Jump to:

BATCo

1996-1997 Research Agenda - Request for Applications

Date: No date
Length: 36 pages
800105375-800106143
Jump To Images
batco02 HLE51A99

Fields

Named Organization
World Health Organization
University of Minnesota
University of Lisbon
NYU Medical Center
Concordia University
University of Vermont
Colorado State University
University of Pittsburgh
University of Gothenburg
San Diego State University
University of Missouri-Rolla
University of Tulsa
Wake Forest University
University of Toledo
Tufts University
US Public Health Service
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Virginia Commonwealth University
US FDA
University of Washington
University of Illinois
Philip Morris USA
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation
Japan Tobacco Incorporated
US EPA
Meharry Medical College
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
US Department of Energy
TRC Environmental Corporation
Washington University
Campbell University
Danish National Institute of Occupational Health
Penn State University
Science Advisory Board
Svenska Tobaks AB
Ecusta
Texas A&M University
Meckler Engineers Group
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
University of Aarhus
Proctor & Gamble
Ford Motor Company
Virginia Polytechnic Institute
NIEHS
Standard Commercial Corporation
Shorewood Packaging
Pennsylvania State University, The
University of Mysore
University of Tennessee, The
DIMON International
Cornell University Medical Centre
New York University Medical Centre
Ottawa
Mead Paper
Mundet International Limited
Quest International Flavors USA
Somerville Packaging Corporation
United Technologies Carrier Corporation
Gas Research Institute
Touro College
United Technologies Research Centre
ITRI
University of Alaska Fairbanks
Dorgan Associates
NYU Medical Centre
ICF Kaiser Engineers Incorporated
National Medical Advisory Service Incorporated
University of North Arizona
Synesthetics Incorporated
Apex Environmental Incorporated
Tulane University Medical Centre
Rexair Incorporated
Battelle
St Louis University
Building Science Corporation
IRC Canada
University of Denvar
Johnston Controls Incorporated
National Centre for Occupational Health South Africa
Prairie Swine Centre Incorporated
Health Effects Institute, The
University of Kentucky
University of California
University of Texas
University of Reading
Southern Illinois University
RJ Reynolds Tobacco GmbH
University of Maryland
Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health
Illinois Institute of Technology
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Universal Corporation
Lorillard Corporation
Utah State University
American Health Foundation
Harvard School of Public Health
University of Wisconsin Hospital
Ohio State University
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Boston University School of Public Health
