American Tobacco
American Brands, Inc., 1982 Annual Report
Fields
- Litigation
- 10004026
- Type
- Annual Report
- Report
- Request
- 16,
- (Set
- 2)
- 1
- (Set
- Date Loaded
- 23 Nov 1998
- Attachment
- 60079920
- Author
- American Brands Inc
- Brand
- Lucky Strike
- Tareyton
- Pall Mall
- Carlton
- Silva Thins
- Benson & Hedges
- Berkeley
- Condor
- Antonio Y Cleopatra
- La Corona
- Silk Cut
- Half & Half
- Paladin Blackcherry
- Bourbon Blend
- Sail
- Flying Dutchman
- Clan
- Blue Boar
- Roi-Tan
- Old Holborn
- Hamlet
- Tareyton
Document Images
of the GoIden Belt Manufacturing Company division) who meet certain age and service requirements,
and also
provides for disabiIity, severance and spouses' benefits in accordance with its terms. Tl~e normaI
retirement
benefit ~t age 65 is based on an employee's average actual earnings (as defined) during ~e 5ve
highest paid
consecutive calendar years of his employment. The amount of herbert is eqllal to the sum of 1 ~% of
such average
actual earnings multiplied by the number of years of service, plus ~ of 1% of such average actual
earnings
in excess of $4,800 muir/plied by the number of years of set'dee before 1900, pins Ľ of 1% of such
average actual
ean~ings not in excess of $4,800 multiplied by the number of years of service before ]960¸ There is
no credit
for service in excess of 35 years. Average actual earnings as de~ned by the Retirement Plan do not
include
incentive compensation paid under Article Xlr of the Company's By-Laws. Cer[aln directors and
officers of the
Company my be entitled to benefits under the retirement plans of the Company's subsidiaries
attributable to
their service with such subsid/arles, which behests are also based upon year~ of service and covered
compen~atlen
with such subsidiaries. Except a~ provided in the Supplemental Plan dlseussed below, the annual
bcne~t payable
under the retirement plans of the Company and its domestic subsidiaries may not exceed the lesser of
$75,005
or the employee's average total compensation paid during the three highest paid consecutive calendar
years
of hls employment.
A supplemental retirement pIan (the ~SuppIemental Pl~al") provides supplemental benefits to the
~oup of
key employees who are a]lotted incentive compensation under Artlcle X~I, in an amount equal to the
difference
between the behests payable under the Retirement Plan and the amount that would be payable under
file
]Retirement Plan if (i) Article X~I incentive compensation pa~d to the employee pr~or to termination
of employ-
ment and to the employee's normal retirement date were included in the d~finit~on of a~erage actua]
earnings
mad (ii) the maxlmttm limlt on annual hene~ts were raised to the lesse~ of $225,000 or the
erap]oyee's average
total compensation paid during the three highest paid consecutive calendar years of his employment.
In
eaIcu]afing supplemental benefits, no credit is Wen inz service in excess of 55 years. Berlefit
payments under
the Supplemental Plan are made concurrently with benefit payments under the Retirement Plan.
The /oIinwlng tabulation sets forth file highest estimated annual retirement benefits payable
to persons
in the speci~ed remttnem'tion and years of service cla~sifleallons upon remitment at normal
retirement date
under the retirement plans of the Compmly and its domestic subs~d/aries (other than The Franklin
Life
Insuranc~ Company), o~cers of wbAch were directors of the Company during its last fiscal year,
assuming
election of an annuity for the life of the employee only:
~ghe st Consecu~ve
~e e~ Aver~
Covete~ Com])ens~oD
Estimated Annual Retlrement Benefits for
Repres~ntat lye years of Ct edlted Sexviee
IO 20 30 35
$ 50,000 ............... $ 10,061 $ 17,5~0 $ 22~581 $
26,057
75,000 ............. 15,686 26,250 34,436 59,274
lO0,O00 .... 21,311 35,000 46,311 531400
150,000 32,561 52,500 70,700 78,837
200,000 ................. 43,811 70,000 85,352 105,212
250,000 ................ 55,061 75,000 106,707 131,587
500,060 ....... 66,311 75,000 128,082 157,962
400,000 ........... 75,000 l(]O,O00 170,802 210,712
500,000 ............. 75,~00 125,000 213,582 225,0@0
600,000 ............. 75,000 150,000 225,000 205,000
700,000 .... 57,500 175,000 225,000 225,000
SOO,O00 ................ 100,000 200,0(]@ ~o25,000 225,000
900,000 ................ I1~500 225,000 225,000
225,0t]0
1,000,000 ....... I25,0~} 225,000 225,000 225,000
1,100,C@0 ............. 137,500 225,000 2'9~,000 225,000
While only those employees entitled to 'oenefits under file Supplemental Plan are entitled to
receive annual
retirement benefits in excess of $75,000, there was no employee not receiving incentlvc compensation
in 198"2

whose annual rettieinent benefits ~ould have been r*'dueed by the $75,000 linlffatain, Normal
retirement
benefits under the Galiaber Limited Pension Plan (which arc based on final salary) exceed the
benefits reflected
above in all years di service classiŁcadous. Normal retilement benefits under The Franklin Life
Employees'
Eetirement Plan exceed the bencllts reflected above in most years of sen'ice classi~eations, except
that The
Franklin Life Employees' Retirement Plan also has a maximum benefit of $75,000. In addition, The
Franklin
Life Insurance Company has a supplemental retirement plan sirmlar to tile C~mpany's Supplemental
Plan
described above, with a m&x/nmm limit on annual benefits of $gl25,000 (including amounts received
under
The Franklin Life Employees' Bet/rement Plan). The retirement plans of certain subsidiaries of the
Company
provide that benefits are offset by a portion of Sooinl Seourity bencŁts and the estimated annual
retirement
benefits set forth abeve do not include this offset.
The years of service for \fessrs. Lougee, Mehas and Whittemore are 32, 32 and 36,
respectively, and the
years of service for Mr. Cameron (who is covered by the Gallaher Limited Pension Plan) are 18. Mr.
Henson's
benefit is computed under an arrangement that gives him years of service as if employed tinee
August 1, 1961.
The 1982 remuneration of Messrs. Cameron, Henson, Lougee, Mehos and Whittemore covered by the
retirement
plans was $105,940l, $194,500, $465,000, $400,0~ and $884,620, respectively.
The Proflt-fihar/ng plm~ of Amaeaiean Brands~ /ale. covers employees of the Company (other
than employees
of the Golden Belt Manufaelmrir~gl Company division) who complete a year of sexviee. The Company
annually
contributes to the Frollt-ghazing Plan Trust a stun equal to the following percentages of
consolidated Net Income
Before Taxes (defined pursuant to the Plan as, mainly, net income before taxes from domestic
tobacco operations ) :
3~% of the first $100,000,000, plus 5% of the next $50,000,000, plus fi% of any excess. No
contribution will be
made, however, for any year (a) for which Net Income Before Ta.xes does not equal or exceed 12% of
net worth,
(b) in which a cash dividend is net paid on the Common fitoek of the Company or (e) in exeess of
the amount
dadurffble for that year by the Company for federal ineome tax purposes, Subject to certain
Iinatiat/nns, the
contribution of the Company is reduced by the amount of forfeitures from members' accounts.
Employer
contributions are apportioned to Plan members on the basis of each member's Adiusted Earnings for
the year
in relation to Adjusted Earnings of all members. "Adjusted Earnings" for any year means earnings
for that
year plus 50% of such earnings in excess of the Social Security wage base.
A member's balances in the ProŁt-Shaiing Plan Trust arising from employer contribntYon~ become
distributable upon termination of employment. In eases of termination by retirement, death,
disabgity or
term/nation without fault (or upon partial or complete termination of the Plan) the full amount is
distributable.
