Jump to:

Bliley PM

Shareholder Issues

Date: 26 Mar 1992
Length: 135 pages
2023004617-2023004751
Jump To Images
bliley_pm 2023004617-2023004751

Abstract

Provides questions and answers regarding possible shareholder issues at the Philip Morris 1992 Annual Shareholders Meeting. Covers: Advertising; Compensation: executive; Contributions; Corporate Matters; Environment; Human Resources; Labeling; Legislation; Litigation: actual and threatened; Questions at other companies' annual meetings; Smoking and Health (including animal rights); and Taxes.

Fields

Type
Report
Named Person
Shipman, F.
Sarokin, Hadden Lee Judge (Judge (Fed. Dist Court); tried Cipollone case)
Judge Hadden Lee Sarokin is a Federal District court judge, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Newark, NJ. Tried Cipollone case. Removed from Haines case by the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Nominated 5/94? to the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals (The Record 5/8/94). Sarokin later said his comments about the tobacco industry being "the king of concealment and disinformation" may have been unduly strong, "I agree the language was strong, maybe unduly strong"; "If I could take it back, I probably would" (AP 8/4/94).
Named Organization
American Medical Association (physicians group)
Professional trade group representing American physicians.
Philip Morris & Co. Ltd. (Cigarette manufacturer, incorporated in U.S. in 1902)
Philip Morris & Co. Ltd.., was incorporated in New York in April of 1902; half the shares were held by the parent company in London, and the balance by its U.S. distributor and his American associate. Its overall sales in 1903, its first full year of U.S. operation, were a modest seven million cigarettes. Among the brand offered, besides Philip Morris, were Blues, Cambridge, Derby, and a ladies favorite name for the London street where the home companies factory was located - Marlborough.
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Cigarette manufacturer (Camel, Winston, Doral))
Cigarette manufacturer (Camel, Winston, Doral)
Surgeon General of the United States Public Health Service (U.S. Federal government public health advocate)
The U.S. Surgeon General's office has found since 1964 that tobacco use causes disease in humans.
Region
Canada
Germany
Japan
Singapore
United States
Keyword
Canadian Tobacco Products Control Act (T.P.C.A.)
Smoking and Health
Environmental Tobacco Smoke ETS
Thesaurus Term
advertising restriction
alcoholic beverage
business activity
legal activity
tobacco manufacturer
Legislation
warning label
Brand
Camel (RJR)

