Brown & Williamson
Statement by Puzant C. Torigian, President, Bravo Smokes, Inc., Hereford, Texas Before Committee on Commerce of the United States Senate
Fields
- Attachment
- 296743
- Type
- DEPO, DEPOSITION TRIAL TRANSCRIPT
- LEGAL
- Request
- E37
- Named Person
- Raynaud/X
- Stewart, W.H./X
- X/Us Comm, O.N. Commerce
- X/Columbia Univ
- X/Us Public Health Service
- X/Us Interstate Commerce, C.O.
- X/Us Department, O.F. Agriculture
- X/Food And Drug Administration
- Stewart, W.H./X
- Original File
- Tobacco Institute 670700-670900
- Litigation
- 10004026
- Date Loaded
- 23 Nov 1998
- Author
- Torigian, P.C.
- Brand
- Bravo Smokes
Document Images
Puzant C. Torigian~
Before Co~r~ittee on Commerce
(
Statement by
president~ Bravo gmokes~ Inc.~ He?ere?d, Texas
of The United States Senate
Washington August
24, I~67
Mr. Chairman~ members of The Committee~ my nalne is Puzant C.
Tori~ian. I am president of Bravo Smokes~ Inc. of Herefo?d~ Texas,
which since October, 1965~ has manufactured and marketed a smoking
product -- unde~ my patented process -- that contains ou]~ed and bio-
che]~ically treated outer leaves of the lettuce plant~ instead of
tobacco. I am a pharmaceutical chemist, with a degree from Colun~bia
University -- yet with little p~esent sympathy for my alma mater's
current approach to cigarat filters.
For 1O years I have womked on the d~velopment of a safer smok-
in~ product. I am here to relate, with some pride, that such a pro-
duct has been achieved and that the fact it is safer than tobacco
eigaDets has been tested and p~oved by members of the medical pro-
fesslon.
To be sure~ OUrS is a small scale endeAVOr. We do not have
The vast resources for research, production and prcmotion that the
large tobacco companies enjoy. Nor do we have large grants from
government, private health organizations or foundations that many
medical societies and unlvemsitles draw from.
- ~ore -
~˘
.j
&1

(
(
Pate 2.
What we do have is an approach that is refreshingly simple~
direct and efficacious, Rather than attempt to devise new blends of
tobaeeo~ additives for Tobacco or filters for tobacco~ we have de-
cided to discard Tobacco, For one reason: Tobacco contains nicotine.
And nicotine is a deadly poison, a pPoduct whose ~,ost ~mportant
function, aside fPom Gradually poisoning millions of Tobacco smokers~
is a~ a dangerous and potent toxic insectlclde.
THE PRO~LEM IT NICOTINE
Mr. Chairman~ I am here to propose that~ in its efforts to
counteract and cure The epidemic and eontageous disease of ci~areT
emoking~ this conu~ittee and other organizations of gover,nment and
private industry strike at the heart of the p?obleTn...that we launch
an all-out attack on the ingredlent whose ingestion in smoke
causes untold hundreds of thousands of deaths each year f~om cardio-
vascular and other diseases. That ingredlent is nicotlne~ and that
ingredient is found in only one p]ant...wbich is closely related to
The Deadly N~ghts.lade that is nicotlnia tabacum~ or the common dom-
estic Tobacco.
This hearing has been called To report on p~ogress toward safe?
smoking products. No filter for tobacco smoking can truly be termed
safer unless it eliminates and not merely ~educes the amount of ~,
nlcotino to he inhaled. The challenge Today is not To make tobacco~
safer, but to devise and successfully present to the public smoking~
products that are safer Than tobacco, with its harmful nicotine and~
carclogenlc nicotine Tars.
- ~ore -

(
Page 3.
The distinguished Surgeon General of The United States, Dr.
William H. Stewart, who ~oins us in Testimony here today~ has penned
The preface To a repomt of The Public Health Service issued This week
the± staTes~ among other observations~ That nicotine increases the
heart rate~ pressures in the arteries and heart output~ which result
in an increased demand for oxygen by the elreulatory system. AT The
same time, persons with heart disease can not transmit this needed
added oxygen Through Their systems, Even in heal~hy persons, it is
difflcult~ if not impossible~ for the system to carry the added amount
of oxygen that is needed when these candle a~terles are constricted
by nicotine-effects.
HEART DISEASE THEMAIN KILLER
We have heamd fom years that eigarsT smoking is closely allied
TO the incidence of lung cancer, a disease that the President's new
study committee on This disease admits of only a five per, cent hur,e
or postponement~ based on earliest possible diagnosis. Lung eaneem
is a di~.e and deadly disease; each yeam mope Than 50~000 ~lerleans
succumb to it. While death's sting is not assuaged by statistics, i%
is s~gnerlcant To note That far more people perish each year from The
nation's numbep one killer, coronary disease, The carclno~enlc Tars
in Tobacco smoke have been deemed ~esponslble for i~ereased incidence
of lung canc@r. But the deaths from nicotine in Tobacco smoke are
far more epidemic, rivalling in proportion The toll of bubonic plague
that ]]as wiped out major civilizations in the world. A lapse propor-
Tion of These deaths az~e attributed by mop~. and more researchers to
nicotine~ which is ingested 9n!Y thrgugh Tobacco smoke, ~SO~7~8~9
- more -