In the ease of any other termination a percentage varying with the member's length of service and
reaeb/ng
100% upon eompletion of twelve years' service is diataibutabIe. Distribution is made by such method
of
setffement--a single distribution in cash or partly in cash and partly in Common Stock of the
Company, or
periodic cash installments -- as the Divisional Benefits Plan Committee determines. Certain
directors and o~ficers
of the Company who are also emplnyees of subsidiaries of the Company *nay be entitled to participate
in the
profit-sharing plans of the subsidiaries under which contributions are also based on pre-tax income
of the
subsidiary, are apportioned among plma members on the basis of their relative annual earnings and
are
dista6bntable upon termination of employment
Article XII of the B~Laws of tire Company provides for payment of incentive compensation to
members
of the Management Group (consisting of hey employees, defined pursuant to Article XII). An amotmt
equal to
-Ta of 1% of Net Income Before Taxes (as dallaed in Article XII) is made available for allotment
annually if net
income before taxes equals or exceeds 12% of net worth and a cash dividend has been paid on the
"Common Stock
of the Company. Of the amount available for incentive compensation, 18% is allotted to the Chairman
of the
Board and the remainder is available to the Management Group on the following basis: fi4% of the
total amount
available is a]lotted by Article XII to the members of the Management Group in proportion to their
fixed salaries,
and the balance Js aPottable to them by the Incentive Compensation Committee, ~ntlroly at its
discretion as to
amounts and individuals. Payments are made by distributing 50C2b of the amount payable in eath as
soon as
practicable and 50% /n ea~h on the December 15 next following the close of the year for which the
allotment

was made. The deferred portion of the Article XII payment is contingent upon the employee not
engaging in
competitive employment prior to receipt of payment thereof. Certain directors and otheers of the
Company who
are also employees of subsidinr/es of the Company may be entitled to participate in the incentive
compensation
plans of the subxidlaries, under whinh a percentage of pre-tax income of the subsidiary is
allocated annually
among key employees of the su~idiary.
On Oetober 27, 1981, tho Board of Directors adopted the Stock Option Plan which, as amended,
was
approved by the stockholders at the I952 A~nuaI Meeting. The $teck Option Plan authorizes the grant
to key
employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, seleetad by a Stock Op~on Committee of directors who
are not
employees, of options intended to qualify as "incentive stock optinaas" under the Internal Bevenue
Code and
options which are not intended to so qualify. Under the Stock Option Plan, there may be granted
incentive
stock options to purchase a maximum of 1,206,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company, and
nonquaIthed
options to purchase, or stock appreciation rights (as deserthed below) to receive, a maximum of
200,000 shares
of Common Stock of the ComiJan)~ Not more than 180,000 shares can be optionad as nonquali~ed stock
opt/ons under the Stock Option Plan to any ene person. Under the Stock Option Plan (i) the option
price
per share may not be less than the inis market value at the time of grant, (ii) options gonerally
may not be
exercisad prior to one year nor more than ten years Dora the date of grant and (hi) no option or
stock
appreciation right may be ~auted after October 26, 1986. The $toch Option Plan eontains additional
restrictive
provisions for incentive stock options so that (i) an incentive stock option may not be exercised
while there
is ou~standlng an earlier granted incentive stock option and (ii) the aggregate fair market value
Cdeterminnd
at the date of grant) of the shares for which a key employee may be granted incentive stock options
in any
calendar year eaanot exceed $106,000 plus any ~unused limit carryover" (as defined in the Stock
Option Plan).
The Stock Option Plan permits the grant of stock appreci~on rights in conjunction with the
grant of a
nonqualified stock option, either at the time of the option grant or thereafter during its term and
in respect
of all or part of such nonqualifled stock op~on. Stock appreciation rights permit an optionee, upon
exercise
of such rights and surrender of the related option or part theceof, to receive a payment equal to
the excess
of the ~alr market valuo (on the date of exercise) of the shares covered by such option or part
thereof so
surrendered over the option price of such shares. Such payment may be made in Common Stock of the
Company (valued on the basis of the fair market value of such Common Stock on the date of exercise),
in
cash, or partly in cash arzd partly in Common Stock of the Company, as the Stock Option Committee
may
determine. N~ stock oppreciation right is exercisable prior to six months from the date of its
grant,
Eaab option also bears a limited righi which may be exercised within 30 days after an
aequisi~io~ by some-
one other than the Company of stock of the Company having more than 20% of the voting power of the
Company's outstanthng shere~, The limited right entitles the optioneo to receive cash equal to the
difference
between the option exe, rdse price per share and the greater of (i) the ~air marlcet value of a
share of Coron~on
Stock at the date of exercise of the limited tight and (li) the purchase ptiee per share in the
acquisition, multi-
plied by the numhe~ o~ shares sul~eet to the optima. The option will be e~neelled to the extent of
the exercise
of the limited right.
The following tabulation shows as to the directors and othcers of the Company named in the
table on
page 5 and as to all directors and othcers o~ the Company as a group (i) the number of shares
subject to options
granted during the period January i, I982 through December 31, 198~9 and the average per ~hare
option exerelse
price thereof, (ii) the net value of shares (market value less exercise price) or cash realized
duting the p~riod
January i, 1982 through December 31, 1982 upon the exercise of options or stock appreciation rights
and (ill) the
number and the potential (unrealized) value (market value at December 31, 1982 less exercise cr base
price)
of shares subiect to outstauthng options held at December 31. 1982.