Jacksonville University
National Institute of Health Guidelines Committee
Northeastern University
University of North Carolina
Named Person
Lebowitz, Michael D
Woods, James E
Levetin, Estelle
Eisenberg, Max
Kessler, Irving
Matanoski, Genevieve M
Utell, Mark J
Wolf, Alfred P
Adams, Eric W
Arora, Sanjay
Aust, Steven D
Bascom, Rebecca
Bell, Iris R
Benjaminson, MA
Billick, Irwin H
Blumenthal, Malcolm N
Brennan, Terry
Burleson, Gary R
Burrell, Robert
Cheek, Jeffrey
Chen, Qingyan
Croome, Derek J
Crouse, William E
Cain, William S
Das, Salil K
Delumyea, R Del
Dorgan, Charles
Dowell, Russell T
Driscoll, Kevin
Dunn, Bonnie
Evans, Hugh L
Fales, Henry M
Frampton, Mark W
Larson, Susan M
Francis, Bettina M
Gardner, Donald
Last, Jerold A
Gearhart, Jeffrey
Getchell, Thomas V
Giardino, Nicholas J
Giese, Roger
Gilbert, Stephen L
Hedge, Alan
Lehrer, Samuel B
Glicksman, Leon R
Ford, Timothy
Jenkins, Roger A
Gong, Henry
Meckler, Milton
Gordon, Terry
Greene, Robert
Haghighat, Fariborz
Hajjar, David
Hasselblad, Victor
Hemenway, David
Reif, John
Roboz, John
Rogers, John M
Sen, Mihir
Sharma, Vinod Kumar
Silver, Wayne
Smith, Douglas A
Stoner, Gary D
Stuart, Bruce
Temple, Robert W
Turner, Simon
Tyler, Walter S
Ultman, James
Wallace, Lance
Wispe, John
Yager, James
Yang, Chin S
Zhang, Yuanhui
Guerin, Michael R
Lewis, Roger
Lippman, Morton
Witschi, Hanspeter
Kilpatrick, James
Akland, Gerald
Burge, Harriet
Bush, Robert
Djordjevic, Mirjana
Dockery, Douglas W
Doty, Richard L
Hoidal, John R
Johnting, Jennifer
Kanarek, Marty S
Kleeberger, Steven R
Kleinman, Michael T
Knutson, Earl
Kuhlman, Michael R
Lewis, Robert
Loyalka, Sudarshan K
McGrath, James J
Mennear, John H
Nielson, Gunnar
Ogden, Michael
Otto, David
Rohde, Charles
Spannhake, E William
Valberg, Peter
Moschandreas, Demetrios
Arey, Janet
Hoffman, Dietrich
Bohanon, Hoy
Nagda, Niren L
Brunnemann, Klaus
Kilpatrick, S James
Camboni, Silvana
Klinger, Lorry A
Menzel, Daniel
Palmer, Kenneth C
Potter, William T
Ramsey, J Michael
Stedman, Donald H
Benson, Janet
Baker, AJ
Castagnoli, Neal
Costa, Daniel L
Rood, Mark J
Lacey, John
Leith, David
Bement, Collette L
Boyse, William K
Christianson, Leslie L
Cosma, Greg
Costa, Lucio G
Cunningham, Jennifer B
Dharamsi, Amin
Duffy, Lawrence K
Eastmond, David A
Fang, Jin Bao
Gatley, John
Gilbert, Avery Nelson
Gilmour, Matthew Ian
Gornes, Joao FP
Goud, S Niranjan
Graham, Charles W
Grinsh, Sergey A
Hittle, Doug C
Holbrook, G Thomas
Horner, W Elliott
Hung, Ling-Ling
Inyang, Hilary I
Keller, John G
Kjaergaard, Soren
Koch, Wendy H
Lehnert, Bruce
Linn, Bill
Lorig, Tyler S
Madhusudhan, B
Koller, Loren
Koutrakis, Petros
Nishimoto, Marc
O'Callaghan, Michael W
O'Neil, Carol
Otten, James
Ritter, Gary L
Saman, Namir
Samini, Behzad S
Ryan, Lisa
Smith, Raymond A
Sauer, Hary J
Sawnor, Marcia
Solornon, Jerome J
Swift, David L
van Berkel, Gary
Yousefi, Vali
Zannetti, Paolo
Zelikoff, Judiath T
Notes

