Jump to:

Bliley PM

The ETS Issue - Language Exploratory

Date: 18 May 1993
Length: 64 pages
2024137353-2024137416
Jump To Images
bliley_pm 2024137353-2024137416

Abstract

Comprises packet of materials assembled under assignment "[t]o develop a broad range of credible and compelling: messages; language; sound bytes; [and] voices" with goals to "moderate attitudes and public opinion about ETS [Environmental tobacco smoke: To the extent possible put ETS/EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] in proper persective; [and] Humanize smokers and bolster their self-esteem; Help forestall further smoking bans and restrictions; in public/work places". Includes sections: "Assignment; Target mindsets; Communications objectives; Communication strategies; Voices of reason; Let's work it out; EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]; [and] Epidemiology". Includes extensive editing and commentary in marginalia. Relates to Bates 2024137219, 2025381712, 2025381778 (see "Document Quotes" field for complete list of headings and subheadings).

Fields

Quotes

Includes sections: "Assignment; Target mindsets (Smoker mindsets; [and] Nonsmoker mindsets); Communications objectives; Communication strategies (Glossary; [and] Potential umbrella themes); Accommodation (Potential umbrella themes; Accommodation/In perspective {Prohibition seemed like a good idea at the time; When it comes to smoking, is Big Brother really the answer?; Good guys and bad guys; [and] Do you have to be a nonsmoker to be a good person?}); Voices of reason (The most unusual cigarette smoker in the whole dam [sic] business; Marriage and cigarettes; She breaks for animals and cigarettes; He'll roll down the window if you turn down the music; On my time, I call the shots; Profile of a 90's smoker; Let's work it out (A burning question; Tobacco roots; Another Tea Party?; The new Prohibition; Big Brother the babysitter?; Does regulation discourage reasonable behavior?; Who's blowing more smoke?; Will productivity go up in smoke?; Should we lighten up about smoking?; A voice of reason; Do smokers want too much?; [and] What is your IAQ [Indoor air quality]?); EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] (Another EPA 'scare du jour'; Elvis lives!; The government is often wrong and Americans know it; Scientific accuracy or 'political science'?; The EPA is hazardous to honest scientific inquiry; [and] All the air we breathe is second-hand); [and] Epidemiology (Epidemiology - Glossary of key terms; Epidemiology - The ABCs; Epidemiology and the public's need for standards; The perils of epidemiology and political polling; [and] Kumquats, lies and epidemiology)".

Type
Advertising copy
Draft material
Informational packet
Position statement
Author (Organization)
Young & Rubicam
Named Person
Blanchard, S.
Brennan, B.
Bush, G. Pres.
Clinton, W. Pres.
Davis, D.
Dobbins, J.
Feinstein, A.
Fowler, H.
Gluck, M.
Gori, Gio Batta, Ph.D. (Tobacco Consultant, formerly w/ NCI, Industry Expert)
1993 Started career at NCI and then went to work for the industry. Believed a safer cigarette could be made, and that there were safe threshold levels for exposure to the chemicals in cigarette smoke.
Mills, B.
Oggia, B.
Presley, E.
Tucker, W.R. Rep.
Twain, M.
Warhol, A.
Named Organization
Environmental Protection Agency
EPA
Muzack
National Academy of Sciences
National Cancer Institute
National Cancer Institute NCI
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute located in Rockville, MD
The National Review
Yale Medical School
American Journal of Public Health
Keyword
Alar
Anti-smoking alarmists
ASAs
Behavioral factors
Carcinogens
Confounding factors
Dietary factors
Environmental tobacco smoke
ETS
Familial history
Highly vocal extremists
HVEs
Legionnaires' Disease
Malaria
Personal choice
Polio
Radon
Risk assessment
Smallpox
Smoking bans
Typhoid
Workplace smoking
Subject
asbestos
epidemiology
Federal level
Government agencies
industry response
industry sponsored research
legislation
mass media
Nonsmokers
public relations
Research studies
secondhand smoke
accommodation

