUBS, SUBSTANCE
- VASH, VARIANCE SHEET
- Named Person
- Beasley/X
- Blott, R.A./X
- Brand/X
- Butler/X
- Coleman/X
- Dant/X
- Domantay/X
- Finley/X
- Gravely, L.E./X
- Herzog/X
- H, G./X
- Johnson, D./X
- Kopp, R.J./X
- Lajti/X
- Mcguire/X
- Middleton/X
- Reid/X
- Rozek/X
- Schreiber/X
- Sharp/X
- Simon/X
- Tweed, W./X
- Veatch/X
- Wein, G./X
- X/Management Science Associates
- X/Bat
- X/R.J. Reynolds
- X/Lorillard
- X/Philip Morris
- X/Kmdp
- X/Carlos Funk
- X/C+W
- Xxgeorge/X
- Attachment
- 455758
- Litigation
- 10004026
- Request
- H83
- I93
- Original File
- Untitled
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- Brand
- Kool
- Belair
- Benson & Hedges
- Bright
- Camel
- Carlton
- Generic
- Marlboro
- Merit
- Newport
- Northwind
- Now
- Players
- Reynolds
- Salem
- Simon
- Triumph
- True
- Winston
Document Images
........ J
"'ql
o

---

1984
KOOL OPERATIONAL PLAN
TABLE of CONTENTS
PAGES
N
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
II. MARKETING OBJECTIVES and STRATEGIES
A. Advertising
B. Target Audience/Media
Music Sponsorship
D. Promotion
- National
- Test
E, Product
F. Packaging
G, Tan'a
Deluxe
Research
J. Spending Principles
K. Rec~mnended Budget
5
I0
14
16
17
22
33
34
35
41
48
51
54
III. SALES and SHARE FORECAST
55
IV. SITUATION APPRAISAL
57
V. EXHIBITS

1984
KOOL OPERATIONAL PLAN
6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Overall Narketi~
- Achieve 7.23% SOM, 43.4 billion unite in 1984
- Stop XOOL share decllne by 1986
Markotin Strata ins
Continue the revitalization strategy begun in December,
IDR2, with numerous strategic and executionel improve-
ments discussed later.
Reduce spending to minimum amount necessary to sustain
reference trend until these improvements are developed
and validated. The thrust continues to be use of the
music campaign, music sponsorship, and ancillary pro-
motion to revitalize KeeL product and mmoker images
thereby increasing inflow from historical sources.
We are not attempting to repositlon KOOL, but rather to
ra-eetablleh its relevance to smoker groups historically
most receptive to the brand.
As
Convince smokers that, at any tar level, KOOL is the
epitome of smoking satisfaction and will satisfy their
need for an attractive, contemporary image. This is
possible because Keel provides the most menthol re-
freshment for a taste sensation superior to any other
cigarette, menthol or non-menthol.

- 2 -
Advertising should symbolize both the best cigarette
(quality} end a contemporary image of self-assurance,
confidence and control (cool).
B. Tar et Audience
Prime targets are the young adults, males and females,
in that order. 1984 REV weights are based on KOOLts
1975 demographic profile adjusted for the demographic
ahlfts.
1984 XOOL Normalized REV Weights*
l-Ill ZV-___~V Total
Men 9..! 12_3_? 1l.._~5
Under 25 153 208 193
25-34 100 136 124
35+ 69 94 86
.ome____~n 6~2 9_! s_~3
Under 25 149 204 191
25-34 58 78 71
35+ 43 59 53
Total 77 111
100
*Detail of REV weight derivation in Exhibit
C. Music S nsorshi
Continue wltl. music events during 1984 to extend our
advertising property with the objective of mass,trebly
increasing KOOL SOM. Music events shall pay for them-
salves and their format shall emanate directly from the
creative strategy (young, contemporary, etc.).
U

!
N
- 3-
D. Promotion
Primary role is to generate c~petitlve trial for
total EOOL Family and to profitably generate incremental
short term volume. Extensive testing will occur during
1984, lnolu~lng a relaunch program with incremental pro-
motion support.
Product
Achieve significant preference over Salem and Newport
among the franchise and primary inflow sources. Attmpt
to reduce harshness on LIGHTS and ULTRA while retaining
the Keel character.
F,
G.
H.
Initiate exploratory packaging to co~unlcate the epitr~e
of m0oklng satisfaction across all styles, ~onaiatently
with XOOLeo young and cont~porary creatlva objective.
Changes 8hal~hoaover time as to reduce granchiJe ap-
prehenaion~.o~Lrf'product changes.
~Tle
Ten'...._8
Launch a 10-unlt pack in areas with no tax penalties
for miler than 20-unit packs. Five styles (Parent,
KS, and 100's; ~llds KS end LIGHTS KS and 100's).
Minimize premium cost to consumer while mainta%nxng
variable margin.
Deluxe
In conjunction with exploratory advertising and BBT-level
spending, develop and test market strikingly improved
KOOL packaging 1) as a replacement for current packaging,
and 2) in box form as a line extension.