Author name is not available in the document Missing originals: 800105409-800106141. Handwritten.

UCSF Code
hle51a99
Type
agenda
table
Region
United Kingdom
China
Sweden
Canada
South Africa
Date Loaded
01 Dec 2004
Box
0161
Folder
bcmn0000

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: HLE51A99
-t • CENTER FOR INDOOR AIR RESEARCH 1996-t997 RESEARCH AGENDA REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS 0 0 BATCo US DOJ v Philip Morris
Page 2: HLE51A99
Mission Statement The mission of the Center for Indoor Air Research is to sponsor high quality research on indoor air issues and to facilitate communication of research findings to the broad .scientific community. Science Advisory Board Members William S. Cain, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology) University of Califomia, San Diego Michael R. Guerin, Ph.D. Head, Organic Chemistry Section Analytical Chemistry Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Irving Kessler, M.D., Dr.P.H. Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine Morton Lippmann, Ph.D. Vice-Chairman, Department of Environmental Medicine New York University Medical Center Genevieve M. MatanOski, M.D., Dr.P.H. Professor, Department of Epidemiology Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health Demelrios Moschandreas, Ph.D. Professor, Pritzker Department of Environmental Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology Mark J. Utell, M.D. Professor, Medicine and Toxicology University of Rochester School of Medicine Alfred P. Wolf, Ph.D. Director, Cyclotron - PET Program Brookhaven National Laboratory James E. Woods, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. Professor, College of Architecture and Urban Studies Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University t3ATCo US DOJ v Philip Morris
Page 3: HLE51A99
J~uary, 1996 Dear Investigator: I am plsased to provide you th~ Center for Indoor Air Research's "Request for Applications" booklet. This package includes information about the Center, the research and review process, procedures for application, the contract man- agement process and the application forms. Also included is our Research Agenda which describes CIAR's research interests. Applications must be postmarked by June 1st. Funding of awarded projects begins the following January I st. If you have additional questions concerning application procedures, please contact the Center at (410) 684-3777, Thank you for your interest. Sincerely, "°" J Bg~Co US DO
Page 4: HLE51A99
Table of Contents Research and Review Process .................................................................................. 3 Research Agenda .................................................................................................... ... 5 Application Process ................................................................................................. 10 Management of Research Contracts ....................................................................... 10 Contract Administration Policy .............................................................................. 11 Application - General Information and Instructions ............................................. 12 Application Forms .......................................................................................... FI - F3 Appendix A: CIAR Membership ........................................................................... 15 Appendix B: CIAR Peer Reviewers ....................................................................... 17 Appendix C: CIAR Final Report Guidelines ......................................................... 25 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. 26 O0 0 0 0 BATCo US DOJ v Philip Morris
Page 5: HLE51A99
Center for Indoor Air Research The Center for Indoor Air Research (CIAR) is a non-profit corporation fonmed in March, 1988 to sponsor high quality research on indoor air issues and to facilitate communication of research findings to the broad scien- tific community. The Center has three classes of mem- bership: charter members, regular members and associate members (See Appendix A). The charter members are those corporations that established the Center and are currently providing the majority of the funding. Regular and associate members are those per- sons or corporations that are interested in indoor air quality research but were not involved in the establishment of the Center. The regular members are represented on the Board of Directors while the associate members are not. The Center is actively seeking addi- tional members in both the regular and associate categories. Additional information on membership can be obtained by contacting the Center. The Center has established a Science Advisory Board (SAB) which develops the research agenda for approval by the Board of Directors. The SAB recommends proposals for funding after they have been peer reviewed by the Center's pool of peer reviewers. This structure ensures that only high quality research which will contribute to the knowledge bank on indoor air is recommended for funding. Research and Review Process The research agenda of the Center for Indoor Air Research is formulated by the Science Advisory Board (SAB), a multi-disciplinary group of individuals with reputations for expertise and scientific leadership in the disciplines relevant to indoor air research. The SAB seeks the best judgments of active research scientists as to what scientific information is missing in the various disciplines before independently ascertaining the research priorities of the Center. After the SAB establishes the research agenda, the Center announces to the scientific community at large that research applications in response to the agenda are being accepted. The review of proposals and their selection for funding is accomplished in a scientifically rigorous and objective manner. Applications are reviewed f~t for scientific quality by the appli- cant's peers selected from the group listed in Appendix B. The SAB, in turn, reviews the applications and peer evaluations, and develops recom- mendations on the selection of applications. Studies recommended by the SAB are subject to final approval by the Board of Directors. A staff scientist is assigned to each funded project to monitor the investi- gator's progress and to provide assis- tance to the investigators toward the successful completion of the project. When a project is completed, the investigator submits a draft final report which is reviewed by the Center for its scientific quality and soundness of conclusions. The investigator is encouraged to publish the work in an independent, peer reviewed journal for the benefit of the scientific commtmity at large. ]3ATCo US DOJ v Philip Morris