( (
Page ~.
In approaching the subject of safe? smoking through a safer raw
material than tobaeeo~ although we may not have eliminated entirely
the threat of long eance?, we have taken a major flmst step to safe~
smoking. ~'~e have eliminated entirely, and not Just diminished, the
known most Toxic material in tobacco smoke, Our pmoduct~ known as
Bravo Smokes~ is commercially available~ not just an idea yet to be
evaluated and proved, It is safe~ by far Than an~ othem smoking pro-
duct.
And in devising another substance' than nicotine-beaming tobaceo~
we have solved some other p~oblems. I ~efer to:
1. The effect on healthy bodies of nicotine's constriction
of a~temies~ raising of normal pulse ~ate and increase of blood press-:
urel I refer to an exhibit I leave with the oo[a~nittee on tests con-
ducted by two Philadelphia hospitals comparing effects of these ele-
m, ents of physiology among smokers of tobacco and lettuce leaf p~oduets.
2. The incidence of under-weight babies borne by mothers who
a~e heavy smokers and the ?elationship~ in te~rf, s of pmematu~s bi?ths~
to infant mortality among children too small %0 survive this matern-
ally induced assault.
3. The documentei effect~ in terms of ill health and death
mates, of nicotine smoking among diagnosed cases of diabetes~ peptic
ulee?s~ and~ of eouDse~ heart disease.
-mor, e -

( (
Page 5.
pRESENT LA~'~S NEED ENFORCEMENT
In urging an all-out war on smoking~s great leading killer,
nicotine, I believe I have The support of already-existing statutes
and government agencles...providing these laws are enfomeed and The
agencies do their ~obs. But here government compounds its own
dilemmas°
One agency supports the price~ for the tobacco farmer. Anothe~
umges importation of Tobacco f~om Communist countries as an encoun-
age~an~ To trade and understanding. Another Taxes tobacco to support
• I
the ea?ller efforts. And fxnal-y~ the heali:h agencies spend to dis-
courage young people and old from using tobacco.
There are numerous programs that have not, but could be under-
taken by government to held alleviate the misery of this suicidal
sharae that is tobacco smoking. For example:
I. The Interstate Conmlerce Commission is charged ~ith control
of interstate shipments of poison. Each packet of tobacco cigarets
contains a lethal human dose of nicotine. Should the ICC not enforce
a labeling pmactice calling fop each pack to display '*skull and cross-
bones" and present InfoDmatlon on the antidotes for nicotine poison-
ing, which, incidentally~ calls fore pumping out the stomach and su:n-
moning a physician?
2. The Department of AgrleulTuPe should ~eview its supports~
ond oThe? aldto Tobacco growing in view of This national epidemic.
-J
Surely, the Tobacco farmer may suffer~ but only temporarily~ from
restriction. The force for innovation, the capacity to cope with
change~ is inherent in modern America. Forced to master challenge~
- more

(
(
Paz~ 6.
our sclen~iets have sent men to spaee~ are producing safer care~ nlgh-
superhuman colnputers. The tobacco growing and manufacturln~ indusfDy
is a backward one. Its products have hardly changed in several dec-
ades. Yet one cannot but believe -- if he has confidence in our com-
bination of free°enterprise and %echnlcal competence -- that the richly-
funded tobacco indus±~y could not catch up wi%h new~ better and d~Jf-
feren% pl, oducts. Certainly~ if a small enterprise of 20Q people in
He~-eford, Texas~ such as ours~ can pioneer with a safer ~moking pro-
duet~ the vast tobacco Companies should be able to do it bettel,
once they free themselves of the complacency that is so ing.~alned in
this industry that the phrase, ~Tobacco Road~'~ has become synonymous
in ~mlemic~n llfe for what is backward and decadent.
3. The Federal Food and Drug Administration has taken great
strides in making the public aware of harmful or inefficacious drugs
and medicines. ~.~e believe %his agency should insist ell further warn-
ings on ciga~et packs, calling puDlic attention to the fact that
smoking i_ss and not only may be dangerous to health, particularly among
sufferers f~om high blood pmessu?e, Raynaud ~s disease~ arter.loseler-
osis, ulee~,s and other ills in between which %here is almeady positive
llnk with nicotine Ir~gestion.
4. The Federal Trade Commloszon has rullngs on tobacco pro-
motion that need more ~igld interpretation and enfomcement. Should
not our television commercials devote equal tlme to the showing of
O
that slde of the eigaret pack on whmeh a eautlo.~ary message is im-
T
printed? If an advertiser is to urge~ in multi-million dollar com-
mercma-s~ that the public, "Show us your pack," should not they in
N
fairness show both sides of it?

