American Tobacco
Approval Recommendation - Lucky Strike Package Design Exploratory
User-Contributed Notes
Fields
- Litigation
- 10004026
- Type
- Memo
- Correspondence
- Request
- 93
- Recipient
- Smith-Re
- Characteristic
- Attachment Missing
- Date Loaded
- 23 Nov 1998
- Attachment
- 60131858
- Author
- Bogie-Jc, Atco
Document Images
WTHE
AMERICAN
TOBACCO
COMP/M~r
Memora.dum
To Mr. R. E. Smith,
n~October 22t 1990
Vice President - Brand Management
Fm~ J" C. Bogie, ~roduct Manager~
R~ Approval Recommendation - LUCKY STRIKE Package Design Exploratory
This document will serve as a recommendation to conduct a
package design exploratory for the total LUCKY STRIKE
product line. The exploratory will cover creative
development and qualitative testing of a new f~mily of
paokage~ for LDCRY STRIKE.
LUCKY STRIKE Non-Filter was introduced in 1916 with its
classic green package. The green pack was changed to white
in 1942 because the chromium needed to produce green ink
beoame a valued war commodity.
It wasn't until 1981 that LUCKY STRI~ introduced its
Filtered King size Low Tar product. A new package design
and ~odified bullSs eye was used. Soon after the Kings were
introduced the 10O's style was introduced using the same
packaqe design.
Then, in 1984 LUCKY STRIKE Lights wore introduced in King
and 100's soft pack styles. The packaging for these styles
was again different from Non-Filters and the LOW Tar
packages. The silver striped packaging with yet still
another slightly different treatment of the bull's-eye was
used for the Lights product.
Attached for your review is a color photo copy of the entire
LUCKY STRIKE line of packaging.
~ECOMMENDATIO~
It is recommended that LUCKY STRIKE conduct a package design
exploratory that would encompass both creative development
($100M-$20OM) and qualitative testing ($25M) of a new family
of packages for the brand. The costs to complete the
exploratory are e~ti~ted at $125M to $225M.

Mr. R. E. Smith
October 22, 1990
Page TWO
~ATIONALE
The following will identify the key rationale in support of
this recommendation:
o Our ~ajor competitors, Marlboro and Camel, both offer
an integrated and totally consistent package design
and brand nane/logo treatment across all their
package styles. (See attached exhibits). These
brands have successfully attracted the young adult
male audience and can be our role model in how to
create one image or one badge in a package line.
o An integrated look across all styles can provide an
image of quality. In combination with LUCKY STRIKE's
~ore competitive lower price this should result in
the brand being perceived as a good value.
Establishing a desirable and compelling quality image
along with an acceptable price will give consumers
the sense that LUCKY STRIKE is a good value.
o Introducing a new line of packages for LUCKY STRIKE
provides some news value to the trade and the
consumer. Designing packages that appeal to our
young adult male target (21-29) provides some real
news to these consumers and an additional motivation
for them to try the brand. If supported with media,
this can help our selling efforts as it provides a
new reason for the trade to display the brand.
0 ~ocus groups have indicated that the green pack would
be well received by young adult males. This should
be a starting point for the oreative exploratory.
Many of the smokers at the groups thought that the
green packaging was very new and unique. They
thought it was eye catching and a different approach
to packaging. Specifically they stated:
- It's distinguished looking
- The LUCKY STRIKE logo re~lly stands out
- It looks richer, more yuppie like
- It would be great to put down on the bar
- Designer brand, a Ralph Lauren design

Mr. R. E. Smith
October 22, 1990
Page Three
o Consumers mention packaging as one of the four
important criteria in selecting their ideal
cigarette. The four key criteria appear to be:
Image
Taste
Package
Price
CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT
Peterson and Blyth will develop the new integrated packaging
line for LUCNY. An initial cost range off $100M to $200M
has been identified as appropriate for the package line
development. However, a formal estimate will be obtained
once the design objective and specifications have been
approved.
The objective of the design work is to provide a closely
integrated look to the LUCKY STRIKE package line. Due to
the importance of the King size to LNCKY'S target audience
the package design exploratory should focus on that size.
This would help economize on the development costs and
translating the final King designs to 100's size should be
relatively easy. There are two starting points that seem to
make sense:
i. Use the Non-Filter white look across all styles.
2. Use the nostalgic green package look for Non-Filters
and LOW Tar and the current white Non-Filtered look
for Lights.
Once the package designs have been determined, the carton
designs should be a simple translation from the packages.
A qualitative test of two to three package line designs will
be conducted to determine which packaging is best received
by our target audience. This will be a test of whether the
new packaging fits the brand's new positioning.
We must be very sensitive to the desires of our Non-Filters
users. They represent two-thlrds of the franchise and
should be consulted regarding any potential change of the
Non-Filtered style. Consumer research among Non-Filter
users would be conducted to confirY~% that an acceptable new
package design has been developed.
The estimated cost for research is $25M.

Mr. R. E. Smith
October 22, 1990
Page Four
~UMMARĄ
Providing consumers with a package they are proud to display
is unquestionably a critical asset to successfully marketing
a cigarette. I believe the LUCKY STRIKE can benefit from a
more integrated family design. A package design exploratory
will enable us to optimize LUCKY's package and provide some
real news value for our target. A new package will
hopefully provide added motivation for consumers to try the
brand.
Your approval of this recommendation is requested.
JCB/fso
Package/l-4

Approval Reoommendation - LUCKY STRIKE Package Design Exploratory
J. M. Ockers
Date T.A. Albert D~te
J. E. Vyse Date
R. J. Leisure e
G. T. Touger Date
E. J. Gesell Date
J-~ Date
D. ts.~J~ohnston Date
R. E. smith
R. M. Spight /Date
W. J. Moore Date
C. H. Mullen Date