Page 6: HLE51A99
Request for Research Applications Introduction The Center for Indoor Air Research was established in 1988, as an inde- pendent, non-profit corporation. Its primary purpose is to sponsor scientific and technical research on the sources, transformation and fate of constituents affecting indoor air quality; on factors governing human exposure to, and retention of those constituents; on the effects of those constituents on health, including exposure-response relation- ships; and on methods of preventing or abating the concentrations of indoor air contaminants. The research program will be supplemented by periodic conference workshops and commissioned monographs. A Science Advisory Board has been assembled to assist in the formation and review of the research program. The Advisory Board consists of eminent scientists from a range of disciplines, including environmental engineering and monitoring, chemistry, toxicology, microbiology, epidemiolo~, behavioral sciences and biostatistics. The following research agenda was established at a Center for Indoor Air Research Science Advisory Board (SAB) Workshop. Research topics of major interest to the Center are described in the agenda. Individuals who intend to apply for funding are encouraged first to submit a letter of intent, two-to-three pages in length, indicating the research objectives, key elements of the experimental design and methods, estimated time required and approximate direct and indirect cost. The letter should be addressed to: Center for Indoor Air Research 1099 Winterson Road, Suite 280 Linthicum, Maryland 21090 | I II O0 0 0 0 0 13ATCo US DOJ v Philip Morns
Page 7: HLE51A99
Research Agenda In the research agenda that follows, the Center's priorities and specific requests for application are presented. These represent the Center's best judgment on currently important research problems, but the agenda is by no means exhaustive. As stated in the Introduction, any proposal that is consistent with the Center's purpose will be considered. Our objective in presenting priorities and research topics is to stimulate researchers to focus on problems related to indoor air quality (IAQ). The research needs that follow are grouped according to sources investi- gations, exposure/dose assessment, heallh effects, perception of IAQ, and engineering control strategies for IAQ. This collection of topics represents one general approach to indoor air quality research. Numerous indoor air contaminants warrant investigation in terms of their fate and transport in the indoor environment, the forms and quantities in which they present themselves to exposed indi- viduals, the dose actually delivered to a target (e.g., individual, organ, cell), strategies to reduce their levels, and the perception of indoor air quality in the presence and absence of the contam- inants. Some contam.inants of interest are volatile organic compounds (VOCs), environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), biological aerosols (aeroallergens and aeropathogens), and particulate matter. Indoor air quality is "'the nature of air that affects the health and well-being of occupants" where, according to the World Health Organization, "health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity". CIAR is interested in all relevant chemistry, physics, control strategies for, health effects caused or aggravated by, and psychosocial factors influencing the perception of indoor air quality. Due to the interdisciplinary nature of indoor air research, most projects will encompass more than one of these areas. CIAR, therefore, encourages interdepartmental collaborations and joint projects whenever they serve to enhance the interpretation and evalua- tion of results or to strengthen the validity of conclusions. SOUrces Myriad substances in indoor air have potential to affect health. The sources are many (e.g., outdoor air, people and their activities such as cooking, con- sumer products including pesticides, heating and cooling systems, building materials, electronic equipment) and distributions of sources and chemicals vary among indoor environments. For example, certain chemicals might be added to heating/cooling systems to exert a biocidal or preservative effect. The fate and effects of such known- source agents have not been studied extensively. Many constituents are being studied within risk assessment frameworks as toxicologically-signifi- cant compounds; however, much work remains to be done in characterizing distributions of various agents in specific envinmmeats related to sources and assessing their impact on human health. 0 0 0 BATCo US DOJ v Philip Morri,,
Page 8: HLE51A99
CIAR is interested in creative proposals • Develop methods to characterize and quantify source emissions. Research in this area could include biologically-based means of source characterization and product screening, such as human irritation and odor assays, as well as development/ improvement of chemical analytical methods. • Investigate the transport and environmental fate of indoor air contaminants, particularly via sinks. This work will elucidate indoor air chemistry, and is important in deter- mining concentrations for short and long-term exposure estimates. • Develop and validate models to relate source emissions, fate, and transport. The air in virtually all indoor environ- ments is a complex mixture of low levels of both reactive and unreactive species which may interact chemically or physically in a dynamic equilibrium between gaseous and particulate phas- es. The physical and chemical natures of the species themselves as well as those of the surrounding environment could affect the composition of the air to which an occupant is exposed. For example, does the presence of moisture lead to chemical reactions with indoor air constituents? How and to what extent do different types of building materials and surfaces influence the fate of indoor contaminants? • Elucidate the dynamics of complex physico- chemical mixtures typical of indoor environments. Numerous biological agents in indoor air may cause human disease. The most common biological agents found uo~im~.ry in indoor environments are bacteria, viruses, fungal spores, algae, arthropod fragments and droppings,, and animal dander. Proliferation of microorganisms is dependent on moisture level and temperature. These requirements for growth are often provided by heating and air conditioning systems, and humidifiers. Exposure Assessment/ The estimates of exposure and inter- nal dose are critical factors in the reliability of studies to determine the health consequences of exposures. There are at least two critical issues in exposure-dose