Jump to:

Bliley PM

The ETS Issue - Language Exploratory

Date: 18 May 1993
Length: 64 pages
2024137219-2024137282
Jump To Images
bliley_pm 2024137219-2024137282

Abstract

Comprises packet of materials assembled under assignment "[t]o develop a broad range of credible and compelling: messages; language; sound bytes; [and] voices" with goals to "moderate attitudes and public opinion about ETS [Environmental tobacco smoke: To the extent possible put ETS/EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] in proper persective; [and] Humanize smokers and bolster their self-esteem; Help forestall further smoking bans and restrictions; in public/work places". Includes sections: "Assignment; Target mindsets; Communications objectives; Communication strategies; Voices of reason; Let's work it out; EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]; [and] Epidemiology". Includes extensive editing and commentary in marginalia. Relates to Bates 2024137353, 2025381712, 2025381778 (see "Document Quotes" field for complete list of headings and subheadings).

Fields

Quotes

Includes sections: "Assignment; Target mindsets (Smoker mindsets; [and] Nonsmoker mindsets); Communications objectives; Communication strategies (Glossary; [and] Potential umbrella themes); Accommodation (Potential umbrella themes; Accommodation/In perspective {Prohibition seemed like a good idea at the time; When it comes to smoking, is Big Brother really the answer?; Good guys and bad guys; [and] Do you have to be a nonsmoker to be a good person?}); Voices of reason (The most unusual cigarette smoker in the whole dam [sic] business; Marriage and cigarettes; She breaks for animals and cigarettes; He'll roll down the window if you turn down the music; On my time, I call the shots; Profile of a 90's smoker; Let's work it out (A burning question; Tobacco roots; Another Tea Party?; The new Prohibition; Big Brother the babysitter?; Does regulation discourage reasonable behavior?; Who's blowing more smoke?; Will productivity go up in smoke?; Should we lighten up about smoking?; A voice of reason; Do smokers want too much?; [and] What is your IAQ [Indoor air quality]?); EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] (Another EPA 'scare du jour'; Elvis lives!; The government is often wrong and Americans know it; Scientific accuracy or 'political science'?; The EPA is hazardous to honest scientific inquiry; [and] All the air we breathe is second-hand); [and] Epidemiology (Epidemiology - Glossary of key terms; Epidemiology - The ABCs; Epidemiology and the public's need for standards; The perils of epidemiology and political polling; [and] Kumquats, lies and epidemiology)".

Type
Advertising copy
Draft material
Informational packet
Position statement
Author (Organization)
Young & Rubicam
Named Person
Blanchard, S.
Brennan, B.
Bush, G. Pres.
Clinton, W. Pres.
Davis, D.
Dobbins, J.
Feinstein, A.
Fowler, H.
Gluck, M.
Gori, Gio Batta, Ph.D. (Tobacco Consultant, formerly w/ NCI, Industry Expert)
1993 Started career at NCI and then went to work for the industry. Believed a safer cigarette could be made, and that there were safe threshold levels for exposure to the chemicals in cigarette smoke.
Mills, B.
Oggia, B.
Presley, E.
Tucker, W.R. Rep.
Twain, M.
Warhol, A.
Named Organization
Environmental Protection Agency
EPA
Muzack
National Academy of Sciences
National Cancer Institute
National Cancer Institute NCI
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute located in Rockville, MD
The National Review
Yale Medical School
American Journal of Public Health
Operation/Project
Accommodation/preemption
Keyword
Workplace smoking
Alar
Anti-smoking alarmists
ASAs
Behavioral factors
Carcinogens
Confounding factors
Dietary factors
Environmental tobacco smoke
ETS
Familial history
Highly vocal extremists
HVEs
Legionnaires' Disease
Malaria
Personal choice
Polio
Radon
Risk assessment
Smallpox
Smoking bans
Typhoid
Subject
asbestos
epidemiology
Federal level
Government agencies
industry response
industry sponsored research
legislation
mass media
Nonsmokers
public relations
Research studies
secondhand smoke
accommodation

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: 2024137219
DRAFT The, ETS Issue: Language Exploratory Young ~ Rub:icam May 18, 199:3,
Page 2: 2024137220
.. As.signment DR,AFT To dievelop a broad range of credible and compelling • Messages • Language Sound,Bytes "Voices" Which make more impactful/emotional connections with the attimdinally diverse segments of smokers and nonsmokers in order to: Moderate attitudes and public opinion about ETS; to, the extent possible put ETS/EPA in: proper perspective • Human~e smokers and bolster their self-esteem • Help,forestaI1 further smoking bans': andi restrictions in, public/work places
Page 3: 2024137221
DRAFT Target Mindsets To help: create the most effective messages, consumer a,ttitudes about smoking and ETS were:examinedi. This revealed: A diversi~ of consumer minclsets,which communications must be designed to, address • ,, Key 1,everage points for different mindsets • :- Implicatio:ns~ for language and tonality
Page 4: 2024137222
Smoker Mindsets Strong Sense of Empowerment Fractious Holdouts • Angry and expressive about cncroachments on their smoking rights Unwilling to make volunta~ concessions Preaching not judged to be effective. Speak to tllem indirectly by speaking to other groups Social Considerates • Enjoy smoking, but understand that it is socially correct to respect the rights of nonsmokers •Makc concessions, but 0nly up to a point • Reinforce Current Behavior Self Adjusteds Regulate themselves. Wait for signals that say it's ok to smoke Feel constrained by issue of smoking public. Take pride in their ability to control their smoking behavior .l Enhance sense of empowerment as a smoker Weak Sense of Empowerment Guilty, Conceders Are guilty smoking in public. tlave capittdate(l the rights ()f nonsm()kers • Feel like second:class citizens • l'.'nha nee pci'CCpt.{b!!s of : smokeri~ as a group (and in turn, their own self-perceptions)
Page 5: 2024137223
Non-Smoker Mindsets Closed.Minded about Smoking Issue Anti-Smoking Militants Hold extreme views. Strongly favor further bans and restrictions Separatists • Favor bans and restrictions • Organizers and potential zealots. Can't be persuaded to adopt more moderate attitudes/behavior • Acknowledge rights of smokers, and view separate accommodations as a reasonable way to handle the issue Raise doul)ts that ba ns and restrictions are the best ways to handle the secondhand smoke issue Resigned Accepters i-lavc s()mC issues witl~ smoking, but accept it as a fact of life • Have a strong respect for personal choice, and are more flexible toward smokers Open.Minded about. Smoking Issue Liberals i lave greatest respect R)r the rights of others. Personal choice is a way of life l,east likely t() voice ol)jection. Most likely t<) make adjustments themselves Reinforce reasons for current behavior
Page 6: 2024137224
DRAFT Communications Objectives Reinforce Empower Inform,
Page 7: 2024137225
Communication Strategies Accommodation Personal Rights EPA a~nd Epidemiology
Page 8: 2024137226
Note: GLOSSARY Some termshave been, used in the written work: appropriate for conversational' use, Others aremore ETS/Se¢ond Hand Smok?/Passive ~;moke Indirect sm,oke ~ncidental smoke Ambient smoke Non-Smokers People who don't smoke: People zoh, o choose not to smoke Smokers People who smoke People who enjoy tobacco People who choose to: smoke Peovle Who Smoke Accommodating Considerate
Page 9: 2024137227
GLOSSARY DRAFT II. EXPANDED TERMS Accommodation~ Cooperation Equal, treatment Equ a I Provision We can work it out Mutual respect Anti Smoking Lobby and Activists, ME's-Highly vocal extremists ASA's- Anti,smoking A,larmists Fright-Bytes:, overbloum concl;usions made expressly for the media Bans (Smoking) andl restri, ctions The New Prohibition Exclusionary remedies Reactionary legislation "Knee-jerk" legislation On-site absentees: people who come- to. work, but must exercise their' right to. smoke outside the building. Corporate MIA " s: people who:are missing in actionwhile they~ go: outside to smoke
Page 10: 2024137228
DRAFT Bans (Smokin~g) and. restriction.8 ((~ont, d). Corporate Stoops: places in fro~.t.: . of buildings where people go in order ~o smoke: Excise Ta.x on Cigarettes or:"Sin Taxes" Punitive taxes Regressive taxes: Biased. taxes Inequitable taxes Self righteous taxes Tax Abuse Opportunistic taxes "Personali" taxes EPA A~en~da End-justifies-the.means.regulation Politicized: regulation Politicized: bureaucracy Hidden objectives

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: