Bliley RJReynolds
Draft Report Concerning Smoking and Health Issues Prepared by Outside Legal Counsel to Tobacco Companies Transmitted to Tobacco Companies' in-House Legal Counsel for the Purpose of Rendering Legal Advice.
Fields
- Author
- Holtzman, A.
- Shinn, William W. (TI Communications; Shook, Hardy, CTR Attorney)TI Communications Committee and was also a lawyer for CTR. William W. Shinn worked for Shook, Hardy & Bacon.
- Shook Hardy
- Decker, F.K. Jr
- Recipient
- Haas, F.P.
- Hetsko, C.F.
- Smith, P.D.
- Ramm, Henry H. (CTR Chair; RJR VP & Gen Counsel, c. 1967)Chairman of the Board & General Counsel for R.J. Reynolds and CTR Chairman 1971-1975.
- Rjr
- Yeaman, A.Y.
Document Images
LE OF CONTENTS
Genera .................
A. The Secretary's Report ............
B. The Surgeon General's Report - 1967 ...... 6
,. II. Specific Areas ..................
i0
A. Smoking and Overall Mortality .........
10
I. Measures of Exposure ...........
ii
,i 2. Cessation of Smoking ...........
15
~ B. Smoking and Overall Morbidity .........
18
C. Smoking and Cardiovascular Disease ........
19
1 Introduction
• 19
2 Summary
20
3. The Status According to ~he Surgeon General
22
O a. Prospective Mortality Studies .....
23
, b. Longshoremen Study ...........
25
c. Morbidity Study ......
"...... 26
d. Mechanisms ...............
28
e. Cerebrovascular Disease ........
3.3
4. The Current Status .............
34
a. Prospective Studies ..........
34

b. Retrospective Studies .......... 38
Multifactorial Disease ......... 41
d. Multivariate Analysis in General ..... 41
e. Multivariate Analyses and the
Prospective mortality Studies ...... 44
f. Statistics Do Not Prove Cause ...... 45
Og. Twin Studies .............. 46
h Emotional Stress " 47
j. Predictors ............... 50
k. The Constitutional Hypothesis ...... 50
.... 5 Conclusion' 53
D. Smoking and Chronic BronchoPulmonaryDiseases
(Non-Neoplastic) ................. 55
O Unjustified Broadening of 1964 Conclusion . • 55 1.
2. Difficulties of Diagnosis .......... 56
3. Four Prospective Mortality Studies ..... 57
4. Reliability of Mortality Statistics .....
Questioned ................. 58
5 Autopsy Studies " 59
6. Morbidity Studies .............. 59
7. H~redity and'Constitutional Factors .... 61

8. Occupational Exposures and Air
Pollution .................. 62
.9. Experimental Evidence ............ 62
10. Summary ................... 63
Smoking and cancer - Highlights of Current
Information ................... 65
1. Lung Cancer ................. 70
a. Mortaiity- General Background ..... 71
b. Vital Statistics Inconsistent with ~
Cigarette Theory 7~"
c. Increase in Lung Cancer Mortality
Pathologic Data ............. 81
d. Current Information on the Cigarette
Smoke - Lung Cancer Association ..... 83
I. No Statistical Association Found... 8~"
2. No Relation in Case of Females . . . 84
3. Effect of Other Respiratory Illness ..
including Tuberculosis ....... 86
4. No "Dose-Response" Shown ....... 88
5. Cessation of Smoking ........ 92
e. Current Information Concerning Suspected
Carcinog4nic Agents in Tobacco Smoke. . . 94
f. The 1967 Report Understates the Evidence
that Exposures other than to Cigarette
Smoke appear to be related to Lung
Cancer ................. I01 o
O

g. Generally ............... 105
2. Oral Cancer .............. 106
3. Laryngeal Cancer .............. 107
4. Urinary. Bladder Cancer ........... 108
5. Esophageal Cancer •
Conclusion ..

- , . . t ~&~":~
50~132 8080

RESPONSE TO HEW REPORT TO CONGRESS ON SMOKING AND
HEALTH AND SURGEON GENERAL'S REPORT ON THE HEALTH
• CONSEQUENCES OF SMOKING--1967
I. ~enerally.
A. The Secretary's Report.
Pursuant to the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Adver-
rising Act Of 1965, Secretary Gardner has submitted a report to
Congress concerning "current information on the health conse-
quences of smoking" and "recommendations for ~egislation". The
Secretary reports that the "principal thrust" of more than 2,000
recent research studies .completed and reported in "the biomedical
-literature" has been to "strengthe~ the conclusions leached in
1964 and to determine more precisely the extent of death and dis-
/ ~~ords--at~_r!but~h~e tQ with th~emore careful word-
in~-~n mortality and morbidity reports "showing d~a~san-~--~a~ili-
ties statistically "associated" with cisarette smoking: (i) The
Division o-----~ Vital Sta6is~i~s, in l~tin~ ~e~hs fr6m diseases sta-
tistically asso6iated with smoking, warned that it had "no infor-
matron" as to the proportion "actually caused" by.smoking (HEW
Appropriations Hearings, 1968, Part.4~ p. 79); and (2) The National
Center for Health Sta£istics pamphlet on "C~garette Smoking and
}~ealth Characteristi6s," which presents statistics on disability,
observed that data showing a statistical association "cannot es-
tablish any existing relationship as a causal one" (p. 6~ When
asked (see page 78 of the same volume on the H~ Hearings) ~y he
referred to "at least 125,000 premature deaths, and maybe "as many
as 300,000 deaths . . due to c~garette smoking", Surgeon General
Stewart responded, "D~d I say 'due to'?" See Appendix
A~ and
the discussion at pages i0 and 18 .

The Secretary further reports (I] that the present warn-
ing label on cigarette packages "is inadequate"~ (2) that the label
has not"been a significant deterrent to cigarette smoking ("as
amply show~ in the recent report of the Federal Trade Commission").
and "does not have any impact oh the many children and young people
who are daily exposed to cigarette ad~ertisln~"~ and (3) that "the
acc ulated evidence strongly suggests that the lower t.e 'tar: and
nicotine content of cigarette smoke, the lowe~ the harmful effect"
and that inf6rmation concerning content "of the smoke of each brand
of cigarettes should be put before the smoker and the potential
smoker" so the consumer would "thus be able to make an informed
choice of product". :
O The Secretary, based on the considerations stated, recom-
mends (I) that the warning label on each package of cigarettes be
~strengthened to state more specifically and positively that ciga-
rette smoking is a hazard to.health'~; (2) that the warning should
be required in advertisements as well as on cigarette packages;
and (3) that both the label and advertising should be required to
contain information on the "tar" and nicotine levels "in the smoke
of th~ cigarette" and the identity and quantity of such other sub- ~
O
stances or agents "in the smoke as may sub-D£quently be found by the ~
O

appropriate Federal agency to c6ntribute to the health hazards of
smoking.
.The Sedreta~y attached a "Surgeon General's
summary re-
port", said to contain "detailed information on the
health conse-
quences of ~m£king", and referred to technical
information, ~.ot
att-.'~ed, which "will be available as an addendum to the Surgeon
General's Report". . o
•
This response will demonstrate that "the gaps in knowl-
edge identified in 1964"* in Smokinq and Health still exist, par-
ticularly with respect to "the mechanism by: which ingredients in
cigarette smoke induce harmful effects on t~e human body"* if, in
fact, they do.
.-
.Until a "mechanism" has been identified, it is premature
t5 assign a causative roleto cigarette smoking with respect to any
disease and meaningless to speak in terms of "how much illness and
mortality would be ave.rted by cessation of smoking".* ~t isequai-
ly meaningless to modify the warning label imposed by Congress in-
1965 unless some scientific breakthrough has implicated cigarette
*Secretary Gardner's statement, page 1

smoking by producing evidence fa@ more persuasive than that pre-
• sented in the Surgeon General's 1967 report. In this respect it
"" is certainly significant that the Secretary's statement, in deal-
ing with the additional research efforts since 1964 refers in
detail only to "epidemiological Information'--as to which the
Surgeon Seneral's AdvisOry Committee had this to saM:. "Statistical
Omethods cannot establish proof of a causal relationship in an
association" (Smoking and Health, p.28).
.The Secretary's recommendation that a warning be placed
on cigarette gdvertising refers to "the recent rel~rt of the Federal
Trade Commission". Since no data or other materigl supporting such
a recommendation is incorporated in the HEW report, it will ~ot be
dealt with further in this resl~nse.
.The Secretary advances no reason why or how "tar", whic~
presented "a puzzling anomaly" (Smokin~ and Health, p. 33) in 1964,
had suddenly become an indicator that would enable a smoker to
make "an informed choice". Equally mysterious is the conclusion
that the lower the.nicotine content of cigarette smoke, "th~ lower
the harmful effect". If the "principal thrust" of recent studies
has been to "strengthen the conclusions reached ~n 1964", then one ~

of ~he conclusions "strengthened" is the following:
"(T)he chronic toxicity of nicotine in quantities
• absorbed from smoking and other methods of tobacco
use is very low and probably does nob represent an
important health hazard." [Smoking and Health,
p. 32)
The "tar" and nicotine recommendation Is discussed hereafter
commencing at page ii .
