Bliley TI
[Memo Concerning Legal Advice and the Industry's Position On Addiction]
Abstract
Memo from William Kloepfer to Samuel Chilcote regarding legal advice and the industry's "Position On Addiction." Includes conventional wisdom on nicotine addiction. States arguments to counter what is traditionally said and thought about nicotine's addictive properties. Directs the industry not to make comments on nicotine and addiction to protect against product liability suits.
Fields
- Notes
(indexer.indexer_email WAS INVALID IN OLD DATABASE: JL)
- Company
- TI
- Named Organization
- American Psychiatric Association
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (An addiction research center in Baltimore, MD)
An addiction research center located in Baltimore, MD- World Health Organization (Concerned with global public health)
International organization concered with public health worldwide - National Institute on Drug Abuse (An addiction research center in Baltimore, MD)
- Type
- MEMO
- Author
- Kloepfer, William J., Jr. (TI Public Affairs VP, c. 1988)Senior Vice President of Public Affairs Relations for the Tobacco Institute
- Copied
- Cullman, H.
- Recipient
- Chilcote, Samuel D., Jr. (TI President (1981-1997))Chilcote has knowledge of The Tobacco Institute's and the tobacco industry's participation in public fraud and disinformation relative to health hazards of tobacco use, in the manipulation of nicotine in tobacco products and in marketing of tobacco products to children.
- Named Person
- Sirridge, Patrick M. (Attorney, Shook, Hardy and Bacon)
- Subject
- addiction
- industry response
- Lawsuits
- nicotine
- product liability
- industry response
Document Images
Telecopy to: Hugh Cullman
From: Sam Chilcote
For your information, as
we discussed on the phone.
Total pages: 2 pages
November 26, 1984
~0 "- et ~t8
~0.: ~ /. 199
T0: S~L D. CHILCOTE, JR. C1,~ ~0~ ~
FROM: WILLI~ ~OEPFER, JR.
SUBJECT: POSITION ON ~DICTION
This is reconstructed from personal notes I made several months
ago when, at our request, Pat Sirridge of Shook, Hardy & Bacon
briefed the public relations division staff on what's being
said, and what we might say, on the matter of cigarette
addiction.
What's being said
o People smoke to get nicotine
o Nicotine is psychoactive -- it influences behavior
o Nicotine releases certain hormones or "opiates" which
produce pleasure and relaxation
o Stopping smoking produces withdrawal symptoms
o People who wish to quit smoking often can't, or the
recidivision rate is high
o Such conclusions as those above have been reached by NIDA,
WHO-and the American Psychiatric Association
o Smokers compensate for low-yield cigarettes by smoking more
o Smoking is a "gateway" to other drug use
o Prescribed nicotine gum is an antidote
It can also be argued --
o Smoking is different things in terms of time, place, etc.
for different people -- that complexity doesn't fit addiction
TIMN 0054213

CED
Samuel D. Chilcote, Jr . "~4~..~_~t~e C~..~[~)~_.
November 26, 1984 ~_ -~ur~. e~,-"~rs A4~?'*~a
o The te~ addiction is heine used casually and its real
meanin~ is bein~ lost; smokin~ should be called a custom
or habit
o Addiction should be defined accurately, not carelessly
o Some s~toms of "withdrawal" can be associated ~th all
sorts of inErained behavior or habits
o Nicotine is not intoxlcatlnE -- it produces no "high"
o People c~'t quit? More than 33 million have in this
co.try -- 95 percent of them on their o~ without help --
and that is not characteristic of addiction
o ~ere's no consensus in the literature that nicotine is
addictive
o At about the sa~ the ~erican Psychiatric Association
labeled smokin~ as addictive, i~ dropped ho~se~allty as a
disorder -- their disorder man~l seems more political than
scientific -- and in it, tobacco does not fit their o~
definition of physical substance abuse
o Coffee dri~inE is similar ~o smokinE
o Re~ardinE recidivism, the majority of foyer s~kers who
remain nonsmokers have not been studied scientifically --
is there somethin~ special about the recidivists that science
should know?
o If nicotine is a dru~, why are there different quit rates ~on~
different social strata?
o If s~kers are pers~ded through propaganda that they are
addicted, it ~ives them an excuse not to quit
Use of this material
Co~sel has advised us to make no co~ents on our o~ initiative
on this subject so lonE as it is a basis for product liability
suits aEainst Institute members. This advice is in keepinE with
nodal advice to defendan~ clients and their a~ents and is not
especially significant reEardin8 just this one subject. ~e "It
can also be arEued" points above are provided in case of an inquiry
which must be answered.
~SS ~
