Abstract
Document offering a "suggested response to the charge of addiction." Informs that the National Advisory Council on Drug Abuse "had recommended to the Surgeon General that an addiction warning be placed on cigarette packages" based upon a report by the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA). Asserts NIDA report concluded by seeming to suggest "that there are more questions than answers about the smoking habit and that any conclusion that cigarettes are addictive is premature." Asserts that "claims that cigarette smoking is an addiction remain unproven." Concludes said claims "represent primarily an attempt to condemn product and the person who enjoys it by the use of an emotionally charged word." Indicates document is "cleared for internal use" by Shook, Hardy & Bacon.
Page 1: 00002705
[cT~ scientific sta ff
eared by SHB for internal use I/8/813
A SUGGESTED RESPONSE TO ....
THE CHARGE OF ADDICTi0~.~ ~,~.,~.~
Background
The beZ£ef that the subject of a~d£et£on w£ZZ be
oonta£ned £n eCtber the ~etter of transmCttal to Congress
£n the Surgeon ~enera~'s report £tseZf £s based on news
storCes that arose after a summer meetCng o~ the NatConaZ
Adv£sory Couno£Z on D~ug Abuse, ~be sto~£es reported t~at
the Coune£Z had recommended to the Surgeon General that an
add£ot£on wa~n£nz be p].aeed on e£ga~ette packages.
The Council's recommendation was based on the report of
an August 1979 meeting sponsored by NIDA in which seventeen
"experts" were convened as a "Technical Review Group on
Cigarette Smoking as an Addiction." The group concluded
"That cigarette smoking behavior should be considered a
form of addiction, and tobacco In the form of cigarettes,
an addicting substance. "I
Given the one-sided conclusion of the NIDA Report, one
wonders why the final section recommends research progr~s
to elucidate "the behavioral and pharmacological variables
which influence both the maintenance and elimination of
cigarette smoking behavior..." and to explore "the role of
nicotine in the initiation and maintenance of cigarette
smoking." Such statements seem to suggest that there are
more questions than answers about the smoking habit and that
CO~EMTIAL:
~OTA TOBACCO LITIGATION . 311419

Page 2: 00002706
any conclusion that cigarettes are addictive is premature.
The description of smoking as an "addictlon~has become
a convenient way for anti-smokers to criticize both the
product and its consumers. One example is the recent
statement of a member of the National Advisory Council who
said his group used the term "addictive" in its recommendation
because it"s "sort of a dirty word."2
in studying smokers' motivations, scientists have
examined a variety of possible physiological, pharmacolo-
gical and psychological mechanisms that may be involved in
smoking behavior. They have looked at the effect of nicotin~
on various components of the body. They have looked at the
situations in which people smoke, the frequency with which
they smoke, the length of the puffs they take on their
cigarettes. They have attempted to determine whether or no~[~
people smoke more frequently or more intensely ifthey are ~o~~
g~ven c~garettes with a lower nicotine content than those
they are accustomed to smoking. They have examined what
happens to smokers when they stop smoking. They have
attempted to characterize particular smokers according to
classification systems based on the smokers' motivations.
The results of these numerous scientific investigations
have been varying and often conflicting. More than anything
else, the research has shown that smoking is a complex behavior,
that people smoke for different reasons, and that individuals
react differently to smoking. T~e difficulty in distinguishing
COI~IFIDENTIAL: TIMN 311420
SOTn TO nCCO

Page 3: 00002707
psychological from phy-~;iological effects has also been a
problem.
Recent scientific publications indicate that the role
of nicotine is unclear and the hypothesis that people smoke
for pharmacological effects is unproven. One group of
researchers has described the area of smoking motivation as
"virtuallyunexplored.3 An arti@e in the October, 1977,'
issue of the British Medical Journal describes tobacco
smoking as a ~omplex phenomenon, some aspects of which are
the physical act of smoking, taste and smell, relief of
tension and enhancement of sociability.4 The final sentence
of this article s~erized the current state of knowledge as
.
follows "But what makes people smoke is still largely a
mystery..."
It is interesting to note that one well-known anti-smoking
spokesman, Dr. Ernst Wynder of the American Healti Foundation
when asked whether he considered cigarette smoking to be an
addiction replied;
."There is some controversy among my
colleagues in this area. I consider it
to be an habituation. In other words,
once you quit the habit, your system will
not collapse like that of a heroine addict, ,5
but you will live perfectly happily ever after...
Those who claim that smoking is addictive often c~te studies
which report that high percentages of smokers want or have
tried to stop smoking but continue to smoke. However, such
CONFIDENTIAL:
MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION TIM 311421

Page 4: 00002708
studies may not be ve1~Lable. In a recent Lancet a~ticle,
reseaPchers "encouPaEed caution in what is made of what
smokers say about theil~ wish to Eive up smokinE and their
a~Sempts 50 do so."6 The authors, wh6 are opposed ~o
smoking~ also pointed out that ~ertain psycho!oEical pPessu~es
on smokePs miEht make sSatemen~s abou5 their desires
attempts 5o stop smoking suspect.
One often repea~ed claim is that smokePs are "addicted"
to nicotine. Yet, i5 is useful to remembeP that the Eove~nmen~
aEency responsible fop the PeEulation of druEs~ the Food and
DvuE Administration, has denied petitions seekinE ~o have
oigarettes oontaininE nlco~ine PeEulated as a "dPug" on two
separate occasions. The most ~ecent vullnE, in la~e November,
1980~ ~eitevated the position 5hat ciEa~e~tes do no5 fall
undeP FDA juPisdiction.
Claims that ciEa~'eSte smokinE is an addiction Pemain
unproven. They repPe~|ent pvimaPily an attempt 5o condemn a
product and the person who en~oys it by ~h-e use o~ an
emo~ionally charged
Produced es r~qa~d ~.e~ ~.~.~~.~ ....... 7. .............
January 8, 1981
CONFIDENTIAL:
MINNESOTA TOBACCO LITIGATION
TIMN 311422
