Blum Oral Tobacco
JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association) Smokeless Tobacco
Fields
- Named Organization
- Atlanta Constitution (Newspaper)
- Journal of the American Medical Assocation JAMA
- Notes
Reply to inquiry regarding safety of smokeless tobacco use in comparison to cigarette smoking.
- Master ID
- 001_20A
- 001_20A_0001 Argus Leader Doctor: Snuff, Chewing Tobacco Also Risky
- 001_20A_0002 Health & Fitness, Dallas Morning News
- 001_20A_0004 Writers Guidelines for: Heartland USA
- 001_20A_0006 Tobacco Lore A Look at the History of Snuff
- 001_20A_0008 Smokeless Tobacco: A Life Saver?
- 001_20A_0009 National Collegiate Athletic Association Conferences Policies on Smokeless Tobacco
- 001_20A_0017 Special Article: The Reemergence of Smokeless Tobacco, New England Journal Medicine Vol 314
- 001_20A_0025 Pinch Me
- 001_20A_0029 American Journal of Public Health -- Snuffing Tobacco Our of Sport"
- 001_20A_0029A American Journal of Public Health Color Cover
- 001_20A_0033 Ebay Harry Gant 33 Skoal Tobacco 1987 Fan Club
- 001_20A_0035 Ebay 1997 SKOAL Tobacco Ad! Cruises! #3338
- 001_20A_0037 Ebay NHRA Don Prudhomme Skoal Press Kit Auto'd
- 001_20A_0039 Ebay A Skoal Sample Pack
- 001_20A_0041 Flight Attendant Loses Tobacco-Smoke Claim, Miami Herald 9/6/02
Related Documents:
Document Images
dAMA
THE JOURNAL of the
Am'erican Medic,al Association
July 11, 1980 Vol 244. No. 2
Questions and Answers
'Smokeless' Tobacco •
QDuring the 1980 Olympic G~mes at "Lake Placid, NY,
television advertisements showed professional athletes rec=
ontmending the use of .so-called smokeless tobacco, whose
manufacturer was noted to be an• official Olympic sponsor. On
March 30, 1980, the Atlanta Journal and Constitution carried an
article headlined "A Little. Plug •for Chewing Tobacco," which
extolled "America's most misunderstood indulgence." Is it true that
using snuff or chewing tobacco is much less harmful than smoking
cigarett.~s?
MD, Georgia'
Snuff-dipping, the placing of a pinch of powdered,
A. flavored tobacco in the cavity between gum' and
cheek and sucking on the "quid," is reported to be
increasing among youths of Southern. states, including
grade-schoolers.' In addition, .the US Department of
Agriculture says there is a "r~cent 6% increase in the
consumption of chewing tobacco; the use'of which involves
a. golf-ball size "chow" thaf~ is~. held in the in~er cheek
area?
Such a phenomenon comes at the heels of television and
printed media advertising by the United States Tobacco
Co that features the testimonials of well2known athletes
and country-rock stars for various hran, ds of snuff and by
the P. Lorillard Co for its Beech-Nu.t cl~ewfng ~tob~cco.
Advertising research by the industry has resulted in:these
campaigns being directed at the youth market. The role
models are portrayed as intelligent and "with-it," partly
because they have switched to smokeless tobacco out of
concern for their health.
H6wever, based on the current medical evidence, their
long-term health would be far better if they did not use
tobacco at all. Because snuff still is not as widely used as
other forms of tobacco and because it is not inhaled as
smoke, it does not present as great a danger to health as
cigarettes. But such a risk is purely relative, for snuff
seems to he even more injurious to the oral cavity than
cigarettes. Snuff can appreciably accelerate a litany of
destructive changes, including gingival recession, tooth
abrasion~ and periodontal bone destruction? Leukoplakia
(also dubbed snuff-dipper's keratosis), a nonspecific white
patch involving the nonkeratinized epithelium of the oral
muc0•sa, is most often attributed to the use of tobacco.
Upwards of one in 20 cases of leukoplakia will hndergo
malignant transformation into an epidermoid carcinoma.2
A nitrosamine, N-n~trosonornicotine, which can be iso-
lated from snuff, has been shown to be tumorigenic.in
experimental..animals~
The c~se agai.nst chewing tobacco may prove to be even
~nore damning~n an analysis of 2,005 patients in India
with oral,~ph~ynge.al, and esophageal cancers (and an
equal number of"control subjects cgmpar.able in age, sex,.
and religion), Jayant e~ ;iP quanti.fi.ed tbe.relative etiologic
fraction--the proportion bf cases of a disease'attributable
to a particular factor--from chewing and smoking tobacco
for these' cancers. Overall, chewing or smoking, or both,
accdunted fo~ 70% of cancers of.the oral cavity, 84% of
cancers of the oropharynx, 75% of cancers of the hypo-
pharynx and larynx; and 50% of cancers of the esopha-
gus.. ,, -
Chewing and ~moking act synergistically in varying
degrees, Jayant et aP noted. For instance, chewing alone
has a sixfold higher risk of.cancer of the oral cavity
relative to the nqnchewer., nonsmoker, while smoking
alone has "only" a threefold increase. Both.chewing and
smoking increases the risk .tenfold.
Despite t~he evidence attributing serious health prob-
lems to smokeless tobacco, Frankel" points out that there
is no warning required on packages•or adv. ertisements for
these products. Nor have pz:ofessional health organiza-
tions, publishers, or broadcasting corporations taken any
significant steps to counteract an advertising onslaught
aimed at young people.
ALAN BLUM, MD
1. Christen .AG: Tobacco chewing and snuff dipping. N Engl J Med
302:818, 1980.
2. Christen AG, McDaniel,RK, Doran JE: Snuff dipping and tobacco
chewing in a group ef Texas college athletes. Tvx Dent J 97:6-10, 1979.
3. Christen AG, hrmstrnng WR, McDaniel RK: Intraoral leukopla.kia,
periodontal breakdown, and teath loss in :t snuff" dipper. J Am Dcnl Assoc
98:5~t -,5811, 1979.
4. (~,ddsmith DP, Winn DM: Hazards with snulL l,a~cct i~8~5, 1980. "
5. Jayant K, Balakrishnan V, Sangbvl IA). et ah Quantification of the
role of smoking and chewing tobacco in neat, pharyngeal, and besophageal
cancers. Br J Cancer 35:232-235, 1977.
6. Frankel l I1 !: Another cowboy selling cancer. Wcsl J Mcd 13(1:.270-271,
1979. 19 2