Common Stosk
Craated--~a~uaey 1, I982
through December 31, 198~:
No~qualltlod steak o0tions with
stock apprec~tlon rights .... 1,750 4,000
7AO0 g,200 21,750 4fl,1~0
Average per ~are eaerci~e prico $473123 $47.512~
$47.3123 $47 3/~5 ~˘'.3125 $47 51~3
ExercL~ed-- Jemuary :t~ 198g
through December 31, 1982
Net v/flue real/z~:1 iiI shares
( m~'ket value ]~ eze*ci~e
price) of cash ............ $ -0~ $ i6,87~ $ 16,87~
$ -0~ $ 16,875 $ B8,4~7
Ou~tanding at
De~ember 31, 1982:
]nce.tlw $toc1˘ optlonn ..... 4~500 2,000
g.000 4~300 ~,I300 55,g~
~cnqualit~d atc~k o~E~m v,'i~h
stoat: approcfation 21ghts .... 3fl63 11,100
~3,700 ~2~300 57,250 lgT,gff0
Yotent~al I~arsalize~I) value
~market vaI~ ~ De~mh~r
All ~ese~t
dln~etors and
Stuart G, Arnold V/rglnlus B. Charles A. ]~dwar~ W,
oi~˘˘rs as
Camero= Henson Lougee, Ill Me]los Whi~temore
a ~'ou Fp_
31, 198g M*$ exercise or baso
~i~) ............... $ ~%70~ $ 47,9~5
$116,(~%3 $ 64,800 $239,~25 $TaS,7g0
~aer$ any information in this proxy statement as to mmtmaration or other tzatisactions is
called for with
regard to persons holding specked positions or relationships, ln~orraation is not inc~ude~ for any
portion of th~
requisite periods during which such persons did not hold any s~ch positions or relationships.
]~ropoaal 1
ELECTION OF INDFA?ENDENT AUDITORS
The B~ar4 (~i Direetor~ recommends that the ~tockholder~ elec~ C~ope~s ~ Lybra~d as
iadepende~t auditors
for tho Company for the year 1983. In line with this reconmlencIation the Board of Directors i~tends
to introduce
at the forthcoming Annual Meeting the foIIowing resolution ~ designated herein ~s Proposa~ ] ) :
"BESOLVED, tha~ Coopers & Lybrand b~ and they are heroby elected indcpenaent auc]ito~ for the
Com-
1)any ~or the ~eax ~3Y
I~ acc~dax~˘e ',~dth the Comp~my's pra~ti~e, a member o~ C~Wr~ & Lyhra~d will a~:et~d the
A~auaI Meeting
to make a statement ff he desires to do so mad to respond to any appropriate q~estions that may b~
asked by
stockholders.
The a~armative vot~ of a majoriO/ oŁ the combined votes cast by tho holders o~ Common Stock,
$1.70
ConvortibIe l~re~erred Stock, $2.75 Preferred Stock and ~2.b7 Conver~ble Pre~crrecl Stock voting
th~eon is
nuce~sary ~o~ $h~ ~doptio~ ~ ~FmV~al i.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vcote FOIl Proposal 1.
l0

Yroposal 2
!~ESOLUTION REQUESTLN'G CUMULATIVE VOTING PROPOSED BY FOUR STOCKHOLDERS
The Company is informed that Lewis D, Gilbert, a record hoIder of 160 shares of Common Stock,
whose
address is 1165 Park Avenue, New York, N.1. 10028, and/or John J. GilberL a record holder of 100
shares of
Common Stock, of the same address, and representing an additional family interest of 500 shares of
Common
Stock, and/or john C. Henry, a record holder of 3,200 shares of Commml Stock, whose address is 5
East 93rd
Street, New York, N.Y. i9028, and/or David Brown, a record holder of 12 shares of Common Stock,
whose address
is 214-15 iSth Avenue, Bayside, N.Y. 11360, intend to introduce at the Annual Meetthg the following
resolution
( designated herein as Eroposal ~) :
"RESOLVED: That the stoelthelders of Amerlean Brands, Inc., assembled in annual meeting in person
and by proxy, hereby- request the Board of Diret~tors to take the steps necessary to provide for
cumulative
voting in the elecldon of directors, which means each stockholder shalI be entitled to as many
votes as shall
equal the v~umber of tha~e~ he or she owns multipliezl by the namher o~ directors to he elected,
and he or
she may ea~t all of such votes for a single candidate, or any two or more of illcm as he or she
may see
fit."
