Bliley PM
Subject: Your Letter to James R. Shepley
Abstract
Encloses suggested closing paragraph for letter "in view of the testimony given in Congress last week" by more than 20 industry-sponsored investigators that "statistical evidence is ambiguous and medical evidence is lacking for the assertion that cigarette smoking is a hazard to health". Cites prominent organizations and areas of expertise of witnesses. Suggests offering "copies of these statements" to Shepley and reviewing their testimony with his editors.
Fields
- Company
- Philip Morris Incorporated
- Type
- Memorandum
- Author
- Holtzman, Alexander (PM Asst General Counsel. 1975-85.)
- Recipient
- Cullman, J.F. III
Document Images
To : "
PHILIP HORRIS INCORPORATED
-" .:.I~TER-OFF ICE CORRESPONDENCE
l.~ I00 Park Avenue, New York, I~.Y. 10017
Mr. Joseph F. Cullm~n 3rd 0ate:Hay 6, 1969
F tom : •
Alex Holtzman
Your letter to James R. Shepley
Subject: •
.~:'::~:r: :'' . "+= : You may wish to consider substituting the
.~."/~!i: ~' . ~ " .~ .. for the closing paragraph of your letter, mony given in Congress
last week.
It is unfortunate that you~ a~¢tcle
to the conclusion of the hearings before the House
Interstate and Forei~ Commerce Committee. Imst week
18 doctors and statisticians testified in person
before that Committee and over 20 more filed state-
ments to the effect that the statistical evidence
is ambiguous and medical evidence lacking for the
assertion that cigarette smoking is a hazard to
health. These witnesses included medical researchers,
professors of medicine, pathology and statistics and
present and former presidents of such professional
organizations as the College of American Pathologists,
The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the
American Medical Women's Association. Their testi-
mony is strong evidence that the real issue in this
c~troversy continues to be whether there is
Justification for the claim that cigarette smokin~ ~;~--::=
endangers health.
the s~a~emea~s o~ those au~o~f~tes should be called
to the attention of your editors. I would llke to
review the testimony wlth them and p~ovlde them wlth.~:~
copies of these statements.