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: 2023004617
~0~3004617
Page 2: 2023004618
SHAREHOLDER ISSUES A. Advertising AMA ban Directed at specific audiences "Old Joe" Camel advertisements EC countries Canada B. Com[}ensation, executive Co (~ontributi0n~, philanthropic " political Corporate Matt@r~; 2. 3. 4. 5. o 7. 8, 9. Agreements: Change of Control and Employment Audit issues Business with minority groups Currency Meetings: Board of Directors " Shareholders New York headquarters Officers, minority and women Shareholder Proposals Stock - Divestment " Dividends " Ownership " Repurchase Environment 1. o Policy ETS
Page 3: 2023004619
-2- Fo, H~man Resources 1. Affirmative Action 2. Testing for unlawful drugs 3. Testing for AI:DS 4. Sexual harassment: 5, Hlarassment 6. Hiandicapped employees 7. Club memberships 8 KGF Management Development and Personnel 9. KGF union relations 10,. KGF safety 11. KGF affirmative action 12. Closure of Hoboken plant 13.. Closure of Evansville, Ind. facility 14. Move of Baker's chocolate to Canada 15. Oscar Mayer plant closings Go Tobacco LGF Products 1. Corporate 2. Tobacco 3. KGF Products
Page 4: 2023004620
actual and threatened: 1. Corporate Smoking and health products liability suits Cipollone ETS suits Insurance Judge Sarokin Rocco Cappuccitti/OPDI vs Frito-Lay (HFL), 2. Philip Morris USA, suits and issues 3. KGF litigation 4. Human Ressources (class actions) Questior~ at other companies' annual meetings (to be developed between April 1 and 16 rehearsals) K. Smoking and Health (including animal rights) L. Taxes 1. Tobacco 2. Miller Brewing
Page 5: 2023004621
~0~3004~
Page 6: 2023004622
A. ADVERTIISING 1¸. What iis Philiip Morriis, position, on the American Medical: Association's call for a complete ban on the advertising and promotion of all tobacco products? • AMA's proposal directly conflicts with fundamental rights to commercial free speech u,nder the First Amendment • We doubt such a ban would have the intended effect. In some countries smoking actually increased following the imposition of advertising bans = Does Philip Morris make special efforts to advertise its cigarette products to African-Americans, Hlispanic-Ameriicans and women? • We: advertise our cigarette products to adults, whatever their ethnic and socio-economic background, who choose to smoke • As one of the nation's largest advertisers in print media, it is not surprising that PM advertises in many African,American, Hispanic- American and women's publications = Does Philip Morris target minors in its advertising? • No.= We participate in programs to discourage the young from smoking • We have developed a major retail and vending program called "l:t's the Law" to discourage sales to those under age • We participate in design and distribution ofi booklet, Helping Youth Say "No", to enable edu,cators and parents to help mi!nors
Page 7: 2023004623
-2- o The "Old Joe" Camel advertisement; for RJ'R's Camels is receiving much criticism from the Surgeon General, other government officials and the AMA. What is Philip Morris' position? • It~ is not our practice to comment on the advertising of our competitors.. However, we believe that the First Amendment protections which extend to commercial speech adequately and morally shield this advertising from such, attacks How would Philip Morris business be affected by the enactment of any of the current proposals on non-dedUctibility ofi cigarette advertising expenditures? • Would adversely affect our ability to advertise our products o Are U.S. cigarette manufacturers introducing cigarette advertising to newly opened international markets, causing more people to smoke? • Vast~ majority of st:udies show that advertising has no significant influence on whether or not; to begin to smoke. People begin because of familial circumstances, societal influences and peer behavior • This issue was examined at length: during the Constitutional Challenge to the Tobacco Products Control Act in~ Canada. Matter was litigated for months, and no. basis was found for allegation that cigarette advertising is the cause of smoking
Page 8: 2023004624
What measures restricting advertising have been adopted outside the United States? • Most countries have regulations which affect advertising in general and. cigarette advertising in particular. Countries such, as Singapore have total bans while nations such as Germany and Japan respect the importance, ofi commercial free speech What; is the current situation with respect to advertising in the EC countries? • A draft Advertising Directive banning all tobacco advertising was recently approved: by a narrow margin by the European Parliament • But Directives do not become law unless adopted: by the Council of Ministers,. The next Council vote will be in May 1992. Currently five of the 12 EC Member States oppose the Directives. This minority constitutes a blocking vote under the rules of the European Parliament el, What is the status of the constitutional challenge to the advertising ban for tobacco products in Canada? • On. July 26, 1991 the Quebec Superior Court struck down Canadian Tobacco Products Control Act (T.P.C.A.)L Judgement found no basis for allegation that cigarette advertising is the cause of smoking • Canadian government filed an appeal! in 1991 which will be heard in Quebec Court of Appeals in May 1992. It is expected the appeal judgement will be taken to the Canadian, Supreme Court
Page 9: 2023004625
~0~3004C~5
Page 10: 2023004626
PHILIP MORRIS 1992 ANNUAL SHAREHOLDERS MEETING COMPENSATION OLIESTION & ANSWERS GENERAL OUESTIQNS 1,. What is Philip Morris Compensation Philosophy? We provide competitive levels of base pay to attract and retain top talent. We pay for performance tied to results, and emphasize large variable pay when, maximizing shareholder value. Fair, motivating and rewarding. Consistent with company's culture and organization. 2. How closely tied is the level of our pay programs tO business results? We believe they are closely aligned. Our compensation levels are reflective of our strong performance. Philip Morris pay programs are linked to business results at the corporate, business unit and individual levels. Philip Morris pay for performance philosophy links salary increases to achievement of individ~uaI goals and objectives, Incentive compensation payouts (annual incentive, stock option and long- term programs): are based on corporate and business unit measures such as:: - EPS growth - Revenue growth - Volume growth - Market share growth The quantitative measures vary depending upon the business and may be combined with a discretionary component. Do you believe your plans are competitive? Do, you believe that comparing with competition is a good way to set Compensation Programs? Yes, our plans are competitive. We believe that comparisons are appropriate, however, we design our plans to support our specific needs and: initiatives. We look at what competitors are doing to remain aware of their practices. Are Philip Morris pay practices similar around the world/similar across operating companies ? Yes, they are similar. Philip Morris pay philosophy., which is to pay for performance, is uniform aroundl ~, the worldl and between operating companies. ~ Actual pay practices, are tailored to meet business needs and; will vary as it makes business sense tO do so.

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: