Brown & Williamson
the Growth of Menthols 330000 - 770000
Fields
- Type
- MRPT, MARKETING REPORT
- CHAR, CHART
- GRAP, GRAPH
- GRAPHIC
- REPORT
- Named Person
- Maxwell/X
- Simmons/X
- Stewart, W.H./Us Public Health Service
- Terry/Us Public Health Service
- Wynder/Sloan Kettering
- X/Readers Digest
- X/Lorillard
- X/Natl Consumer Surveys
- X/R.J. Reynolds
- X/Us Congress
- X/Tgi
- X/Us Public Health Service
- Xxwillie/X
- Attachment
- 249111
- Original File
- Menthol History
- Request
- B20
- H83
- Litigation
- 10004026
- Date Loaded
- 26 Mar 1999
- Brand
- Kool
- Salem
- Alpine
- Belair
- Benson & Hedges
- Camel
- Carlton
- Chesterfield
- Doral
- Duke of Durham
- Eve
- Fact
- Golden Lights
- Iceberg
- Kent
- Lemon Twist
- Life
- Lucky
- L&M
- Marlboro
- Max
- Merit
- Montclair
- More
- Newport
- Now
- Old Gold
- Pall Mall
- Parliament
- Raleigh
- Real
- Saratoga
- Silva Thins
- Spring
- Tareyton
- True
- Twist of Lemon
- Vantage
- Viceroy
- Virginia Slims
- Winston
Document Images
THE GROWTH OF MENTHOLS
1933- 1977
60~L9~0"9
• ~ T~i,d ~vgnu. Nt~ yo,k~ 14lw y+rh 1~]7

THE GROWTH OF MENTHOLS
I. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................
t
If. RSVIEW DS TXE HISTORY ..................................................
3
A. The Overall Trend ..................................................
3
B, The Phases .........................................................
~O
I. Early History oF Kools 1933 - 1950 .............................
&O
2, Th~ Filters an~ Entry ~f Salem 19~D - 19&2 .....................
14
3. Th~ Growth of Kools ...........................................
26
4. Th~ Low-Tars 1975 to Date ......................................
36
Ill. FREE STANDING BRANDS, LINE £XTENSIDNS A~D COMPANIONS ...................
37
IV. HI-FI AND MENTHOL .....................................................
54
V, MENTHOL, TAR AND TASTE LEVELS ..........................................
62
VI. APPENDIX ...............................................................
70

INTRODUCTION
Mentholated cigarettes have grown from a relatively minor 2.6~ share of the cigarette
market in I~hg to over 28~ c~rren~Iy, So important are ~e~hols tod~y that every new
brand is introduced with a menthol companion that typicaiIy provides one-third of the
brandls voIume.
The growth of menthols colncldeB in time and is evldentIy lFnked wlth the major changes
whiG~ have ~haken th~ clgaret~c market,
The Factors behlnd the extraordinary grc~ith of menthols sl~ce I~50 s~em to be I~tertwlned
wi~h the 6hangin9 taste Of cigarezte51 ~hanging tar and ~icotine leveIsp and sm0kers',
efforts to adjust to these cha~ges.
All of these are again undergoing rapid change with the upsurge of the latest low-tar
trend in 1975.
ATso of eruclal importance, especla11y to Kools, Is the exceptionallg high share that
menthols have obtalned among blacks a~d the youth, Trends her~ also seem to ~ changing
in the last two years.
Kocls~ spectacular growth has ?fattened out during this period,
The growth of }ow-tar cigarettes again changes th~ ta~t~ oF clgarettBs and~ thorefore,
agal~ affects the fundamentals of tb~ market, The great growth of menthols In the 50:$
aros~ durlng a ~imKlar period, as consumers searched for an acccptabl~ taste in fi]ter
~i~ar~ttes. TodBy Consumers m~y a~ain be seeking ~ acceptable tast~ i~ ~ Icw-tar cigarette
a~d F~ndlng ~t ~n a menthol. In the ~O~s, ~he cholce was very li~ited. Now, however,
,~f!Lhol i~ readily available in pFact~ca11y all b~ands at var~o~s strengths and ~ar l~vels.
The low-tars seem to be se111ng about as much menthol as the hlgh-tars.
The purpose of this report is to e~amlne the trends in menthols since 1950 In order to
obtain a better grasp of the factors ~h~ch c~ntrol the course of menthols and Kool,

This r~par: covers ~sentially th~ d~v~lopment= through 1976. The more r¢cent trends
will be dealt wlth in Phase II of this studv.
Therefore, we will reserve our c0rm~n~s on the la~est trends and Lhe [m~li~tion~ For
the future for that report.
'9
2

BL~IEW OF THE HISTORY
THE OVERALL TREND
Before I~56~ Kools was, fcr all ~ntent5 and purposes, the only menthol cigarette. It ~as
i~tr~H,]~d in I~33 and by I~35 had att~iqed a 2,2~ shar~ of all ¢Tqar~tte~. Thereafter,
iLs sha,¢ declined to 1,4~ in 1940, ros~ to 2.3~ in I~41 d~clined again to 1.5~ i~ I~L7
and ended up in l~ back at 2.~ whe,~ iL had baen in ~35.
In 1950~ ~i:h lhe heighL~r~ng ~wareness of the d~n~er5 oF smokTn9 kicked off by ~ J~nuary,
I~ R~derls 3Tg~$t article, "Ho~ ~anqerous are Cigarette$?"~ a new p~a~e 5e~med ~o begin.
K~ols~ st~II tn~ ~nly men~h~l~ rose to a ~.~% share, e~ceed~ng its prev~ou~ peak.
STnc¢ ~hen~ menth~]~ have g~in~d im share every year ~thout exception to re~h ~ ]ev~] of
abou~ 28~ in I~76 - a gain ~f 2~ sh~re point~ ~n 2~ yocrs. As shown ~y the chart or ~en~ho]'s
~hare of ~Tg~r~ttes~ th~r~ ~as a 51ow upw~l'd trend un[Jl ]~56 ~nc ~ 5harper ri~ ~nc~ ~hen.
In torts cf share of filters, ~he patL~r~ is ~o~ dramaEJ¢, In 6 y~ar~ from th~ ~ntroduc~on
of menthol filter~ in 1956 t~ I~9, mnrt~ols ros~ ~o 25~ of all fH~er~. ~n the 14 years
f~llowlng through i~76~ it lose only ar~th~r 6 poln~s ~o abou~ 31~,
Th~s~ apparently smoot~ overall curves m~k startl~ng chan~es in th~ ~r~nd trend~ p~rtic~larly
th~ trends of the ~o le~ding men~hcI brand~ - Kuu] ~Id S~1~m. As ~hown clearly by the char~s~
there are distinct phase~ in the history of n~enthols since 1950, pqas~s wi~h different brand
tr~nd~.
Un:TI I~62~ Koo!s market share shows remarkable constancy while S~l~m's leaps u~ward.
Thereafter, Salem's trend becomes rla~ wh]le ~uol~' ~iscs steadily until 1974~ ~×c~ding ~alem.
In I~7~ ~ n~w ~rend sets Tn~ with Kco s flattening.

Accordingly we have d~vided the histor~ oR menthols ~nto the following phases:
I. The Rarly History of Kools - I~33-1955
il. The Rise of Salem - 1956-I~62
II~. Th~ Kc~] 6rowth Phase - I~3-I~74
IV. The ~r~th o~ tow ~ar~ - 1975 to date
Each of these phases will be discussed in detai].

60o
500
400
300
2OO
I00
__ Total Cigarett~
.... T~ta] Menthols
Exhibit
GROWTH OF MENTHOLS
UNIT SALES
(B~lIions)
YEAR 50 5l 52 53 3L 55 56 57 58 ~ 60 61 G2 63 64 65 66 67 E8 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77

35.0
TOTAL MENTHOL
SHARE OF ALL CIGARETTES
¢J
=it
L~J
Q.
30.f
25.o:
2~.C
15.0
I0.0
l t f I I P I L. I T 1 r 1
Y Y ~ 1 1 I ) ~ I T t I ,
YEAR 50 5l 5~ 53 54 55 '56 57 ~8 59 &O 61 62 63 64
G5 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 7~ 7~ 77
.gT&9 O
6

u~
3~.0
30.0
25.0
20,C
lO.O
5.C
TOTAL FILTERED MENTHOL
SHgRE OF TOTAL FILTERS
¢,,
i i , * L t # I I I I t % I ~ I
I t I # I t I I # I I
YEAR 50 51 92 53 54 55:56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 7l 72 73 74 75 76 77
7

GROWTH OF MAJOR HENTHO[. BRANDS - I
SHARE OF TOTAL CIGARETTES
Total Koo]
.... T~tal Salem
• ~ ..... Total Line Extensions
• ~. Total Companions
12,0 PHASE I
PHASE !1
PHASE III
PHASE IV
I.-
z
¢.J
54 55
/
t
#
/
!
/
/
56 57
60
7Z 73 74 75 76
77