: ( C
~age 7.
THE FILTER $ELF-DEFEATIN@
There are blind alleys that lead no<~heme in the search for a
safer smoke. One of them, to this interested observer, is the em-
phasis on the filter as a panacea for the diseases that tobacco leaves
us prone to. The cigarst industry intnodL~ced filters in 1959 and
1@60. In order to be effeetive~ they w~e so hard to q'draw" they be-
cams known as "hernia sticks." In order to gain a lar~eD share of
smoke~s and make them ssll~ it became necessary to loosen the filters
-- and reduce their effectiveness -- and to develop "filter blends"
of tobacco that were combinations of stronger and more deleterious
tobaccos than were used in non-filter eigarets.
Filters gained success because they did not "filte~ the
taste." Neither did they filter the danEeDous ingredients of tobacco
smoke. The idea of the filter is foredoomed because hlstorioa! :pme-
cedent demonstrates that the mo~e it filters and keeps from the
mouth, the more poison will have to be put in f~ont of any filter in
order to "satisfy the smoker."
Po~ years, we have seen untrled and untested ideas fom filte~
foisted upon the news media and then the public° Perhaps happily
these have been permitted to lapse into limbo by the tobacco industry,
which, after all~ does know its business. The latest product to
be heralded as a phenomenon with only a paucity of evldence~ is a
"secret" for~ula that has gained the backing, I reluctantly ~eport~
of my own university~ Columbia. AS former president of the alumni
%9
association of Columbia's College of Pharmacy, I can only ~ue that
this great unlverslty has lent its name, p~estlge and ~esources and
morality to such an ethereal endeavor,
- more -

. L
Page 8.
Thepe are other evils than tobacco and inefficient filters in
clgarets. One of the most common flavoring ingr~edients in cigarets
does itself produce ta~s that, our laboDaTory tests have ehown~ rank
almost with tobacco in its harmful effect on the ci~cula'tory system.
I am convlnceu, and~ on the best of present evidence, Europ-
eans have demonstrated, that it is possible for science To remove
nicotine from Tobacco. Filters become meaningless in face of such an
achievement. The challenge to the American tobacco industry to re-
move th~ deadly nicotine from its main ingredient cannot be over-
whelming. I hope, and millions of other Amsr.icans should pl, ay~ that
this challenge w~ll be meti
But The prime ansi.yet to safer smoking~ gentlemen, must lie in
devisin~ products that are safe? than tobacco. Hopefully these pro-
ducts may he even safer than lettuce, as well I urge conslderat~on
of the committee and the Senate of the value of government sponso~ed
research and grants to worthy pnivate enterprlse to develop~ o? at
least test~ new and safer smokin~ products.
~ I believe that we have pioneered a start in this direction with
a smokin~ p~cduet that is being found acceptable by a limited but in-
el.easing number of people~ not only in the United States but in Eng-
land~ Po~tugal~ Canada, Sweden~ Italy and oe.her countries to which
we export, ~ ~
If those of us who have first found a method of ~educin~ the
t'oll that nicotine exacts on millions of lives can assist, then we
0
stand ready with counsel, ha~d work and imagination to assist the
govel.nment and even The tobacco industry in thls vital mission°

C
The popularity and the peril of tobacco smoking are
closely related. The smoker is habituated to nicotine effects;
he derives unconscious physiological and psychological satis-
faction by ingesting the d~ug. This is "nlcotin8 addiction."
If nicotine-free smoking pDoducts are devised from
tobacco or othe~ substances~ and successfully mass marketed
and promoted, we will see a gradual diminution of the smoking
habit. For as nicotine conten'~ is reduced and eliminated,
the smoked will have less and less "need" to snmke and he can
be moth rational in his approachto giving up the habit.
Therefore, I urge the nation to restrict the use of nicotine
in eiga~ets to eliminate the illnessand death th~s drug
foists on the nation.
#
0
N