The proposers of the resolution have fmmisbed the fo]lowlng statement setting forth the reasons
advanced
by them in support of theh" proposal:
'%ast year 8,251 owners of 3,402,638 shares voted in favor of our similar resolution. The vote
against
included the unmarked proxies.
"The importance of cumulative voting has been noted in the f01Io~hng words by the Giant Por~Iand
Cement
Corporation in their 1974 proxy statement:
'Cumulative voting is a form of proportional representation which pernait.~ minority
thl~reholders fo
have representaBon on the Board of Directors. Under the e~sting by-lawJ a tharebolder is
entitled
to one vote for each share of stock registered in his name. Thus, the holders of a maiority of
tile shares
may elect all of the directors, in which event the remaining shareholders may not elect any
directors.
The proposed Article Ninth provides for cumulative voting in the election of directors, ha
wtfieh case
each stedtholder is entitled to as many cohos as he owns shareJ, multiplied by the number of
directors
to be elected, to be cast for one or distributed among two or more directors, as he sees fit.
Therefore
the prttposed amendment would permit a person or a group of persons holding a slgniŁ˘ant block
of
shares to have representation on the Board of Directors.'
"If you agree, pIea~ mark 9-our pmx3r fo~ this resolution; othotvtl~e it is autematicahly ea~t
a~ainrt it, un~ss
you have marked to abstain."
In the view of the Board of Directors, the function of a hoard of directors is lv administer
the affairs of
a corporation for the benegt of all its stockholders. The Board of Directors believes that a
director elected by
a minority through eumu]aBve voting might feel bound to act in what he colasiders the interests of
the minority
overt though such action might not be in the best interests of the corporation and the stockholders
as a whole.
It believes that the present method of electing directors, wb2ch is the corporate equivalent of
majority rule, has
worked successfully and should not be cl~anged. Cumulative voting was ovel~,vhe]mingly reiected at
the 1964
and I969 Ammal Meetings when approximately 94.8% of the votes *~ere cast against it on each
occasion, at the
1970 Ammal Meeting when aphlroximately 93.7% of the votes were cast against it, ae the 1976 Ann~ml
Meeting
when approximately 94.4% of the votes were east against it and at ~e 1977 Armu~g Meeting when
approxi-
mately 94.1% of the votes wer~ cast against it. Last year approximately 93.4% of the votes were cast
against it,
The at~rmatlve vote of a majority of the corablned votes cast by the holders of Coammn Stock,
81.70
Convertible Preferred Stock, 82.75 Pcefe~red Stock and $'2.67 Convertible Preferred Stock voting
thereon is
necessary for the adoption of proposal 2.
The Board of Directors recomroenth that you vote AGAINST Proposal 2.
11

Proposal 3
RESOLUTION ON ESTABLISHMENT OF NOMINATING COMMITTEE
PROPOSED BY FOUR STOCI~-IOLDERS
The Company is informed that the four stockholders whose names, addresses and record holdings
are set
forth with respect to Proposal 2 intend to intzoduee at the Annual Meeting the following resolution
(designated
herein as Proposal 3 ) :
"RESOLVED: That the stockholders of _4aneriean Brands, Inc., assembled in annual meeting in
person
and by proxy, hereby request the Board of Directors to take the steps necessary to pro~dde for
the formation
of a nominating committee, at least the majority of which should be composed of outside
directors."
The proponents of the resolut%n have furnished the followxng statement setting forth the
reasons advanced
by them in support of their proposal:
"Last year 8,697 owners of 3,311,798 shares voted in favor of our similar resolution. The vote
against
included the tmmarked proxies.
"The whdie purpose of having a nominating eommRtee in to be assured that independent directors,
not
afaliated vAth management, assume the xesponsthiliry of selecting new nominees for the Board.
"Your attention is celled to the fact that more and more corporations now have a nominating
committee and
this has been recommended as good corporate governance by a Chairman of the SEC and the New York
Stock Exchange.
"Among the latest companies to adopt this practice axe: Southern Paol~e, B. Hoe, Facet Ind.,
Landmark
Land Co., Inc., Foremost McKesson, Vista Resources, Sonesta International Hotels Corporatien,
Electro
Audio Dynamics, Inc., GAF Corp, First National Boston Corp., New Mexico and Arizona Land Co.,
Calbro Corp., Bell ~d Howell, Carter Wallace, Inc., Collins and Aikman Corporation and Claremont
Capital Corporation.
"Lf you agree, please mark your proxy for this zesolution; otherwise it is automatically east
against it. unless
you have marked to abstain."
The Innetiol, of a nominating committee has been performed by the Board of Directors as a
whole. Your
Board believes that this function should continue to be performed by all of the Board members, It is
the vlew
of your Board that each member should be a person whose experience, knowledge and expertise enable
him
to make a substantial contribution to the work of the Board and that the selection of persons with
these quali-
fications can be best assured if ell members, rather than a committee, have an opportunity to
participate directly
in the selection of nominees of the Board. An identical resolution was overwhelmingly defeated at
the 198g
Armual Meeting wben approximately 93.6% of the votes were east against it. Accordingly, the
resolution should
lie reiected as not in the best interests of the Company and its stoekholders.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the combined votes cast by the holders of Ceminon Stock.
81.70
Convertible Preferred Stock, $2.75 Preferred Stock and $2.67 Convertible Preferred Stock voting
thereon is
necessary for the adoption eI Proposal 3.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote A G.~INST Proposal 3.
CERT.MN /iNFORMATION REGARDING SECURITY HOLDINGS
The following tabulation sets forth information with respect to the beneficial o~naership of
eqdity securities
of the Company by all directors and ollleers of the Company as a group at February 1, 1983. Such
group
ownership does not e×eeed one percent of the outstanding shares of those classes of equity
secutiEies of the
12

Company listed below. The information is based on information received by the Company from the
directors
and of~cers, from the Divisional Benefits Pian Committee and from the Trustee of the Profit-Sharing
Plan o,~ the
Company.
Arao~t and ~a~ute
Tige of of beneŁelat
das~ ownershlp{ a)
Common Stock 250,199 shares(b)
$2.75 Preferred Stock 642 shares
(a) For inthrmatiori as to ~otlng power and investment power ~vlih respect to Shares owned by
directors, see
Notes (d) and (e) to the table under "Election of DLrectors." To the best of the Companys
knowledoe,
each o~cer who is not a director has sole voting and investmeot power with respect to shares
owIaed by
him. With regaad to voting power ia respect of skates held by the Tntstee of the Proflt-Shadnd
Plan of
the Company. see Note (d) to the table under "Election of Directors."
(b) Includes 28,881 shares of Common Stock held on December 31, 1982, by the Trustee of the
ProŁt-Shaxing
Plan of the Company (incluc]ing those referred to in Note (a) to the table under "Election of
Directors"),
which number is equivalent as of that date to the undivided proportionate beneficial interest of
the directors
and officers of the Company in all such shares, and 109,000 sh~res (hlcluding those referred to
in
Note (b) to the tahl~ uade~ "Election of Directors"), o~ whinh the directors and officers had
the right to
acquire beneficial ownership pursuant to the exercise on or before April 2, 1983 of options
granted by the
Company. Inclusion of such 109,000 shares does not constitute an admission by the directors and
officers
that they are the bene~cial owners of s~Jeh shares.
The ~ollowing tabulation sets forth information with rcspect to each person known to the Company to
have been the benegelal owner o~ more than 5% of any class of voting securities of the C0mpally at
Febraar/ I.
1983 ~d is based o~ informatioxx received by the Compauy from, or on haha|f of, such persom To the
best
of the Company's knowledge, no one person w~s the benellalal owner of ia excess of 5% of the
outstanding
voting securities of the Company at February 1, 1983.
.Maount a~ad ~at~e
Title o~ N~O and address
of beneficial Percentage
dass of bmaefleial owner
_ ownersh~{a ) of class
$2.75 Preferred Rtoch The Chubb Corporation
430,800 sheres 7.8%
100 William Street
New York, New York 10038
(a) To the best of the Company's knowledge, the beneficial owner listed has sole voting and
investment power
with respect to the sllares listed.
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Proposals cf stockholders intended to be submitted at the next Annual Meeting of stockholders
scheduled
to be held May 2, 2984 must be received by the Company on or b~ore December 18, 1983 to be eligibIe
for
inclusion in the Company's proxy' statem~t and accompanying proxy for such meeting.
MISCELLANEOUS
A copy of the Company's annual report on Form 10-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for its last fiscal your, including the finanelal statements and the fmanalal statement
sohedu]es
thereto, will lie made available to stockholders vdthout charge upon written request to Mr. Louis F.
ICernous,
Jr,, Secretary, Ameaiean Brands, Inc., 245 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10167. The Company will
furnish
any exhibits to Form 10-K to each stockholder requesting them upon payment of a fee of $.IO per page
to
cover their cost.
lg

Promptly after the Annual MeetL~g stockholders will be mailed a return postcard on whluh they will
he
able to indic-ate their deslro to reeeiv~ a copy of the summary of the meeting,
The expense of the so]iri~at~on of proxles for this me~tlng, incl~dlug the cost of mailing,
wi]I be borne ]~y
file Company. In addition to mai]ing copies of this material to stoe!dlolde~, the Company will
request persons
who hold stock in their na~es or custody, or in the names of non~luees, for the beneflŁ of other~ to
forward
copies of such materia! ˘o the beneBcIal owi~ers of the stock of the Company and to relluest
authority for the
execution of the proxies. To the ext~nt deemed rieeessaly lit order to asstLro sume~ent
represel~t~tiola at [he
meeting, oflleers and regult~r employees of the Company will retJuest the return of I~roxies 1Jy
telephone,
telegram or in person. Irt addition~ th~ Company h~s revalued The Klssel-Blake Organization, Inc..
~fl Broadway,
New York, N.~L 18004, to aid lu the solicitation of proxies ~r a ~e, including its e.xpens~s,
estimated at $23,50(~
TI~e total expense to be home by the Company will depend u oon the volum~ oŁ sl~ares re~resented by
the proxies
• eeeived promptly le~ re~pons~ to the nonce of meeting.
S~ockho|ders ~vho do not intend to be presen~ at the meeting are ~rged to serid in their proxies
without del~y.
Proalpt response is helpful, and your cooperation will be sppreeiated.
March7,1983
I4

245 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10167
March 15, I983
D ~r.2~ STO*CK/~LD~2~:
The 1983 AnnuaI Meet/ng of stockholders will be held on gVednesday,
May 4, 2983 at I0:00 a.m. in the Grand Ballroom of The "WaIdorLAstoMa, Park
Avenue~at g0th Street~ New York City. You are invited to attend the meeting
to eonsidcr personally the business descr:bed in the Łollovcing notice of meet-
ing and proxy statement.
At the meeting there will be a report to the stockholders on the progress
of the Company during the past year. A discussion period will also take
place during which stockholders wi]I have an opportunity to discuss matters
of interest concerning the Company.
A feature of these Annual Meetings has been the attendance in person of
ninny stockholders, some with lmrge ho]dlngs and some with small holdings.
This has been most welcome. It is important to ensure that your shares be
represented at the meeting whether or not you plan persvnagy to attend. We
urge you promptly to compIete, date and return your proxy in the enclosed
postpaid return envelope provided for that purpose.
Sincerely yours,
EDWAI~D X,'~I WHITTE:XfOP~E
Chairman o[ the Bocrrd
and Chie[ ExecIItive Off{cer

245 Park Avenue
New York, New Yoth 10167
NOTICE OF MEETING
March 15, 1983
The Annual Meeting of stockholders of American Brands, Inc. will be held
in the Grand Ballroom of The Waldorf-Astor/a, Park Avenue at 50th Street,
New York City, at 10 o'clock in the forenoon (Eastern Daylight Time) on
Wednesday, May 4, 1983, for the folIowing purposes:
A. To elect directors.
To consider and vote on:
(1) Aproposal (designated Proposal I and set forth in the folIowing
proxy statement), approved by the Board of Directors, to eIect
Coopers & Lybrand independent auditors for the Company for
the year 198,q;
(2) A proposal (designated Proposal 2 and set forth in the following
proxy statement) relating to cumulative voting, expected to bo
made "oy four stockholders; and
(31 A proposal (designated Proposal 8 and set forth in the following
proxy statement) relating to the establishment of a nominating
eommitteB of the Board of Directors~ expected to be made by four
stockholders.
To transact such other business as may properIy come liefore the
meeting.
The stoc~ transfer hooks will not he closed, but holders of Common Stock,
$1.70 Convertible Preferred Stock. $2.75 Preferred Stock and $2.67 Convertible
Preferred Stock, to I~e enfftled to vote, must be holders of record at the close
of business on March 7, 1983.
LOUIS F, FERXOU$, JR.,
Secretary