- 4 -
F~ploretory creative tasting, ten'm packaging and role
model mtudiem (1983). Information needs for 1984 fall
into creative, promotion and line extension research.
J. Remottrce Allocation
Grams Media $ 47.6MM
Promotion
Ongoing 13.2
Testing 1.9
M&P 7.8
Total Advertising and Promotion $ 70.SNM
X. S endin Prtnc£ lea
Geographical allocation by family BDI! magazine list
defined bF RZV weighted CPM; style allocation ts 30t
Parent, 30t LIGHTS and 40% Family.
S¸

- 5 -
II. MARKETING OBJECTIVES
- Achieve national MSA share of 7.23 with total volume
of 43.4 billion units in 1984.
Stop KOOL Family market share decline by 1986 or earlier.
Consumption share trend in 1984 should index (94) or
better to 1983 (consumption reference trend 94). Regain
menthol category leadership long term.
MARXETING STRATEGY
Continue the revitalization strategy begun in December, 1981,
with numerous strategic and eotecutionel improvements dis-
cussed later.
Reduce spending to minimum amount necessary to sustain
reference trend until these improvements are developed and
validated. The thrust continues to be use of the music cam-
paign, music sponsorship, an~ ancillary promotion to re-
vitalize KOOL product and s~oker imagery thereby increasing
inflow from historical sources.
We are not attempting to reposition KOOL but rather to re-
establish its relevance to smoker groups historically most
receptive to the brand.
A.
Adverttsin~
Objective
TO creative an image that will motivate the adult target
audience to start with or switch to the KOOL Family.

- 6 -
s~ateg~
Convince mmokers that, at any tar level, KOOL is the
epitome of smoklng satisfaction and will eatlafy their
need for an attractive, contemporary image. This is
possible beoause KOOL provides the most menthol re-
fresh|Bent for a taste aensetlon superior to any other
cigarette, menthol or non-menthol.
Advertising should symbolize both the beet cigarette
(quality) and a contemporary image of self-assurance,
confidence, and control (cool).
8trots ic Pro err
For the foreseeable future, KO05 will employ pan-racial
music sy~boliBm/imagery to co~unicate the strategy.
Executional~
In the main, executions to-date have been off-strategy.
It is felt we do not have the optlmum combinatlon of
visual aMmbollsm, copy, and layout. An exploratory is
underway now and should continue to comRunlcate the
product and imagery benefits of KeeL stated above in a
meaningful and compelling way to the target audience.
Specifically addressed will be:
- 8moking satisfaction from KOOL'e superior menthol
refreshment.
Attractive, contemporary image to young adult Whites.
Cool
The Best

Creative Allocation Strateq~
1.,
recommended. Allocation of styles to ads is
arbitrary as no data exists on the co~unication
effectiveness of "family" versus single style
execution.
In 1983w the allocation scheme was 20% Family, 30%
Parent only, 301 LIGHTS only, and 201 ULTRA only
Lv "*~ ~ (based on real dollars). In 1984, it is proposed
/~ ,J .F"- that dollars allocate 40% Family, 30~ Parent only,
~1 /~ L./ 30t LIGHTS only and no ULTRA only.
Tip-in teat indicated that pack/product notice
was greatest st 40% unaided recall with the
three pack "bay window" configuration in George
d// Tenor Sex. The ad generated 27% more interest
,~/ in buying EOOL.
J
~/~i,~! ~.~. v/.~' One camDalgn should be continued for all ethnic
"r'~u s w t • ac mu~c~ans on ~k~
"'~-','~+ "~Ia,~ White m~,ic~an, on1 ~n ,net c ~..
To show KOOL am a brand for all people, more emphasis
1 , is needed on interaction of White musicians with EOOL
~,L imagery.
- ~,'~ /. Recent TAT wor) indicates that visuals featuring
~'/,v. ~. % White musicians were leas likely to be associete~
~" ~$ ~ with KOOL by Wh .re respondents than Black musicians
V" exhibit.
Blacks named KC~ as best brand fit with visuals
more frequently ~an Whites did.
• /As a creative ex .'ution, Tweed (Black pianist)
< is highly interpretive among Blacks, rather than
Whites.
