American Tobacco
Dean Tosteson and the Tobacco Industry
Fields
- Named Person
- Adams-M
- Tosteson-D, Harvard Medical School
- Harvard University
- Meadow-H
- Stanford-L
- Advisory Committee
- Koch-Weser-S
- Mount Auburn Hospital
- Lcc
- Harvard Medical School
- Horn, National Clearinghouse, O.N. Smoking And Health
- Reynolds
- Barger-C
- Henry
- Mitchell
- Charlesgate
- Brompton Hospital
- Nih
- Duke University
- First
- Rabkin, Beth Israel Hospital
- Cournand
- Tosteson-D, Harvard Medical School
- Litigation
- 10004026
- Type
- Memo
- Correspondence
- Request
- 71
- Recipient
- Files
- Characteristic
- Marginalia
- Date Loaded
- 23 Nov 1998
- Attachment
- 60258299
- Author
- Huber-G
Document Images
H~y 24, 1979
Page 11
In concluding, I said to Dean Tosteso~, "|~ re~Tospect, I think we all
could have done things differently. We could have approached things, with
the knowledge we now have, in a much better way. That is part of a learning
experience. Unfortunately, in this case, the price for these lessons has
been very high."
Dean Tosteson said, "Let us assume for the moment that it is finished.
At least that its fiBished here or that we're going to phase it out. Yeah,
and I suspect that any conversation that we mizht J~ve in the future with
the C~lef ~xecutives of the industry should be. with the acceptance of
that, as a pre~ise for other discussions, witi: the goal then being to have
it ~nderstood that this school is not a tool of empathy for the tobacco
Industryms interests, an~ so on."
I told Dean Tosteson that I was not sure that the Industry executives
would want to meet with him, I indicated that I would be pleassd if bstte~
und~rsta~dlng and communication were develQped, howev~ so tha~ all partles
could learn better relative to ~ny future ~onsiderations here or elsewhere.
Dean Tosteson said, "Sa, what a~e your pla~s? Your o~ personai
plans?"
I told bean Tosteson thlt, although I did not really ~nt to do so, I
would remain at HarVard with this program th#ough a phase-out perlod to
bring to a responslble concluslon our past endeavors. I would do that
because I thought it was important to help the other investlgators In the
pro~rmm salvage as much of their professlonal careers as possible, under
these circ%tmstances. • I saldthat so much of my time and energy had been used
up in the past year and one-half on futile endeavors, and t~at I needed an
opportunity to recover. I told Dean Tostesonthat 1%~uld yery nuch like
to go to Drompton Hospital, ~n L~ndon~ in order to bring m~self up to date
on some new cllnlcal and applied research techniques. I said that in~)"
Judgement pulmonary mediclne was now at the same crossroad~ that cardiology
was whe~Cour~and first cat~erize~ a ~eart, ~ s~id we now have the fiSeroptlc
bToncoscope in the pulmonary spec~altles and we can harvest from the l~ng
of nan ke~ defense cells at various stages in the response of the lung to
envlro~mental influences. ~ said that instead of stud~ing end stage diseases,
we can quantify the very earlfest responses of the host to an en%'~ronmental
agent. I told Dean Tosteso~ that f hoped the industry would give me a~
opportunity to conduct a Tese&rch program on their behalf elsewhere, although
it would be somewhat different in design. I said that I, too, had learned
a great deal from our experiences here, and did ~t feel that a program of
this exact nat~Te would flourish ~nder any circumstances In a different
university. A different kind 6f program would have a better chance Of
success, hob:ever, I told him.
Dea~ Tosteson and I discussed the importance of a year away'to put all
Of ~hese matters in perspective, and to reestaSlish ~y research career
after the additional adverse events that would Occur here in the coming
yeKr,

• tr
~.lay 24, 1979
Page 12
DeB~I Toste$on said~ "~o q~estion, there's no question about how good
your program was. ~at was not the issue, Your source of ~unding was, and
that is un£oz, tunate."
I told Dean Tosteson that, "I will pu~ sl| of that in perspective wit~
so;0e tl;~e .'*
Dean Tosteson said, "Thank you for coming by and letting me know about
this, Gsry, ~nd you have given me a new perspective. I will certainly
discuss this further w~th Henry Neadow and Mitchel| Adams and they will be
in touch with you soon on how we might structure a get together to make
amends to the tobacco Industry. ~e will see how we can pick up the plecos
o£ this disaster,"
I thanked Dean Tosteson for spending so much time with me. He said
~hst he was apFreciatlve o£ my stopping by, and discusslng these matters
with him first hand. He said ~e was glad to meet me. I ~eminded him ~st
we had met seve~&l years before whenwe so~ed togetheT on a joint comlttee
at NIH, when he was still at Duke Unlverslty. He rocalled those meetings,
and our discussions ~t that time. He said he would do his best to extend
an ~olggy to the tobacco indust~7 ~or Hazard's mishsndllng of this p~ogrsm.