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: 2024137353
DRAFT The ETS Issue Language Explorato~ Young ~Rubicam May 18, 1993:
Page 2: 2024137354
Assignment DRA,FT To develop a broad range of credible: and compelling Messages °, La~nguage • , Sound Bytes °, "Voices!" Which ma~ke more impactfial/emotional co:nnections with the attitudinally diverse segments of smokers and nonsmokers in order to: • , Moderate attitudes and public opinion about ETS; to the extent possible put ETS/EPA in proper perspective Humanize smokers and bolster their self-esteem Help forestall further smoking bans and restrictions in publiic/work places
Page 3: 2024137355
DR,AFT Target Mindsets To help create the most effective messages,. consumer attitudes about smoking: and ETS were examined. This revealed: • .. A diversity of consumer mindsets whi~ch. communications, must be designed! to ad,dress o,, Key lleverage points for different mindsets Implications for language, and tonality
Page 4: 2024137356
Smoker Mindsets Strong Sense of Empowerment [ Fractious Holdouts ¢ • Angry and expressive about encroachments on their smoking rights Social Considerates • Unwilling to make voluntary concessions Enjoy smoking, but understand that it is socially correct to respect the rights of nonsmokers • preaching not judged to be e,ffective. Spea,k ~to .t~hem !ndi.rect~y ~y speaking to other groups • Make concessions, but only up to a point * Reinforce Current ,Behavior .| Self Adjusteds • Regulate themselves. Wait for signals that say it's ok to smoke • Feel constrained by issue of smoking public, Take pride in their ability to control their smoking behavior • Enhance sense of ] empowerment as a smoker Weak Sense of RmPOWe~ent Guilty Conceders • Are guilty about smoking in public. Have capitulated to the rights of nonsmokers • Feel like second-class citizens Enhance perceptions of smokers as a group (and in turn, their' own self-perceptions)
Page 5: 2024137357
Non-Smoker Mindsets Closed-Minded 'about• Smoking Issue Anti-Smoking Mllff~ini~'~ Hold extreme views; Strongly favor further bans and restrictions Separatists • Favor bans and restrictions • Organ!ze,rs an.d potential zealots. can't be persuaded to adopt more moderate attitudes/behavior Acknowledge rights of smokers, and view separate accommodations as a reasonable way to handle the issue Raise doubts that bans and restrictions are ,the best ways to handle the secondhand smoke issue Open-Minded about . Smoking Issue Resigned Acceptors Have some issues with ~moking, but accept it as a fact of life • Have a strong respect for personal choice, and are more flexible toward smokers Liberals Have greatest respect for the rights of others. Personal choice is a way of life Least likely to voice objection, Most likely to make adjustments themselves Reinforce reasons for current behavior
Page 6: 2024137358
DRAFT C " " Obj " ommumcaUons ectives Reinforce Empower I!nform
Page 7: 2024137359
~A, FT Commu~cation Strategies Accommodati, on Personal Rights, EPA a~nd E, pidemiolo~
Page 8: 2024137360
DRAFT GLO'SSARY Note: Some termshave been used in the writtenwork, Others aremore appropriate for conversational use. ETS/Secondl Hand Smoke/Passive ~;m0ke Indirect smoke Incidental smoke A'mbient smoke Non.Smoker~ People who don "t smoke People who choose not to smoke Smokers People who smoke People who enjoy tobacco, People who choose to smoke People Who Smoke Accommodating Considerate'
Page 9: 2024137361
GLOSSARY OR.AFT H. EXPANDED TERMS Accommodation Cooperation Equ,al freatment Equal Provision Wecan work it out Mutual respect Anti Smoking Lobby and Activists HVE" s- Highly vocal extremists ASA's- Anti-smoking Alarmists Fright-Bytes: overblown concl~usions : rnade expressly for the media Bans (Smoking) and restrictions The New Prohibition Exclusionary remedies Reactionary legislation "Knee-jerk" legislation. On.site absentees: people who come - to: work, but m ust exercise ' their right to smoke outside the building, Corporate MIA's: people who are missing in action while theygo outside to smoke
Page 10: 2024137362
DRAFT Bans (Smoking)an~d restriction8 (Cont'd) Corporate Stoops: places: in:front of buildings: where people go in order to: smoke~ Excise Tax on Cigarettes or "Sin Taxes. Punitive taxes Regressive taxes Biased, taxes Inequitable taxes Self righteous: taxes Tax Abuse Opportunistic taxes "Personal"taxes End-justifies-the-means-regulation Politicized regulation Politicized bureaucracy Hidden objectives

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: