AHF NCI Collection
Analytical Investigations
Fields
- Type
- Bibliography
- Chart/Graph
- Scrt, Scientific Report
- Chart/Graph
- Named Organization
- FTR, Fabriques De Tabac Reunies S.A.
- Thermo Electron
- Characteristic
- Extra
- Brand
- Cambridge (PM)
- Author
- Brunnemann, K.D.
- Named Person
- Bourquin, J.
- Briggs, D.
- Gallaher
- Hoffman, D.
- Spiegelhalder, B.
- Briggs, D.
Document Images
PME RESEARCH LABORATORY, DECEMBER 1979
1
Project Title ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATDONS
Period Covered DECEMBER 1979
Written By K. D. BRUNNEMANN
ANALYSIS OF TOBACCO- SPECIFIC NITROSAMINES BY GC - TEA
Instrumental
The tubular oven built recently by J. Bourquin (1) has
shown good performance so far. It has been observed that
the detector response is most consistent when the cera-
mic catalyst is operated at 450°C (2).
Gas chromatographic conditions: 7ft xk" o.d., glass co-
Lumn, 3'$ SP-2100 on Supelcoport 100-120, oven 175°C,
inj. port 230°C, 40 ml He/min.
Analytical Procedure
a) Mainstream smoke (MS)1: 50 cigarettes are smoked (with an
N2 flush every alternating,puff): into two gas wash bottles
containing 100 ml ascorbate buffer each,; a Cambridge
:____r paw is piace; between the wash bottles and the
smoking machine. After every-10 cigarettes, the filter
pad is exchanged and combined with the buffer solution.
b) Si'destream,smoke (SS): Ten cigarettes are smoke&in-
dividualliy in a sidestream cham::er with a"pushing;" air
flow at 25 m1/sec. into two gas wash bottles containing
100 ml ascorbate buffer each; a Cambridge filter pad is
placediafter the wash bottles. After smoking the Cambridge
filter pa&is combined with the buffer solution.
c) Tobacco : 25 g Tobacco are extracted overnight with
250 ml ascorbate buffer under shaking.
d) Work-up : NNN - 14C is used as internal standard
(84000 cpm, 450 ng). The work-up is similar to that of
Hoffmann et al (3), with the foll'owing modifications: the
CH2CL2 e:ctract was not dried over Na2SO4 but filtered
through a C1inEliut column. The solvent used for the
column chromatography was 1 % acetone in CH2C12. After
eluting 100m1, the NNN - 19'C was detected. It eluted in
approx. 200ml ; an additional 200ml were collected to in-
clude the NNK. Before making to a final volume (usually
5m1),, dihexylnitrosamine was added to serve as internal
standard for the GC. Aliauots were used to account for
- 5 -

recovery. For the smoke samples, the first 100m1 eluted
from the column contain the volatile nitrosamines.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figure 1 depicts gas chromatograms obtained for both to-
bacco and~mainstream smoke of the Kentucky IRI reference
cigarette. As expected:, both NNN and NNK are detected.
Interestingly, nitrosoanatabine (NAtB) is as abundant as
is NNN. This has aLso beemobserved in other studies
for Fv-nerican (:3,4), French (4,5) and German cigarettes
(6) although~no explanation has been found so far. Con-
sidering that the major precursor for NNN is nicotine
(7), it i~s not clear from where the NAtB derives since
the typical tobacco alkaloid distribution reported (8)
is nicotine (194,5 %), anatabine (2,7 %):, nornicotine
(0,96 $)~ and anabasine (0y35 %).
In order to evaluate our new method, we compared the
Kentucky IRI! data with those of Hoffmann's group (3))
and Galliaher (9). Table L summarizes the data. Since we
had only a qualitative trace of NAtB available to deter-
mine the retention time, our data for NAtB are estimated,
based on the same TEA response as for NNN.
Table 1 Tobacco-specific Nitrosamines in IRI.
A comparison.
FTR'
D. Hoffmann
D. Briggs
NNN 1.02 01.63 1.26
Tobacco NNK 0.54 01.13 0.60
(ppm) NAtB 1.2* 01.62 1.37
NN 0.17,0 01.390~ 0.298
MS NNK 0.120 01.160, 0.202
(,ug/cig.) NAtB 0.18* 01.5301 0.550
NNN 0.135 01.210, 0.165 .
SS NNK - 0.240, 0.534.
(,ug/cig.) NAtB - 0.190 0.148
* estimated:
When analyzing other tobacco samples, we observe&NAtB
only in Kentucky 2RI tobacco but not in ribs (Table 2).
F
- 6 -

,
1
I
1
1
Table 2 Tobacco-specific Nitrosamines in tobacco (ppm).
Tobacco NNY NNK' NAtB
2RI 1.4 01.77 1.4*
3483'Ribs 7.3 4.8 not present
3508 Ribs 2.6 0.92 not present
8206 Ribs 2.0 - not present
* estimated
We also noted that if the Cambridge filter was not combi-
ned withithe buffer, significantly lower values were ob-
served (MS, IRI) or no nitrosamines were detected at all
(SS,IRI). This does not exclude the possibility of pos-
sible artefact formation on the filter pad. We pLan to
persue this finding. In addition we attempted to use the
new Thermosorb cartridge (10) for trapping NNN in SS. ..
When extracted with 5ml CH2C12-Acetone 1:1, we detected
no tobacco-specific nitrosamines at all. According to
B. Spiegelhalder, (the European representative of Thermo
Electron), the Thermosorb cartridge was not intended for
non-volatile nitrosamines but rather to cover the vola-
tili~ty range from DMN to ni!trosomorpholine (11).
The recovery off NNN-14C for smoke samples ranged from
78'to 96 $; for tobacco extracts we recovere&from 47
to 75 %.
Fin,: lly we explcred .inzther the volatile nitrosamines can
be determined simoultaneously in smoke samples using the
same work-up. We thus used the first 100m1 of the column
fraction that eluted before NNN-14C. The data are summa-
rized in Table 3.
Table 3 Volatile Nitrosamines (ng/cig.) Kentucky lRl
Sample DMN DPY
MS, with Cambridge filter 9'.1 9.2
MS, without Cambridge filter 7.1 2.2
SS, with Cambridge filter 325 85
SS, without Cambridge filter 296 79'
SS, with Thermosorb cartridge 221 4,6
Hoffmann (12)i reported 9.01 ng DMN and 6. 6 ng NPY for MS Ken-
tucky IRI. We pian to investigate the efficiency of the
ascorbate traps with Thermosorb:cartridges since we al-
so obtain lower values for volatile nitrosami~nes when the
Cambridge filter is not combined with the buffer solution.
- 7 -

References
PME Research Laboratory, Monthly Report, Oct. 1979, p.9
PME!Research Laboratory, Monthly Report, Nov. 1979, p.5
D. Hoffmann et al, Cancer Research, 39,2505 (1979)
D. Hoffmann et al, 6th IARC Meeting, Budapest, 16-19 Oct. 1979
J.J. Piade et al;"33rd TCRC, Lexington, Ky, 29-31 Oct. 1979
C. RuhI et al, paper subm. to Beitr. Tabakforsch.
S.S. Hecht et al, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 60, 819, (11978)
H. Elmenhorst, Bu1L. Inf. Coresta, Abstr. S-13, p. 120 (1978).
D. Briggs, Gallaher, personal communication Dec. 21, 1979'
D. Fine et al, 6th IARC Meeting, Budapest, 16-19 Oct. 1979
B. Spiegelhalder, personal communication, Dec 21, 19'79
D. Hoffmann et al, Cancer Research, 37, 3218 (1977)
- 8 -
~;b

"Il i)
!'J Ol
I
~fr
T
1
FIGURE 1. GC-TEA chromatograms of tobacco-specific
nitrosamines. Left: Tobacco extract,lRl,
right: Mainstream smoke, 1R1
- 9 -