relationships: the effect of aerodynamic respiratory tract defenses in altering the quantity and distribution of the exposure to achieve a tissue dose, and measure- ment of actual internal dose. The complex particle-gas composition of indoor air contaminants has an important effect on the pulmonary distribution of the inhaled exposure. Research proposals are requested on the following: • Develop sampling methods amenable to standardization for the characteri- zation of microorganism concentra- tions in the indoor environment. • Characterize the size-segregated distribution of specific antigens in various indoor environmems. Attention should be paid to factors influencing the distribution of the antigen in settled dust and as air- borne particles. Measurements from site-specific and personal monitoring including biomarker measurements, are more reliable than self-reported history of exposure. In epidemiological studies, inaccurate reports of exposure history introduce misclassification bias. In field studies, the use of inaccurate ~0 0 0 0 BATCo US DOJ v Philip Morris
Page 9: HLE51A99
estimates of exposure can lead to variable, unreliable dose-response data. Appropriate modeling may esti- mate dose from exposure. Biomarkers can be useful in studying tissue injury and to determine dose from the low levels of exposure common indoors. Applications are requested for the following: • Clarify the relationship between experimental measures of exposure and self-reporting as a measure of exposure. • Clarify the relationship between exposure and dosimetry by conducting studies to improve the use of bio- markers together with exposure monitoring and health effects. This effort would involve improvements in pharmacokinetic modeling as well as methods development for exposure research. Particular areas in which there are limited data are: - personal monitoring in non-indus- trial occupations and in high risk groups; - time-activity profiles in exposure studies. • Develop unique, new biomarkers with the sensitivity and specificity to be useful in studying injury in both animals and humans. • Develop assays for detection of biological markers for exposure, effect, and susceptibility. • Investigate the use of polyclonal antibodies for screening in exposure- dose studies. • Develop and validate models to pre- dict dose and allow for extrapolation between animals and humans. Health Effects/Responses Low levels of airborne species may mediate lung injury by effects related to cumulative dose or long-term dose rather than peak dose. This concept is well-established for lead, where total dose is as important as dose pattern. Although there is growing agreement regarding the techniques used to measure indoor contaminants, there remains the problem of whether point or time-weighted measures are most meaningful. Given a specific indoor environment with a characterizable distribution of airborne substances, do measure,able health effects relate to cumulative, chronic, low-level concentrations, to acute peak concen- trations, and/or to synergistic effects between substances? CIAR is interested in considering creative proposals to: • Investigate the effects of long-term steady exposures to non-peak or low levels of indoor contaminants in order to determine whether or not realistic indoor levels of these chem- icals contribute to overall adverse health effects. While many chemical constituents have been identified in indoor air, little is known about the chemical changes that occur therein and the mechanisms by which they occur. The chemical fate of single species and their resulting impacts on health could vary greatly in different complex environments. For example, does the presence of an airborne contaminant or reaction intermediate alter the O 130 13ATCo US DOJ v Philip Morris
Page 10: HLE51A99
tissue dose and physiological responses to other indoor air contaminants? CIAR will consider creative proposals tO: • Elucidate the health responses of interactive, low-level, complex exposures. Studies of the relationship between indoor air contaminants and precisely def'med cl~cal cl~ases are en~uraged. Health effect/response questions of interest to CIAR include: • Do inhaled indoor contaminants - impair cardiovascular performance and contribute to the incidence of angina and myocardial infarction? - initiate or aggravate bronchial hyperreactivity in asthmatics and/or the normal population? - affect resistance to respiratory infec- tion? - affect prenatal and perinatal development? - affect cognitive performance? CIAR requests applications to: • Perform studies to determine the effects of indoor contaminants on cardiovascular, pulmonary, immune system and behavioral function. • Investigate host susceptibility factors for effects due to inhalation of indoor contaminants. CIAR is interested particularly in the long-term consequences of low level exposures. Biological agents may cause allergenic or pathogenic responses. Indoor allergens, including those present in animal dander and arthropod fragments and droppings, appear to be ubiquitous. Virtually all homes studied, whether or not pets have been present, have exhibited allergens. Such allergens are risk factors in both the development of asthma and provocation of acute asthmatic attacks. Avoidance of the allergens has been associated with improvement in the clinical status of asthma. The extent to which the risk imposed by specific allergens is determined by their aerodynamic characteristics and airborne concen- trations is uncertain. A variety of microorganisms including fungi, bacteria, nematodes and amoebae have been implicated as producers of sensitizing antigens responsible for the development of acute and chronic forms of immunologically mediated disease. Elevated humidity and moist surfaces promote the growth of the parent organisms. The role of aempathogens in inducing allergenic rather than pathogenic responses is an area of interest to the Center. • Conduct highly-focused studies of aempathogens (endogenous bacterial and fungal flora found in specific envimrar~nts which induce allergenic rather than pathogenic responses. Proposed studies in this area should be promising with respect to yielding productive, new results. • Relate such health responses to indicators of host susceptibility. • Develop immunological and biochemical markers that best char- acterize susceptibility and response. Perception of IAQ A basic objective of environmental control is to provide for the comfort and health of occupants. Investigators have not always been able to identify specific contaminants responsible for reported health complaints, the most O0 0 0 0 BATCo US DOJ v Philip Morris

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: